ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Konstantinos Potaris
Igor D. Gregoric
Ara Vaporciyan
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potaris, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vaporciyan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Potaris, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vaporciyan, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:409
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Correspondence

Reply

Konstantinos Potaris, MD a , Igor D. Gregoric, MD a , Branislav Radovancevic, MD a , Ara Vaporciyan, MD b

a Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX77030
b Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX77030

(Email: bradovancevic{at}sleh.com).

To the Editor:

We appreciate the comments of Bagan and colleagues [1] concerning our article [2]. They make the valid point that computed tomographic (CT) scanning may be more useful and effective than the chest roentgenogram for detecting lung cancer in heart transplant recipients on follow-up. However, CT screening trials are not yet conclusive on this point, and the cost to benefit ratio remains unknown. In any case, regular and consistent screening of heart transplant recipients for lung cancer, particularly those with a history of smoking, is important.

The correspondents also note that survival was poor among our patients with late-stage tumors (n = 5) and suggest that this poor survival may have been due to the inefficiency of adjuvant therapy. When called for, the use of adjuvant therapy in our patients was not compromised by immunosuppression, although renal insufficiency was undeniably a limiting factor. Moreover, as we stated in our article, the small number of lung cancer cases seen in our study population precludes making any sweeping claims about disease management and survival.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Bagan P, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Riquet M. Prognosis of lung cancer in heart transplant recipient Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:409.[Free Full Text]
  2. Potaris K, Radovanovic B, Thomas CD, et al. Lung cancer after heart transplantationa 17-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:980-983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Konstantinos Potaris
Igor D. Gregoric
Ara Vaporciyan
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potaris, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vaporciyan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Potaris, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vaporciyan, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS