ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marco Pocar
Andrea Moneta
Adalberto Grossi
Francesco Donatelli
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:468-474
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Coronary Artery Bypass for Heart Failure in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: 17-Year Follow-Up

Marco Pocar, MD, PhD*, Andrea Moneta, MD, Adalberto Grossi, MD, Francesco Donatelli, MD

Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy

Accepted for publication September 6, 2006.

* Address correspondence to Dr Pocar, Via Pompeo Litta 2, 20122 Milan, Italy (Email: marco.pocar{at}unimi.it).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been safely extended to ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure, but outcome beyond 5 years remains poorly defined.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 45 consecutive angina-free patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤0.35) and heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class III to IV) who were selected for CABG between 1988 and 1995. Positron emission tomography was used for preoperative identification of myocardial viability.

RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 4.4%. At a median follow-up of 117 months (longest observation, 205 months), the probability of survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years after CABG was 93.3%, 84%, 65%, and 44%, respectively. At multivariable analysis, a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of 25 mm Hg or more predicted a threefold increase of the hazard of death (p = 0.02), whereas a LVEDP of 20 mm Hg or more correlated with the requirement of an intraaortic balloon pump perioperatively (p = 0.04). Other independent predictors of survival were age older than 70 years and peripheral vascular disease. Cardiac events accounted for 88% of late deaths, which were primarily related to sudden death or progressive heart failure. Most patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I to II at late follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: CABG alone yields good long-term outcome in selected angina-free patients with ischemic systolic dysfunction and advanced heart failure. However, associated diastolic impairment, reflected by elevated LVEDP, predicts reduced long-term survival despite myocardial viability.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Although poor left ventricular function adversely affects early and late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), particularly in case of clinical heart failure [1, 2], revascularization has been extended to ischemic cardiomyopathy [3, 4]. In this context, viability testing allows the exclusion of patients who are unlikely to benefit from CABG [5–7]. Outcome beyond 5 years remains poorly defined, however, and most reports include patients with associated angina pectoris [8, 9].

This retrospective study focuses on long-term survival, up to 17 years, after complete revascularization in patients with ischemic heart failure and assessment of myocardial viability. The impact of preoperative and surgical variables is also analyzed.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
A retrospective analysis was conducted of a cohort of 45 consecutive individuals with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction of 0.35 or less; lowest, 0.16), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV chronic heart failure, and no anginal symptoms. All patients underwent elective CABG between April 1988 and December 1995 with preoperative identification of myocardial viability at positron emission tomography (PET). Exclusion criteria other than angina were reoperation, associated cardiac surgical procedure, more than mild valve dysfunction, acute myocardial infarction during the preceding 12 weeks, and absence of atrioventricular coupling. Two patients who, respectively, underwent associated carotid and coronary endoarterectomy were included in the study. Three-vessel disease was present in 84% of the patients.

No patient was supported with intravenous inotropic agents or intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation preoperatively, either for low cardiac output or prophylactically. Early and late mortality, respectively, denote events occurring during or after the first 3 postoperative months. Characteristics and operative variables are outlined in Table 1. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and individual consent was obtained from patients at the time of follow-up data collection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Preoperative and Surgical Characteristics (n = 45)
 
Preoperative Assessment
Patients were selected for CABG according to the detection of myocardial viability with fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET performed in fasting conditions (minimum, 16 hours). Preoperative technetium-99m hexakis-2-methoxy-isobutylisonitrile single photon emission tomography was combined to evaluate rest–stress perfusion. First-pass radionuclide angiography was used to assess segmental wall motion and to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction. Algorithms for patients’ selection have been described previously [10, 11]. Schematically, the left ventricle was divided into five segments: anterior, septal, apical, lateral, inferior. All patients showed metabolic tracer uptake, indicating residual viability, in at least two segments with abnormal wall motion, perfusion defects, and critically stenotic coronary tributaries.

Left heart catheterizations were performed at a single institution, and values of intracardiac pressures refer to measurements before contrast medium injection and coronary angiography. Patients were scheduled for CABG provided that the left anterior descending branch was judged technically graftable.

Surgical Procedures
All operations were performed on moderately hypothermic (30°C core temperature) cardiopulmonary bypass with blood antegrade and retrograde cardioplegia, normothermic induction, cold maintaining doses every 20 minutes, and substrate-enriched controlled reperfusion, according to Buckberg’s principles for energy-depleted hearts. The left ventricle was vented through the right superior pulmonary vein. Stenoses of 50% or more were bypassed.

Follow-Up
Data were obtained from the patient or patient’s family and referring physicians or cardiologists directly or by phone interviews. Follow-up was complete at March 31, 1996, although 42 patients (93.3%) could be traced at June 30, 2005. Median follow-up, including hospital deaths, was 117 months (longest observation, 205 months).

Statistical Analysis
The t test was used to compare means between groups. The {chi}2 test, or the Fisher exact test when 2 x 2 tables had a cell with an expected frequency of less than 5, and stepwise logistic regression were used for univariable and multivariable analysis. Variables showing a trend toward statistical significance (p < 0.15) at univariable analysis were subsequently evaluated in the multivariable analyses. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. All 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as ± 2 SEs. Differences in probability estimates were calculated using the log-rank test. Cox’s proportional hazard model was used for multivariable analysis of time-dependent variables. Unless otherwise specified, continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using SPSS 11.5.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) for Windows (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA). Values of p < 0.5 were considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Survival
At a median follow-up of 117 months (longest observation, 205 months), the probability of overall survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 93.3% (95% CI, 86% to 100%), 84% (95% CI, 72% to 95.0%), 65% (95% CI, 50% to 79%), and 44% (95% CI, 27% to 60%), as shown in Figure 1. However, a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of 25 mm Hg or more (9 patients, 20%) independently predicted an approximately threefold increase of the probability of death. Predicted survival was 97.1%, 90.9%, 75%, and 51%, respectively, at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years in patients with a LVEDP of less than 25 mm Hg versus 80%, 60%, and 30% at 1, 5, and 10 years in patients with a LVEDP of 25 mm Hg or greater. Accordingly, survival functions were significantly divergent (Fig 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Probability of survival. Bars indicate 95% confidence intervals 1, 5, 10, and 15 years after coronary artery bypass grafting.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Probability of survival in patients with a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of less than 25 mm Hg (solid line) or 25 mm Hg or more (dashed line).

 
Two patients (4.4%) died of low cardiac output and multiorgan failure on postoperative day 7 and 21, respectively. In the former, salvage support with a left ventricular assist device (Bio-Pump, Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) was attempted unsuccessfully. A third patient was discharged but died suddenly 3 months after CABG, accounting for a 3-month mortality rate of 6.7%. No correlation could be outlined at multivariable analysis between preoperative or surgical variables and early mortality, but both hospital deaths occurred in patients with a LVEDP of 25 mm Hg or more (p = 0.02).

Predictors of death and low cardiac output requiring IABP are listed in Table 2. The only independent predictor of overall death other than LVEDP was age. Peripheral vascular disease (claudication, carotid occlusion or >50% stenosis, previous or planned intervention on the abdominal aorta, limb arteries or carotids) correlated with death beyond 3 months, but this was not observed when early events were included in the multivariable analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Predictors of Death and Perioperative Intraaortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation
 
Fifteen (88%) of 17 deaths recorded among 43 operative survivors were cardiac-related. Causes of cardiac death were sudden death in 7 patients (47%), end-stage heart failure in 6 (40%), and acute myocardial infarction in 2 (13%). No correlation was outlined between terminal events and follow-up duration. Extracardiac deaths were related to cancer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Operative Variables and Perioperative Complications
There was no occurrence of incomplete revascularization. Saphenous vein grafts alone were constructed in 2 patients (4.4%) only. No arterial conduit other than the internal thoracic artery was used. High-dose inotropic support (intravenous dopamine at >6 µg/[kg · min], epinephrine, or phosphodiesterase inhibitors) was used in 21 patients (47%) and IABP in 13 (29%). A LVEDP of 20 mm Hg or more (29 patients, 64%) independently predicted perioperative IABP (odds ratio, 10.2; p = 0.04). Only 1 (6.7%) of 15 patients with a LVEDP of less than 20 mm Hg versus 12 (41%) of 29 with a LVEDP of 20 mm Hg or more required IABP. Two of the latter required delayed sternal closure for hemodynamic instability. Mechanical respiratory support was prolonged beyond 48 hours in 11 instances (24%). In 9 patients (20%), perioperative renal dysfunction developed, defined as a serum creatinine rise of more than 2 mg/dL or more than 1.5 baseline value in patients with preexisting renal dysfunction.

Adverse Late Cardiovascular Events
Two patients underwent reoperation dictated by recurrence of heart failure. Both were alive at late follow-up, but clearly represented failures of primary CABG. One underwent transplantation 56 months after CABG. In another, secondary mitral regurgitation developed and the patient was reoperated on twice, at 36 and 84 months after CABG. Valve dysfunction was initially corrected with ring annuloplasty (Carpentier-Edwards Classic, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and subsequently with implantation of a mechanical prosthesis (St. Jude Medical, Inc, St. Paul, MN).

Three patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, whereas 4 required implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Among the latter, atriobiventricular resynchronization was applied in 3 patients, and a defibrillator was implanted in 2. Extracardiac vascular events were recorded in 4 patients, including permanent stroke in 2, carotid endarterectomy in 1, and endovascular descending thoracic aortic aneurysm exclusion in 1.

Among 40 operative survivors traced in 2005 (including late deaths), 18 (45%), 12 (30%), 3 (7.5%), and 7 (17%) were in NYHA I, II, III, and IV, respectively, at time of follow-up or death. No independent predictor could be outlined, but a LVEDP of 25 mm Hg or more correlated with a worse late functional status at univariable analysis (p = 0.01), whereas no patient with a LVEDP of 25 mm Hg or more improved to NYHA I. Furthermore, all late sudden deaths occurred in NYHA I or II patients. Among 23 survivors at late follow-up, NYHA class was I in 12 patients, II in 8, III in 2, and IV in 1. At echocardiography, the ejection fraction was 0.386 ± 0.054 (p < 0.001), whereas at least moderate mitral regurgitation was documented in 5 patients, of whom 3 were in NYHA II, and 1 each was in III and IV. Irrespective of mitral dysfunction at late follow-up, regurgitation was also outlined in case of cardiac resynchronization (n = 3) or mitral surgery (n = 1). Finally, angina developed in 9 patients, dictating percutaneous revascularization in 3, and 2 patients died of myocardial infarction.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
CABG is performed with acceptably low risk in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, with or without concurrent heart failure. Viability testing has an established role in the identification of patients who are unlikely to benefit from revascularization [5–7]. Extent of viability has also been shown to predict reverse ventricular remodeling [12]. Data concerning survival beyond 5 years are scarce, however, and reports addressing ventricular dysfunction often include patients with concurrent angina [8, 9], which seems to protect from subsequent remodeling, possibly in relation to recruitment of collaterals or ischemic preconditioning [13].

Survival and Predictors of Death
This retrospective analysis confirms that good long-term survival—beyond 10 years after CABG—can be anticipated in patients with advanced ischemic heart failure and residual viability, irrespective of concurrent angina. In our experience, the probability of survival at 15 years for the entire cohort was 44%, which rose to 51% in patients with a preoperative LVEDP of less than 25 mm Hg. This is noteworthy when considering that during the same period, most angina-free patients with cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart failure were referred for cardiac transplantation (2 patients actually were on the waiting list), whereas survival rates obtained with transplantation during the same surgical era approach 50% at 10 years [14]. However, a true comparison is impossible because transplant registries also include more critical patients (eg, circulatory support) that account for a higher mortality during the first 6 to 12 months.

Conversely, outcome is more disappointing in patients with a preoperative LVEDP of 25 mm Hg or more. Although LVEDP independently correlated with survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study [2], this has not been elucidated specifically in case of left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure, which is often associated with higher baseline LVEDP. Extent of viability could not predict outcome and was not correlated with LVEDP in our analysis.

Interestingly, impaired flow reserve and correspondingly decreased contractile reserve, particularly in the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries, has been outlined in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, indicating microvascular dysfunction [15]. Because flow is predominantly diastolic in left coronary territories, a similar pathophysiologic condition is also possible in ischemic cardiomyopathy after CABG and could explain the predictive role of LVEDP for adverse events despite complete revascularization and myocardial viability. In other words, increased LVEDP seems related to the degree of left ventricular remodeling, when excluding non-elective patients.

In this context, medical therapy for heart failure and coronary artery disease, and the respective impact on recommended guidelines, has changed substantially since the period of the present study. ß-blocker therapy, which was particularly uncommon, has recently been reported to improve diastolic function in heart failure with severe diastolic and systolic impairment, both on an ischemic or nonischemic basis [16]. Four-year survival of more than 80% has been documented with ß-blockers, although the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) also included NYHA II patients enrolled a decade later [17]. On theoretic grounds, wider use of ß-blockers might improve survival after CABG in systolic heart failure patients with elevated LVEDP and represents an intriguing issue. Conversely, improved medical therapy might reduce the relative benefits of CABG, but a true comparison between treatments performed in different periods is not feasible.

These considerations stress the importance of echocardiography and the assessment of diastolic filling patterns [18], suggesting that more aggressive approaches with respect to additional procedures might be justified in patients with a higher LVEDP. In this context, improved survival has been documented with left ventricular restoration, cardiac resynchronization, and implantable defibrillators [19–22], but respective benefits are under investigation in controlled trials. Other procedures, such as cardiac constraint and stem cell transplantation, are also being introduced in clinical practice. Finally, although reports addressing functional mitral regurgitation are controversial, the latter and increased left atrial volume index adversely affect survival after myocardial infarction [23–26]. Ongoing trials, such as the Surgical Treatment for IschemiC Heart failure (STICH) and the PET And Recovery following Revascularization-2 (PARR-2) trials, will further clarify benefits of ventricular restoration and cost-effectiveness of PET-guided CABG [7, 27].

Excluding older age, the only other independent predictor of mortality was coexisting peripheral vascular disease, even though this could be outlined only excluding early events. The predictive value of peripheral arterial disease is noteworthy when considering that the study does not comprise diabetic patients, in whom diffuse arteriosclerosis is more prevalent, since the latter did not undergo PET viability testing during the same period. More specifically, only 9 patients with impaired glucose tolerance were included. Similarly, poor coronary targets are more common in diabetic patients and correlate with worse outcome [8]. It may be inferred that survival might be less satisfactory in correspondingly similar diabetic patients.

Early Mortality
Elevated LVEDP did not independently predict early mortality in our population; however, this could be related to the small number of events and a correlation could be outlined at univariable analysis. Interestingly, both patients who died perioperatively had a LVEDP of 25 mm Hg or more, whereas a LVEDP of 20 mm Hg or more predicted the requirement of perioperative IABP at multivariable analysis. This is in accordance with studies correlating echocardiographic diastolic filling patterns with operative risk in heart failure patients undergoing CABG [28]. It may be inferred that preoperative left ventricular unloading, including IABP, should reduce the hazard of postcardiotomy low cardiac output, which was the cause of both hospital deaths. Similarly, newer-generation phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitors or calcium sensitizer agents (eg, levosimendan) represent adjunctive pharmacologic tools [29].

Causes of Late Death
Most late deaths (88%) were cardiac related. Sudden death (47%) and end-stage heart failure (40%) represented the leading causes of death, which further emphasizes the potential role of implantable defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy in this population. Consequently, we now implant a left ventricular epicardial lead intraoperatively in patients eligible for resynchronization therapy. Of interest is that an increased risk of sudden death has been observed in diabetic patients, including patients with impaired glucose tolerance, showing a progressively higher risk in relation to the severity of diabetes [30]. This further suggests that our results are possibly biased by the exclusion of diabetic patients. Conversely, outcome might be more favorable in current years owing to the advances in medical therapy for heart failure. Finally, acute myocardial infarction accounted for two late deaths, and 3 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during follow-up. Although we were unable to outline the benefits of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting, complications were not increased.

Late Functional Status
Thirty of 40 operative survivors were in NYHA I or II at late follow-up or death. Even when considering heart failure as a plausible cause of death in 3 patients lost from follow-up, this results in a NYHA class I or II in 30 (70%) of 43 survivors. A LVEDP of 25 mm Hg or more correlated with a worse outcome and precluded recovery to NYHA I. The incidence of sudden death in NYHA I and II patients, and progressive mitral valve dysfunction in patients in whom heart failure recurred, indicate the importance of cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization. Stress echocardiography was seldom performed to evaluate functional mitral insufficiency at time of the study, and the importance of moderate regurgitation has become progressively evident. The relative prevalence of mitral dysfunction in patients with recurrent heart failure may thus indicate an underestimation of preoperative regurgitation, particularly in patients with elevated LVEDP.

Ejection fraction at echocardiography was improved in late survivors, and this was confirmed in a small group of PET-selected patients in whom segmental wall motion was reassessed with radionuclide angiography 6 months postoperatively [10]; however, the lack of improvement has not been associated with reduced survival [9]. Finally, angina developed in 9 patients and was successfully treated percutaneously or medically.

Limitations
Although the selection criteria exclude important confounding variables, the major drawbacks are inherent to the retrospective nature of the study. Specific echocardiographic variables, recently outlined as independent survival predictors after myocardial infarction (sphericity and left ventricular end-systolic volume indexes), were inconstantly specified, especially in earlier records. This dictated the policy to analyze systolic performance data (ejection fraction, regional wall motion) derived from radionuclide preoperative assessment. Although elevated LVEDP is more likely in dilated hearts, this does not allow the comparison with postoperative echocardiographic data focusing on volume changes or with reports addressing associated ventricular restoration surgery.

Conclusion
CABG alone yields good long-term outcome in angina-free patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and advanced heart failure who are selected on the basis of residual viability. However, associated diastolic impairment, reflected by elevated LVEDP, predicts reduced long-term survival despite myocardial viability. Because PET cannot be routinely proposed, this report indirectly stresses the role of rest and stress test echocardiography.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Argenziano M, Spotnitz HM, Whang W, Bigger Jr JT, Parides M, Rosa EA. Risk stratification for coronary bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: analysis of the coronary artery bypass grafting patch trial database Circulation 1999;100:II119-II124.[Medline]
  2. Myers WO, Blackstone EH, Davis K, Foster ED, Kaiser GC. CASS Registry long term surgical survivalCoronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:488-498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Elefteriades JA, Tolis Jr G, Levi E, Mills LK, Zaret BL. Coronary artery bypass grafting in severe left ventricular dysfunction: excellent survival with improved ejection fraction and functional state J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1411-1417.[Abstract]
  4. Baker DW, Jones R, Hodges J, Massie BM, Konstam MA, Rosa EA. Management of heart failureIII. The role of revascularization in the treatment of patients with moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. JAMA 1994;272:1528-1534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1151-1158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pasquet A, Robert A, D’Hondt AM, Dion R, Melin JA, Vanoverschelde JL. Prognostic value of myocardial ischemia and viability in patients with chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction Circulation 1999;100:141-148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Beanlands RS, Ruddy TD, deKemp RA, et al. Positron emission tomography and recovery following revascularization (PARR-1): the importance of scar and the development of a prediction rule for the degree of recovery of left ventricular function J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1735-1743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kleikamp G, Maleszka A, Reiss N, Stüttgen B, Körfer R. Determinants of mid- and long-term results in patients after surgical revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1406-1413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Samady H, Elefteriades JA, Abbott BG, Mattera JA, McPherson CA, Wackers FJ. Failure to improve left ventricular function after coronary revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy is not associated with worse outcome Circulation 1999;100:1298-1304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lucignani G, Paolini G, Landoni C, et al. Presurgical identification of hibernating myocardium by combined use of technetium-99m hexakis-2-methoxy-isobutylisonitrile single photon emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with coronary artery disease Eur J Nucl Med 1992;19:874-881.[Medline]
  11. Paolini G, Lucignani G, Zuccari M, et al. Identification and revascularization of hibernating myocardium in angina-free patients with left ventricular dysfunction Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:139-144.[Abstract]
  12. Rizzello V, Poldermans D, Boersma E, et al. Opposite patterns of left ventricular remodeling after coronary revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathyRole of myocardial viability. Circulation 2004;110:2383-2388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Solomon SD, Anavekar NS, Greaves S, Rouleau JL, Hennekens C, Pfeffer MA, HEART Investigators Angina pectoris prior to myocardial infarction protects against subsequent left ventricular remodeling J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1511-1514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Taylor DO, Edwards LB, Boucek MM, et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-second official adult heart transplant report—2005 J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:945-955.[Medline]
  15. Skalidis EL, Parthenakis FI, Patrianakos AP, Hamilos MI, Vradas PE. Regional coronary flow and contractile reserve in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2027-2032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Palazzuoli A, Quatrini I, Vecchiato L, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function improvement by carvedilol therapy in advanced heart failure J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2005;45:563-568.[Medline]
  17. Cleland JG, Charlesworth A, Lubsen J, et al. A comparison of the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on well-being, morbidity, and mortality (the "patient journey") in patients with heart failure: a report from the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European trial (COMET) J Am Coll Cardol 2006;47:1603-1611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Dokainish H, Zoghbi WA, Lakkis NM, et al. Optimal noninvasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparison of tissue Doppler echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with pulmonary artery catheters Circulation 2004;109:2432-2439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Maxey TS, Reece TB, Ellman PI, et al. Coronary artery bypass with ventricular restoration is superior to coronary artery bypass alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:428-434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Yamaguchi A, Adachi H, Kawahito K, Murata S, Ino T. Left ventricular reconstruction benefits patients with dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:456-461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure N Engl J Med 2005;352:225-237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Inverstigators Cardiac-resinchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure New Engl J Med 2004;350:2140-2150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bax JJ, Braun J, Somer ST, et al. Restrictive annuloplasty and coronary revascularization in ischemic mitral regurgitation results in reverse left ventricular remodeling Circulation 2004;110:II103-II108.[Medline]
  24. Wu AH, Aaronson KD, Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Welch K, Koelling TM. Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty on mortality risk in patients with mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:381-387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment Circulation 2001;103:1759-1764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Møller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK, et al. Left atrial volumeA powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003;107:2207-2212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Buckberg GD. Questions and answers about the STICH trial: a different perspective J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:245-249.[Free Full Text]
  28. Vaskelyte J, Stoskute N, Kinduris S, Ereminiene E. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: predictive significance of left ventricular diastolic filling pattern Eur J Echocardiogr 2001;2:62-67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Gheorghiade M, Teerlink JR, Mebazaa A. Pharmacology of new agents for acute heart failure syndromes Am J Cardiol 2005;96:68G-73G.[Medline]
  30. Jouven X, Lemaître RN, Rea TD, Sotoodehnia N, Empana JP, Siscovick DS. Diabetes, glucose level, and risk of sudden cardiac death Eur Heart J 2005;2:2142-2147.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marco Pocar
Andrea Moneta
Adalberto Grossi
Francesco Donatelli
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS