ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yuichi Izumi
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izumi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Izumi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:573-576
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

On-Pump Beating-Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Yuichi Izumi, MD, PhD * , Katsuaki Magishi, MD, PhD, Noriyuki Ishikawa, MD, Fumiaki Kimura, MD

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nayoro City General Hospital, Nayoro, Hokkaido, Japan

Accepted for publication August 23, 2005.

* Address correspondence to Dr Izumi, Nayoro City General Hospital, West 7, South 8, Nayoro, Hokkaido 096-8511, Japan (Email: yi398ngh{at}seagreen.ocn.ne.jp).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
BACKGROUND: The early results of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting by conventional operative method for acute myocardial infarction are reported to be poor. The purpose of this study is to evaluate on-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS: Thirty-one patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent emergent surgery between January 1998 and June 2004 at Nayoro City General Hospital. In 16 patients, on-pump surgery was performed on the arrested heart, and in the other 15, on-pump surgery was performed on the beating heart. Early results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: Preoperative and perioperative patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Although there was no statistically difference between the two groups, the early mortality rates of on-pump arrested-heart coronary bypass grafting (31.3%) was higher than that of on-pump beating-heart coronary bypass grafting (13.3%). Postoperatively, the creatine kinase myocardial band value for the on-pump beating-heart group was significantly lower than that for the on-pump arrested-heart group (221 ± 200 IU/L versus 666 ± 540 IU/L, p = 0.008). The incidence of postoperative acute renal failure was significantly higher in the on-pump arrested-heart group than in the on-pump beating-heart group (p = 0.034). The durations of ventilator use and inotropic agent use were longer in the on-pump arrested-heart group than in the on-pump beating-heart group, though the differences were not statistically different (p = 0.152, p = 0.223).

CONCLUSIONS: On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting has the possibility to eliminate intraoperative global myocardial ischemia and to be an acceptable surgical option for acute myocardial infarction associated with lower postoperative mortality and morbidity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The early results of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute myocardial infarction have been reported to be poor. Percutaneous catheter intervention (PCI) is generally the first choice for treatment of acute myocardial infarction to immediately reperfuse the coronary flow. However, there are some cases requiring emergent surgical treatment, and in these cases the clinical results have been generally unacceptable because patients are often hemodynamically unstable owing to cardiogenic shock. Moreover, cardioplegic arrest during cardiopulmonary bypass can induce myocardial damage. Recently, in these situations, we have performed on-pump CABG on the beating heart, whereas in the past cases would have been treated with on-pump CABG on the arrested heart. We have now studied the results of on-pump beating-heart CABG for acute myocardial infarction and have evaluated the usefulness of this technique.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Thirty-one patients with acute myocardial infarction, 23 men and 8 women with a mean age of 66 years (66.0 ± 11.8; range, 37 to 82), underwent emergent CABG between January 1998 and June 2004 at Nayoro City General Hospital. They all had already performed coronary angiograms by cardiovascular internist, and the decision for emergent operation was made before transferring to our department. The indications for emergent operation were failed or unsuccessful precutaneous coronary intervention in 16 patients, concomitance with a severe stenosis or aneurysm of the left main coronary artery in 7 patients, and severe three-vessel disease in 8 patients. Although the culprit vessel was the left anterior descending artery in all cases, there were 2 cases concomitant with the infarction of right coronary artery area from the findings of the electrocardiogram. The electrocardiogram indicated ST-segment elevation in leads V1 to V4 in all cases, and 2 cases were associated with ST-segment elevation in leads II and III and aVf.

In 16 patients, between 1998 and 2001, on-pump surgery was performed on the arrested heart; in 15 patients, between 2002 and 2004, on-pump surgery was done on the beating heart. The same surgeon performed the CABG in all cases.

Cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted by canulation of the ascending aorta and the right atrium, and a standard circuit with a hollow fiber membrane oxygenator and a centrifugal blood pump were used in both groups. In the on-pump arrested-heart CABG, after cardiopulmonary bypass was established, aortic cross clamp and cardiac arrest were induced with Young's solution. Myocardial protection was achieved by means of intermittent antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia after every anastomosis. A terminal warm shot was administered before declamping of the aorta at finishing of all distal anastomoses as a rule. In patients with aneurysm of the left main coronary trunk, declamping of the aorta was performed after transaortic suture of the left coronary ostium and proximal anastomosis on the ascending aorta. Patient body temperature was maintained at 28°C.

In the on-pump beating-heart CABG, total cardiopulmonary bypass was established, and body temperature was maintained at 36°C. Bypass grafting surgery was performed on the beating heart using a heart stabilizer and heart positioner. The left anterior descending artery was the first target vessel, the right coronary artery system the next, and the circumflex system the last. During anastomosing of the next graft, the bypass grafts that had already been sutured were unclamped and opened.

Urine output was measured every hour in the intensive care unit, and intravenous continuous infusion of the mannitol and furosemide cocktail was given to the patient with low urine output below 0.5 mL/kg an hour lasting for 3 hours. Continuous hemofiltration started when urine output did not increase or renal shutdown occurred in spite of mannitol and furosemide. Hemodialysis was introduced after the patient's hemodynamic state improved. The condition requiring hemofiltration or hemodialysis was defined as postoperative renal failure in this study.

We analyzed the clinical results, mortality rate, morbidity rate, and blood chemistry data between the two groups retrospectively.

Informed Consent
The Institutional Review Board of Nayoro City General Hospital approved this study, and waived the individual consent because this study was retrospective.

Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis comparing the two groups was performed with an unpaired Student's t test for the means or with a {chi}2 test for the variables. Probability values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The preoperative patient data analysis (Table 1) between the two groups demonstrated no significant differences in mean age, sex, comorbidities, clinical preoperative status, creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) values, or duration between onset and operation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Characteristics
 
Three patients in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG group and 2 in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group required cardiopulmonary resuscitation or temporary pacing because of cardiopulmonary arrest or ventricular tachycardia before transferring. Before reaching our department, 11 and 10 patients in each group, respectively, were assisted by intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP); and a patient in the on-pump arrested-heart group was supported by percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). Cardiopulmonary internists made the decision of indication for them because of hypotension and low output heart. Only 1 patient was conducted on PCPS after reaching our hospital, and was in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group. The mean overall number of distal anastomosis was 2.3 ± 0.7 versus 2.5 ± 0.5 in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG and on-pump beating-heart CABG groups, respectively (p = not significant). Although there were no significant differences in the target vessels between the two groups, arterial grafts were utilized in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group more than in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG group (p = 0.003; Table 2.).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Target Vessels and Bypass Grafts
 
The cardiopulmonary bypass time in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG group was longer, but the difference was not statistically significant. Blood loss volume was also similar between the two groups (Table 3). There was a patient in each group required immediately introduction of cardiopulmonary bypass before graft takedown because of unstable hemodynamic state.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Operation Data
 
The postoperative clinical data for the on-pump beating-heart CABG group suggest better results than do those for the on-pump arrested-heart CABG group. Postoperative maximum CK-MB values in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG group were 666 ± 540 IU/L, whereas those in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group were statistically lower at 221 ± 200 IU/L (p = 0.008), despite the similar preoperative values between the two groups. The durations of use for ventilator and inotropic agents in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group were shorter than for the on-pump arrested-heart CABG group (p = 0.152, p = 0.223). Postoperative renal failure (requiring hemodialysis or hemofiltration) appeared to have occurred frequently in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG (p = 0.009). There were 5 cardiac-related deaths in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG group and 2 in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group, making the mortality rate lower in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group (p = 0.394; Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Clinical Results
 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The goals of treatment for acute myocardial infarction are saving life and preserving myocardial function by prompt revascularization of coronary artery. Percutaneous catheter intervention techniques have recently become more popular and are now considered to be the first-choice treatment for acute myocardial infarction. However, there are some cases that require surgical revascularization, especially in patients who have done into in cardiogenic shock. The early results of emergent conventional CABG for acute myocardial infarction have generally been reported to be poor [1–3]. These poor results can possibly be explained not only by the patient's poor status, but also by operative procedures associated with extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest, which induce ischemic injury and reperfusion injury to the myocardium. Although off-pump CABG has some advantages [4–6], it is not always technically feasible. Beginning in 2001, as an alternative to conventional CABG with cardioplegic arrest, we have conducted CABG based on maintenance of a beating heart with cardiopulmonary bypass but without aortic cross-clamping for acute myocardial infarction.

It has been demonstrated that keeping the heart beating is associated with less myocardial edema and better function [7]. As cardioplegic arrest can trigger intense inflammatory responses, aortic cross-clamping should be avoided in unstable patients in acute myocardial infarction. The avoidance of aortic cross-clamping and cardiac arrest can contribute to myocardial protection and eliminate intraoperative global myocardial ischemia. Our data show that CK-MB values in the on-pump beating-heart CABG are significantly lower than those in the on-pump arrested-heart CABG. It has previously been demonstrated that in the on-pump beating-heart CABG is a lower release of troponin Ic, which is a highly cardiac specific marker of tissue damage [8]. In the present study, the operative mortality was lower in the on-pump beating-heart CABG than the on-pump arrested-heart CABG, although the difference was not significant.

Renal failure is a frequent complication in patients who have experienced hemodynamic failure or undergone conventional cardiac surgery. Ascione and associates [9] have demonstrated that beating-heart CABG offers a low risk of systemic hypoperfusion during surgery and as a consequence superior renal protection, as demonstrated by a low incidence of postoperative renal complications. Prifti and colleagues [10] have also indicated that this technique offers better renal protection associated with fewer postoperative complications due to intraoperative hypoperfusion. Although renal failure requiring dialysis or hemofiltration was identified postoperatively in both groups in our series, the incidence was significantly lower in the on-pump beating-heart CABG group.

Another point to consider is the technical features of the on-pump beating-heart CABG technique. When fully assisting the heart with cardiopulmonary bypass, it is advantageous to place the graft on the circumflex artery area easier owing to the reduction in heart volume compared with off-pump CABG. Utilizing a heart stabilizer and positioner, which are routinely used in off-pump CABG, optimal exposure in the posterior and lateral fields of the heart can be obtained even in the beating heart. Borowski and colleagues [11] have indicated that the on-pump beating-heart technique can help avoid extreme upward retraction of the heart during revascularization of the circumflex artery branch, thus contributing to better myocardial protection. Although the likelihood of incomplete revascularization tends to increase in off-pump CABG [12], we can achieve complete revascularization with the on-pump beating-heart method.

Our results lead us to believe that on-pump beating-heart CABG offers the possibility to eliminate intraoperative global myocardial ischemia and is an acceptable surgical option for acute myocardial infarction associated with lower postoperative mortality and morbidity.

Limitations
Several limitations of this study need to be addressed. First, our investigation was retrospective. Second, as the patients undergoing conventional CABG were from a former series, whereas the beating-heart CABG was conducted during the most recent decade, a historical difference exists; however, the operations were performed by the same surgeon. Third, the number of patients in each group was small. Further studies will be necessary and are expected.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Curtis JJ, Walls JT, Salam NH, et al. Impact of unstable angina on operative mortality with coronary revascularization at varying time intervals after myocardial infarction J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:867-873.[Abstract]
  2. Applebaum R, House R, Rademaker A, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting within thirty days of acute myocardial infarctionearly and late results in 406 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:745-752.[Abstract]
  3. Quigley R, Milano CA, Smith LR, et al. Prognosis and management of anterolateral myocardial infarction in patients with severe left main disease and cardiogenic shockthe left main shock syndrome. Circulation 1993;88:65-70.
  4. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2)a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Lancet 2002;539:1194-1199.
  5. Hazama S, Eishi K, Yamachika S, et al. Inflammatory response after revascularizationoff-pump versus on-pump. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;10:90-96.[Medline]
  6. Wan IY, Arifi AA, Wan S, et al. Beating heart revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypassevaluation of inflammatory response in a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1624-1631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mehlhorn U, Allen SJ, Adams DL, Davis KL, Gogola GR, Warters RD. Cardiac surgical conditions induced by ß-blockadeeffect on myocardial fluid balance. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:143-150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Perrault LP, Menasche P, Peynet J, et al. On-pump, beating-heart coronary artery operations in high-risk patientsan acceptable trade-off?. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1368-1373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularizationevaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:493-498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Frati G, et al. Beating heart myocardial revascularization on extracorporeal circulation in patients with endstage coronary artery disease Cardiovasc Surg 2001;9:608-614.[Medline]
  11. Borowski A, Korb H. Myocardial infarction in coronary bypasss surgery using on-pump, beating heart technique with pressure- and volume-controlled coronary perfusion J Card Surg 2002;17:272-278.[Medline]
  12. DiMauro M, Iaco AL, Contini M, et al. Reoperative coronary artery bypass graftinganalysis of early and late outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:81-87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Miyahara, A. Matsuura, H. Takemura, S. Saito, S. Sawaki, T. Yoshioka, and H. Ito
On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction has lower mortality and morbidity
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 521 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. M. Dewey and M. J. Mack
Myocardial Revascularization without Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 633 - 654.
[Full Text]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. Fouda
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery with On-Pump Beating-Heart Technique
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2007; 15(5): 392 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Mizutani, A. Matsuura, K. Miyahara, T. Eda, A. Kawamura, T. Yoshioka, and K. Yoshida
On-Pump Beating-Heart Coronary Artery Bypass: A Propensity Matched Analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1368 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yuichi Izumi
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izumi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Izumi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS