ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kwang Ree Cho
Ki-Bong Kim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K.-B.

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1353-1360
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

Does Diabetes Affect the Postoperative Outcomes After Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease?

Jae-Sung Choi, MD, PhD, Kwang Ree Cho, MD, Ki-Bong Kim, MD, PhD *

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Accepted for publication April 21, 2005.


Abbreviations and Acronyms AF = atrial fibrillation; AMI = acute myocardial infarction; ARF = acute renal failure; ASO = arteriosclerosis obliterance; BITA = bilateral internal thoracic artery; CAG = coronary angiography; CRF = chronic renal failure; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; HHNC = hyperosmolar hyperglycemic nonketotic coma; HR = hazard ratio; IABP = intraaortic balloon pump; ICU = intensive care unit; ITA = internal thoracic artery; MI = myocardial infarction; OR = odds ratio; PMI = perioperative myocardial infarction; PVOD = peripheral vascular obstructive disease; RA = radial artery; RGEA = right gastroepiploic artery; UGI = upper gastrointestinal


* Address reprint requests to Dr Kim K-B, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yeun-Kun Dong, Chong-Ro Ku, Seoul 110-744, Korea (Email: kimkb{at}snu.ac.kr).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the adverse effects of diabetes on surgical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We reviewed our experience to determine the impact of diabetes on early and midterm surgical outcomes of patients with multivessel disease who underwent total arterial revascularization with avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2003, 517 patients with multivessel disease underwent total arterial off-pump CABG; 214 were diabetic (DM group) and 303 were nondiabetic (NDM group). The DM group was sicker than the NDM group (more left ventricular dysfunction, postinfarction angina, previous myocardial infarction, and chronic renal failure). Mean follow-up period was 34 ± 17 months. The multivariate risk factors for operative mortality, one-year angiographic patency, and midterm survival were analyzed.

RESULTS: Mean numbers of distal anastomoses were not different between the two groups (DM, 3.1 ± 0.9; NDM, 3.0 ± 0.8). Operative mortality was 1.4% (DM, 1.4% vs NDM, 1.3%; p = not significant [ns]). No differences were found in the incidences of postoperative morbidities, including mediastinitis and superficial wound problems, between the two groups. In immediate postoperative angiography, the patency rates were 99.2% in the DM and 98.9% in the NDM group (p = ns). One-year patency rates in angiography were also similar between the two groups (DM, 96.0%; NDM, 95.4%; p = ns). Multivariate analysis indicated that diabetes was not an independent risk factor of steno-occlusion at one-year follow-up angiography. Five-year cumulative survival was 87.7 ± 4.1% in the DM, and 94.2 ± 1.4% in NDM (p = ns) group. Five-year freedom from cardiac death was 99.0 ± 0.7% in the DM, and 97.4 ± 1.0% in the NDM (p = ns) group. Old age (age >75 years) and chronic renal failure were independent risk factors for lower midterm survival. Our study failed to demonstrate that diabetes was an independent risk factor for lower midterm survival.

CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes mellitus did not affect the early postoperative and midterm results, including one-year graft patency, in patients with multivessel disease undergoing total arterial and off-pump CABG.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the adverse effect of diabetes on surgical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [1–6]. These equivocal data may be because each study differed in the extent of coronary artery disease, adequacy of diabetic control, strategy of conduit selection, and surgical techniques including cardiopulmonary bypass, which have been considered as possible factors influencing surgical outcome in diabetic patients [2, 6–13].

Recent studies indicate that arterial conduit might have a positive effect on maintaining its biologic integrity and improving surgical outcome in diabetics [2, 14, 15] and that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) technique would reduce surgical morbidities even in diabetic patients [12, 13]. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether diabetes influences the surgical outcome as a risk factor in patients with multivessel disease, undergoing total arterial revascularization with avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Of the 825 patients who underwent isolated CABG (109 on-pump CABGs, 716 OPCABs) between January 1998 and December 2003, 517 patients, who had multivessel disease and underwent total arterial OPCAB with at least one internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft, were studied in a prospective nonrandomized manner. A computer-based patient database system was used for this prospective study. Patients were regularly followed up through the out patient clinic at 3 or 4 month intervals postoperatively, and telephone contact was performed to confirm a patient's condition if the last hospital visit was not conducted at the scheduled time. Five hundred and seven patients (98.1%) were followed up until December 2004 and the mean follow-up period was 34 ± 17 months. The 517 patients were divided into two groups for comparison; 214 were diabetic (DM group) and 303 were nondiabetic (NDM group). The operations were all performed by a single surgeon (Ki-Bong Kim).

The DM group included all the patients who had been previously diagnosed as diabetic and requiring pharmacologic glycemic control. Nine patients without a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus but with elevated glucose levels at admission (fasting glucose level, ≥126 mg/dL; 2-h glucose level after a meal during glucose tolerance test, ≥200 mg/dL) were also included. In the DM group, there were 65 patients (30.4%) with insulin-treated diabetes and 149 patients (69.6%) with noninsulin-treated diabetes. Intravenous insulin, glucose, and potassium (GIK regimen) commenced before the operation for all diabetic patients. Usually, seven units of insulin in 500 mL 5% dextrose containing 15 mEq potassium was the starting solution, and was administered at 80 mL/h. The target glucose range was 90–180 mg/dL and serum potassium levels were maintained between 4.0 and 5.5 mmol/L. Blood glucose levels were monitored hourly intraoperatively and immediately after the operation. The infusion was stopped and the preoperative glucose control regimen resumed once oral intake was established, usually on the first postoperative day.

The patient's preoperative evaluation included clinical history, neurologic examination, and cardiac examination. The neurologic examination consisted of an interview and neurologic evaluation by a neurologist, carotid duplex ultrasonography, and transcranial Doppler or magnetic resonance angiography. The patients were reevaluated one week after the operation, or earlier if necessary. Stroke was defined as a new and sudden onset of neurologic deficits lasting more than 24 hours with no apparent nonvascular causes. Cardiac rhythm was continuously monitored postoperatively during the stay in the intensive care unit and in the general ward until the chest tubes were removed. A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram was checked daily thereafter during the postoperative hospital stay. Perioperative myocardial infarction was defined as positive results on at least two of the three different tests: the peak level in serial serum creatine kinase isoenzyme (>100 IU/L), appearance of a new Q wave on the electrocardiogram, or newly developed regional wall motion abnormalities on the postoperative echocardiogram. Postoperative acute renal failure was defined as a rise in serum creatinine of 1 mg/100 mL above baseline. In patients with a previous change in serum creatinine levels, postoperative acute renal failure was considered as an increase of 50% or more from the preoperative level.

Cardiac death was defined as any death related to cardiac events including sudden death. Operative mortalities and late mortalities were defined, respectively, as death rates within 30 days and after 30 days postoperatively. Preoperative data of this study showed that more patients in the DM group had left ventricular dysfunction, postinfarction angina, chronic renal failure, and a history of myocardial infarction than did those in the non-DM group (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Characteristics of the Patients
 
The basic surgical procedures and principles of OPCAB have been previously described [16]. All the patients used at least one ITA graft. Other arterial conduits used were the other ITA, the right gastroepiploic artery, and the radial artery.

The patency after operation was evaluated by angiography and graded as described by FitzGibbon and colleagues [17]. Steno-occlusion was defined as occluded, or 75% or greater diameter stenosis. Early postoperative angiographies (postoperative 1.4 ± 1.2 days) were performed in 97.9% (506/517) of the patients (209/214 in the DM group, 297/303 in the NDM group), and postoperative one-year angiographies (12.1 ± 4.3 months postoperatively) were performed in 88.2% (456/517) of the patients (180/214 in the DM group, 276/303 in the NDM group), regardless of the patient's anginal symptom. Patients who died, refused angiographic evaluation, or had renal function impairment were excluded from the angiographic follow-up rate.

Target-lesion revascularization was defined as percutaneous coronary intervention of the target vessel because of the presence of 75% or greater diameter stenosis of the target lesion, as measured by the follow-up angiography. The target lesion was defined as the surgically bypassed segment. Target-vessel revascularization included the target lesion or another segment within the same vessel. Nontarget-vessel revascularization was defined as revascularization of a new lesion outside the target vessel.

Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software package (version 11.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Comparison between the two groups was performed using the unpaired Student's t test, and using the {chi}2 test (Pearson {chi}2 and Fisher exact tests) for categoric variables. Follow-up losses were counted as missing data and excluded from the calculation of late mortality. Actuarial survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient's variables associated with operative mortalities, graft steno-occlusion at postoperative 1-year, and midterm survival were assessed by univariate ({chi}2, t test) and multivariate analysis (logistic or Cox regression analysis).

The univariate variables with p values less than 0.3 were entered into the logistic or Cox regression to detect significant independent risk factors. All results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Arterial Grafts Used and Distal Anastomoses
The right ITA, bilateral ITAs, and radial artery were used more frequently in NDM patients, whereas the right gastroepiploic artery was more common in DM patients (Table 2). The number of distal anastomoses per patient was not different between the two groups. The rates of constructing arterial Y grafts and sequential anastomoses were 68.2% and 39.2%, respectively, in the DM group, and 60.4% and 36.6%, respectively, in the NDM group (p = not significant [ns]).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Comparison of Arterial Grafts Used and Distal Anastomoses
 
Operative Mortalities, Morbidities, and Hospital Course
Operative mortalities were 1.4% (3 of 214 patients) in the DM group and 1.3% (4 of 303 patients) in the NDM group (p = ns) (Table 3). There was no operative mortality in the patients receiving insulin preoperatively (p = ns, when compared with the operative mortality of noninsulin treated diabetic patients).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Comparison of Operative Mortalities, Morbidities, and Hospital Course
 
There was no instance of stroke after the operation in either group. No differences were noted in the incidences of postoperative morbidities, including mediastinitis and superficial wound problems, which was also the case in patients who received bilateral ITA (p = 0.6, not indicated in Table 3). No differences were noted in the intensive care unit or hospital stay between the two groups (p = ns).

Late Mortalities and Midterm Survival (Appendix)
Late mortality was 5.3% (27 of 507 patients). There were no significant differences in late mortalities between the DM and NDM groups (7.2%, 15/209 vs 4.0%, 12/298; p = ns). Late mortality of insulin-treated diabetics was not significantly different from that of noninsulin treated diabetics (9.8%, 6/61 vs 6.1%, 9/148; p = ns). Among the 27 late deaths, the number of cardiac deaths was four (14.8%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of late cardiac deaths between the DM and NDM groups (0.5%, 1/209 vs 1.0%, 3/298; p = ns). In terms of midterm actuarial survival, there were no significant differences between the DM and NDM groups (93.8 ± 1.7% vs 96.6 ± 1.0% at 1 yr, 87.7 ± 4.1% vs 94.2 ± 1.4% at 5 yr; p = 0.119) (Fig 1). There were no significant differences in freedom from cardiac deaths between the two groups (99.0 ± 0.7% vs 98.3 ± 0.8% at 1 yr, 99.0 ± 0.7% vs 97.4 ± 1.0% at 5 yr; p = 0.261).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Comparison of midterm survival: DM versus NDM groups. (DM = diabetes mellitus; F/U = follow-up; NDM = nondiabetes mellitus.)

 
Immediate Postoperative and One-Year Angiographies
Early postoperative angiographies demonstrated a 99.2% patency rate in the DM group and 98.9% patency rate in the NDM group (p = ns). Postoperative one-year angiographies demonstrated a 96.0% patency rate in the DM and 95.4% in the NDM group (p = ns) (Table 4). There were no significant differences in the postoperative one-year patency rate between the patients with insulin-treated and noninsulin-treated diabetes among the DM group patients (95.3%, 163/171 vs 96.3%, 368/382; p = ns). Diabetes was not an independent risk factor of steno-occlusion at one-year follow-up angiography (Table 5). Although not indicated in the table, no significant risk factors arose when the analysis was performed separately in each DM or NDM group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Patency Rate: DM Versus NDM Groups
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Logistic Regression Analysis: Risk Factors for Steno-Occlusion at One-Year Angiography (n = 517)
 
Target or Nontarget Vessel Revascularization
Of the 291 patients who underwent follow-up angiography, target vessel revascularization (n = 6) or nontarget vessel revascularization (n = 1) was performed at 20 ± 9 months after the operation in seven patients (2.4%). Of the patients who underwent target vessel revascularization in which two target-lesion revascularizations were included, three patients were diabetic (2.8%) and the other three patients were nondiabetic (1.6%) (p = 0.493). Among the three diabetic patients undergoing target vessel revascularization, one patient was receiving insulin treatment. The two patients who underwent target lesion revascularization were all nondiabetic, whereas one patient who underwent nontarget vessel revascularization was diabetic.

Causes of Deaths and Risk Factor Analysis
Whereas 71.4% of early deaths were cardiac deaths, 14.8% of late deaths were cardiac deaths. Common causes of noncardiac late deaths were chronic renal failure, infection, and malignancy (Table 6). Univariate and logistic regression analysis for increased operative mortality demonstrated that left main disease was the only independent risk factor (p= 0.013) (Table 7). Diabetes and preoperative insulin treatment were not independent risk factors at either univariate or multivariate analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Causes of Operative and Late Deaths
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Logistic Regression Analysis: Risk Factors for Operative Mortality
 
Univariate and multivariate analysis of increased risk factors for midterm survival demonstrated that old age (>75 years) and chronic renal failure were significant risk factors (Table 8). Diabetes and preoperative insulin treatment were not independent risk factors, either. Left ventricular dysfunction and respiratory complication were significant factors in univariate analysis, however, they were not risk factors at Cox analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Cox Regression Analysis: Risk Factors for Midterm Survival
 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
This study demonstrates that diabetes with or without insulin treatment was not a risk factor for operative mortality, morbidity, one-year angiographic patency, and midterm survival for patients in whom the coronary artery bypass was performed with total arterial revascularization, at least one ITA graft was harvested, and cardiopulmonary bypass was avoided.

Diabetes has been reported to have an adverse effect on surgical outcomes and most CABG series comprise 20% to 30% of the diabetic population [13, 18–21]. We controlled the bias associated with the extent of coronary disease involvement by limiting the study to patients with disease in more than two vessels because coronary artery disease tends to be more extensive, involving multiple vessels in diabetic patients [22, 23]. This study included a relatively high diabetic population (41.4 %), which might result from our inclusion criteria of multivessel disease, racial difference, and high percutaneous intervention rate in our country. Cardiopulmonary bypass was reported to be associated with more complications [13] and to induce a greater oxidative stress in diabetic patients than in those without diabetes [24]. We routinely performed OPCAB for isolated coronary artery disease in our institute.

Although there have been disappointing long-term results of saphenous vein grafts in CABG [17, 25–27], the superiority of the ITA, even in diabetic patients, has been reported [15, 28, 29]. In this study, we used at least one ITA for CABG. In diabetic patients, the right gastroepiploic artery was more frequently used and bilateral ITAs were less frequently used compared with nondiabetic patients. In the early period of this study, we tried to avoid bilateral ITAs and used the gastroepiploic artery as an alternative graft in diabetic patients. We rarely used the radial artery as a bypass graft because it is prone to arteriosclerosis, intimal hyperplasia, and medial calcification [29] as well as the requirement of additional incision. The radial artery was used less often in DM patients with impaired renal function, in preparation for the future need of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis, especially in insulin-treated patients. The less frequent use of bilateral ITAs in diabetic patients may have been related to the result of no differences in the incidences of mediastinitis and superficial wound infection between the DM and NDM groups. However, since August 1999, when a standard skeletonizing technique was used, we have felt that skeletonization of ITA lowers the risk of deep sternal and superficial wound infection, even in diabetic patients who used bilateral ITAs; this has already been noted by other authors [30].

There was no difference in operative mortality between the DM and NDM groups in this study, which is in agreement with other reports [1, 4]. Most of our operative mortalities were related with cardiac death, and diabetes was not a risk factor for operative mortality at multivariate analysis. Calafiore and colleagues [18] also suggested that the 30-day mortality was influenced by the technical details of the surgery more than by the disease itself.

Overall and late mortalities during this study period were also similar between the two groups (8.4% and 7.2% in the DM, 5.3% and 4.0% in the NDM group, p = ns). In contrast to some reports [3, 6, 24, 30–32], diabetes did not appear as an independent risk factor for midterm survival in the Cox analysis and 5-year freedom from cardiac deaths was 99.0 ± 0.7% in diabetic patients (Fig 2) . Another study [1] a lso came to a conclusion similar to ours by showing that diabetes was not recognized as an independent risk factor for late survival. Our study showed more encouraging results, when considering that the DM group was sicker than the NDM group (more left ventricular dysfunction, postinfarction angina, previous myocardial infarction, and chronic renal failure).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Freedom from cardiac death: DM versus NDM groups. (DM = diabetes mellitus; F/U = follow-up; NDM = nondiabetes mellitus.)

 
Insulin-dependent diabetic patients were reported to have a poorer 5-year survival than noninsulin-dependent patients [19]. Other studies suggested that optimization of metabolic control in the acute phase and during follow-up can reduce the postoperative morbidities and enhance long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients [8, 33–36]. In this study, preoperative insulin treatment did not influence any adverse results postoperatively.

Chronic renal failure (CRF) and old age (>75 years) were independent risk factors for midterm survival in our study. Although there were more patients with chronic renal failure in the DM group, the comparison of late deaths with CRF did not demonstrate any significant difference between the two groups. Six of 22 (27.3%) diabetic CRF patients and 2 of 7 (28.6%) nondiabetic CRF patients died during the follow-up period.

Hirotani and colleagues [2] showed that, from their angiographic results obtained three weeks after surgery in 395 patients, there was no difference in the graft patency rate between the diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Our one-year angiographic patency rates in both groups were higher than 95% without statistical difference, and preoperative insulin treatment did not influence the 1-year angiographic outcome.

There are limitations to the present study that must be recognized. First, this study had a relatively small sample size and a small number of postoperative events. These resulted in high confidence intervals and reduced statistical power, particularly in the multivariate risk factor analysis for operative and late mortalities. In this regard, further subgroup analyses (DM vs NDM groups, insulin-treated vs noninsulin-treated diabetes groups) were not performed adequately. Second, we focused on the patients undergoing total arterial OPCAB for multivessel disease and did not compare with other patient populations because we performed total arterial OPCAB in most of our patients. The results of this study might not be extrapolated to the patients with on-pump CABG, single-vessel disease, or saphenous vein grafting.

In conclusion, diabetes mellitus did not affect the early postoperative and midterm results, including one-year graft patency in patients with multivessel disease undergoing total arterial and off-pump CABG.


    Appendix
 
Variables Used in Risk Factor Analysis for Operative Mortality and Midterm Survival

Preoperative Variables
Female
Age >75 yr
BMI (body mass index) > 30
Smoking
Hypertension
Diabetes mellitus
Preoperative insulin treatment
Hyperlipidemia
Stroke history
CRF (chronic renal failure)
ARF (acute renal failure)
COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
AMI (acute myocardial infarction) history
Postinfarction angina
Left main disease
PTCA (percutaneous coronary angioplasty) history
LV (left ventricular) dysfunction
Unstable angina

Intraoperative Variables
Intraoperative IABP (intraaortic balloon pump) insertion
Y-anastomosis
RGEA (right gastroepiploic artery)
RA (radial artery)
Bilateral ITAs (internal thoracic arteries)
Sequential anastomosis
Anterior vessels
Posterior vessels
Inferior vessels

Postoperative Variables
Steno-occlusion at immediate postoperative angiogram
Postoperative atrial fibrillation
Postoperative ARF
Respiratory complication
Mediastinitis
Reopen sternum d/t postoperative bleeding
Steno-occlusion at 1-yr angiography
TVR (target vessel revascularization) or non-TVR


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Gardner TJ, Greene PS, Rykiel MF, et al. Routine use of the left internal mammary artery graft in the elderly Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:188-194.[Abstract]
  2. Hirotani T, Kameda T, Kumamoto T, et al. Effects of coronary artery bypass grafting using internal thoracic arteries for diabetic patients J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:532-538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Herlitz J, Wognsen BG, Emanuelsson H, et al. Mortality and morbidity in diabetic and nondiabetic patients during a 2-year period after coronary artery bypass grafting Diabetes Care 1996;19:698-703.[Abstract]
  4. Horvath KA, DiSesa VJ, Peigh PS, et al. Favorable results of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients older than 75 years J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:92-96.[Abstract]
  5. Morris JJ, Smith LR, Jones RH, et al. Influence of diabetes and mammary artery grafting on survival after coronary bypass Circulation 1991;84(suppl III):III275-III284.
  6. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, et al. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery graft10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:599-605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cohen Y, Raz I, Gideon M, Mozes B. Comparison of factors associated with 30-day mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus Am J Cardiol 1998;81:7-11.[Medline]
  8. Furnary AP, Zerr KJ, Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:352-360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Zerr KJ, Furnary AP, Grunkemeier GL, Bookin S, Kanhere V, Starr A. Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operations Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:356-361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Furnary AP, Gao G, Grunkemeier GL, et al. Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1007-1021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:855-872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Srinivasan AK, Grayson AD, Fabri BM. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patientsa propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1604-1609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Magee MJ, Dewey TM, Acuff T, et al. Influence of diabetes on mortality and morbidityoff-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:776-781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lorusso R, Pentiricci S, Raddino R, et al. Influence of type 2 diabetes on functional and structural properties of coronary artery bypass conduits Diabetes 2003;52;:2814-2820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wendler O, Landwehr P, Bandner-Risch D, et al. Vasoreactivity of arterial grafts in the patient with diabetes mellitusinvestigations on internal thoracic artery and radial artery conduits. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:305-311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kim K-B, Kang CH, Chang WI, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass with complete avoidance of aortic manipulation Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:S1377-S1382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. FitzGibbon GM, Burton JR, Leach AJ. Coronary bypass graft fateangiographic grading of 1,400 consecutive grafts early after operation and of 1,132 after one year. Circulation 1978;57:1070-1074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Di Giammarco G, et al. Effects of diabetes on early and late survival after isolated first coronary bypass surgery in multivessel disease J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:144-154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Szabó Z, Håkanson E, Svedjeholm R. Early postoperative outcome and medium-term survival in 540 diabetic and 2,239 nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:712-719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. The BARI Investigators Influence of diabetes on five-year mortality and morbidity in a randomized trial comparing PTCA and CABG in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Circulation 1997;96:1761-1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. Coronary surgery in Europecomparison of the national subsets of the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:396-399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gum PA, O'Keefe Jr JH, Borkon AM, et al. Bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty for revascularization of treated diabetic patients Circulation 1997;96(suppl II):II-7-II-10.
  23. Jacoby RM, Nesto RW. Acute myocardial infarction in the diabetic patientpathophysiology, clinical course and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:726-744.
  24. Matata BM, Galinanes M. Cardiopulmonary bypass exacerbates oxidative stress but does not increase proinflammatory cytokine release in patients with diabetes compared with patients without diabetesregulatory effects of exogenous nitric oxide. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:1-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. FitzGibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcomeangiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616-626.[Abstract]
  26. Ömeroglu SN, Kirali K, Güler M, et al. Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:844-850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. van der Meer J, Hillege HL, van Gilst WH, et al. A comparison of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts after coronary artery bypass surgeryno difference in 1-year occlusion rate and clinical outcome. Circulation 1994;90:2367-2374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kaufer E, Factor SM, Frame R, et al. Pathology of radial artery and internal thoracic arteries used as coronary artery bypass grafts Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1118-1122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ruengsakulrach P, Sinclair R, Komeda M, et al. Comparative histopathology of radial artery versus internal thoracic artery and risk factors for development of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis Circulation 1999;100(suppl II):II139-II144.
  30. Peterson MD, Borger MA, Rao V, et al. Skeletonization of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts lowers the risk of sternal infection in patients with diabetes J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1314-1319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Morris JJ, Smith LR, Jones RH, et al. Influence of diabetes and mammary artery grafting on survival after coronary bypass Circulation 1991;84(suppl III):275-284.
  32. Smith RL, Harrell FE, Rankin S, et al. Determinants of early versus late cardiac death in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery Circulation 1991;84(suppl III):245-253.
  33. Sajja LR, Kulshreshth P, Yarlagadda RB. Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces infections in diabetes after CABG Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:667-668.[Free Full Text]
  34. Morricone L, Ranucci M, Denti S, et al. Diabetes and complications after cardiac surgerycomparison with a nondiabetic population. Acta Diabetol 1999;36:77-84.[Medline]
  35. Lazar HL, Chipkin S, Philippides G, Bao Y, Apstein C. Glucose-insulin-potassium solutions improve outcomes in diabetics who have coronary artery operations Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:145-150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Malmberg K. Prospective randomized study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. DIGAMI (diabetes mellitus, insulin glucose infusion in acute myocardial infarction) Study Group BMJ 1997;314:1512-1515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. R. Smith
Surgery, Not Percutaneous Revascularization, Is the Preferred Strategy for Patients With Significant Left Main Coronary Stenosis
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 1013 - 1020.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Marcheix, F. Vanden Eynden, P. Demers, D. Bouchard, and R. Cartier
Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Survival in Systematic Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1181 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. K. Singh, N. D. Desai, S. D. Petroff, S. Deb, E. A. Cohen, S. Radhakrishnan, L. Schwartz, J. Dubbin, S. E. Fremes, and for the Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators
The Impact of Diabetic Status on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency: Insights From the Radial Artery Patency Study
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S222 - S225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. Onorati, F. Pezzo, M. C. Comi, B. Impiombato, A. Esposito, M. Polistina, and A. Renzulli
Radial artery graft function is not affected by age.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1112 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Echahidi, P. Pibarot, J.-P. Despres, J.-M. Daigle, D. Mohty, P. Voisine, R. Baillot, and P. Mathieu
Metabolic Syndrome Increases Operative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 843 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. P. Perrault
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1360 - 1361.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kwang Ree Cho
Ki-Bong Kim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K.-B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS