ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Richard D. Weisel
Terrence M. Yau
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yau, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yau, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:640-646
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Effects of Cell-Based Angiogenic Gene Therapy at 6 Months: Persistent Angiogenesis and Absence of Oncogenicity

Christopher Kim, BS, Ren-Ke Li, MD, PhD, Guangming Li, MD, Yaoguang Zhang, MD, Richard D. Weisel, MD, Terrence M. Yau, MD, MS*

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, and Heart and Stroke Foundation/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Accepted for publication September 12, 2006.

* Address correspondence to Dr Yau, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, 4N-470, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada. (Email: terry.yau{at}uhn.on.ca).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Transplantation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–transfected cells into myocardial scar enhances angiogenesis and may support the transplanted cells. We evaluated the effect of cell type, time, and location on the durability of this angiogenesis and potential oncogenicity.

METHODS: Lewis rats underwent myocardial cryoinjury 3 weeks before transplantation with heart cells (HC [a mixed culture of cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts]), VEGF-transfected heart cells (HC+), skeletal myoblasts (Sk), VEGF-transfected skeletal myoblasts (Sk+), or medium (control) (n = 3 per group x 5 groups x 5 timepoints). Three days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 months after transplantation, hearts were excised and the scar, border zone, and normal myocardium evaluated for angioma or sarcoma formation, and vascular density quantitated.

RESULTS: Vascular densities were lowest in controls, intermediate in HC and Sk (p < 0.05) and highest in HC+ and Sk+ (p < 0.05). Densities were highest in the border zone, intermediate in normal myocardium, and lowest in the scar (p < 0.05), peaking in the border zone of HC+ and Sk+ hearts at 4 weeks. At 6 months, densities were greater in HC and Sk than controls (p < 0.05), and higher in Sk+ than Sk (p < 0.05), but HC+ and HC were similar. There was no evidence of angioma or sarcoma formation at any timepoint.

CONCLUSIONS: Angiogenesis induced by HC and Sk transplantation lasts at least 6 months and is increased by transfection with VEGF without apparent oncogenicity. The durability of the VEGF effect on vascular densities may be greater with Sk.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Cell transplantation is a novel potential therapy for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction [1–6]. We have reported that transplantation of endothelial cells induces angiogenesis but does not alter ventricular function [7]. Even greater angiogenesis was observed in response to the transplantation of a mixed culture of heart cells (predominantly cardiomyocytes, with smaller proportions of endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts) after ex vivo transfection with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF165) [8]. Formation of new vascular beds and extension of existing vascular networks with this technique may have resulted from interactions of the transplanted cells with native cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells, or perhaps by recruitment of bone marrow–derived progenitor cells.

We have observed that VEGF transgene expression in these transplanted cells is limited to the scar and border zone, and lasts approximately 4 weeks [9], while upregulating the VEGF receptors flk-1 and flt-1 through a paracine effect on donor cells [10]. Ex vivo modification of cells before transplantation may therefore have the potential to enhance survival of the transplanted cells and modify their effect on myogenesis, angiogenesis, or matrix remodeling. However, the durability of the angiogenic response to this transient VEGF overexpression is unknown. Rapid induction but rapid regression of vascular ingrowth would significantly limit the long-term utility of cell-based angiogenic gene therapy. Conversely, excessive stimulation may result in formation of angiomas or sarcomas, as has been previously reported as a result of long-term VEGF expression [11].

In this study, we hypothesized that cell transplantation alone would increase vascular densities in the scar and border zone, but that transient expression of a VEGF transgene in these cells would increase both the magnitude and the duration of this angiogenic effect. We also hypothesized that this angiogenic response would not result in observable oncogenicity during the 6-month duration of this study. Finally, we evaluated the effect of two different cell types, to determine whether there were cell-type–specific differences in either the durability or the safety of this effect.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Animals and Experimental Model
Animals were syngeneic adult Lewis rats (females, 225 to 250 g; males, 250 to 300 g [Charles River Canada, Quebec, Canada]). All procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University Health Network and conformed to the guidelines in the "Guide to the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" published by the National Academy Press.

A large transmural scar was created in the left ventricular (LV) free wall of rat hearts by a cryoinjury technique, as previously described [8]. Briefly, through a left lateral thoracotomy, the LV free wall was exposed and cryoinury performed by 12 1-minute applications of an 8 x 10 mm elliptical metal probe cooled to –196°C by immersion in liquid nitrogen. After recovery, the cryoinjured rats were randomly divided into five experimental groups: control, injected with medium without cells, transplantation with a mixed culture of unmodified heart cells (HC), transplantation with VEGF-transfected HC (HC+), transplantation with unmodified skeletal myoblasts (Sk), or transplantation with VEGF-transfected Sk (Sk+) (n = 3 per group x 5 groups x 5 timepoints = 75 recipient rats total).

Cell Isolation and Culture
A mixed primary culture of cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts was isolated from the left ventricles of donor rats as previously described [8]. The cultured cells were depleted of fibroblasts by a preplating technique and then maintained in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 5 to 7 days. In a subset of plates, 70% of cells stained positively for myosin heavy chain and were assumed to be cardiomyocytes, 15% of cells stained positively for alpha-smooth muscle actin and were assumed to be smooth muscle cells, and 11% of cells stained positively for factor VIII and were assumed to be endothelial cells. The remainder of the cells were assumed to be fibroblasts.

Primary skeletal myoblasts were isolated and cultured by a modified single-muscle fiber culture technique [9, 10, 12]. Briefly, muscle (3 g) from the quadriceps femoris muscle of adult male donor Lewis rats was digested with protease and type I collagenase (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri) before isolation and resuspension of single, intact muscle fibers in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. After preplating, single skeletal muscle fibers were plated onto laminin-coated plates (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, Massachusetts). Skeletal myoblasts dissociated from the muscle fibers, attached to the plate, and were allowed to proliferate for 48 to 72 hours as the original muscle fibers underwent cell death and lysis. The skeletal myoblasts were maintained in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 5 to 7 days and transfected before fusion and myotube formation.

Cell Transfection
Skeletal myoblasts and heart cells were transfected for 24 hours in 100-mm dishes at 60% to 70% confluence. Cells were transfected ex vivo, by Effectene (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario), a nonliposomal lipid formulationwith a plasmid encoding VEGF165 (pCEP4-VEGF), as previously described [8–10]. Transfection efficiencies were monitored in a subset of plates by cotransfection with pEGFP-N2 (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, California), expressing green fluorescence protein. Transfection efficiencies for both cell types were approximately 30%.

Bromodeoxyuridine Prelabeling
One of every four plates of cells was prelabeled with bromodeoxyuridine 2 days before transplantation and 1 day before transfection [8–10]. A monoclonal antibody directed against bromodeoxyuridine was used to identify the transplanted cells within the recipient hearts.

Cell Transplantation
Rats underwent cell transplantation 3 weeks after LV cryoinjury. Donor male rat mortality after cryoinjury was less than 20%. Cells were detached from culture dishes with trypsin, centrifuged, and resuspended in serum-free medium. Under general anesthesia, rat hearts were exposed through a midline sternotomy. Three million cells in 0.05 mL serum-free medium, or the same volume of medium without cells, were injected at multiple points into the center of the LV scar with a 28G needle.

Rats were sacrificed and the hearts excised 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, or 6 months after cell transplantation. The atria and the right ventricular free wall were excised, leaving the LV, which was divided into the scar zone (transmural scar), the border zone (partial-thickness scar), and normal myocardium.

Immunohistochemical Assays and Quantitative Histology
Myocardial specimens were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned into 6-µm-thick slices. Samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Limited, Oakville, Canada) or with antibodies against factor VIII, to facilitate quantitation of vascular density. The number of vessels per high power field (0.2 mm2) in the scar, border zone, or normal myocardium was counted by two masked observers in five fields per slide, and the mean number of vessels per field employed for analysis.

Statistical Analysis
To evaluate the determinants of vascular density, we analyzed the effect of group, time, and location by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Both main effects and interactive effects were evaluated. Nonsignificant (p > 0.05) interactive effects were discarded, and the final model included only the statistically significant main and interactive effects. When the ANOVA F-value was significant, specific differences between groups or timepoints were identified by Duncan’s multiple range test. To statistically evaluate the effect of VEGF transfection and cell type rather than group assignment in general, a second analysis was performed on only the four cell-transplanted groups, evaluating the effects of VEGF transfection (yes versus no), cell type (HC versus Sk), time, and location by ANOVA.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Vascular Densities
Overall effects of group, time, and zone
Vascular densities in the scar, border zone, and normal area at 3 days, 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and 6 months are depicted in Figure 1 for the four cell-transplanted groups and the control group. As anticipated, all overall main effects were highly significant (group, time, and zone effects all p < 0.0001) (Table 1). All interactive effects were also highly significant (group x time, group x location, time x location, group x time x location effects, all p < 0.0001). Overall, vascular densities were lowest in the control rats, intermediate in the HC and Sk groups (p < 0.05 versus control), and highest in the HC+ and Sk+ rats (p < 0.05 versus HC, Sk, control). Overall, vascular densities were highest in the border zone, intermediate in the normal myocardium, and lowest in the scar (all p < 0.05 versus other zones).


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Vascular densities in rat hearts transplanted with HC, HC+, Sk, Sk+, or medium alone (control), at 3 days (open bars), 1 week (heavy crosshatch bars), 2 weeks (solid bars), 4 weeks (light crosshatch bars), or 6 months (checked bars), in (A) the scar, (B) the border zone, and (C) normal myocardium. Vascular densities in both the scar and border zone were lowest in the control hearts, intermediate in the HC and Sk hearts (p < 0.05 versus control), and greatest in the HC+ and Sk+ groups (p < 0.05 versus HC, Sk, or control). Vascular densities in the border zone were greater than those in the scar in all cell-transplanted groups (p < 0.05) and similar in the normal myocardium in all groups. (HC = heart cells; HC+ = vascular endothelial growth factor–transfected heart cells; Sk = unmodified skeletal myoblasts; Sk+ = vascular endothelial growth factor–transfected skeletal myoblasts.)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Summary of Statistical Analysis of Vascular Density
 
When the four cell-transplanted groups were analyzed without the control group to determine the independent effects of cell type and VEGF transfection, the effects of VEGF, time and zone were all highly significant (p < 0.0001). Cell type did not, however, significantly influence vascular densities (p = 0.5). The VEGF x zone, VEGF x time, time x zone (p < 0.0001), and VEGF x zone x time (p = 0.003) interactive effects were also significant, whereas cell-type–related interactive effects were not. In the four cell-transplanted groups, vascular densities in HC+ and Sk+ were greater than in HC and Sk (p < 0.05), and densities in the border zone were higher than those in either the scar or the normal myocardium (p < 0.05). Vascular densities were lowest at 3 days, greater at 6 months (p < 0.05), greater again at 1 week (p < 0.05), and greatest at 2 weeks and 4 weeks (p < 0.05). Cell type did not have an effect on vascular densities.

Effect of cell transplantation alone
Vascular densities in the scar and border zone of control rat hearts injected only with medium were extremely low and did not vary significantly with time (Fig 1A and 1B). In hearts transplanted with unmodified HC or Sk, vascular densities were increased by approximately 60% in the scar compared with controls, and densities in the border zone were approximately doubled (p < 0.05). Densities in the normal myocardium were unaffected by cell transplantation at any time.

Effect of transfection with VEGF
Transfection with VEGF resulted in dramatically increased vascular densities in the HC+ and Sk+ rats compared with the HC and Sk transplanted groups or controls (p < 0.05). Peak vascular densities in both the scar and the border zone of HC+ and Sk+ hearts were approximately double those in HC and Sk rats, and approximately fourfold greater than those in control hearts (p < 0.05). Densities in normal myocardium, however, were unaffected by HC+ or Sk+ transplantation.

Effect of time
There was no significant time-dependent variation in vascular densities in the HC and Sk rats, and the differences seen between HC and Sk rats versus control rats were persistent to the 6-month timepoint. In contrast to the effect of cell transplantation alone, in which there was little variation with time, there was a strong time-dependent effect of VEGF transfection, with vascular densities in the HC+ and Sk+ groups increasing steadily from 3 days to 4 weeks before declining at 6 months (p < 0.05).

Six months after cell transplantation, vascular densities in the scar of Sk+ hearts were still significantly greater than those in any other group (p < 0.05 versus HC+, HC, Sk, control). Densities in the HC+, HC, and Sk rats were still greater than control (p < 0.05), but the difference between HC+ and HC was not statistically significant. At 6 months, vascular densities in the border zone of all cell-transplanted groups remained significantly higher than control hearts (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the four cell-transplanted groups. Densities in the normal myocardium of all 5 groups were similar.

Effect of cell type
In contrast to the dramatic effects of VEGF transfection, time, or zone, vascular densities were not significantly influenced by cell type (p = 0.5). Both HC and Sk induced similar degrees of angiogenesis after transplantation, and both had similar increases in effect with VEGF transfection.

Oncogenicity
Histologic examination of the scar and border zone in control rats revealed a hypocellular scar with very few vascular spaces and a thinned scar region consisting predominantly of collagen and fibroblasts (Fig 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Photomicrographs of the scar region in rat hearts 6 months after transplantation with (A) culture medium alone (control), (B) HC, (C) HC+, (D) Sk, or (E) Sk+, after immunohistochemical staining for factor VIII (original magnifications, x200). Vascular densities were lowest in the control hearts, intermediate in the HC and Sk rats, and greatest in the HC+ and Sk+ groups (p < 0.05). (HC = heart cells; HC+ = vascular endothelial growth factor–transfected heart cells; Sk = unmodified skeletal myoblasts; Sk+ = vascular endothelial growth factor–transfected skeletal myoblasts.)

 
Transplanted cells, some of which were bromodeoxyuridine-positive, were clearly visible in the scar of the HC and Sk groups. Vascularity in these cell-transplanted groups was increased compared with the controls, as described quantitatively above. There were no disorganized dense clusters of vessels suggesting an angioma, nor any apparent focal proliferation of transplanted HC or Sk, in any of the sections examined at any timepoint.

In the HC+ and Sk+ transplanted rats, donor cells were again clearly visible in the transplanted scar. Qualitatively, the degree of engraftment appeared to be somewhat increased, although this was not quantitated. Vascular densities were obviously greater, particularly in the border zone at the 2-week and 4-week timepoints, as quantitated above. Again, there was no evidence of angioma or sarcoma formation at any timepoint evaluated.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Therapeutic angiogenesis has been investigated as a potential therapy for patients with ischemic LV dysfunction. Fibroblast growth factor protein has been delivered into ischemic regions that could not be revascularized during coronary bypass surgery, to improve regional perfusion [13, 14]. Gene therapy with VEGF has been employed both as an adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting and as sole therapy [15, 16]. Both protein and gene therapy have successfully induced angiogenic responses in numerous animal studies, but optimal delivery of the angiogenic factor can still be difficult. Protein therapy requires a complex response from both the ischemic and nonischemic regions. Not only are endothelial cells required to establish a capillary network, but also the scar must be remodeled to accommodate the new vessels. Therefore, protein therapy must induce a cascade of cellular events to successfully revascularize a myocardial region, and adequate delivery of proteins to intracellular targets to achieve the required effects may be difficult. Expression of a therapeutic transgene within a transfected cell may be able to induce a variety of intracellular effects, but in vivo transfection requires a large number of viable, metabolically active cells in the ischemic region where the genes are injected. Cell-based gene therapy may permit engraftment of cells already expressing desired transgenes into the ischemic regions. Cell engraftment persists for at least 17 months, and the muscle tissue continues to prevent thinning and dilation of the infarct region [17]. The advantages of transfected cell transplantation include the safety of transfection, the potential to improve cell survival and engraftment, and the potential for a more integrated angiogenic response. Ex vivo transfection avoids the potential deleterious effects of the viral vectors necessary for efficient in vivo transduction. Induction of angiogenesis may increase cell engraftment if the enhanced perfusion is directed to the implanted cells. In addition, transfected cells may be able to remodel the infarct region to facilitate cell attachment to the matrix and prevent apoptosis as well as to induce more profuse angiogenesis [18].

We have previously reported that the angiogenic response of cell transplantation can be augmented by the implantation of VEGF-transfected cells [8]. Expression of VEGF, while transient and localized [9], induces sequential upregulation of the VEGF receptors flk-1 and flt-1 in host cells through a paracrine effect [10], and leads to enhanced angiogenesis. Transplanted cell survival was also significantly increased by expression of the VEGF transgene, and may have been due to the induction of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in an ischemic environment [19]. Smooth muscle cells expressing insulin-like growth factor-1 demonstrated induction of VEGF expression, greater angiogenesis, and reduced apoptosis [20]. We have evaluated the combination of VEGF and insulin-like growth factor-1 transgenes in an attempt to maximize their effect on cell survival and ventricular function. We noted that the simultaneous expression of both VEGF and insulin-like growth factor-1 transgenes in transplanted bone marrow cells had a synergistic effect on myogenesis, further enhancing transplanted cell survival, LV ejection fraction, and cardiac contractile protein content [21].

Our current study demonstrates that the angiogenic response to cell transplantation can be significantly enhanced in both the scar and the border zone by the expression of a VEGF transgene, and that vascular densities peak 4 weeks after implantation. Whereas transgene expression is transient, the angiogenic effect of this gene expression is more durable, persisting to at least 6 months, the last timepoint at which rats were evaluated in this study. Vascular densities from 3 days to 4 weeks were similar between the HC transplanted and the Sk transplanted rats, indicating that the proangiogenic effect of the VEGF transgene was not limited to either cell type. Six months afterward, vascular densities were still greater in the Sk+ group than in all other groups, indicating a durable response. Although vascular densities in the HC+ group were still elevated over baseline, there was not a significant difference between HC+ and HC, perhaps owing to the limited number of rats evaluated at the 6-month timepoint. By 6 months, however, cell engraftment is complete, and the survival of any viable hibernating host cardiomyocytes in the injured region will also have been determined. The minor differences between HC and Sk may not translate into functional differences 6 months after transplantation.

Vascular densities in the cell-transplanted and VEGF-transfected cell-transplanted rats were greater in the border zone than in the center of the scar. It has previously been shown that VEGF-transfected Sk significantly enhance vascular density at 3 months in the peri-infarct region of pig hearts [22]. Cell engraftment was identified almost exclusively in the scar, where the cells had been injected. Therefore, the treatment produced an effect at a distance, confirming the paracrine influence of cell and transfected cell transplantation. This angiogenic response could have been due to the release of a variety of proteins or the remodeling of the extracellular matrix.

Prolonged angiogenic stimulation has been associated with angioma formation [11, 23]. Using our current technique of cell transfection, VEGF expression by the transplanted cells is transient and localized [9]. This transient expression did not result in formation of angiomas or any evidence of local accumulation of proliferating cells, even 6 months after cell implantation. Similarly, Suzuki and colleagues [24] have previously reported that VEGF-transfected Sk expressed VEGF transiently, without angioma formation at 1 month after treatment. Thus, the addition of VEGF transfection did not lead to detectable oncogenicity after cell transplantation.

Establishing the safety and potential efficacy of cell-based gene therapy will require an extensive series of preclinical investigations. This study is only one of many evaluations that will be required before the clinical application of this therapy. However, capillary density may be the most important characteristic of this intervention. Extending the vascular network is the first requirement for successful angiogenesis. Other studies have already reported that angiogenic transgene expression can increase cell survival and LV function [19, 21].

This study has distinct limitations. The cryoinjury model is not clinically relevant, but provides a severe test for the angiogenic potential of gene-enhanced cell transplantation. The resultant scar may be most similar to the thinned, dilated scar of a LV aneurysm resulting from an infarct in a patient without preformed collaterals. In these patients, cell transplantation offers the promise of ventricular restoration that cannot be anticipated with protein or gene therapy alone. Determination of the significance and relevance of these findings will, however, require more extensive studies.

In summary, VEGF-transfected myocytes increased vascular densities more than cell transplantation did alone. The increase was greater in the border zone than in the center of the injured region and increased for 4 weeks after cell implantation. Six months later, the capillary density continued to be greater in the cell-transplanted groups than the control group, and VEGF transfection further increased capillary densities in the Sk+ group. Our experiments demonstrate that the expression of an angiogenic trangene further enhances the angiogenic effect of heart cell and skeletal myoblast transplantation. Further studies will be required to determine the optimal application of cell-based gene therapy for myocardial repair.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This work was supported by a grant from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (T5305) to Terrence M. Yau. Doctor Yau is also supported by the Angelo and Lorenza DeGasperis Chair in Cardiovascular Surgery Research at the University Health Network.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Zibaitis A, Greentree D, Ma F, Marelli D, Duong M, Chiu RC. Myocardial regeneration with satellite cell implantation Transplant Proc 1994;26:3294.[Medline]
  2. Van Meter Jr CH, Claycomb WC, Delcarpio JB, et al. Myoblast transplantation in the porcine model: a potential technique for myocardial repair J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1442-1448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Li RK, Jia ZQ, Weisel RD, et al. Cardiomyocyte transplantation improves heart function Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:654-660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Li RK, Weisel RD, Mickle DA, et al. Autologous porcine heart cell transplantation improved heart function after a myocardial infarction J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:62-68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yau TM, Tomita S, Weisel RD, et al. Beneficial effect of autologous cell transplantation on infarcted heart function: comparison between bone marrow stromal cells and heart cells Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:169-176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Yoo KJ, Li RK, Weisel RD, et al. Heart cell transplantation improves heart function in dilated cardiomyopathic hamsters Circulation 2000;102(Suppl 3):204-209.
  7. Kim EJ, Li RK, Weisel RD, et al. Angiogenesis by endothelial cell transplantation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:963-971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yau TM, Fung K, Weisel RD, Fujii T, Mickle DA, Li RK. Enhanced myocardial angiogenesis by gene transfer with transplanted cells Circulation 2001;104(Suppl 1):218-222.
  9. Yau TM, Li G, Weisel RD, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor transgene expression in cell-transplanted hearts J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1180-1187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yau TM, Li G, Zhang Y, Weisel RD, Mickle DA, Li RK. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor upregulation in response to cell-based angiogenic gene therapy Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:2056-2063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lee RJ, Springer ML, Blanco-Bose WE, Shaw R, Ursell PC, Blau HM. VEGF gene delivery to myocardium: deleterious effects of unregulated expression Circulation 2000;22:898-901.
  12. Rosenblatt JD, Lunt AI, Parry DJ, Partridge TA. Culturing satellite cells from living single muscle fiber explants In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1995;31:773-779.[Medline]
  13. Laham RJ, Sellke FW, Edelman ER, et al. Local perivasclar delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: results of a phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Circulation 1999;100:1865-1871.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ruel M, Laham RJ, Parker JA, et al. Long-term effects of surgical angiogenic therapy with fibroblast growth factor 2 protein J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 2002;124:28-34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rosengart TK, Lee LY, Patel SR, et al. Angiogenesis gene therapy: phase I assessment of direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing VEGF121 cDNA to individuals with clinically significant severe coronary artery disease Circulation 1999;100:468-474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rosengart TK, Lee LY, Patel SR, et al. Six-month assessment of a phase I trial of angiogenic gene therapy for the treatment of coronary artery disease using direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing the VEGF121 cDNA Ann Surg 1999;230:466-470.[Medline]
  17. Menasche P, Hagege AA, Vilquin JT, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1084-1086.[Free Full Text]
  18. Fedak PW, Altamentova SM, Weisel RD, et al. Matrix remodeling in experimental and human heart failure: a possible regulatory role for TIMP-3 Am J Physiol 2003;284:H626-H634.
  19. Yau TM, Kim C, Ng D, et al. Increasing transplanted cell survival with cell-based angiogenic gene therapy Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1779-1786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Liu TB, Fedak PW, Weisel RD, et al. Enhanced IGF-1 expression improves smooth muscle cell engraftment after cell transplantation Am J Physiol 2004;287:H2840-H2849.
  21. Yau TM, Kim C, Li G, Zhang Y, Weisel RD, Li RK. Maximizing ventricular function with multimodal cell-based gene therapy Circulation 2005;112(Suppl 1):123-128.
  22. Husnain HKh, Ye L, Jiang S, et al. Angiomyogenesis for cardiac repair using human myoblasts as carriers of human vascular endothelial growth factor J Mol Med 2004;82:539-549.[Medline]
  23. Arbiser JL, Larsson H, Claesson-Welsh L, et al. Overexpression of VEGF 121 in immortalized endothelial cells causes conversion to slowly growing angiosarcoma and high level expression of the VEGF receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in vivo Am J Pathol 2000;156:1469-1476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Suzuki K, Murtuza B, Smolenski RT, et al. Cell transplantation for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction using vascular endothelial growth factor–expressing skeletal myoblasts Circulation 2001;104(Suppl 1):207-212.

Related Article

Invited commentary
Bonaros Nikolaos, Rauf Rauend, and Kocher Alfred
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 83: 646-647. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
H. Fujii, Z. Sun, S.-H. Li, J. Wu, S. Fazel, R. D. Weisel, H. Rakowski, J. Lindner, and R.-K. Li
Ultrasound-Targeted Gene Delivery Induces Angiogenesis After a Myocardial Infarction in Mice
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 869 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. Angoulvant, S. Fazel, R. D. Weisel, T. Y.Y. Lai, P. W. Fedak, L. Chen, S. Rafati, C. K. Seneviratne, N. Degousee, and R.-K. Li
Cell-based gene therapy modifies matrix remodeling after a myocardial infarction in tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-3-deficient mice.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 471 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Okada, T. R. Payne, B. Zheng, H. Oshima, N. Momoi, K. Tobita, B. B. Keller, J. A. Phillippi, B. Peault, and J. Huard
Myogenic Endothelial Cells Purified From Human Skeletal Muscle Improve Cardiac Function After Transplantation Into Infarcted Myocardium
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 2, 2008; 52(23): 1869 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. S. Penn and A. A. Mangi
Genetic Enhancement of Stem Cell Engraftment, Survival, and Efficacy
Circ. Res., June 20, 2008; 102(12): 1471 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. M. Yau, C. Kim, G. Li, Y. Zhang, S. Fazel, D. Spiegelstein, R. D. Weisel, and R.-K. Li
Enhanced Angiogenesis With Multimodal Cell-Based Gene Therapy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1110 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Nikolaos, R. Rauend, and K. Alfred
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 646 - 647.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Richard D. Weisel
Terrence M. Yau
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yau, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yau, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS