|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1575
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Anesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex UB9 6JH United Kingdom
(Email: d.royston{at}rbht.nhs.uk).
| Dr Royston discloses a financial relationship with Bayer HealthCare, GSK, Organon.
|
I would like to comment on the article by Kincaid and colleagues [1] suggesting an adverse interaction between aprotinin and inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI).
First, the authors claim a "plausible mechanism" for their observations is induced by vasoconstriction of the efferent glomerular artery. A source reference is not cited. Studies thus far fail to show an effect of aprotinin on angiotensin-stimulated afferent or efferent artery tone [2], or additional effects of aprotinin on renal tubular function after heart surgery [3].
Second, one of three referenced articles suggesting potential nephrotoxic action of aprotinin (reference 7 [1]) showed that creatinine clearance increased from 110.7, to 122.0 and finally 132.9 mL/minute with increasing doses of aprotinin making a direct nephrotoxic effect unlikely.
Third, we have also been interested in interactions between ACEI administration and aprotinin therapy [4]. Of 1,870 patients in our analysis, 381 (20.4%) were taking ACEI until surgery. Biochemical renal impairment was recorded in 6.9% patients allocated to high-dose aprotinin and 6.7% to a placebo. Two other studies from hospitals in which aprotinin was not routinely used showed renal impairment in 7.7% [5] and 7.74% of patients [6]. The Kincaid and colleagues' [1] data showed renal impairment in 1.9% of patients not receiving aprotinin. Compared with our own report [4] and those of others [5, 6], the remarkably low incidence of renal impairment in the nonaprotinin group reported by Kincaid and colleagues' [1] raises the issue of whether risk factors for adverse outcome were similar between aprotinin and nonaprotinin groups. In particular, the authors show a very strong relationship between incidence of renal impairment and blood transfusions (Fig 2 [1]). Figures 3 and 4 [1] suggest some patients received up to 8 units of red cells in addition to aprotinin, a rare scenario for this patient population.
Finally, the authors may agree that the causal relationship suggested in the title, and the conclusion that a combination of ACEIs and aprotinin should be avoided, is somewhat overstated. The article shows administration of a blood transfusion was numerically more important than ACEI and aprotinin combination. Construction of relationships (eg, Fig 3 [1]) using the data of 13 patients (approximately 1% of the study population) may be mathematically sound, but clinically misleading, until more data is forthcoming.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. H. Kincaid, N. D. Kon, and J. W. Hammon Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1575 - 1576. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |