ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert J. Downey
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downey, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downey, R. J.

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1488
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


New technology

Invited commentary

Robert J. Downey, MD

Thoracic Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021

(Email: downeyr{at}mskcc.org).

Lunn and co-authors [1] provide a retrospective review of 23 patients who had debridement of the trachea and main bronchi with a "microdebrider" placed into the airway through either a laryngeal suspension system or a rigid bronchoscope during a recent 2-year period. This is a near-novel application of this technology to endotracheal and endobronchial obstructive disease, and the article will be of interest to the general thoracic community.

As the authors state, the primary advantages of the microdebrider compared with other modalities for clearing the airway are (1) that the rapid removal of debrided tissue is made without removal of the debriding instrument, and (2) that there is a reduction of risk of combustion in the airway. It is not clear from this report how much better the microdebrider is compared with currently available and cheaper technology, such as a reusable biopsy forcep. Furthermore, this article provides only a limited demonstration of safety; there is nothing in the text to suggest that the normal tracheal or broncheal wall could not be removed as easily as scar or neoplastic tissue. I would be particularly concerned about application of this device to the more distal, thinner walled airway in which the pulmonary artery is opposed to the outer wall. Finally, this article should be viewed as a feasibility study in that the durability of treatment is incompletely reported. Adequacy of treatment will require a more detailed report that should include information on the manner and length of follow-up and subsequent treatments.

This having been said, the microdebrider appears to represent a very useful addition to the tools already available to the interventional bronchoscopist, and further investigation is clearly warranted.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Lunn W, Garland R, Ashiku S, Thurer RL, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A. Microdebrider bronchoscopya new tool for the interventional bronchoscopist. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1485-1488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert J. Downey
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downey, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downey, R. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS