ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malhotra, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakra, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malhotra, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakra, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - other

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:298-302
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original article: General thoracic

Incidence and Types of Arrhythmias After Mediastinal Manipulation During Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Surender K. Malhotra, MD a , * , Rupinder P. Kaur, MD a , Narinder M. Gupta, MS b , Anil Grover, DM c , Krishnan Ramprabu, MD a , Dhiraj Nakra, MD a

a Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
b Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
c Department of Cardiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Accepted for publication February 22, 2006.

* Address correspondence to Dr Malhotra, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India 160012 (Email: drskmalhotra{at}yahoo.com).


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is a common operative procedure for carcinoma esophagus. Complications of this procedure include arrhythmias and hypotension during blunt dissection of the esophagus from posterior mediastinum. In the literature, exact incidence and type of arrhythmias have not been reported. We employed Holter monitoring during mediastinal manipulation in patients undergoing THE, for this purpose.

METHODS: This prospective study was carried out in 20 consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-II patients undergoing THE. Anesthetic technique included induction with thiopentone and maintenance with morphine, vecuronium, and isoflurane. In addition to routine parameters, Holter monitoring was undertaken to record the exact incidence and types of arrhythmias. "Premanipulation" or control period included duration of 30 minutes preceding mediastinal manipulation, while "during manipulation" or study period included the duration of mediastinal manipulation. The incidence of arrhythmias was studied for 48 hours in the postoperative period. The Fisher exact test was applied to analyze incidence of arrhythmias and hypotension.

RESULTS: Out of 20 patients, only 2 had arrhythmias in the premanipulation period, while 13 had arrhythmias during the manipulation period (p < 0.01). During the manipulation period, arrhythmias included supraventricular ectopics and ventricular ectopics in 2 patients each and a combination of both in 9 patients. Arrhythmias were transient and had no correlation with either duration or degree of hypotension in all the patients. However, there was a linear relationship between hypotension and duration of mediastinal manipulation. Two patients (10%) had atrial arrhythmias in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS: In transhiatal esophagectomy, there is a significant incidence of both arrhythmias and hypotension during mediastinal manipulation. The incidence of arrhythmias can be minimized by limiting the duration of the manipulation. The incidence of postoperative arrhythmias was not significant.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Various operative procedures for carcinoma esophagus include transthoracic approach, transhiatal approach, or thoracoscopic dissection of the esophagus combined with abdominal mobilization of the stomach [1]. The last two approaches involve a cervical anastomosis, but are considerably less traumatic than the transthoracic approach [2–4].

Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is a widely used technique for carcinoma of the esophagus and other conditions, such as benign strictures and motility disorders [5–8]. However, the transhiatal approach may present a few potential problems for the anesthesiologist. Dissection of the esophagus from the posterior mediastinum can be hemodynamically challenging. Intraoperative hemodynamic disturbances like hypotension and arrhythmias may be significant and may result from compression and anterior displacement of the heart during blunt finger dissection of the esophagus from the posterior mediastinum, which interferes with cardiac filling and output [9, 10]. The severity of hemodynamic disturbances is proportionate to the duration of mediastinal manipulation that varies between 5 to 15 minutes [11]. It requires close cooperation and coordination between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist to minimize the severity of these disturbances [12]. Although hypotension and arrhythmias occurring during mediastinal manipulation are routinely observed, as well as reported [13, 14], there is a paucity of available literature highlighting the exact incidence and types of arrhythmias. Moreover, the main thrust of previous studies has been on postoperative cardiac functions after THE [11, 15–19]. Adverse outcome in patients undergoing THE depends upon the duration and severity of hypotension and arrhythmias and could be detrimental to the patients with coexisting cardiac disease.

Although the occurrence of arrhythmias and hypotension has been duly observed, the aim of our study was to quantify the incidence, as well as types of arrhythmias. This was achieved in our study employing Holter monitoring in premanipulation and during manipulation periods.


   Material and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Patient Population
This prospective study was carried out in 20 consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients, aged 40 to 60 years, of both sexes undergoing THE for carcinoma esophagus for midesophageal tumors. Institutional Review Board approved the study dated June 18, 2001 and individual informed consent from all the patients was duly obtained.

Patients excluded from the study were those with any cardiac dysfunctions, severe pulmonary obstruction or restriction, and patients with electrolyte imbalance or on drugs such as steroids, ß-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and digitalis.

Nine patients were smokers but without any evidence of pulmonary dysfunction. There was a history of receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy in 2 patients each and a combination of both in 7 patients. All the patients were premedicated with oral diazepam 0.2 mg/kg to a maximum of 10 mg on the night before, and on the morning of surgery.

After securing peripheral and right-sided central venous access, the right radial artery was cannulated to spare the left side for the surgeon's convenience to perform the cervical anastomosis. Monitoring included electrocardiogram (ECG), oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO 2), temperature, urine output, central venous pressure (CVP), and direct arterial blood pressure. Warming blankets were employed to prevent hypothermia.

For a constant recording of incidence and types of arrhythmias, intraoperative Holter monitoring was instituted after induction of anesthesia. All patients received morphine (0.1 mg/kg) and thiopentone followed by succinylcholine to facilitate rapid-sequence tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and N2O/O2 (60:40) and ventilation controlled with vecuronium keeping end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2) within normal limits. Central venous pressure was kept at a normal level by appropriate administration of fluids before starting mediastinal manipulation. Inspired oxygen concentration was increased up to 50% to avoid the chances of transient hypoxia during mediastinal manipulation. At the end of the procedure neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. The same surgeon performed the mediastinal manipulation in all the patients to ensure the uniformity of the surgical technique.

Intraoperative heart rate was recorded every minute during mediastinal manipulation and every 10 minutes before and after that, while ECG, SpO 2, direct arterial pressure, and ETCO 2 were monitored continuously. The 30-minute period preceding mediastinal manipulation was taken as the "premanipulation" or control period, while that during mediastinal manipulation was taken as the "during manipulation" or study period. All the patients in this study acted as their own control.

Continuous monitoring of ETCO 2 and arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis prior to induction, and before and after mediastinal manipulation, was undertaken to exclude hypercarbia or hypoxia as the contributing factor to rhythm disturbances. Potassium levels were monitored along with ABG analysis to rule out hyperkalemia-hypokalemia as the causative factor for arrhythmias. The incidence of arrhythmias was studied for 48 hours in the postoperative period.

Statistical Analysis
Hemodynamic data during mediastinal manipulation were analyzed using the paired t test. Correlation of variables with duration of hypotension were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient of correlation. Hypotension and incidence of arrhythmias between the premanipulation and during manipulation groups were compared using the Fisher exact test.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Patient Characteristics
The demographic data and various hemodynamic and electrolyte variables are given in Table 1. Total duration of the surgery ranged from 3 to 5 hours. The mean duration of mediastinal manipulation was 7.90 ± 3.49 minutes (range, 4 to 15 minutes).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Demographic Data and Baseline Hemodynamic and Electrolyte Variables
 
Arrhythmias
In the premanipulation period, only 2 (10%) patients had arrhythmias while 13 (65%) had arrhythmias during the manipulation period (p < 0.01) as shown in Table 2. In almost all the patients, the arrhythmias were transient and occurred as singlet or couplets. In only two patients did supraventricular ectopics occur in runs (Table 3). In both the patients, reversion to sinus rhythm occurred after stoppage of mediastinal manipulation. The arrhythmias had no correlation with duration of hypotension (p > 0.05). The serum electrolytes and arterial blood gas values remained within normal limits in all the patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Incidence and Types of Arrhythmias
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Number and Types of Arrhythmias During the Manipulation Period
 
In the postoperative period, two patients (10%) had supraventricular arrhythmias in the form of atrial fibrillation that was managed with digoxin and verapamil. However, the incidence of arrhythmias was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) and was not associated with longer hospital stay and 30-day morbidity or mortality.

Hemodynamics
Hypotension, defined as a 20% decrease in systolic blood pressure from the baseline, taken just before the start of mediastinal manipulation, occurred in 75% (ie, 15 out of 20 patients) (p < 0.01). The mean duration of hypotension was 3.05 minutes (range, 0 to 13 minutes).

The mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 125.65 mm Hg at 0 minutes to 86 mm Hg at 15 minutes. Systolic blood pressure at 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12 minutes was significantly less than at baseline. A similar trend was seen with diastolic and mean blood pressures. There was a linear relationship of duration of mediastinal manipulation with duration and degree of hypotension (p < 0.05) as shown in Fig 1. Blood pressures returned to normal values in all patients immediately after stoppage of mediastinal manipulation.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 1. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) changes during the manipulation period. (• = systolic BP; {blacksquare} = diastolic BP; {blacktriangleup} = mean BP; {circ} = mean HR.)

 
There was no correlation between duration of hypotension and preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or with the factor of smoking. We did not experience blood loss as a cause of hypotension and none of our patients required thoracotomy to control hemorrhage.


   Comment
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
Acknowledgments
 References
 
The transhiatal esophagectomy is based on an upper abdominal approach through a midline supraumbilical incision with blind manual manipulation of the esophagus in the mediastinum. During the manipulation, the surgeon's hand, dissecting bluntly around the esophagus inevitably compresses the atria and distorts the heart, causing profound arterial hypotension and arrhythmias [2]. Also, the dissection can induce marked vagal stimulation resulting in bradyarrhythmia, ventricular escape beats and, rarely, even cardiac arrest [17]. Manual contact with the pericardium may also contribute to arrhythmias [11]. Only by the careful monitoring of arterial blood pressure (the capnometer trace and the pulse oximeter), can the anesthesiologist judge the acceptable duration of such an insult and advise the surgeon to stop. Restoration of cardiac filling is usually rapid, leading to quick restoration of the arterial pressure, but prolonged and excessive hypotension can often lead to severe impairment of cardiac functions, as coronary blood flow is impaired. The inspired oxygen concentration was increased to 50% during actual mediastinal manipulation to minimize the adverse effects of arrhythmias and potential hypotension. Once the dissection is completed and the diseased esophagus resected, anastomosis of the stomach to the upper esophagus causes little further problem [2]. Although hypotension and arrhythmias occurring during mediastinal manipulation of THE are routinely observed, there is a scarcity of available literature highlighting the exact incidence and types of arrhythmias as well as hypotension.

The unique aspect of this study was the use of Holter monitoring to observe the exact incidence and type of arrhythmias. Mediastinal manipulation was performed by the same surgeon in all patients in our study to exclude surgeons' variability as the contributing factor for the duration and skill of manipulation.

Arrhythmias
In our study, out of 20 patients only 2 (10%) had arrhythmias in the premanipulation period, while 13 (65%) had arrhythmias during the manipulation period (p < 0.01). In the premanipulation period, 2 patients had supraventricular ectopics that occurred as singlets. During manipulation, singlets occurred in 13 patients; supraventricular and ventricular ectopics in 2 patients each and a combination of both in 9 patients (Table 3). Couplets occurred in 8 patients; supraventricular in 2 patients, ventricular in 1, and a combination of both in 5 patients. Supraventricular ectopics in runs occurred in 2 patients. None of the patients had ventricular ectopics in runs. These episodes were transient and almost resolved promptly reverting to sinus rhythm when the surgeon's hand was removed from the posterior mediastinum. Arrhythmias did not correlate with hypotension. In our study, incidence of hypotension and arrhythmias was 75% and 65%, respectively, and that reverted to normal after stoppage of manipulation.

Hypoxia, hypercarbia, and electrolyte disturbances as the cause of arrhythmia were ruled out because they did not occur in any of the patients. Moreover, the patients with any coexisting cardiopulmonary disease were excluded from our study. Therefore, the arrhythmias and hypotension were exclusively due to mediastinal manipulation.

There have been some significant reports describing arrhythmias in the postoperative period. Ritchie and colleagues [16] noted up to 60% of patients developing cardiac dysrhythmias after esophagectomy that were not prevented by prophylactic digitalization. Amar and colleagues [17] reported that 13% of patients developed supraventricular tachycardia that was associated with higher intensive therapy unit admission rate and a longer hospital stay. Patti and colleagues [11] reported atrial arrhythmias, which occurred in 14 patients (32%) that were treated with digoxin and (or) verapamil. However, in our study the dysrhythmias occurred in the form of atrial fibrillation only in 2 patients (10%) that was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Also, it was not associated with higher intensive care unit admission rate, longer hospital stay, and a 30-day morbidity or mortality. The better outcome in the postoperative period was most likely owing to the exclusion, in our study, of patients with cardiac dysfunctions.

Hypotension
Hypotension was defined as a decrease of systolic blood pressure by 20% from the baseline. It occurred in none of the patients in the premanipulation group, in comparison with 15 out of 20 patients during manipulation (p < 0.01). The average duration of hypotension was 3.05 minutes (range, 0 to 13 minutes). The magnitude of decrease in blood pressure during mediastinal manipulation varied from 0% to 65.71%. In 4 patients, there was no decrease in blood pressure. In all the patients, blood pressure reverted to normal after removal of the surgeon's hand from the mediastinum.

Mediastinal Manipulation
The duration of mediastinal manipulation was 7.90 ± 3.49 minutes (range, 4 to 15 minutes). There was a linear relationship between duration of mediastinal manipulation and degree of hypotension (p < 0.05) as shown in Figure 1. In the study by Patti and colleagues [11], hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg that occurred in all the patients with duration of hypotension varying from 4 to 60 minutes (mean, 8 minutes). Hypotension of greater than 15 minutes occurred in 32% of their patients. The risk factors for prolonged hypotension in their study were patients with cardiac disease, preoperative radiotherapy, and midesophageal tumors [11]. In these patients, there was a more gradual reverting back of blood pressure after stoppage of mediastinal manipulation. Greater duration of hypotension was associated with increased perioperative mortality. In our study, the duration of mediastinal manipulation correlated with duration of hypotension. Although 9 out of 20 patients in our study received radiotherapy preoperatively, it did not prove to be a risk factor for prolonged hypotension.

Blood Loss
The average blood loss in our study was 620 mL; that is less than that reported after transthoracic operation (1,000 mL). The amount of blood transfused varied from 0 to 2 units. In a study by Orringer and colleagues [20] average blood loss after THE was 689 mL. We did not observe the blood loss as the cause of hypotension in any of the patients.

Fluids
There may be significant third space losses during THE, thus adequate replacement of fluids and close monitoring of blood pressure and urine output are mandatory to avoid hypovolemia [5]. The average amount of crystalloids used in our study was 16.53 mL · kg–1 · hour–1 (9.26 to 23.81 mL/kg–1/hour–1). In the study by Patti and colleagues [11] mean intraoperative fluids given were 19 mL · kg–1 · hour–1 (range, 5.5 to 36.5 mL/kg–1/hour–1). In their study, susceptibility of the patients to arrhythmias was increased by fluid overload and the author suggested limited intravenous fluid administration as a way of preventing the arrhythmias, though no explanation was put forward. However, we kept the central venous pressure within normal limits as these patients may be hypovolemic because of low intake of fluids. Hypotensive episodes may be more pronounced when intravascular volume is low before starting mediastinal manipulation.

Study Limitations
The patients with underlying cardiac dysfunctions were excluded from our study because we planned to observe the effects of mediastinal manipulation exclusively. As the hypotension and arrhythmias may be detrimental in cardiac patients, future studies should include such patients. Furthermore, large-scale studies documenting the effects of hemodynamic disturbances occurring during mediastinal manipulation on long-term patient outcome are recommended.

Conclusions
We therefore conclude that during transhiatal esophagectomy the severity of incidence of arrhythmias and hypotension is significant during mediastinal manipulation. Incidence of arrhythmias can be minimized by constant monitoring of vitals, as well as limiting the duration of mediastinal manipulation. However, the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias was insignificant.


   Acknowledgments
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
References
 
This study was conducted with institutional funding.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Pompili MF, Mark JB. The history of surgery for carcinoma of the esophagus Chest Surg Clin N Am 2000;10:145-151.[Medline]
  2. Black AMS, Prys-Roberts C. Anaesthesia for gastrointestinal surgeryIn: Prys-Roberts C, Brown Jr BR, editors. Oxford International practice of anaesthesia. 1st ed.. Oxford, UK: ButterWorth-Heinemann; 1996. pp. 1-15.
  3. Law SY, Fok M, Wei WI, et al. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:418-422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sia AT. A preliminary report on anaesthesia for thoracoscopic oesophagectomy Med J Malaysia 1997;52:433-437.[Medline]
  5. Whyte RI, Chow JL. Esophageal surgeryIn: Jaffe RA, Samuels SI, editors. Anesthesiologist's manual of surgical procedures. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. pp. 377-390.
  6. Gupta NM, Goenka MK, Behera A, Bhasin DK. Transhiatal oesphagectomy for benign obstructive conditions of the esophagus Br J Surg 1997;84:262-264.[Medline]
  7. Orringer MB. Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign disease J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:649-655.[Abstract]
  8. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease World J Surg 2001;25:196-203.[Medline]
  9. Gandhi SK, Naunhim KS. Complications of transhiatal esophagectomy Chest Surg Clin N Am 1997;7:601-610.[Medline]
  10. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Anesthesia for thoracic surgeryIn: Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, editors. Clinical anesthesiology. 3rd ed.. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2002. pp. 525-551.
  11. Patti MG, Wiener-Kronish JP, Way LW, Pellegrini CA. Impact of transhiatal esophagectomy on cardiac and respiratory function Am J Surg 1991;162:563-567.[Medline]
  12. Orringer MB. Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomyIn: Zuidema GD, Yes CJ, editors. Surgery of the alimentary tract. 5th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2002. pp. 407-442.
  13. Yakoubian K, Bougeois B, Marty J, Marmuse JP, Desmonts JM. Cardiovascular responses to manual dissection associated with transhiatal esophageal resection J Cardiothorac Anesth 1990;4:458-461.[Medline]
  14. Katariya K, Harvey JC, Pina E, Beattie EJ. Complications of transhiatal esophagectomy J Surg Oncol 1994;57:157-163.[Medline]
  15. Murthy SC, Law S, Whooley BP, Alexandrou A, Chu KM, Wong J. Atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy is a marker for postoperative morbidity and mortality J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1162-1167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ritchie AJ, Whiteside M, Tolan M, McGuigan JA. Cardiac dysrhythmia in total thoracic oesophagectomya prospective study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993;7:420-422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Amar D, Burt ME, Bains MS, Leung DH. Symptomatic tachydysrhythmias after esophagectomyincidence and outcome measures. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1506-1509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Reed CE. Surgical management of esophageal carcinoma Oncologist 1999;4:95-105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Akiyama H. Master of surgery. 3rd ed.. Boston, MA: Little-Brown; 1997. pp. 784-792.
  20. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Lannetoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomyClinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392-403.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. N. Scipione, A. C. Chang, A. Pickens, C. L. Lau, and M. B. Orringer
Transhiatal Esophagectomy in the Profoundly Obese: Implications and Experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 84(2): 376 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malhotra, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakra, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malhotra, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakra, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - other

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS