ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
John W. Brown
Mark Ruzmetov
Andrew C. Fiore
Mark D. Rodefeld
Mark W. Turrentine
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Turrentine, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Turrentine, M. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2301-2308
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

Long-Term Results of Apical Aortic Conduits in Children With Complex Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction

John W. Brown, MD a , * , Mark Ruzmetov, MD, PhD a , Andrew C. Fiore, MD c , Mark D. Rodefeld, MD a , Donald A. Girod, MD b , Mark W. Turrentine, MD a

a Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James W. Riley Hospital for Children and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
b Section of Pediatric Cardiology, James W. Riley Hospital for Children and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
c Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Accepted for publication June 3, 2005.

* Address correspondence to Dr Brown, Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr, EH 215, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5123 (Email: jobrown{at}iupui.edu).

Presented at the Poster Session of the Fifty-first Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Cancun, Mexico, Nov 2–4, 2004.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Apical aortic conduits were used in children with complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction at our institution before we adopted the Ross and Ross-Konno procedures. The early results with apical aortic conduits were quite good when we used a porcine xenograft conduit and were less satisfactory when we converted to an aortic homograft valve as the conduit valve. This report summarizes our clinical experience with apical aortic conduits in children with an emphasis on hemodynamic results, reoperation, and long-term follow-up.

METHODS: Records of 28 patients (age range, 2 weeks to 19 years) who underwent insertion of apical aortic conduit between September 1979 and June 1993 were reviewed. All patients had complex multilevel left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. All were symptomatic, and 22 (79%) had had one or two previous aortic valvotomies or left ventricular outflow tract operations, or both.

RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 11% (3 of 28). Twenty-five children survived the perioperative period and improved, and 21 have had one or more cardiac catheterization from 6 to 18 months (mean, 1.2 years) after the initial operation. Reduction or resolution of resting mean left ventricular–to-aortic peak gradient in the early postoperative period from 81.8 ± 24.0 to 15.4 ± 8.9 mm Hg was demonstrated (p < 0.001). Overall 25-year survival was 57%. Fourteen surviving patients (56%) have undergone subsequent procedures (n = 18) from 5 months to 16 years postoperatively (mean, 6.9 years) because they developed a recurrent left ventricular–to-aortic gradient of 58 ± 28 mm Hg (p < 0.002). One patient underwent heart transplantation. All other late survivors have normal left ventricular function as determined by serial echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS: Apical aortic conduit is effective in relieving complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and improving left ventricular performance with acceptable short-term and midterm results, but late complications caused primarily by conduit tissue valve dysfunction are frequent in children. Since the early 1990s, the apical aortic conduit procedure has been largely replaced with the Ross or Ross-Konno procedure in our pediatric practice.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The treatment of complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in children remains a surgical challenge. Conventional surgical techniques, including patch reconstruction of the aortic root for supravalvar aortic stenosis (AS), valvotomy for bicuspid valvar stenosis, and myotomy and myectomy for obstructive cardiomyopathy, are highly successful in treating simple forms of LVOTO in children. There are, however, a significant number of children in whom diffuse tunnel AS or multilevel obstruction to the left ventricle cannot be adequately treated using these standard procedures.

In cases of LVOTO not amenable to simple surgical valvotomy because of associated diffuse subvalvar or supravalvar stenosis, or because of annular hypoplasia, other surgical techniques have been used to allow for unobstructed egress of blood from the left ventricle. One such operation is the creation of a second outlet for the left ventricle by anastomosing a valved conduit from the left ventricular (LV) apex to the descending or ascending aorta. Such procedures were initially conceptualized as early as 1910 by Carrel [1], initially experimenting with a vein graft conduit interposed between the left ventricle and the thoracic aorta. By 1955, the technique was successfully applied in dogs [2]. Clinical series of apical aortic conduit (AAC) insertion began appearing in the late 1970s [3–9].

Between 1978 and 1993, we implanted 28 AACs in children. We continue to implant AACs in elderly adult patients with a porcelain ascending aorta, prior healed sternal wound infections, or relative contraindications to cardiopulmonary bypass in whom relief of critical LVOTO is indicated. In 1993, we adopted the Ross and Ross-Konno procedures for children with complex LVOTO. The autologous pulmonary valve, placed in the aortic position, does not require anticoagulation, has growth potential, and can be combined with a Konno septoplasty for diffuse forms of subaortic obstruction.

The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term outcome of children who underwent insertion of an AAC for LVOTO and to examine the effects of the conduit and subsequent procedures on their LV function.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Between 1979 and 1993, 28 children underwent insertion of an AAC for complex forms of LVOTO at the James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children in Indianapolis by one surgeon (J.W.B.). The patients ranged in age from 2 weeks to 19 years (mean, 7.4 ± 6.8 years). There were 15 male and 13 female patients. Ten children (36%) were younger than 1 year of age. Symptoms were present in all patients and included syncope in 1, angina in 9, and dyspnea on exertion in 18. Preoperatively, the majority of patients (79%; 22 of 28) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV.

All patients had complex forms of AS that were not amenable to repair by established conventional methods at that time. The location of major obstruction was tunnel subvalvar AS in 15 and multilevel LVOTO in 13 patients. Among those patients with multilevel LVOTO, residual valvar and annular stenosis and subvalvular AS was present in 7, whereas supravalvar and subvalvar stenosis was observed in 4 and all three levels of LVOTO, in 2 patients. Seventeen of the 28 patients had undergone 26 prior operations to relieve left heart outflow obstruction. These operations included aortic valvotomy (n = 8), subvalvar resection of a membrane (n = 8), repair of supravalvar AS (n = 3), coarctation repair (n = 5), patch enlargement of hypoplastic transverse aortic arch (n = 1), and aortic valve replacement (n = 1).

Table 1 and Figure 1 show the age at operation, preoperative diagnosis, prior LVOTO procedures, conduit valve type, and follow-up on all 28 patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Data and Follow-Up of Patients With Apical Aortic Conduits
 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Distribution and disposition of patients with congenital aortic stenosis who underwent various surgical repairs. (AAC = apical aortic conduit; F-U = follow-up; HT = heart transplantation; m/m = myotomy/myectomy; pts = patients.)

 
All patients underwent preoperative cardiac echocardiography, catheterization, or both. Peak preoperative aortic gradients ranged from 40 to 154 mm Hg with a mean value of 81.8 ± 24.0 mm Hg. Patients with aortic gradients less than 30 mm Hg underwent operation because of cardiac symptoms (dyspnea, angina, syncope, and fatigue). The gradient exceeded 100 mm Hg in 7 patients. At initial presentation, aortic valve regurgitation (AR) was present in 16 patients (57%), and was mild in 12 and moderate in 4.

Two of the 4 patients with moderate aortic incompetence underwent initial aortic valve replacement with small pericardial tissue prosthesis before AAC insertion. The other 2 had the AAC inserted despite the moderate AR, and postoperatively the AR subjectively seemed to be less. Eight patients had associated intracardiac lesions including single ventricle (n = 4), atrioventricular septal defect (n = 3), and tetralogy of Fallot (n = 1).

Operative Technique
The AAC was inserted using a median sternotomy or a fifth intercostal space left thoracotomy [4, 10]. If the left thoracotomy approach was used, then exposure with or without cannulation of the ipsilateral femoral artery and vein was undertaken on occasion in the event that partial cardiopulmonary bypass was indicated. A median sternotomy was used for insertion of the AAC only if coexisting cardiac lesions required repair at the time of conduit insertion.

When the left thoracotomy approach was used, the distal end of the Dacron valved conduit was sutured to the descending thoracic aorta with a partially occluding vascular clamp and pledgeted interrupted sutures. The patient was anticoagulated with heparin, and the partial occluding clamp was released to allow the distal end of the conduit to fill with blood up to the level of the conduit valve. The proximal end of the conduit, which always included a semirigid right-angled LV stent, was inserted after four pledged mattress sutures were placed about the proposed site of proximal conduit implantation, ie, the LV apex and the sewing ring on the LV stent. A circular piece of muscle was excised from the apex using a standard laboratory cork borer and a Foley catheter. Once the plug of muscle was removed from the apex of the left ventricle, the proximal end of the conduit was rapidly inserted. The four pledgeted sutures placed about the LV apex and through the sewing ring of the LV stent were tied, and additional pledgeted reinforcement mattress sutures were placed in the adjacent quadrants. Figure 2 illustrates the two anastomoses and the appearance of a completed AAC placement. A more detailed description of the surgical technique has been previously described [10]. The AAC valve was usually placed in the middle of the AAC. This location was chosen because it allowed clamping of the Dacron graft proximal and distal to the valve if valve replacement became necessary later.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Transthoracic placement of the apical aortic conduit (25 of 28 patients). (A) The aortic anastomosis is performed using a partially occluding clamp and interrupted pledgeted sutures. (B) The apical ventriculotomy is made with a Foley catheter and cork borer.

 
The thirty-three AACs (primary, n = 28; redo, n = 5) were placed between the apex of the left ventricle and the descending thoracic aorta (n = 25) or ascending aorta (n = 3) for LVOTO in 28 children. The conduit was constructed using a right-angled semirigid Dacron-covered LV stent and a woven Dacron graft containing glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine valve (Hancock-Extracorporeal, Inc, Anaheim, CA; n = 17), St. Jude mechanical valve-containing conduit (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN; n = 6), or aortic homograft (AH) conduit (CryoLife Inc, Kennesaw, GA; n = 10). The conduits sized ranged from 9 to 22 mm (mean, 15.0 ± 4.2 mm). Infants and small children younger than 3 years of age received conduits from 9 to 12 mm, children 7 to 14 years of age received conduits 14 to 18 mm, children older than 14 years of age received 20- to 22-mm prostheses. We began using cryopreserved AHs as the AAC valve after 1987 (when they became available at our institution) because they were available in sizes smaller than 12 mm and because we hoped they would be more durable than xenograft valves in children.

Patients with associated intracardiac lesions, before AAC insertion, underwent tetralogy of Fallot repair (n = 1) and complete atrioventricular communication repair after initial pulmonary artery banding (n = 1). Patients with single ventricle underwent pulmonary artery banding (n = 4) before AAC insertion, and one of them underwent completion Fontan operation after AAC implantation. Two patients with complete atrioventricular communication also underwent mitral valve replacement with mechanical prostheses before AAC insertion. One patient with severe AR and sinus of Valsalva fistula from aorta to the right atrium secondary to subacute bacterial endocarditis underwent initial aortic valve replacement with a xenograft valve 2 years before AAC insertion. Two other patients who had moderate AR underwent AAC insertion with concomitant aortic valve replacement with Ionescu-Shiley (Shiley Laboratories, Irvine, CA) pericardial prosthesis.

Statistical Analysis
SPSS statistical program for Windows version 10 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL) was used to perform data analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and range. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method and Cox proportional hazards regression methods were used for actuarial survival analysis and analysis of freedom from reoperation. Multiple regression analysis was performed as conditional backward stepwise proportional hazards regression. Probability values of 0.05 or less were considered significant. An early death was defined as death in the hospital or within 30 days of discharge, whereas all other deaths were considered late.

Mean and peak aortic gradients were measured by Doppler echocardiography. The grade of aortic and conduit regurgitation was evaluated with color Doppler, using a five-grade (from 0 to 4; absent, trivial, mild, moderate, and severe), semiquantitative scale according to the ratio of the width of the regurgitant jet at its origin to the LV outflow tract diameter [11]. Aortic and conduit lesions were classified as predominant stenosis and predominant regurgitation according to the conclusive judgment of the operating surgeon after summarizing preoperative hemodynamic data and intraoperative findings.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Early Mortality
There were 3 early hospital deaths (11%; 3 of 28). All 3 deaths occurred in the early part of our experience (1979 to 1981).

The first child who died presented at age 17 years with acute bacterial endocarditis and severe AS and AR resulting in preoperative heart and liver failure. Preoperative hemodynamic instability necessitated aortic valve replacement with a small pericardial valve to eliminate the AR. Apical aortic conduit was inserted to relieve the residual AS. Both prostheses were implanted uneventfully, but the patient experienced coagulopathy and died 8 days postoperatively secondary to multiorgan system failure. No postmortem examination was performed.

The second death occurred in a 3-year-old patient with tunnel subaortic stenosis, critical valvar AS, and cardiogenic shock who had had multiple preoperative cardiac arrests. His operation was uneventful, but death occurred secondary to mechanical airway obstruction on the second postoperative day. Postmortem examination confirmed a normal functioning conduit.

The final early death occurred in a 2,300-g, 4-month-old infant with univentricular heart, transposition of the great arteries, interrupted aortic arch, and tunnel subvalvular AS. He underwent interrupted aortic arch repair with pulmonary artery banding at 6 weeks of age. At 4 months of age, the AAC was inserted using a 12-mm Hancock porcine valved conduit. The patient could not be weaned from ventilatory support and died 2 weeks postoperatively of sepsis secondary to pseudomonas pneumonia. At autopsy, thrombosis of two of three porcine valve cusps was observed. The 12-mm conduit was twice the size of the aorta, and we conjectured that cusp thrombosis was related to the inability of the small LV stroke volume to open all three cusps adequately.

Late Mortality
There were 9 late deaths (9 of 25; 36%). Six patients died of cardiac-related events that included respiratory arrests secondary to congestive heart failure (3 patients, at 6 months and 1 and 1.5 years), ventricular arrhythmia (1 patient at 1 year), dilated cardiomyopathy secondary to congestive heart failure (1 patient at 6 years), and cardiomyopathy 2 years after orthotopic heart transplant (1 patient). Two deaths were noncardiac related and included hemoptysis (1 patient at 4 years) and pulmonary hemorrhage (1 patient at 3 years postoperatively). The remaining late death occurred 7 years after AAC insertion and was of unknown cause. Overall survival estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method including early mortality was 75% at 1 years, 64% at 5 years, and 57% at 10, 20, and 25 years (Fig 3).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Actuarial patient survival, including operative mortality in patients with apical aortic conduit (AAC) overall (A) and for the three types of valves used (B).

 
Late Hemodynamics
Twenty-one of 25 hospital survivors of AAC insertion underwent cardiac catheterization from 6 to 18 months (mean, 1.2 years) postoperatively. The resting peak LV-to-aortic gradient was reduced from 81.8 ± 24.0 mm Hg preoperatively to 15.4 ± 8.9 mm Hg at the time of catheterization (p < 0.001). Late LV function as determined by ejection fraction and LV fractional shortening has been followed in long-term survivors and remains in the normal range despite the obvious apical scar in all patients and the septal scar in patients who subsequently underwent a Konno procedure.

Reoperations
Fifteen of 25 hospital survivors (60%) underwent 18 subsequent procedures 5 months to 16 years postoperatively (mean, 6.9 ± 4.6 years). The mean peak LV-to-aortic gradient at the time of the second operation was 58 ± 28 mm Hg (p = 0.002). Nine patients experienced significant conduit valve regurgitation, which was moderate in 7 patients and severe in 2. Overall freedom from reoperation was 83% at 1 year, 52% at 5 years, 23% at 10 years, and 5.6% at 15 years (Fig 4).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Actuarial freedom from reintervention in patients with apical aortic conduit (AAC) overall (A) and for the three types of valves used (B).

 
Long-Term Outcome of Apical Aortic Conduit Analyzed by Valve Type
Hancock porcine valve conduit
Seventeen of 25 hospital survivors underwent AAC with a Hancock porcine valve (initial, n = 16; redo, n = 1). There were 3 early and 4 late deaths (see Mortality). The mean interval from AAC implantation to late death was 3.1 years (range; 6 months to 7 years). Postmortem examination of 3 children demonstrated a normal functioning AAC (there was no autopsy in one case). One patient was lost to follow-up. One patient with dilated cardiomyopathy underwent heart transplantation 5 months after initial AAC insertion. The removed AAC was normal in appearance in the explanted heart.

Seven patients underwent conduit reintervention (n = 9; 2 patients had two concomitant procedures) as a result of porcine valve degeneration: replacement with St. Jude mechanical prosthesis (n = 3), and removal of AAC (n = 4) with concomitant Konno (n = 1) and Ross procedure (n = 1). The mean time from initial surgery to reoperation was 9.9 ± 3.8 years (range, 5 to 16 years). The predominant indication for reoperation was the presence of severe (5 of 7; 71%) or moderate (2 of 7; 29%) conduit valve regurgitation and conduit valve stenosis (n = 6) with mean peak gradient of 54 ± 21 mm Hg (range, 20 to 70 mm Hg). Only 1 patient still has a Hancock porcine valve 20 years after initial implantation. At last follow-up this patient has mild conduit regurgitation with a gradient of 15 mm Hg. The other 2 long-term AAC patients have had inserted mechanical (St. Jude Medical) valves.

ST. Jude medical valve conduit
Six children underwent AAC implantation with St. Jude mechanical valve (initial, n = 3; redo, n = 3). There was 1 late death at 3 years because of pulmonary hemorrhage, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 4 patients, 2 underwent reoperation at 9 and 13 years after mechanical AAC insertion because of mechanical conduit valve thrombosis. Both patients had removal of the AAC and underwent a Ross procedure. The remaining 2 patients still have an AAC with a St. Jude mechanical valve at 13 and 14 years after implantation and are doing well with minimal conduit gradient (5 and 8 mm Hg) and mild conduit regurgitation.

Aortic homograft valve conduit
Nine children underwent AAC insertion with AH (n = 10; initial, n = 9; redo, n = 1). We started using cryopreserved AHs after 1987 (when they became available at our institution) because they were available in sizes smaller than 12 mm and because we hoped they would be more durable than xenograft valves in children. One patient experienced a pseudoaneurysm of the LV anastomosis 9 months after initial implantation and required redo surgery with insertion of an AH conduit. There were 3 late deaths (6 months and 1 and 6 years after implantation) with intact AACs at autopsy. Six patients underwent reintervention (n = 7) as a result of AH valve degeneration: replacement with Hancock porcine prosthesis (n = 1), removal of AAC (n = 5) with concomitant Konno (n = 1) or Ross procedure (n = 1), and conduit patch angioplasty (n = 1). The mean time from initial surgery to first reoperation was 3.3 ± 2.3 years (range, 5 months to 7 years; p = 0.001). The predominant indication for reoperation was the presence of severe (2 of 6; 33%) or moderate (4 of 6; 67%) conduit regurgitation and conduit stenosis (n = 4) with a mean peak gradient of 76 ± 37 mm Hg (range, 50 to 130 mm Hg). Our experience with AH in the AAC was poor owing largely to the poor durability of the AH valve (3.3 ± 2.3 years) in children.

Late Follow-Up
Finally, at latest clinical evaluation (mean time, 10.7 ± 8.2 years; range, 6 months to 25 years), all survivors (n = 14) were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II leading normal or near-normal lives. Only 3 patients still have their original AAC (20, 24, and 25 years after initial implantation), but 2 have had the porcine valves replaced with a mechanical prosthesis 11 years after initial AAC insertion. All surviving patients including patients who had an AAC followed by a Ross-Konno procedure have normal indices of LV function as determined by ejection fraction and LV fractional shortening on serial follow-up echocardiograms.

The peak gradient in the remaining 3 patients with Ross procedure (1 of them with Ross-Konno) at 2, 8, and 9 years after surgery was 17.3 ± 5.9 mm Hg (range, 13 to 24 mm Hg), and AR was trivial in 2 patients and mild in 1. The mean peak gradient in the remaining 2 patients with Konno procedure at 5 and 9 years after surgery was 18 and 20 mm Hg, and AR was trivial in both patients.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The concept of an apical aortic valve conduit to bypass valvular AS was conceived by Carrel [1] in 1910, performed experimentally by Sarnoff and colleagues [2] in 1955, and performed clinically by Templeton in 1962 (personal communication). Templeton's technique did not gain popularity because of problems (hemolysis and emboli) related to the conduit valve (Hufnagel) and because direct aortic valve resection and replacement became quite successful in the early 1960s. The technique received little attention until we and others began to realize it might be useful for complex forms of LVOTO in children. The woven Dacron graft containing a glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine heterograft (Hancock) was introduced in the early 1970s for right heart reconstruction. We used the Hancock conduit and conduits containing mechanical valves, applied a rigid LV stent, and showed experimentally and later clinically that these conduits placed in the apical aortic position functioned well to bypass the LVOTO [12].

While AACs were being developed, other surgical approaches to deal with the hypoplastic aortic annulus and subvalvar area evolved in parallel. In the late 1970s, Konno and colleagues [13] and then Rastan and associates [14] published a method for enlarging the aortic annulus and subaortic area using an oblique incision in the aortic septum placed in the midportion of the two coronary ostia, and combined this with a vertical incision in the outflow tract of the right ventricle to join the septal incision. In so doing, enlargement of the aortic annulus for aortic valve replacement was possible, and the repair completed by patch reconstruction of both ventricular outflow tracts. We did not initially adopt the Konno-Rastan procedure because we thought it was very complex, and had a significant learning curve and mortality. It had a significant risk of complete heart block, required long periods of bypass and myocardial ischemia, and usually required a mechanical valve and anticoagulation.

Although multiple studies have demonstrated good early results using AACs, the incidence of late problems associated with long-term durability of the conduit valve has been appreciable. The reported late complications of AACs are LV pseudoaneurysm, erosion of the conduit into the esophagus or stomach when placed to the abdominal aorta, systemic emboli, and tissue valve dysfunction [15–22]. An LV pseudoaneurysm was seen in one of our patients. The risk of this complication has been reduced by use of a cloth-covered and lined LV stent and by attaching the LV stent to the patients' pericardium after insertion of the AAC. Systemic emboli have not been encountered in our patients, as was reported by Stansel and associates [19], and have not been encountered in other series. If systemic emboli were to occur they would very likely go below the diaphragm inasmuch as flow in the AAC rarely goes proximal to the left subclavian artery. Flow to the other aortic arch vessels is antegrade through the native aortic valve. Erosion of the conduit into the esophagus or an abdominal viscus [21] has not been encountered in our series. This complication could be prevented by placing omentum over the AAC in the retroperitoneum, as suggested by Ergin and coworkers [20], or placing the entire conduit in the left chest, which is our strong preference.

The major drawback of currently available AACs appears to be the limited durability of the porcine and AH valves in children. Conduit failure secondary to early bioprosthetic conduit valve degeneration and calcification has been previously identified as the major late complication of bioprosthetic valves in children. This fact is demonstrated by our study. Conduit valve failure occurred in 15 of the 25 children who survived initial placement. Several of our patients had an AAC valve change by means of a repeat left thoracotomy. Valve replacement was accomplished by clamping the graft on both sides of the valve. Bypass was not necessary in any patients. In patients who underwent a subsequent direct treatment of their LVOTO, the AAC was ligated and left in place.

High early and late mortality rates after conduit placement were observed by DiDonato and colleagues [7] and Norwood and associates [22] after conduit placement in children younger than 2 years of age. They attributed the poor outcome in these young children to congenital maldevelopment of the left ventricle associated with complex left-sided obstruction. Early conduit failure secondary to conduit valve stenosis or regurgitation was more prevalent in their younger group as well, particularly in infants younger than 1 year of age at conduit placement. Those patients undergoing conduit placement after 6 years of age had longer conduit durability, but conduit bioprosthetic valve failure eventually led to reoperation. Durability of the porcine xenograft valve in older children and adults is much better, and we have a few older children in whom the xenograft valve functioned well for 15 to 20 years.

Use of a more durable mechanical valve in the conduit is possible but requires warfarin sodium anticoagulation, which is not attractive in children. We have used mechanical valves in selected patients (n = 6). Unlike aortoventriculoplasty, the extracardiac location of the valve in AACs makes the apical aortic approach ideal for reoperation on malfunctioning prosthetic valves without bypass and permits a delayed primary attack on the LVOTO. Two of our patients still have their original AAC, 24 and 25 years after initial implantation, but both have had the porcine valve replaced with a mechanical prosthesis 13 and 14 years after initial AAC insertion.

Since the early 1990s the AAC procedure has been largely replaced with the Ross or Ross-Konno procedures in our pediatric practice. Patients with single ventricle and LVOTO (3 in this series) are currently better-served with a Damus-Kaye-Stansel procedure. We currently would only consider using an AAC in a child if there were serious reservations about doing a repeat sternotomy (ie, prior healed mediastinitis). The AAC procedure with a porcine xenograft valve continues to have a role in older adult patients with critical AS with or without mild AR in whom a direct approach through a median sternotomy is unattractive (ie, calcified eggshell ascending aorta, prior sternal wound infection, or multiple patent arterial or venous bypass grafts). The porcine xenograft in these patients has a durability of more than 10 years, and the procedure is performed routinely without cardiopulmonary bypass. A routine preoperative assessment of lower thoracic aorta by computed tomographic scan is performed to assure a safe location for the distal conduit anastomosis in these older patients. Efforts are currently under way to develop instrumentation to further simplify insertion of the AAC through a limited left thoracotomy and without bypass in the older patient population. The off-pump apical aortic approach to the LVOTO may compete favorably with techniques designed to percutaneously dilate and replace the stenotic native aortic valve in poor-risk adults, which are currently under investigation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Carrel A. On the experimental surgery of the thoracic aorta and the heart Ann Surg 1910;52:83-95.[Medline]
  2. Sarnoff SJ, Donovan TJ, Case RB. The surgical relief of aortic stenosis by means of apical-aortic valvular anastomosis Circulation 1953;11:564-574.
  3. Brown JW, Stevens LS, Holly S, et al. Surgical spectrum of aortic stenosis in childrena thirty-year experience with 257 children. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;45:393-403.[Abstract]
  4. Brown JW, Girod DA, Hurwitz RA, et al. Apicoaortic valved conduits for complex left ventricular outflow obstructiontechnical considerations and current status. Ann Thorac Surg 1984;38:162-168.[Abstract]
  5. Rocchini AP, Brown JW, Crowley DC, Girod DA, Behrendt D, Rosenthal A. Clinical and hemodynamic follow-up of left ventricular to aortic conduits in patients with aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1:1135-1143.[Abstract]
  6. Sweeney MS, Walker WE, Colley DA, Reul GJ. Apicoaortic conduits for complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:609-611.[Abstract]
  7. DiDonato RM, Danielson GK, McGoon DC, Drisscoll DJ, Julsrud PR, Edwards WD. Left ventricle-aortic conduits in pediatric patients J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;88:82-91.[Abstract]
  8. Khanna SK, Anstadt MP, Bhimji S, et al. Apico-aortic conduits in children with severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:81-87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Norman JC, Nihill MR, Coolley DA. Valved apico-aortic composite conduits for left ventricular outflow tract obstructionsa 4 year experience with 27 patients. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:1265-1271.[Medline]
  10. Brown JW, Kirsh MM. Technique for insertion of apicoaortic conduit J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978;76:90-94.[Abstract]
  11. Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:952-959.[Abstract]
  12. Brown JW, Myerowitz PD, Cann MS, et al. Apical-aortic anastomosisa method for relief of diffuse left ventricular outflow obstruction. Surg Forum 1974;25:147-149.[Medline]
  13. Konno S, Yasuharu I, Iida Y, et al. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;70:909-917.[Abstract]
  14. Rastan H, Koncz J. Aortoventriculoplastya new technique for the treatment of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;71:920-927.[Abstract]
  15. Frommelt PC, Rocchini AP, Bove EL. Natural history of apical left ventricular to aortic conduits in pediatric patients Circulation 1991;84(Suppl 3):III-213-III-218.
  16. Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Rodefeld MD, Turrentine MW. Surgery for aortic stenosis in childrena 40-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1398-1411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Behrendt DM, Rocchini AP. Relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in infants and small children with valved extracardiac conduits Ann Thorac Surg 1987;43:82-86.[Abstract]
  18. Stansel HC, Tabry II, Hellenbrand WE, Talner NS, Kelley MJ. Apical-aortic shunts in children Am J Surg 1978;135:547-552.[Medline]
  19. Ergin MA, Cooper R, LaCorte M, Golinko R, Griepp RB. Experience with left ventricular apicoaortic conduits for complicated left ventricular outflow obstruction in children and young adults Ann Thorac Surg 1981;32:369-375.[Abstract]
  20. Berry BE, Quaid TP. Left ventricular-abdominal aortic conduit complicated by late gastric erosion J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;82:147-149.[Abstract]
  21. Chen R, Duncan JM, Nihill M, Colley DA. Early degeneration of porcine xenograft valves in pediatric patients who have undergone apico-aortic bypass Tex Heart Inst J 1982;9:41-47.[Medline]
  22. Norwood WI, Lang P, Castaneda AR, Murphy JD. Management of infants with left ventricular outflow obstruction by conduit interposition between the ventricular apex and thoracic aorta J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:771-776.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. L. Herrmann, M. Ruzmetov, M. D. Rodefeld, M. H. Hoyer, and J. W. Brown
Simultaneous apicoaortic conduit placement and mitral valve replacement in an adolescent with porcelain aorta, aortic stenosis, and mitral stenosis.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 998 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. P. Graham Jr
The Year in Congenital Heart Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2545 - 2553.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
John W. Brown
Mark Ruzmetov
Andrew C. Fiore
Mark D. Rodefeld
Mark W. Turrentine
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Turrentine, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Turrentine, M. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS