|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1550-1559
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Accepted for publication November 24, 2004.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Detterbeck, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina, CB 7065, Medical School Wing CRoom 354, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7065 (Email: fdetter{at}med.unc.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Dr Detterbeck discloses that he has a financial relationship with I-Flow, Corp.
|
A thoracotomy is particularly painful, and good pain control is crucial to maximize the ability to cough and breathe. The most common methods of postoperative pain management are systemic narcotics and epidural administration of local anesthetic agents or narcotics [1]. Techniques involving intercostal nerve blockade are used less often, although this may be unjustified. This article is a systematic review of intercostal nerve blockade after thoracotomy. It is restricted to efficacy data from randomized studies involving any techniques of intercostal nerve blockade.
The simplest method of intercostal nerve blockade is injection of local anesthetics in multiple intercostal nerves before closure of a thoracotomy incision. A longer-lasting method involves cryotherapy of intercostal nerves. Continuous infusion or serial administration of local anesthetics through an indwelling catheter for several days can be performed through an interpleural catheter (by anesthetic diffusion across the pleura and inner chest wall to the intercostal nerves) or through a catheter placed in a subpleural (extrapleural) pocket (closer to the nerves). Each of these methods is discussed separately.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Predetermined inclusion criteria were a randomized study of patients undergoing thoracotomy in which a method of intercostal nerve blockade was compared with either systemic narcotics or an epidural analgesia technique. Randomized studies involving a different control group are included in the discussion as appropriate. Duplicate publications were excluded, ie, earlier publications of patients included in a subsequent larger report. However, studies were included if it was unclear whether the same patients were reported elsewhere. Evidence tables were constructed according to the criteria listed in the legend of each table. The relative paucity of studies, the variability in the durations of patient assessments, and the subjective nature and variability in pain assessment prevent a formal meta-analysis of these data.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Infusion of local anesthetics through the catheter fills the extrapleural pocket, and diffuses across the endothoracic fascia and internal intercostal muscles to cause intercostal nerve blockade. Postoperative imaging studies have shown that the fluid remains in the extrapleural space without leakage into the pleural space [6, 7]. Some authors place the catheter when convenient lateral to the spine [810], while others emphasize placement close to the heads of the ribs in the paravertebral space [6, 7, 11] because there the intercostal nerves are not enveloped by a fascial sheath and the sympathetic ganglia, posterior intercostal rami, and nerve branches to the costovertebral joints are also blocked [7, 12].
Although many types of catheters are used, a small catheter with multiple side holes, such as an epidural-type catheter or an On-Q soaker catheter (I-Flow Corporation, Lake Forest, CA), is most appealing. Most authors have placed a catheter with side holes across multiple intercostal levels [10, 11], while others have placed one catheter above and one below the incision [8], and others have used multiple intercostal catheters [13].
The vast majority of authors use 0.5% bupivacaine as a local anesthetic [3, 9, 11, 1418], although some use 0.25% bupivacaine [6, 10, 1922], 1% lidocaine [9, 23], or 1% lignocaine [6]. The rate of infusion is generally 5 to 7 mL/h for an average-sized adult (0.1 mL·kg1 ·h1) [3, 6, 9, 11, 1416, 18, 19, 2123]. Analgesia to pinprick (approximately 5 dermatomes unilaterally) is similar to a thoracic epidural (bilaterally) [19].
Efficacy
Randomized studies of an extrapleural catheter in patients undergoing thoracotomy are summarized in Table 1. All but two of the studies involving narcotics are double-blind and placebo-controlled. Overall, the data demonstrate that extrapleural analgesia is superior to systemic narcotics. All of the studies have found that pain relief was better, although the difference was not statistically significant in two of seven studies. Moreover, better pain relief was achieved despite a decreased use of supplemental narcotics in most studies. The incidence of pulmonary complications was generally lower in the extrapleural group. There was also better preservation of the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in most studies (although one found a trend to worse results).
|
One study compared extrapleural with interpleural administration of local anesthetics [14]. No difference in pain was noted, although pulmonary complications were decreased and FEV1 better preserved by the extrapleural approach. The lack of a difference in pain control is surprising, given how consistently better extrapleural analgesia is compared with systemic narcotics, which yield similar relief compared with interpleural analgesia (see next section). The poor FEV1 results with interpleural bupivacaine in this study [14] may be caused by bupivacaine pooling above the diaphragm, causing diaphragmatic impairment.
Randomized studies comparing extrapleural infusions of bupivacaine and lidocaine or lignocaine found no difference in pain relief, need for supplemental narcotics, or pulmonary function [6, 9]. These authors argue that lidocaine may be better than bupivacaine because of a larger therapeutic window, a lower risk of cardiac toxicity, and the notion that a constant infusion thwarts any advantage of a longer-acting agent. However, this argument is countered by the extensive experience and minimal toxicity with bupivacaine.
Toxicity
Extrapleural infusion of bupivacaine has been very well tolerated. Local complications were seen in 0.6% of patients (2 of 311) in studies that specifically reported complications (1 patient each with transient hypotension and transient Horner's syndrome) [3, 6, 911, 1517, 22, 2426]. Systemic bupivacaine toxicity (confusion) was noted in 0.8% of patients (3 of 383) [3, 6, 811, 1420, 22, 24, 26]. Two additional patients experienced confusion thought to be unrelated because their plasma bupivacaine levels were well below the toxic range [19]. One patient experienced rib osteomyelitis as a result of the catheter [21]. No other complications have been reported. Toxicity to other local anesthetics has not been reported. More side effects have occurred in patients receiving an epidural in studies comparing extrapleural bupivacaine with epidural techniques [18, 22, 26].
Average plasma bupivacaine levels during continuous infusion for several days are 3 to 4 µg/mL (range, 2.1 to 4.92 µg/mL) in studies that have measured this [8, 16, 19, 26, 29, 30], which is close to the commonly accepted threshold of 5 µg/mL for central nervous system toxicity [30]. Maximal levels of 7.48 µg/mL [29] and 10.25 µg/mL [16] have been reported, but these patients did not experience toxicity. The explanation may be that the vast majority of plasma bupivacaine during an infusion is bound to serum proteins and is thereby rendered biologically inactive [30]. Furthermore, studies attempting to define a toxic plasma level have been unable to do so, and the incidence of toxicity appears to be related to the rapidity of administration [31].
Interpleural Administration of Local Anesthetics
Technique
Interpleural administration of local anesthetics is accomplished by introducing a small catheter percutaneously into the pleural space before thoracotomy closure. An epidural-type catheter with multiple side holes is generally used, and positioned posteriorly in the paravertebral gutter, spanning several intercostal spaces above and below the incision. Usually intermittent doses of bupivacaine are given every 4 [3237], 6 [38], or 8 hours [39, 40], but some authors use a constant infusion [14, 41]. The dose of bupivacaine is not consistent, but the most common volume is 20 mL, and the most common concentration is 0.5% (with epinephrine in about half of the studies). In approximately half of the studies the chest tubes were clamped for 5 to 30 minutes after the dose was given [3335, 37, 38, 40, 42]; in others, gravity drainage [39] or suction was maintained throughout [14, 32, 36, 41, 43]. Management of the chest tubes may be important because a large portion (about 30%) of the administered dose drains from the tubes within 15 minutes [33, 36, 43, 44]. One randomized study suggested that epinephrine was not needed, and that two catheters may be better than one [36].
Efficacy
Randomized studies (mostly double-blind, placebo-controlled) of interpleural local anesthetics after thoracotomy suggest that the benefit of this approach is marginal, at best (Table 2). Most studies have found no difference in patients' perception of pain or need for narcotics, although two studies found both of these outcomes to be significantly better using an interpleural approach compared with narcotics alone. The limited available data regarding pulmonary function tests or respiratory complications do not suggest that interpleural local anesthetics offer a benefit. The few studies comparing an interpleural with an epidural approach have either found no difference in pain control or found a benefit to an epidural technique. In general, blockage of approximately four dermatomes has been achieved in the one study that assessed this [36].
|
Cryoanalgesia
Technique
Cryoanalgesia involves freezing intercostal nerves to 60°C for 30 to 45 seconds, which causes damage to the myelin sheath, thereby interrupting nerve conduction. The nerve axon, however, is unharmed, so that functional recovery of the nerve occurs once the myelin sheath has regenerated [46, 47]. This process generally takes about 1 to 3 months in the case of intercostal nerves [47, 48].
Usually the intercostal nerves are isolated and the cryoprobe is applied directly, although some authors have applied the probe over the intact pleura, provided the pleura is thin [48]. In some studies the nerve has been frozen twice, in others a single application of a cryoprobe was used. Usually the nerve along the intercostal incision and at least one nerve above and one below are frozen (range, three to eight nerves). This technique was practiced fairly commonly during the 1980s, especially in several European centers, but fell out of favor around 1990. This corresponded with more widespread availability of epidural anesthesia, as well as concerns about the efficacy and the potential for neuralgia.
Efficacy
Randomized studies of cryoanalgesia for postthoracotomy pain relief (Table 3) compared with narcotics suggest marginally better pain relief and a trend to less supplemental narcotics with cryotherapy, although many studies have found no difference. However, no study suggested that cryoanalgesia resulted in worse pain control. Three studies found no difference in the postoperative FEV1 [38, 49, 50], although one study noted a benefit to cryotherapy versus narcotics [51], and two found a trend to a benefit [47, 52]. The studies addressing pulmonary complications suggested that cryoanalgesia was beneficial [47, 53]. Most of these studies were conducted in a blinded fashion. Comparison of cryoanalgesia with epidural analgesia suggests worse pain relief and more supplemental narcotics with cryoanalgesia, although the data are limited.
|
Direct Intercostal Nerve Block
Technique
Intercostal nerves can be injected percutaneously from outside the chest or under direct vision from inside the chest before thoracotomy closure. The blocks are administered just below a rib in the region of the intercostal bundle, being careful not to inject the dose intravascularly. In most studies 2 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine per intercostal nerve is used, although some have injected larger volumes [5961] or used 0.25% bupivacaine [62]. In most studies bupivacaine without epinephrine has been used. Some authors have administered the first block percutaneously before the incision [63]. Most authors have administered the intercostal block only once, although some have repeated the blocks during the course of 24 hours [63].
Efficacy
Intercostal nerve block before thoracotomy closure has generally provided better pain relief than narcotics alone, although a reduction in supplemental medication is less clear (Table 4). Interestingly, better pain relief occurred even in studies that assessed pain more than 3 to 5 days, even though the intercostal block was not repeated [60, 64]. Segmental analgesia to pinprick extended to 18 hours in one study after 0.5% bupivacaine without epinephrine [19]. Pulmonary function also appears to be better preserved, even several days later, but an effect on pulmonary complications is unclear. Almost all of these studies were not blinded.
|
Toxicity
Intercostal nerve blocks are associated with minimal side effects. A study of almost 11,000 patients receiving percutaneous intercostal nerve blocks found no episodes of systemic toxicity to local anesthetics [70]. The incidence of pneumothorax was 0.07%, although this is not germane to intraoperative administration of the block [70]. Plasma bupivacaine levels have been low after intercostal nerve blocks (0.19 to 1.46 µg/mL with a peak at 10 minutes) [19]. Even a continuous infusion for more than 5 days has been found to be safe, with local anesthetic levels that are below toxic levels [71].
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A continuous infusion of local anesthetics through an extrapleural catheter results in more effective pain relief than systemic narcotics. In fact, the pain relief afforded by the extrapleural technique appears to be at least as good as an epidural approach. Catheter placement at the time of thoracotomy or thoracoscopy can be accomplished quickly and reliably. Because the extrapleural route results in only a unilateral blockade, the incidence of side effects such as hypotension and urinary retention is greatly diminished. There is no risk of respiratory depression and no need for intensive monitoring or specialized services for management. Although an extrapleural approach does not always eliminate the need for systemic narcotics, the amount needed is reduced.
The value of other techniques of intercostal nerve blockade is less clear. Interpleural local anesthetic results in inconsistent pain relief. Although catheter placement is straightforward, the risk of side effects appears to be slightly higher than with an extrapleural route. As a result, this technique is currently used only rarely. Cryoanalgesia appears to be of some benefit relative to systemic narcotics, but the results are less consistent compared with an extrapleural catheter, and appear to be worse than with an epidural approach. Furthermore, cryoanalgesia carries a significant risk of postoperative hyperesthesia. Direct intercostal nerve blockade appears to provide a benefit compared with narcotics alone in several older studies, particularly during the first day, but the short duration of action makes this approach less appealing.
A more detailed understanding of the pathophysiology of postoperative pain has evolved [74]. Tissue injury causes peripheral sensitization through the release of mediators, so that there is both an exaggerated response of the high-threshold A
and C fibers that are responsible for transmission of true noxious stimuli. This results in exaggerated responsiveness of nerves in the affected area (primary hyperalgesia), as well as an exaggerated response in surrounding uninjured tissue (secondary hyperalgesia) [74]. In addition, noxious stimuli (pain) elicit changes in the dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord known as central sensitization. This has the effect that stimuli from low-threshold Aß fibers, which are normally perceived as relatively innocuous, are now perceived as pain (pathologic pain) [74]. These physiologic changes have been demonstrated in humans using a variety of experimental approaches. In addition, there is evidence from several avenues of investigation that these early changes precipitate the development of chronic pain [57, 74, 75].
The more sophisticated understanding of the physiology of pain has led to the recommendation for a multifaceted approach to postoperative analgesia to prevent the sensitization that amplifies the sensation of pain. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents decrease peripheral as well as central sensitization [74, 76]. Preoperative narcotics decrease central sensitization. However, the major factor in decreasing sensitization seems to be blocking the neural transmission of nociceptive stimuli that result from the incision, something that systemic narcotics alone cannot achieve. An intercostal block leads to a more effective block of nociceptive stimuli than an epidural approach [74]. Highly effective postthoracotomy pain relief has been demonstrated using such a multifaceted approach [77], and the intercostal block appears to be the most important component [77]. Whether analgesic agents are given preoperatively or postoperatively does not seem to be important [78]. Better early pain relief has been associated with a lower incidence of chronic postthoracotomy pain [75, 79], consistent with the theory of the pathophysiology of chronic pain.
In conclusion, continuous intercostal nerve blockade after thoracotomy using an extrapleural catheter results quite consistently in better pain relief and preservation of pulmonary function than systemic narcotics, and appears to be at least as good as an epidural approach. The ease of the extrapleural approach and the low incidence of complications suggest this technique should be used more frequently. Other methods of intercostal nerve blockade appear to be less effective, although direct intercostal nerve injection may decrease pain in the immediate postoperative period. The use of a multifaceted approach to postthoracotomy analgesia that includes intercostal nerve blockade may be beneficial in the immediate postoperative period as well as reduce the incidence of chronic pain.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Esme, B. Apiliogullari, F. M. Duran, B. Yoldas, and T. T. Bekci Comparison between intermittent intravenous analgesia and intermittent paravertebral subpleural analgesia for pain relief after thoracotomy Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2012; 41(1): 10 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wildgaard, R. H. Petersen, H. J. Hansen, H. Moller-Sorensen, T. K. Ringsted, and H. Kehlet Multimodal analgesic treatment in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy using an intraoperative intercostal catheter Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, December 21, 2011; (2011) ezr151v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Meierhenrich, D. Hock, S. Kuhn, E. Baltes, B. Muehling, R. Muche, M. Georgieff, and G. Gorsewski Analgesia and pulmonary function after lung surgery: is a single intercostal nerve block plus patient-controlled intravenous morphine as effective as patient-controlled epidural anaesthesia? A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2011; 106(4): 580 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D'Souza, K. Sondergaard, and F. C. Detterbeck Transient Brachial Plexus Palsy: An Unusual Complication of Paravertebral Infusion of Local Anesthetic Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): e75 - e76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Hunt, D. Eaton, O. Maiwand, and V. Anikin Video-assisted intercostal nerve cryoablation in managing intractable chest wall pain J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2010; 139(3): 774 - 775. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Scarci, A. Joshi, and R. Attia In patients undergoing thoracic surgery is paravertebral block as effective as epidural analgesia for pain management? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, January 1, 2010; 10(1): 92 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kotze, A. Scally, and S. Howell Efficacy and safety of different techniques of paravertebral block for analgesia after thoracotomy: a systematic review and metaregression Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2009; 103(5): 626 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Allen, L. Halgren, F. C. Nichols III, S. D. Cassivi, W. S. Harmsen, D. A. Wigle, K. R. Shen, and C. Deschamps A Randomized Controlled Trial of Bupivacaine Through Intracostal Catheters for Pain Management After Thoracotomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 903 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Blechman and M. Zervos Post-thoracotomy Horner syndrome associated with extrapleural infusion of local anesthetic Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 309 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Clavero, J. E. Cheyre, M. E. Solovera, and R. P. Aparicio Transient Diaphragmatic Paralysis by Continuous Para-Phrenic Infusion of Bupivacaine: A Novel Technique for the Management of Residual Spaces Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1216 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Byas-Smith and A. Gulati Ultrasound-Guided Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 1033 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. C. Detterbeck Subpleural Catheter Placement for Pain Relief After Thoracoscopic Resection Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1522 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |