|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1554-1556
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
University of Virginia Medical Center, Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
* Address correspondence to Dr Kron, University of Virginia Medical Center, Health Sciences Center, PO Box 800679, Rm 2753, Lee St, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Email: ikron{at}virginia.edu).
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Finally I stumbled home that Saturday morning. It had been a particularly difficult time period. We had trouble arranging for intensive care unit beds. The operating room was packed, and it was difficult to get cases done. To say the least, I was troubled and tired of the hospital. I wandered through my doors at home and my youngest son, who at that time was age 7, caught me by the sleeve. He said "Dad, how many lives did you save today?" I began to think about it, and realized at least four actually. The two transplant recipients, the infant for the arterial switch, and the patient with the Type A aortic dissection would not have survived without the surgeries that I was privileged to do. Suddenly my troubles that day disappeared. It was an honor to be able to offer these patients' families new life for their loved ones. Who else gets the opportunity to do that? I had forgotten what I used to say as a resident. "They actually are going to pay us for doing this." Obviously it comes at a high cost to us, and our families. The hours are extensive, the educational process is incredibly long, and patients' mortality and morbidity weigh heavily upon us. The majority of thoracic surgeons I know carry these grave issues heavily on their conscience.
Clearly what we do is important and we must continue this field in some way, shape or form.

| Obstacles |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thoracic surgical training has also been severely impacted. Certainly, the 80-hour work week has reduced the educational opportunities for many of our residents. There is a lot of good to be said about residents being able to spend more time with their families, but this has changed the way we educate the residents. Program directors continue to turn over. As an example, twenty-five percent of program directors changed in 2003. This is among the highest of any ACGME-approved residency programs. If a thoracic surgical program fails to prosper then the simple solution for a Dean or Chair of the department is to fire the program director and start again.
Such turnover is obviously not conducive to good resident training. More importantly, the residents are not happy. Many programs treat the residents as apprentices. The lack of jobs after lengthy training is discouraging. Twenty-five percent of thoracic surgical residents have said they would not do it again if they had to do it over. This has translated into the disaster with the thoracic surgery match this year. One hundred and thirty-nine thoracic surgical spots were offered, and thirty-nine positions were left unfilled. Anyone who applied for thoracic surgical training could get it.
Finally, research in cardiothoracic surgery is at an all time low. To the best of my knowledge, there are only forty cardiothoracic surgeons with NIH funding. This is likely to continue to decline as the NIH funding levels get lower each year. NHLBI is presently funding at somewhere between the 12th and 15th percentile. Our specialty will stagnate without the creation of new knowledge.
| Why Become a Thoracic Surgeon? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The second question I asked was whether they would do it again. Each would. Robicsek, when asked whether he would go into cardiac surgery again, stated: "Sure, why not? It may not be as fun as it used to be, but neither is anything else." Hal Urschel stated: "Again, again, again, and again." The bottom line is that we all are fortunate to be part of an exciting field that is clearly worth preserving.
| Causes of the Crisis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coronary bypass surgery took over our entire field. We began to discuss what type of cardioplegia we should use, whether arterial grafts were better than vein grafts (they were), and finally whether we should perform the procedure on pump, or off. We stopped asking truly scientific questions but rather spent a lot of time fine-tuning minor technical points. Coronary bypass surgery took us away from other areas of interest. We put general thoracic surgical cases late in the day. Fortunately, a few pioneer general thoracic surgeons began to realize how important this discipline was and continued to develop it. While we were "laying pipe," they were developing lung transplantation, thoracoscopic surgery, lung volume reduction, and better surgery for lung, and esophageal carcinoma. In addition, they became the primary care physicians for general thoracic surgery. They saw the patients initially, made the diagnosis, and determined what therapy would be required. As cardiac surgeons we frequently became just technicians. We stopped being doctors. We put distance between ourselves and the patients as well as all referring physicians other than cardiologists. We began to give up other areas that did not interest us as much, or were not quite as financially rewarding. We quickly gave up peripheral vascular surgery. This endeavor was time-consuming, requiring a great deal of patient interaction. I wrote an editorial several years ago about the importance of maintaining our interest in vascular surgery [1]. At one time we played a major role in the development of this discipline. Unfortunately, there are now only a few academic centers where thoracic surgeons (with vascular training) play a dominant role in peripheral vascular surgery. We gave up pacemakers, defibrillators, and most aspects of arrhythmia surgery. We obviously are trying to regain this with a focus on atrial fibrillation ablation. However, we are dependent on electro-physiologists to refer these patients to us. Ironically, the pathophysiology of this arrhythmia was worked out by Jim Cox, a surgeon and STSA member.
Unfortunately, this reduction in coronary bypass surgery reduced resident interest in cardiac surgery due to reduced availability of jobs. I continue to applaud the general thoracic surgeons for making their field as exciting as it is today. My impression was in this match half the individuals who applied were interested in general thoracic surgery.
| Solutions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A huge part of vascular surgery is now endovascular surgery. In many programs open surgery on the aorta has become a thing of the past. Unfortunately, this has not necessarily helped vascular surgery. In this past year's match there were 117 positions offered, and 24 open slots were available at the end of the match. That is anyone who applied in vascular surgery could get a position. There are plenty of vascular jobs available but residents are not necessarily interested in this discipline. Why is that? Most residents do not want to end up essentially as interventional radiologists. This is witnessed by the interventional radiology match, which filled only 70 of 189 slots at the end of the match. Sixty-two percent of the positions were left unfilled.
The bottom line is that we have to continue to offer exciting therapies. Aortic disease and valvular heart disease should be our bailiwick. We should become the primary or at least the secondary physicians for these two disease processes. Of course we should work with the cardiologists because they are a great help but we should not distance ourselves from these patients. No matter what technology is available, if you do not see the patient first, then you do not have the option of using that technology. Clearly thoracic surgeons of the future must be trained in endovascular therapy but we should not abandon the open operations that only we can do. One of the issues for vascular surgery is many of the residents are no longer being trained in complex aortic surgery. There is a true joy to have the ability to do such cases and make a difference for our patients. We must be more involved in both clinical and translational research. Without this, we cannot continue to develop our specialty and improve patient care. Cardiothoracic surgery will stagnate and wither away without new knowledge.
Most importantly, we must offer excellent training for our residents. We must teach them to be both technically excellent as well as to be to be thoughtful physicians. The poorly trained surgeon will not be able to compete in the future.
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The AAMC predicts a severe shortage of specialists in the future. The baby boomers continue to grow older. A generation of elder cardiothoracic surgeons will retire over the next few years. My suspicion is that there will be a shortage of cardiothoracic surgeons in the near future. The problem is that it will take several years to turn this around. I have noticed that the various thoracic surgical organizations have recently had separate retreats to discuss the future of thoracic surgery. It is a noble goal to improve your own organization you are a part of; however, I think that it is time for a general retreat on the future of cardiothoracic surgery. It is time for the leaders of all these organizations to come together to discuss our future, as well as how we solve the problems of today. We need to identify the future leaders of our field and mentor them properly. Finally, we have to remember we are Doctors first and technicians second.
It is only by planning the future of our field that we will be able to continue to answer with pride and joy my son's question: How many lives will you save tomorrow?
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. G. Allen, E. S. Weiss, N. D. Patel, D. E. Alejo, T. P. Fitton, J. A. Williams, C. J. Barreiro, L. U. Nwakanma, S. C. Yang, D. E. Cameron, et al. Inspiring Medical Students to Pursue Surgical Careers: Outcomes From Our Cardiothoracic Surgery Research Program. Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1816 - 1819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Gott, N. D. Patel, S. C. Yang, and W. A. Baumgartner Attracting outstanding students (premedical and medical) to a career in cardiothoracic surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |