|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1688-1692
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
Accepted for publication April 25, 2005.
* Address correspondence to Dr Girardi, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th St, M-424, New York, NY 10021 (Email: lngirard{at}med.cornell.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with a porcelain aorta were referred for heart valve surgery. In every case the aorta was replaced under circulatory arrest before the valve procedure. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, and univariate risk factors for death were calculated. Fisher's exact test defined significant perioperative variables with a p value less than 0.05.
RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 23 (92%) survived the surgery to hospital discharge. One patient had a stroke (4%) and 2 patients (8%) required reexploration for bleeding. Risk factors for perioperative death by univariate analysis included age more than 78 years (p < 0.009), cardiopulmonary bypass time longer than 200 minutes (p < 0.0001), reexploration for bleeding (p < 0.02), need for intra-aortic balloon pump support (p < 0.001), and postoperative gastrointestinal complications (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Valve replacement or repair in the patient with a porcelain aorta can be safely accomplished with a technique based on aortic replacement under circulatory arrest. Elderly patients requiring extensive procedures and prolonged periods on bypass have a substantially increased risk for postoperative complications and death.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An earlier report on 540 patients with atherosclerotic aortas described a small subset of patients having aortic replacement under PHCA [2]. The operative mortality for this cohort was 10% with a small risk of CVA despite a high percentage of patients having significant carotid artery disease. Encouraged by these results, we adopted this technique of aortic replacement before valve replacement or repair in a consecutive series of patients requiring valvular heart surgery in the setting of a truly porcelain aorta. We report our contemporary experience with this aggressive technique, modified by the addition of retrograde cerebral perfusion and high mean arterial pressure cardiopulmonary bypass [12, 13].
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Patients were then placed on cardiopulmonary bypass and core cooled to a bladder temperature of 18°C. While on bypass, mean arterial pressure was maintained between 70 and 80 mm Hg [13]. A right superior pulmonary vein vent was placed, and the ascending aorta was not clamped. Once the appropriate temperature was reached, 1 g pentothal was administered, and PHCA was initiated with the patient in a steep Trendelenberg position. The aorta was opened, and RCP was initiated at 150 to 300 cc/min, keeping the CVP less than 25 mm Hg. Retrograde cold, blood potassium cardioplegia was given during this initial phase of the operation after PHCA was begun.
The aorta was then inspected and palpated, and a suitable area for reconstruction in the proximal arch was identified. If there was no obvious break in the circumferential calcification in this location, a local endarterectomy was performed. Aortic reconstruction was then performed with a one-branch Dacron prosthesis (Meadox Medical, Oakland, New Jersey) and 3-0 polypropylene suture. The suture line was then reinforced with horizontal mattress pledgetted sutures. In patients requiring endarterectomy, a neoadventitia was created with Teflon (Impra, subsidiary of L.R. Bard, Tempe, Arizona) felt strips outside this area. Cardiopulmonary bypass was then reinstituted through the side branch graft and systemic warming was initiated, maintaining a 10°C gradient between the blood and core temperature. Valve replacement, repair or coronary bypass grafting, or both, was then performed after this period of PHCA. The aortic reconstruction was then completed at the level of the sinotubular junction utilizing the aforementioned techniques. Aortic root replacement was not necessary in any of the 25 patients. During this phase of aortic reconstruction, myocardial protection was achieved by antegrade direct coronary ostial injection or retrograde coronary sinus delivery.
All patients were given full Hammersmith dose aprotonin (6 million units), and blood product replacement was utilized as necessary. Postoperative hematocrit was maintained above 30%, and systolic blood pressure was optimized to 110 mm Hg or greater. All postoperative complications were recorded, as was in-hospital mortality. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
Statistical Analysis
A retrospective, comparative statistical analysis of perioperative variables was performed using SPSS statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Univariate analysis was performed with
2 analysis. Statistical significance was defined by a p value of 0.05 or less.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A majority of the patients required procedures in addition to their primary valve procedure (Table 2). Sixty percent of patients required coronary revascularization, and 16% required an aortic endarterectomy to safely reconstruct the aorta in the arch or at the sinotubular junction, or both. One patient with a previous CABG required reimplantation of a patent saphenous vein graft. The other 4 with patent internal mammary artery grafts had this graft identified and controlled during the procedure to enhance myocardial protection. The patient undergoing mitral valve repair also had significant tricuspid regurgitation, and a valvuloplasty was necessary.
|
Postoperative complications and mortality are highlighted in Table 3. Although 20% of patients had previous CABG surgery and 60% of patients required additional bypass grafting, no patient had a documented myocardial infarction. In addition, despite the advanced age of the patients, none had respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy. One patient had a nonfatal CVA (left-sided weakness) and recovered full function before discharge. No patient required hemodialysis.
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because nearly 2% of all cardiac surgery patients have severe aortic atherosclerosis [1], and approximately one fifth of this group will have the extreme "porcelain" subtype, strategies to safely manage this population are needed. Patients with a severely calcified ascending aorta who require isolated CABG may be treated with innovative methods aimed at reducing atheroemboli during the procedure. Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) is a safe strategy that can be performed without aortic cross-clamping and the potential for atheroembolism generated by the heart and lung machine. Alternative sites for proximal anastomoses can completely eliminate aortic manipulation and may further reduce the incidence of stroke. The evolution of proximal connector devices may offer additional benefits for patients with severely atherosclerotic aortas requiring bypass surgery [4, 5].
Patients with advanced valvular heart disease will require cardiopulmonary bypass for valve replacement or repair. In patients with a porcelain aorta and mitral insufficiency or stenosis, surgery can be safely performed without aortic cross-clamping. Recent advancements in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery have led to the development of alternative strategies for arterial cannulation, endoaortic balloon occlusion, and retrograde cardioplegia [18]. In patients without significant aortic insufficiency, hypothermic fibrillation on cardiopulmonary bypass can also provide adequate myocardial protection and valve exposure for patients not requiring concomitant coronary artery bypass [19]. Although successful outcomes utilizing either of these strategies have been reported, it may be difficult to duplicate the usually low morbidity and mortality rates with these techniques in the elderly population with a porcelain aorta. These patients often have severe atherosclerosis of the descending aorta and peripheral vasculature that can make alternative sites for arterial cannulation and endoaortic manipulation less desirable and significantly more technically challenging. Axillary artery cannulation may offer some advantages in this setting [20]. Although only 3 patients in our report had mitral valve disease as their primary cardiac pathology, we believe aortic replacement under PHCA can be safely performed with similarly good outcomes. An overwhelming majority of patients can be managed with central aortic cannulation and antegrade cardiopulmonary bypass, thus eliminating the possibility of retrograde embolization of debris from the descending thoracic aorta. It also reduces the incidence of retrograde aortic dissection and balloon migration that has been reported utilizing endoaortic techniques. In patients with a porcelain aorta needing mitral valve surgery, a complete evaluation of their arterial system is appropriate. That will provide the surgeon with the information necessary to choose the surgical approach they are most comfortable with for these high-risk patients.
Patients in need of aortic valve replacement in the setting of a porcelain aorta are often turned down for surgery because the risk of stroke is thought to be prohibitive. However, the natural history of medically treated severe aortic valve disease, particularly aortic stenosis, is dismal. In a series of 100 symptomatic patients with critical aortic stenosis treated with medical therapy alone, there was a 33% mortality in the first year after the development of symptoms [21]. Over the last 2 decades, a number of innovative techniques have been described that have the common pathway of minimizing manipulation of the severely calcified aorta while performing aortic valve replacement under PHCA or with aortic endarterectomy. Aortic valve replacement under PHCA was first described in 1986. In 2 cases, the aortic valve was replaced during 38 and 44 minutes of circulatory arrest without neurologic injury or death [7]. A similar approach was espoused by Bryne and colleagues [22] in a 1998 report on 3 patients undergoing the same procedure. Despite a mean PHCA period of 54 minutes, the results were again excellent.
Aortic endarterectomy is also useful in this setting. Svensson and colleagues [23] described 6 cases of extensive ascending aortic endarterectomy in patients requiring aortic replacement. Only 1 patient sustained a neurologic deficit, and there were no deaths. However, in the patients with a truly porcelain aorta, PHCA was still required, thus eliminating the potential advantages of this simpler technique. In addition, follow-up was quite limited, and the potential for aneurysmal degeneration of the endarterectomized aorta remains unknown.
Kouchoukos's group [2] was the first to describe aortic replacement under PHCA for patients with a porcelain aorta. Of 540 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 10 had severe diffuse atheromatous disease and were treated with graft replacement of the ascending aorta under PHCA. The mortality rate for this procedure was 10%. There were no strokes, but 1 of the 10 patients had a transient neurologic deficit that resolved before discharge. These results were more remarkable when considering that all these patients were perfused through the femoral artery and that 3 had severe enough carotid disease to mandate concomitant endarterectomy. A follow-up report confirmed the efficacy of this approach in a larger cohort of patients [16]. A recent report in 44 patients having aortic replacement in this clinical setting revealed a stroke risk of 11% with an operative mortality of 6.8% [24].
Certainly, conclusions from any nonrandomized, retrospective analysis of a small cohort of patients should be interpreted with caution. However, we believe the results with aortic replacement under PHCA reaffirm this technique's utility in minimizing neurologic injury. Twenty percent of our patients had previous strokes yet only 1 had a focal neurologic deficit after surgery. With replacement of the diseased aorta, there is no risk of aneurysm formation after surgery, and the risk of embolization from a calcified and diseased ascending aorta and proximal arch is eliminated. The operative mortality from this procedure, 8%, is similar to that of others performing this procedure [2, 16, 24] and correlates strongly with the need for extensive procedures and prolonged periods of cardiopulmonary bypass. Perhaps a less invasive approach dealing only with the patient's valve disease will prove to be more efficacious for elderly patients who may not tolerate extreme intervention [25].
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. De Paulis, D. Maselli, R. Scaffa, and S. Nardella Double-arterial cannulation for aortic valve replacement with porcelain aorta Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 36(4): 769 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Germing and A. Mugge What the cardiac surgeon needs to know prior to aortic valve surgery: impact of echocardiography Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 960 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zingone, E. Rauber, G. Gatti, A. Pappalardo, B. Benussi, G. Forti, U. Tognolli, and M. Gabrielli Diagnosis and management of severe atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta and aortic arch during cardiac surgery: focus on aortic replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 990 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zingone, G. Gatti, E. Rauber, A. Pappalardo, B. Benussi, and L. Dreas Surgical Management of the Atherosclerotic Ascending Aorta: Is Endoaortic Balloon Occlusion Safe? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1709 - 1714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |