|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:620-623
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
mec, MD, PhD
imek, MDDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
Accepted for publication December 20, 2005.
* Address correspondence to Dr Gwozdziewicz, University Hospital Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 6, Olomouc 775 15, Czech Republic (Email: gwozdziewicz{at}email.cz).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Between January 2003 and February 2004, a consecutive series of 50 patients underwent off-pump coronary bypass surgery with at least one venous sequential coronary graft. During the procedure, flow values and pulsatility indexes were measured in both segments of the sequential graft using a CardioMed transit time flow meter (CM 4008; Medi-Stim, Oslo, Norway). The flow values were simultaneously compared with those of individual venous grafts sutured to the same coronary arteries.
RESULTS: The mean flow through the distal anastomosis (individual bypass; D1) was 37.4 mL/min, and this was not significantly influenced by the creation of a proximal sequential anastomosis (D2, 39.0 mL/min). In 32% of the patients, the sequential bypass was unwittingly connected proximally to a larger coronary bed; despite this, the flow in its distal segment was not less than that in the individual bypass.
CONCLUSIONS: The blood flow through an individual bypass is comparable with that through the distal segment (end-to-side anastomosis) of a sequential bypass. The grafting of a sequential bypass proximally to the larger artery (coronary bed) in sequence does not appear to have a significant effect on the blood flow in the distal segment of a sequential bypass.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While arterial revascularization is becoming more popular in coronary surgery [6, 7], the application of the sequential technique, which is often obligatory in complete arterial revascularization, should be considered safe.
In most of the studies comparing sequential to individual grafts, the major limiting factor was that grafts were sutured to two different coronary territories [2]. This study was designed to compareusing intraoperative measurement of blood flow and pulsatility index (PI)blood flow through an individual venous bypass with that in a distal segment of the sequential venous bypass performed on the beating heart. The operative protocol allowing for transformation of an individual graft to a sequential one enabled us to quantitatively compare these two types of bypass.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To create an individual venous aortocoronary bypass, a distal (end-to-side) coronary anastomosis was performed, followed by a proximal vein-to-ascending aorta anastomosis. At the same time, the first measurement (D1) of coronary flow through the distal anastomosis (individual bypass) was made using the CardioMed transit time flow meter (CM 4008; Medi-Stim, Oslo, Norway [Fig 1]).
|
For each recording, attempts were made to maintain the mean arterial pressure at 70 mm Hg.
The recorded data were statistically analyzed using Statistica 6.0 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma). The recorded variables were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for dependent measurements, and pairs of flow values and PIs were subsequently tested using Scheffe's test. Differences among the pairs were assessed by the Sign test. Correlations between variables were evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each patient received an individual mammary artery-to-LAD bypass as one of the grafts. Table 2 lists the types of sequential bypass used. None of the sequential grafts required revision owing to technical errors.
|
|
All PI values remained within the normal range, thus confirming the good patency of the sutured anastomoses.
No deaths occurred in our cohort. One patient had to be converted to the on-pump procedure owing to perforation of the right ventricle during the intramyocardial preparation of the LAD. One patient required repeat surgery owing to bleeding. There were five wound complications, two with complete sternum dehiscence. One patient suffered a mild pulmonary embolism. The postoperative course in the remaining 45 patients was uneventful.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To assess the quality of sequential bypasses performed on the beating heart, and to determine whether a construction of a proximal side-to-side anastomosis alters flow across the distal end-to-side anastomosis, we measured the blood flow and PI in an individual bypass, and then in both segments of a sequential graft. An individual bypass was first constructed using the off-pump technique, which was subsequently transformed into a sequential type by creating side-to-side anastomosis. That allowed us to maintain the same pathophysiologic conditions in relation to vascular resistance, which was crucial for measuring the blood flow.
Our main goal in coronary surgery is to provide a long-lasting reconstruction of the coronary artery system with good graft patency. One of the recommended principles that should guarantee good patency of sequential grafts is suturing the last anastomosis in the sequence onto the largest vessel (coronary bed). That was not the case in 32% of our patients. The flow capacity of a coronary bed observed during papaverine-induced flow measurement was not consistent with prior angiographic estimation in these patients. Despite this, the blood flow in the distal segment of the sequential bypass was not less than that in the individual bypass.
In our 50 consecutive patients, we have proved that the flow through an individual bypass was comparable with that through the distal segment (end-to-side anastomosis) of a sequential bypass (p > 0.9), and this remained unchanged after papaverine administration. The experimental studies of Rittgers and coworkers [11] and Meyerson and colleagues [12] have shown that it is bypass flow (namely, the wall shear stress) that determines the degree of intimal proliferation, which may lead to bypass closure. Comparable blood flows through an individual bypass with those across end-to-side anastomosis of the sequential graft performed on a beating heart might predict similar patency of both types of bypass.
The long-term patency of sequential off-pump bypasses has not been reported yet. A meticulous operative technique and intraoperative blood flow measurement in sutured grafts may disclose the presence of insufficient flow due to technical errors, and prevent early bypass closure. The grafting of a sequential bypass proximally to the larger artery in sequence does not appear to have a significant effect on the blood flow in the distal segment of a sequential bypass.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ka Michaliková, who prepared the diagrams for this article. | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. Schwann, A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Sequential radial artery grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 10-year survival and angiography results. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nordgaard, N. Vitale, and R. Haaverstad Transit-time blood flow measurements in sequential saphenous coronary artery bypass grafts. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1409 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Becit, B. Erkut, M. Ceviz, Y. Unlu, A. Colak, and H. Kocak The impact of intraoperative transit time flow measurement on the results of on-pump coronary surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 313 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |