ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michael J. Shackcloth
Michael Poullis
Ajaib Soorae
Richard D. Page
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shackcloth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Page, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shackcloth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Page, R. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1052-1056
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: General thoracic

Intrapleural Instillation of Autologous Blood in the Treatment of Prolonged Air Leak After Lobectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Michael J. Shackcloth, FRCSa, Michael Poullis, FRCSa, Mark Jackson, PhDb, Ajaib Soorae, FRCSa, Richard D. Page, FRCSa,*

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom
b Department of Clinical Audit, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Accepted for publication April 4, 2006.

* Address correspondence to Dr Page, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Dr, Liverpool, UK L14 3PE. (Email: richard.page{at}ctc.nhs.uk).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the value of instilling autologous blood into the pleural cavity to seal prolonged air leaks after lobectomy.

METHODS: Of 319 lobectomies performed over an 18-month period, 22 patients (6.9%) experienced prolonged air leak (more than 5 days after surgery). Twenty patients consented to be randomly assigned to one of two treatment pathways. The study group received instillation of 120 mL autologous blood into their apical chest drain on the fifth postoperative day, and again if the air leak persisted on days 7 and 9 respectively. No anticoagulation was used for this blood. The control group continued to be treated by tube thoracostomy alone, but if the air leak was still present on the 10th postoperative day they "crossed over" and underwent intrapleural installation of blood as in the study group.

RESULTS: After instillation of blood, the air leak was sealed by the next day in 58.6% of treatments. The median length of air leak was 5 days in the study group and 11 days in the control group (p < 0.001). Time to chest drain removal (median 6.5 days versus 12 days) and hospital discharge (median 8 days versus 13.5 days) were both significantly (p < 0.001) shorter in the study group.

CONCLUSIONS: This technique is effective in sealing air leaks after lobectomy. It allows earlier chest drain removal and shortens hospital stay.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
A persistent air leak after pulmonary surgery can be a difficult and frustrating problem to treat. It results in longer periods of chest drainage and immobility with an increased risk of complications such as respiratory tract infection, empyema, and deep vein thrombosis [1]. It is the principal reason for a delayed hospital discharge. A number of methods are available to treat air leaks including prolonged tube thoracostomy, chemical pleurodesis, and surgical repair of the leak.

The injection of autologous blood into the pleural space in an attempt to seal prolonged air leaks is a simple, painless, and inexpensive treatment. We have been using it as one of our standard methods of managing this clinical situation for many years. However, there is only limited evidence that the technique is truly beneficial [2]. We set out to undertake a randomized study to determine the value of this technique in treating prolonged air leaks after pulmonary lobectomy.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Approval for the study was obtained from the local Ethics Committee. Patients who had an air leak from their pleural drain after lobectomy for primary lung cancer were identified on the third postoperative day. The trial was discussed with them and they were be given an information sheet. If they agreed to participate in the trial and an air leak was still present on the fifth postoperative day, individual written consent was obtained and patients were randomly assigned using sealed envelopes into two groups, the study group and the control group. The study group received an intrapleural instillation of autologous blood on the fifth postoperative day. If the air leak persisted until day 7, then the intrapleural instillation of blood was repeated, and then again on day 9 if the air leak was still present. Beyond day 9, the patient's treatment was to be individualized as clinically indicated.

In the control group, tube thoracostomy alone was continued until the air leak sealed or until the 10th postoperative day. Because of our belief that intrapleural blood instillation was beneficial, we were keen that patients in the control group were not denied its potential benefits if they still had an air leak at this time. Therefore, those control group patients who still had an air leak on the 10th postoperative day were allowed to cross over and receive intrapleural injection of autologous blood if it was considered to be appropriate. This procedure was to be repeated on the 12th and 14th postoperative days if the air leak was still present.

All other aspects of the patients' management were standardized. Information regarding smoking status, history of background lung disease, and spirometry was collected before surgery in all patients. Nonbuttressed linear staplers were used to divide fissures when incomplete. Neither sealants nor pleural tents were used during surgery. All patients had two pleural drains inserted, one basal and one apical, which were both connected to underwater seals. The basal drain was removed on the day after surgery. The apical drain was removed when there was no air leak. Low-grade suction (minus 5 kPa) was applied selectively to the drainage system if the lung failed to expand to fill the pleural cavity on chest radiography. The latter were arranged on a daily basis. The presence of fever, leucocytosis, pleural effusion, empyema, and drain site infection were noted.

Technique of Intrapleural Instillation of Autologous Blood
Using an aseptic technique, a 3/8-inch connector with a luer-lock side port is inserted between the pleural drain and the tubing leading to the underwater seal. The drain tubing is raised 60 cm above its site of entry into the patient by suspending it from a drip stand. Venous blood, 120 mL, is then taken from the patient using a 19G cannula into two 60-mL Luer-lock syringes and immediately injected through the Luer-lock connector through the drain into the pleural cavity. No anticoagulation for the blood is used (otherwise the blood would not clot within the pleural space), so it has to be injected into the drain within as short a time as possible. Using the Luer-lock system described, this is easy to achieve within a few seconds. Indeed, the principal time when the blood might clot before injection is in withdrawing the blood from the patient, which takes on the order of a minute per 60-mL syringe. The elevated drain tubing prevents the intrapleural blood from escaping from the chest but allows continued drainage of air, and if suction is being applied to the chest drain, this can continue also. The patient remains in bed, moving position every 15 minutes for 2 hours in an attempt to distribute the blood evenly throughout the pleural cavity (left and right decubitus, Trendelburg and Fowler positions for 15 minutes each). The drain tubing support is then removed.

A doctor blinded as to the nature of the patients' treatment assessed for the presence or absence of an air leak and also its magnitude on a daily basis both before and after randomization until the drains were removed. Air leaks were classified as 0 (no air leak) through to 3 (large air leak on gentle respiration) as shown in Table 1. We chose not to measure the size of air leaks directly with flow meters as we have limited experience of their use. However, although flow meters may give a more objective estimate of the size of the air leak, we were more interested in the practical issue of whether there was an air leak present or not and whether our patients still required a drainage tube. Thus, the primary endpoints of the study were time to seal off the air leak, time to drain removal, and time to hospital discharge (all expressed as days with respect to the day of surgery).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Classification of Air Leaks
 
Over a 3-year period, 319 lobectomies were performed. The incidence of prolonged air leak (5 days or more) was 6.9% (22 patients; 95% confidence limits: 4.3% to 10.3%). Twenty patients agreed to be randomly assigned for the purposes of the study. All were former smokers. Both groups were evenly matched for age, sex, background chest disease, spirometry, lobe removed, and median size of air leak (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Patient Characteristics
 
Data Analysis
Although there is only anecdotal evidence of efficacy of blood pleurodesis for postlobectomy air leaks, our previous experience with the technique led us to believe that only a small study was necessary to show a scientific benefit. We thus chose to recruit 20 patients, allowing two groups of 10 for comparison.

The durations of air leak, chest drainage, and hospital stay were expressed as median with interquartile range. The frequency of an effective seal and incidence of complications were expressed as percentages with 95% confidence limits (CL). Differences between groups were explored using a Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and a {chi}2 test for categorical variables. Differences were considered significant if the p value was less than 0.05. All results were analyzed using SAS for Windows Version 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
All 10 patients in the study group received at least one treatment, although 14 treatments in all were necessary (one treatment in 7 patients, two treatments in 2 patients, and three treatments in the remaining patient). In the control group, 8 of the 10 patients still had an air leak by the 10th postoperative day, and therefore crossed over to receive a total of 15 intrapleural blood treatments (one treatment in 3 patients, two treatments in 3 patients, and three treatments in 2 patients). Intrapleural instillation of blood was successful in sealing the air leak by the next day on 17 of the 29 occasions (58.6%; 95% CL: 38.9% to 76.5%) it was used, 9 of 14 occasions in the study group (64.3%; 95% CL: 35.1% to 87.2%), and 8 of 15 (53.3%; 95% CL: 26.5% to 78.7%) in the control group (p = 0.71). The timing of the blood instillations and the size of the air leak in individual patients are summarized in Table 3. The median duration of air leak was 5 days (range, 5 to 7) in the study group and 11 days (range, 10 to 12) in the treatment group (p < 0.001). Times to drain removal (median, 6.5 days [range, 6 to 8] compared with 12 days [range, 11 to 13]), and hospital discharge (median, 8 days [range, 7 to 9] compared with 13.5 days [range, 12 to 14]; p < 0.001) were also significantly shorter in the study group. The median interval from first pleurodesis treatment to effective seal was 1 day (range, 1 to 3) in the study group versus 3 days (range, 1 to 4) in the controls (p = 0.32). These data are summarized in Table 4. All air leaks healed in all the patients without any other maneuvres, and all patients were discharged home having had their drains removed. Heimlich valve drains were not used at any stage.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Individual Patient Outcomes
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Overall Outcomes
 
No patients died in the postoperative period. In 1 patient (10%; 1.8% to 40.4%) in the study group who was treated with two intrapleural instillations of blood on day 5 and day 7, fever and fluid collection on chest radiograph developed. A small pleural drain was reinserted on day 10 and led to drainage of purulent fluid, which grew Staphylococcus aureus on culture. The patient's condition rapidly improved with antibiotics, and the additional chest drain was removed on day 14; he was discharged home the day after. Two patients (20%; 2.5% to 55.6%) in the control group had a fever on the day after instillation of blood, but no organisms were grown, the drain sites remained uninflammed, and the temperature settled without treatment. No other complications occurred.

At a median follow-up of 13 months, no patient had a pneumothorax, empyema, or any other complication that could be attributed to the intrapleural instillation of autologous blood.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Robinson [3] first reported the technique of "blood pleurodesis" in 1987. He described the injection of 50 mL autologous blood into the chest tubes of patients with spontaneous pneumothoraces once the air leak had sealed to prevent recurrence of the pneumothorax. Dumire and colleagaues [4] first described the use of the technique to seal an air leak from the lung in 1992.

The instillation of autologous blood into the pleural cavity to obliterate an air leak is thought to work by two methods: (1) coagulated blood adheres to the lung as a patch and seals the air leak directly; and (2) blood causes inflammation and subsequent adhesions between the lung and pleura, and the adhesions are responsible for sealing the air leak. The latter of these methods has proved to be incorrect in an animal model [5]. We therefore suggest the term "blood pleurodesis" should not be used to describe this technique, as it does not work by causing a pleural symphysis.

After lobectomy, most small air leaks are from the raw surface of pulmonary parenchyma at the site of dissection of the fissure and are therefore amenable to treatment by a substance applied to the outer surface of the lung perioperatively. Macchiarini and coworkers [6] describe the ideal sealant as one that is not immunogenic, allows for expansion, is adherent to the lung tissue, and should be strong enough to remain sealed. We would contend that autologous blood may well fulfil these criteria.

Nevertheless, for postoperative air leaks, there can be little control of where autologous blood injected into a chest drain is distributed within the chest. In an attempt to increase the chances of the damaged part of the lung becoming covered with blood, we use 120 mL blood compared with the 50 mL described by Dumire and coworkers [4] and Cagirici and associates [7]. To aid in the distribution of blood throughout the pleural cavity, Cagirici describes the positioning of the patient in the left decubitus, right decubitus, Trendelburg, and Fowler positions for 30 minutes each. We adopted a similar protocol for our study. However, we are unsure of the necessity of this, as it has been shown with radiolabelled tetracycline that distribution of this substance is uniform within seconds of instillation within the pleural cavity [8]. Also given that the clotting time of blood is 3 to 8 minutes, any further distribution is unlikely to occur after this time.

Our incidence of prolonged air leaks is similar to that described by others [1, 2], although in the present study a prolonged air leak was defined as an air leak that persists up to the fifth postoperative day. Other authors have defined an air leak as one that is present 7 days after the initial operation. We chose to use 5 days as our definition as it is our routine to discharge our patients home approximately 7 days after their surgery and we believed that an air leak present on the fifth postoperative day would be likely to delay discharge.

The timing of the instillation of blood is controversial. Although Riva de Andres and colleagues [2] suggest leaving it to the ninth postoperative day, we prefer to carry it out on the fifth postoperative day to minimize hospital stay. Also, it is intuitive that the longer the chest drain has been in-situ, the greater the likelihood of colonization of the chest tube with bacteria and hence the exacerbation of infection in the pleural space when performing the instillation of autologous blood.

We found that the instillation of blood was successful in sealing the air leak by the next day in 17 of the 29 occasions it was used. There was a trend toward greater immediate success in the study group in which the blood instillation was performed earlier; 64.3% air leaks sealed by the next day in the study group compared with 53.3% in the control group, in which the instillation of blood was not performed until the 10th postoperative day. Our success rate is lower than the 78% described by Cagarici and associates [7], although their analysis of success was at 48 hours after blood instillation and a different patient population was studied. Cagarici and associates described the technique in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, whereas all our patients had a lobectomy, and they made no comment on the timing of intervention. It may well be that blood instillation earlier after the initial injury to the lung is more successful in sealing the leak, as the blood may be more likely to adhere to the damaged lung and form a clot at this time.

The intrapleural instillation of autologous blood was well tolerated by all patients although the technique has been linked with fever, pleural effusion, empyema, and tension pneumothorax. These problems can occur in any patient after lobectomy, and the incidence of all complications increases if a prolonged air leak is present [1]. Apart from the single patient who developed a minor empyema, there were no complications that could be attributed to the intrapleural instillation of autologous blood. No patients had a tension pneumothorax after the procedure.

Nevertheless, the possibility of exacerbating any intrapleural infection by the instillation of autologous blood into the pleural cavity needs to be borne in mind. The procedure should be carried out under strict asepsis technique. We would not perform the procedure if the patient had any evidence of wound or chest infection. A large series of patients would be needed to assess whether empyema is in fact a complication of the procedure or a complication of the original operation.

Although we believe we have demonstrated beyond doubt that the intrapleural instillation of autologous blood is successful in the treatment of a prolonged air leak after lobectomy, our small study was not powered to determine the optimum timing and volume of blood used in the procedure.

In conclusion, intrapleural instillation of autologous blood is effective in sealing a prolonged air leak after lobectomy, and leads to a shorter duration of chest drainage and a shorter hospital stay. The procedure is safe and well tolerated.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Keagy BA, Lores ME, Starek PJ, Murray GF, Lucas CL, Wilcox BR. Elective pulmonary lobectomyfactors associated with morbidity and operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;40:349-352.[Abstract]
  2. Rivas de Andres JJ, Blanco S, de la Torre M. Postsurgical pleurodesis with autologous blood in patients with persistent air leak Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:270-272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Robinson CL. Autologous blood for pleurodesis in recurrent and chronic spontaneous pneumothorax Can J Surg 1987;30:428-429.[Medline]
  4. Dumire R, Crabbe MM, Mappin FG, Fontenelle LJ. Autologous "blood patch" pleurodesis for persistent pulmonary air leak Chest 1992;101:64-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mitchem RE, Herndon BL, Fiorella RM, Molteni A, Battie CN, Reisz GR. Pleurodesis by autologous blood, doxycycline, and talc in a rabbit model Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:917-921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Macchiarini P, Wain J, Almy S, Dartevelle P. Experimental and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic, absorbable sealant to reduce air leaks in thoracic operations J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:751-758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cagirici U, Sahin B, Cakan A, Kayabas H, Buduneli T. Autologous blood patch pleurodesis in spontaneous pneumothorax with persistent air leak Scand Cardiovasc J 1998;32:75-78.[Medline]
  8. Lorch DG, Gordon L, Wooten S, Cooper JF, Strange C, Sahn SA. Effect of patient positioning on distribution of tetracycline in the pleural space during pleurodesis Chest 1988;93:527-529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Invited commentary
Jemi Olak
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2006 82: 1056. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S Rinaldi, T Felton, and A Bentley
Blood pleurodesis for the medical management of pneumothorax
Thorax, March 1, 2009; 64(3): 258 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. Rathinam and R. S. Steyn
Management of complicated postoperative air-leak a new indication for the Asherman chest seal
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2007; 6(6): 691 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Olak
Invited commentary.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 1056 - 1056.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michael J. Shackcloth
Michael Poullis
Ajaib Soorae
Richard D. Page
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shackcloth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Page, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shackcloth, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Page, R. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS