ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mark Bonnell
Charles T. Klodell
Daniel G. Knauf
Thomas M. Beaver
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beaver, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beaver, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - transplantation

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1844-1850
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: General thoracic

Cytokine Profile After Lung Transplantation: Correlation With Allograft Injury

Amit Mathur, MD a , Maher Baz, MD b , E. Denmark Staples, MD a , Mark Bonnell, MD a , Jerry M. Speckman, MD c , Phillip J. Hess, Jr, MD a , Charles T. Klodell, MD a , Daniel G. Knauf, MD a , Lyle L. Moldawer, PhD d , Thomas M. Beaver, MD a , *

a Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
b Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
c Department of Radiology, Division of Thoracic Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
d Department of Surgery, Laboratory of Inflammation Biology and Surgical Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Accepted for publication November 28, 2005.

* Address correspondence to Dr Beaver, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, PO Box 100286, Gainesville, FL 32610-0286 (Email: beavetm{at}surgery.ufl.edu).

Presented at the Forty-first Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Tampa, FL, Jan 24–26, 2005.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Post–lung transplant reperfusion edema (PLTRE) and its more severe form, primary graft failure (PGF), occur in 10% to 60% of lung transplant recipients. We hypothesized that PLTRE and PGF would be associated with an elevated proinflammatory cascade and that the allograft would be the source of cytokine appearance in the circulation.

METHODS: Pulmonary arterial and systemic arterial samples were obtained at baseline and at 4, 8, and 24 hours after reperfusion. Post–lung transplant reperfusion-edema and PGF were defined as PaO2/FiO2 less than 300 with a mild or moderate infiltrate, or less than 200 with a severe infiltrate and ventilator dependence after 72 hours, respectively. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF{alpha}), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-10 concentrations were determined by immunoassay.

RESULTS: Fifteen single and 6 bilateral lung recipients were studied. Six (29%) had PLTRE and 4 (19%) had PGF; these patients had an overall elevation in plasma IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 concentrations (all p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly greater elevation in IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 levels in PGF patients (all p < 0.01) versus PLTRE. In the PGF group, TNF{alpha} and IL-10 concentrations were significantly greater in the systemic versus the pulmonary arterial samples (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PLTRE and PGF exhibited graded increases in IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 concentrations. The PGF patients had higher TNF{alpha} and IL-10 systemic arterial concentrations overall, consistent with the allograft being a source of this cytokine production.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Lung transplantation has become a viable treatment option for advanced pulmonary disease [1]. Post–lung transplantation reperfusion edema (PLTRE) occurs in 10% to 60% of recipients and consists of impaired gas exchange, decreased compliance, and patchy radiographic infiltrates [2, 3]. The most severe form of PLTRE, primary graft failure (PGF), requires prolonged mechanical ventilatory support and can result in hemodynamic failure [4]. Importantly, PLTRE and PGF have now been associated with the greatest source of long-term mortality in lung transplant recipients: bronchiolitis obliterans [5].

Our institution has previously identified associations between the appearance of proinflammatory cytokines in the systemic circulation after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair and the development of multiple organ failure [6]. In the setting of lung transplantation, Mal and colleagues [7] have examined plasma cytokine concentrations on postoperative days 1 to 7; however, because PLTRE develops soon after reperfusion, the measurements in this study were not reflective of the early cytokine response. For example, interleukin (IL)-8 elevations in lung allograft biopsies at 2 hours have been shown to correlate with later pulmonary dysfunction [8]. And Pham and associates [9] found elevations of IL-6 at 4 hours correlated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, more severe alveolar damage, and poorer 1-month graft survival. The complete nature of the proinflammatory cytokine cascade that evolves after lung transplantation has yet to be elucidated.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the cytokine response and the development of PLTRE and PGF. We hypothesized that elevations in the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF{alpha}), IL-6, and IL-8 would be associated with allograft injury as defined by PLTRE and PGF. We further hypothesized that the allograft would be the primary source of these cytokines in the plasma.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, patients undergoing single or bilateral lung transplantation between March 2002 and June 2003 at our institution were invited to enroll in this prospective study (Fig 1). With the exception of serial blood sampling to measure the cytokine response, there was no deviation from our standard management of lung transplant recipients [10].


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Experimental design. (ELISA = enzyme-linked immunoassay; h = hour; IL = interleukin; PA = pulmonary arterial; PGF = primary graft failure; PLTRE = post–lung transplant reperfusion edema; SA = systemic arterial; TNF-{alpha} = tumor necrosis factor alpha.)

 
Definitions of PLTRE and PGF
Allograft reperfusion injury was defined according to the literature using clinical indices of oxygenation status and radiographic appearance of lung fields [2, 4, 7, 8, 11–14]. Patients with lung injury divided into moderate (PLTRE) and severe (PGF) injury classes. Moderate injury, or PLTRE, was defined as (1) PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than 300 within 72 hours after reperfusion (PaO2 determined from systemic arterial blood gas measurements); (2) mild or moderate infiltrates on chest radiographs; with (3) no evidence of atelectasis, rejection, or viral, bacterial, or fungal pneumonia. Severe PLTRE, or PGF, was defined as (1) PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than 200 within 72 hours after reperfusion; (2) severe infiltrates on chest radiograph without evidence of atelectasis, rejection, or pneumonia; and (3) ventilator dependence beyond 72 hours after reperfusion. Chest radiographs from postoperative days 1 to 3 were reviewed by a masked radiologist (J.S.) and graded using a devised scoring system (Table 1). For the purposes of this study, patients not meeting the definitions of PLTRE and PGF were termed "not injured."


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Chest Radiograph Infiltrate Grading System Used in Assessing Reperfusion-Mediated Lung Injury After Transplantation
 
Cytokines
Blood samples were obtained from a pulmonary arterial line and a systemic arterial line to determine the difference in cytokine concentrations before and after perfusing the allograft. Samples were drawn baseline upon arrival in the operating room 5 minutes after cross-clamp release or separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (reperfusion) and at 4, 8, and 24 hours after reperfusion. In the case of bilateral sequential lung transplantation, ischemia times were determined and samples obtained after the second lung was reperfused.

The cytokines examined included TNF{alpha}, a proximal mediator in the cytokine cascade; IL-6, a generalized marker of inflammation; IL-8, a chemokine responsible for neutrophil recruitment and activation; and IL-10, a counterregulatory cytokine involved in suppression of the proinflammatory response. Samples were collected in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), placed immediately on ice, and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm (4°C) for 10 minutes. Supernatant was withdrawn and frozen at –70°C until samples were analyzed for cytokine concentrations using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R & D systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota).

Data Analysis
Clinical variables were recorded using a Microsoft Excel database (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington) and included allograft ischemia times, cardiopulmonary bypass, ratios of arterial oxygen pressure tension (PaO2) levels and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2); pulmonary artery and systemic hemodynamics; radiographic findings of reperfusion injury; and the number of hours of required mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation.

Analyses of cytokine levels at each time point and for each clinical injury group were conducted using nonparametric two-way analysis of variance. Post-hoc comparisons were performed using Dunn's test. Pulmonary arterial and systemic arterial samples were compared in a paired fashion using Wilcoxon signed rank analysis, in order to compare overall differences in cytokine levels before and after reperfusion of the allograft. All statistical analyses were conducted with SigmaStat, version 3.1 software package (Systat, Richmond, California).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Clinical Results
During the 15-month period of the study, 22 of 43 patients consented to participate. Sixteen patients underwent single lung orthotopic lung transplantation, and 6 underwent bilateral sequential lung transplantation (Table 2). There were 13 male and 9 female patients. One male patient who underwent right single lung transplantation was excluded from the analysis after pneumonia developed in the first 72 hours after surgery. There was 1 death from an embolic stroke in a patient who did not develop PLTRE.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Demographic Variables of Patients With Primary Graft Failure, Post–Lung Transplantation Reperfusion Edema, and No Acute Lung Injury
 
The diagnoses of patients and their respective procedures are displayed according to their injury group in Table 2. Overall, PLTRE developed in 6 patients (29%) and PGF developed in 4 (19%). Age was statistically significant among the three injury groups, with PGF patients being younger (p < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in each patient who developed PGF, but cardiopulmonary bypass was also used in 1 patient with PLTRE and 1 who had no injury. Three of 4 PGF patients were retransplants; however, 3 other retransplants had no appreciable lung injury (all off-pump single lung transplant procedures). No patients undergoing off-pump single lung transplants progressed to PGF, but 44% had PLTRE. Although patients with primary graft failure had longer mean graft ischemia times, this difference did not reach statistical significance.

Mean pulmonary arterial pressures within the first postoperative day were significantly different among the three groups (p < 0.01), and specifically higher in the PGF population than in the other two groups (both p < 0.05). Mean cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance were also recorded, with PGF patients having more hemodynamic compromise.

Consistent with our definitions, median mechanical ventilation times were longer in PGF and PLTRE, and distinct among the three groups (p < 0.01). The chest radiograph scoring system also revealed unique infiltrate patterns among the three groups (p < 0.001). Patients with PLTRE and PGF had progressively lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios than those patients without injury (p < 0.05).

Cytokine Results
The cytokine concentrations from pulmonary arterial and systemic arterial samples for the lung transplant recipients from the no injury, PLTRE, and PGF subgroups are displayed in Figures 2 through 4 Go Go for IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, respectively (no noticeable elevation in TNF{alpha} was identified at the time points measured). Subgroup analysis revealed distinct IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 patterns in both arterial and venous samples when comparing PGF versus PLTRE (IL-6, both p < 0.01; remainder all p < 0.001), as well as PGF versus patients with no injury (all p < 0.001). Interleukin-6, IL-8, and IL-10 concentrations in patients with PLTRE were higher than in those without injury, although this did not reach statistical significance.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) appearance in patients with clinically severe (PGF; n = 4), moderate (PLTRE; n = 6), and no allograft reperfusion injury (n = 11). (Diamonds = PGF SA; squares = PGF PA; triangles = PLTRE SA; X = PLTRE PA; X with hatch mark = no injury SA; X in box = no injury PA.) *Indicates statistically distinct profile of patients with PGF over PLTRE and no allograft reperfusion injury (p < 0.01). (h = hours; PA = pulmonary arterial; PGF = primary graft failure; PLTRE = post–lung transplant reperfusion edema; SA = systemic arterial.)

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) appearance in patients with clinically severe (PGF; n = 4), moderate (PLTRE; n = 6), and no allograft reperfusion injury (n = 11). (Diamonds = PGF SA; squares = PGF PA; triangles = PLTRE SA; X = PLTRE PA; X with hatch mark = no injury SA; X in box = no injury PA.) *Indicates statistically distinct profile of patients with PGF over PLTRE and no allograft reperfusion injury (p < 0.01). (h = hours; PA = pulmonary arterial; PGF = primary graft failure; PLTRE = post–lung transplant reperfusion edema; SA = systemic arterial.)

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) appearance in patients with clinically severe (PGF; n = 4), moderate (PLTRE; n = 6), and no allograft reperfusion injury (n = 11). (Diamonds = PGF SA; squares = PGF PA; triangles = PLTRE SA; X = PLTRE PA; X with hatch mark = no injury SA; X in box = no injury PA.) *Indicates statistically distinct profile of patients with PGF over PLTRE and no allograft reperfusion injury (p < 0.01). (h = hours; PA = pulmonary arterial; PGF = primary graft failure; PLTRE = post–lung transplant reperfusion edema; SA = systemic arterial.)

 
Time point analysis further revealed a sevenfold elevation in IL-6 concentration at 4 hours in PGF versus PLTRE (10,341 ± 15,931 pg/mL versus 1,403 ± 1,047 pg/mL, p < 0.001), and a 15-fold increase versus no injury (no injury, 679 ± 450 pg/mL, p < 0.001). The PGF patients also had elevated IL-8 serum concentrations when compared with patients who had PLTRE (4 hours, p < 0.001; 8 hours; 24 hours, p < 0.05). Similarly, IL-10 levels were higher immediately after reperfusion and at 8 hours in primary graft failure versus PLTRE (both p < 0.05).

Analyzed as a whole, the 6 patients who were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass had elevations in IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 when compared with patients not requiring bypass (all p < 0.01). However, the 4 bypass patients with PGF had higher IL-6 concentrations than the bypass patients with PLTRE and no injury (Fig 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) appearance in the 6 lung transplant recipients who were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). (Diamonds = PGF SA; squares = PGF PA; triangles = PLTRE SA; X = PLTRE PA; X with hatch mark = no injury SA; X in box = no injury PA.) (h = hours; PGF = primary graft failure [n = 4]; PLTRE = post–lung transplant reperfusion edema [n = 1]; no injury [n = 1].)

 
Paired analysis of pulmonary arterial and systemic arterial blood samples in the PGF patients revealed significantly elevated TNF{alpha} and IL-10 concentrations in the samples that had been exposed to the allograft (systemic arterial, p < 0.05). This is demonstrated most clearly for IL-10 in Figure 4, where systemic arterial concentrations of IL-10 are higher than pulmonary arterial samples (TNF not shown). This was not observed in the patients with PLTRE or in those without injury; and was not seen with IL-6 or IL-8.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Post–lung transplantation reperfusion edema is described by many names, including pulmonary reimplantation response, early graft failure, reimplantation edema, and allograft dysfunction [2, 4, 12]. Although lack of homogeneity exists, most definitions include oxygenation and radiographic criteria [2, 4, 7, 8, 11–14]. The clinical manifestations of allograft reperfusion injury in this study were classified into moderate PLTRE and severe PGF; and the incidence mirrored that reported in the literature [4].

Clinical risk factors for primary graft failure in recipients have been previously identified. In a multivariate analysis of 225 patients, Christie and associates [2] found younger age (21 to 25 years old), older age (more than 45 years), and a diagnosis of primary pulmonary hypertension as risk factors for PGF. Our 4 PGF patients had significantly younger mean age than the other two injury groups; and PGF did develop in the only patient in this series with primary pulmonary hypertension.

Lung allograft ischemia time as a risk factor for PGF has been debated in the literature [2, 12, 15]. In the present study, longer ischemia times were observed in the patients with reperfusion injury, but they were not statistically distinct from those without injury, nor could a difference be observed within the two injury subgroups. Thabut and associates [12] had identified prolonged ischemia time as a risk factor in their PGF population, but their reported mean ischemia time of 282 ± 111 minutes was less than the mean of our severe injury cohort.

Our institution had previously characterized the inflammatory cytokine cascade after visceral ischemia-reperfusion injury in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and found elevations in TNF{alpha} (> 150 pg/mL) and IL-6 (> 1,000 pg/mL) were associated with postoperative multiorgan dysfunction [6]. The goals of the current study were to examine the relationship between proinflammatory cytokine levels in the acute phase of lung allograft reperfusion and the severity of pulmonary allograft injury and to determine the source of these cytokines. Mal and colleagues [7] had examined cytokines on postoperative days 1 through 7, although this did not reflect the early response. However, Pham and colleagues [9] found early elevations in IL-6 did correlate with later allograft dysfunction.

In this study, only minimal concentrations of TNF{alpha} were identified, which may have been a reflection of the immediate and 4-hour collection times that were based on our previous study with aneurysm repair [6]. Others have shown that TNF{alpha} peaks as early as at 45 to 60 minutes, suggesting future studies will require earlier sampling times [16]. However, a significant difference in the TNF{alpha} concentrations pre-lung and post-lung circulation was noted in the PGF patients, implicating the lung allograft or its resident macrophages in the production of this proinflammatory cytokine.

The most significant findings of this study were that patients with PGF (severe injury) exhibited graded increases in IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 levels over PLTRE (moderate injury). The IL-6 concentrations peaked at 4 hours after reperfusion, and PGF patients displayed elevations of this cytokine over the PLTRE and no injury groups, respectively. The peak concentrations of IL-6 and the association with severity of injury further substantiate the study of Pham and coworkers [9] of IL-6 in lung transplantation. We were unable to identify the lung allograft as the source of IL-6, suggesting that other tissues rich in epithelial cells may have a role in its release during ischemia-reperfusion injury. Wen and associates [17] reported that pulmonary complications after liver transplantation were associated with the release of IL-6 from hepatocytes owing to an ischemia-reperfusion mechanism, suggesting that secondary lung injury may be directed through an IL-6 mechanism. Interleukin-6 is also implicated in T-cell stimulation and the generation of T-regulatory cells, both of which have been shown to play a role in the development of reperfusion injury in an animal model of lung transplantation [18–20].

Elevations of IL-8 in PLTRE have been previously established [8, 21, 22]. Increased IL-8 levels in both donor bronchoalveolar fluid and allograft tissue have been associated with primary graft failure, supporting the theory that IL-8 contributes to lung injury through increased chemotaxis and neutrophil recruitment [8]. We observed peak IL-8 concentrations at 4 hours after reperfusion, with persistent elevation through 24 hours, but did not find significant differences in IL-8 levels between the pre-lung and post-lung circulation, suggesting that the source of IL-8 is not likely the allograft.

The anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, peaked at the time of reperfusion. One can speculate that the early release may be intended to limit the magnitude of the inflammatory response and tissue damage during the ischemic period, and to limit injury during reperfusion; this has been suggested in a thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair model at our institution [6, 23, 24]. Higher systemic arterial levels of IL-10 compared with pulmonary arterial levels suggest the lung allograft is one source of IL-10. Because IL-10 can mediate proinflammatory suppression both locally and systemically, it has been suggested as a method for limiting reperfusion injury. Several animal models have employed gene transfer of IL-10 to limit reperfusion injury, with encouraging results [25–27].

Cardiopulmonary bypass has been used to facilitate lung transplantation in bilateral recipients and in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. Cardiopulmonary bypass has been identified as a risk factor for allograft dysfunction by Gammie and coworkers [28], although Christie and associates [2] were unable to identify cardiopulmonary bypass or bypass time as risk factors for PGF. Cardiopulmonary bypass has also been associated with an elevation in the proinflammatory cytokines [29]. In the present study, PGF developed in 4 of the 6 patients placed on bypass; but as shown in Figure 5, the patients in whom PGF developed had higher levels of IL-6, implicating IL-6 and not cardiopulmonary bypass per se in the etiology of PGF.

In summary, the present study found elevations in plasma IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 were correlated with progressive injury in the recipient allograft after lung transplantation, especially IL-6. Elevations in systemic arterial concentrations of TNF{alpha} and IL-10, as compared with pulmonary arterial samples, implicate the lung allograft as the origin of TNF{alpha} and IL-10. Improved understanding of the cytokine cascade will enable the development of novel treatment strategies for the prevention of PLTRE and PGF.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
DR MALCOLM M. DECAMP, JR (Boston, MA): Congratulations on trying to shed some light on a very difficult biologic system that has both important donor and recipient characteristics and factors at play.

One of the things that I took away from the presentation is that the only donor characteristic that you looked at was ischemic time. Additionally, your definition of injury looks at an A-a gradient of just under 300. In fact, as we try to expand our donor pool and transplant more patients, we're routinely looking at donors with A-a gradients between 200 and 300 and actually getting good results. So we may be shooting ourselves in the foot by using a definition where we're already starting out with a donor organ that by your criteria would be considered to have significant lung injury. I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the donors in this group.

I was also struck by the number of retransplants in your series. I think there were 6 retransplantations in this group of 22 patients. Retransplantation of the lung is a controversial ethical issue to begin with coupled with a very complex immunologic factor all thrown into the same mix. I wonder whether the study could be cleaner if you looked at more primary transplants and excluded those undergoing retransplantation.

DR MATHUR: Thank you for your comments and your excellent questions. In response to donor factors, we looked at graft ischemia time as our primary donor criteria. The experience with graft ischemia times in terms of its contributions to reperfusion injury has been met with mixed results. In animal models, graft ischemia time has been shown in several models of rat lung transplantation to be an important indicator for subsequent injury, but in clinical transplantation the graft ischemia has been met with mixed results. Certainly in our experience we did not see a statistically significant difference, but we did see longer graft ischemia times.

In response to your question about using the A-a gradients, the A-a gradients that we used were in order to define clinical injury after transplantation. In terms of looking at donor characteristics before transplantation, our study did not include looking at those clinical criteria.

DR DECAMP: Based on your data, would you recommend pretreating the donor or pretreating the recipient with anything to abrogate some of this cytokine release?

DR MATHUR: Well, our study is a descriptive study, and we were able to show an association with cytokine proliferation with subsequent reperfusion injury. There has been attention to animal studies looking at the gene transfer of IL-10 to a transplant recipient. These models have been met with really good results, they have shown less reperfusion injury, and certainly that is a potential study for the future.

DR DAVID A. FULLERTON (Denver, CO): Amit, I enjoyed your study very much and I compliment you on your presentation and for the fact that, as a medical student, you're taking great advantage of Dr Beaver's laboratory. So it's a job well done.

The comments I have about your study are two things. One, the rise in IL-10, as an anti-inflammatory cytokine, one would hope it could be therapeutically manipulated to suppress the production of proinflammatory cytokines, and I was curious as to whether or not you may have some insight as to how one might do that.

Second, most of the patients like this in our own institution would be immediately started on inhaled nitric oxide, and I was curious if any of your patients were, and, if so, if the use of inhaled nitric oxide might have changed the cytokine profiles that you identified.

DR MATHUR: Doctor Fullerton, I thank you for your kind comments. With regard to your first question about the use of IL-10 and its manipulation for therapeutic intervention, certainly animal models have shown promising results. The WashU group, Itano and colleagues in the Patterson laboratory, have shown that transfection of IL-10 in a rat model was able to mitigate reperfusion injury. The anti-inflammatory effects of IL-10 in vitro have been shown in many models and certainly would be a potential place for therapeutic intervention. In response to your question about nitric oxide, I cannot comment specifically on which patients in this study received nitric oxide, but it certainly is something that is used in other institutions. Depending on the time that it's begun, it could have a potential role in mitigating the late peaks in cytokine release.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The Laboratory of Inflammation Biology and Surgical Science at the University of Florida supported this work. We also appreciate the contribution of Robin Carrie, RN, in collecting the clinical data.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Trulock EP, Edwards LB, Taylor DO, Boucek MM, Keck BM, Hertz MI. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung TransplantationTwenty-second official adult lung and heart-lung transplant report–2005. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:956-967.[Medline]
  2. Christie J, Kotloff R, Pochettino A, et al. Clinical risk factors for primary graft failure following lung transplantation Chest 2003;124:1232-1241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. De Perrot M, Liu M, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S. Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:490-511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Christie J, Bavaria J, Palevsky H, et al. Primary graft failure following lung transplantation Chest 1998;114:51-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Fiser S, Tribble C, Long S, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation increases the risk of late bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1041-1048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Welborn M, Oldenburg H, Hess P, et al. The relationship between visceral ischemia, proinflammatory cytokines, and organ injury in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair Crit Care Med 2000;28:3191-3197.[Medline]
  7. Mal H, Dehoux M, Sleiman C, et al. Early release of pro inflammatory cytokines after lung transplantation Chest 1998;113:645-651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. De Perrot M, Sekine Y, Fischer S, et al. Interleukin-8 release during early reperfusion predicts graft function in human lung transplantation Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:211-215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pham S, Yoshida Y, Aeba R, et al. Interleukin-6, a marker of preservation injury in clinical lung transplantation J Heart Lung Transplant 1992;11:1017-1024.[Medline]
  10. Zander DS, Baz MA, Visner GA, et al. Analysis of early deaths after isolated lung transplantation Chest 2001;120:225-232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kundu S, Herman SJ, Winton TL. Reperfusion edema after lung transplantationradiographic manifestations. Radiology 1998;206:75-80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Thabut G, Vinatier I, Stern J-B, et al. Primary graft failure following lung transplantationpredictive factors of mortality. Chest 2002;121:1876-1882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Khan SU, Salloum J, O'Donovan PB, et al. Acute pulmonary edema after lung transplantationthe pulmonary reimplantation response. Chest 1999;116:187-194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sleiman C, Mal H, Fournier M, et al. Pulmonary reimplantation response in single-lung transplantation Eur Respir J 1995;8:5-9.[Abstract]
  15. Fiser SM, Kron IL, Long SM, et al. Influence of graft ischemic time on outcomes following lung transplantation J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:1291-1296.[Medline]
  16. Palace GP, Del Vecchio PJ, Horgan MJ, Malik AB. Release of tumor necrosis factor after pulmonary artery occlusion and reperfusion Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:143-147.[Medline]
  17. Wen XH, Kong HY, Zhu SM, et al. Plasma levels of tumor necrotic factor-alpha and interleukin-6, -8 during orthotopic liver transplantation and their relations to postoperative pulmonary complications Hepatobil Pancreat Dis Int 2004;3:38-41.
  18. De Perrot M, Young K, Imai Y, et al. Recipient T cells mediate reperfusion injury after lung transplantation in the rat J Immunol 2003;171:4995-5002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lotz M, Jirik F, Kabouridis P, et al. B cell stimulating factor 2/interleukin 6 is a costimulant for human thymocytes and T lymphocytes J Exp Med 1988;167:1253-1258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tosato G, Pike SE. Interferon-beta 2/interleukin 6 is a co-stimulant for human T lymphocytes J Immunol 1988;141:1556-1562.[Abstract]
  21. Fisher AJ, Donnelly SC, Hirani N, et al. Elevated levels of interleukin-8 in donor lungs is associated with early graft failure after lung transplantation Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:259-265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sekido N, Mukaida N, Harada A, et al. Prevention of lung reperfusion injury in rabbits by a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-8 Nature 1993;365:654-657.[Medline]
  23. Huber TS, Gaines GC, Welborn III MB, et al. Anticytokine therapies for acute inflammation and the systemic inflammatory response syndromeIL-10 and ischemia/reperfusion injury as a new paradigm. Shock 2000;13:425-434.[Medline]
  24. Hess PJ, Seeger JM, Huber TS, et al. Exogenously administered interleukin-10 decreases pulmonary neutrophil infiltration in a tumor necrosis factor-dependent murine model of acute visceral ischemia J Vasc Surg 1997;26:113-118.[Medline]
  25. De Perrot M, Fischer S, Liu M, et al. Impact of human interleukin-10 on vector-induced inflammation and early graft function in rat lung transplantation Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003;28:616-625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Martins S, de Perrot M, Imai Y, et al. Transbronchial administration of adenoviral-mediated interleukin-10 gene to the donor improves function in a pig lung transplant model Gene Ther 2004;11:1786-1796.[Medline]
  27. Itano H, Zhang W, Ritter JH, et al. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of human interleukin 10 ameliorates reperfusion injury of rat lung isografts J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:947-956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gammie JS, Cheul Lee J, Pham SM, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with early allograft dysfunction but not death after double-lung transplantation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:990-997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Wan S, Marchant A, DeSmet JM, et al. Human cytokine responses to cardiac transplantation and coronary artery bypass grafting J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:469-477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. A. Daud, R. D. Yusen, B. F. Meyers, M. M. Chakinala, M. J. Walter, A. A. Aloush, G. A. Patterson, E. P. Trulock, and R. R. Hachem
Impact of Immediate Primary Lung Allograft Dysfunction on Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2007; 175(5): 507 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mark Bonnell
Charles T. Klodell
Daniel G. Knauf
Thomas M. Beaver
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beaver, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beaver, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - transplantation


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS