|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:864-868
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Institute of Heart, Pulmonary and Vascular Diseases, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
b Division of Emergency, Beijing Institute of Heart, Pulmonary and Vascular Diseases, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
c Division of Anesthesiology, Beijing Institute of Heart, Pulmonary and Vascular Diseases, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
d Division of Radiology, Beijing Institute of Heart, Pulmonary and Vascular Diseases, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
Accepted for publication March 23, 2005.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Xu, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Cardiac Surgery Division, Beijing Chaoyan Qu, Anzhen Li, Beijing 100029, China (Email: xushangdong{at}vip.sina.com).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: From June 2001 to April 2004, 25 patients with aortic dissection and 5 patients with penetrating aortic ulcer received stent-graft implantation. Within this group were 24 male and 6 female patients, with an average age of 52.3 ± 11.9 years. One patient was diagnosed as type A dissection, 23 patients as chronic type B dissection, 1 patient as acute type B dissection, and the remaining 5 patients with penetrating aortic ulcer. Among the 25 patients with aortic dissection, 3 had contained rupture. All patients were followed up in 1 to 32 months.
RESULTS: All patients received stent-graft implantation. There were 5 type I endoleaks. Retrograde ascending aortic dissection occurred during the operation in 1 patient. Two other retrograde ascending aortic dissections occurred in 2 patients 1 day and 7 days, respectively, after stent-graft implantation. Two patients died 1 day and 18 days, respectively, after operation because of rupture of ascending aortic dissection. One-month mortality rate was 6.7%. No death occurred during follow-up time. One patient received a second stent-graft implantation 20 months after the first procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Serious complications may develop after stent-graft implantation, but the early results of treatment of aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer with stent graft were satisfactory. Long-term follow-up was needed.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preoperative Examination
Routine examination of the heart, lung, liver, and kidney functions was conducted. Renal insufficiency was found in 7 patients. All patients received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or enhanced computer tomography (CT). The landing zone diameter was measured on MRI or CT scan.
Stent Graft
Five types of stent-graft systems have been used. The TALENT (Medtronic, Sunrise, FL) was used in 4 patients, the ENDOFIT (Endomed, Phoenix, AR) in 2 patients, the VASOFLOW (Vascore, Suzhou, China) in 10 patients, the AEGIS (Microport, Shanghai, China) in 7 patients, and the KINPRIDE (Grikin, Beijing, China) in 7 patients. The TALENT and KINPRIDE were made of nitinol skeleton and Dacron. The others were made of nitinol skeleton and polytetrafluoroethylene.
Stent-Graft Implantation
Stent-graft implantation was performed in the catheter lab by a team of cardiovascular surgeons, an interventional cardiologist, a radiologist, and an anesthetist. All procedures were selective except three emergency cases with contained rupture. Transesophageal echocardiography was used in 4 patients. General anesthesia was applied in 24 patients with local anesthesia used in 6 patients. Blood pressure was monitored by right radial artery cannulation. A 5F sheath was inserted into the left radial artery or surgically exposed left brachial artery. A calibrated 5F pigtail catheter was introduced into the ascending aorta through LSCA. The unilateral femoral artery was exposed by surgical dissection. A 6F sheath was inserted. A 6F pigtail catheter was introduced into the ascending aorta through the femoral artery. Angiography was performed. By using a calibrated pigtail catheter, the diameter of the landing zone was measured. The measurement was compared to the digital number obtained from the MRI or CT image. The average of the two numbers was regarded as the diameter of the landing zone. Precise location of the primary tear of the dissection or the penetrating ulcer was also confirmed by angiography. A stent graft with a larger diameter (usually 10% to 20%) was chosen. Prior to the deployment of the stent graft, 1 mg/kg or 5,000U heparin was given intravenously. Through the pigtail catheter an extra-stiff guide wire was threaded into the ascending aorta. A transverse or a longitude arteriotomy was made on the femoral artery. The delivery system was introduced over the super-stiff guide wire, and was then advanced to the appropriate position. After the systolic blood pressure had been lowered to less than 100 mm Hg, and the heart rate lowered to less than 90 beats per minute, the stent graft was deployed under fluoroscopy. Angiography was performed again. If there was endoleak at the proximal or distal end of the stent graft, a cuff was deployed to seal the endoleak. Three stent grafts were implanted in one patient, two stent grafts in each of the 6 patients, and one stent graft in each of the remaining patients. If the distance between the primary tear and the opening of the LSCA was less than 2 cm, the bare stent at the proximal end of the stent graft would surpass the opening of the LSCA. The opening of the LSCA would therefore be partially or totally occluded. A total of nine patients LSCAs were partially or totally occluded. Figure 1
shows the angiography of a patient with penetrating aortic ulcer before and after stent-graft implantation. Figure 2 showed the angiography of a patient with Stanford B dissection before and after stent-graft implantation.
|
|
Combined Procedure
One patient received aortic valve replacement two weeks after stent-graft implantation. A bioprosthetic valve was used. One patient with old myocardial infarction received percutaneous coronary intervention simultaneously with stent-graft implantation, with three coronary stents being implanted. An anticoagulant was used routinely after the procedure.
Follow-Up
Computed tomography was conducted before discharge and at least once a year after operation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although stent-graft implantation is a kind of minimally invasive therapy, sometimes it can cause severe complications. Retrograde ascending aortic dissection is, no doubt, the most severe. We encountered it in 3 patients. The newly developed tears were all at the proximal end of the stent graft in the right aortic arch (Fig 5). Three possible reasons may exist. (1) The first one is procedure related. We used a balloon to dilate the stent graft in the first case. Before we inflated the balloon, we did not lower the blood pressure. The descending aorta was totally blocked while the balloon was fully inflated. The systolic blood pressure went up to more than 200 mm Hg proximal to the balloon. Ascending aortic dissection appeared immediately after balloon dilation. (2) The second reason may be related to the structure of the stent graft and size of the stent graft chosen. All the newly developed ruptures were at the proximal end of the stent graft and all types of stent grafts we used have a bare spring at the proximal end. The bare spring contacts with the aortic intima directly and tightly. The pulsation of the aorta may cause friction between the two; intima damage may develop as a result. Three stent grafts that we used in the three patients who developed retrograde dissection were from three different companies. Thus, we cannot say it is device related. The larger the size of the stent graft, the greater the radial force it gives to the aortic wall. In the second case, we chose a relatively larger size of the stent graft; 25% larger than the diameter of the landing zone. The patient felt sudden severe chest pain in the morning one day after operation and died in the afternoon. Autopsy confirmed ascending aortic dissection and cardiac tamponade. (3) The third reason may be related to congenital weakness of the aortic wall. The aortic wall cannot bear the radial strength of the stent graft. Congenital weakness of the aortic wall must be considered in those patients with no obvious cause of dissection. The third patient developed ascending aortic dissection 7 days after stent-graft implantation. He had no history of hypertension or atherosclerosis. He had no Marfans syndrome either. His older brother died of aortic dissection, so we believe that he may have congenital weakness of the aortic wall. It is common sense that the aortic wall is fragile in Marfans patients. We have two patients with Marfans syndrome who received stent-graft implantation. Then why did we perform stent-graft implantation in patients with Marfans syndrome? The two patients both had type B dissection and moderate aortic root enlargement. The aortic insufficiency was mild. It would be too aggressive to perform Bentalls operation, total arch replacement, and stent-graft implantation in the descending aorta at one time. Stent-graft implantation to seal the tear in the descending aorta was considered. The two patients were monitored closely. If the aorta deteriorates with the stent graft we will make total arch replacement. The two patients were followed up 12 months and 16 months, respectively. They showed no symptoms and a CT scan showed no dilation of the landing zone and no displacement of the stent grafts. They are still under close supervision.
|
Endoleak is a common complication. Five out of 25 patients with aortic dissection had type I endoleak. The incidence rate was 20%. The shorter the distance between the opening of LSCA and the primary tear, the greater the chance of type I endoleak. Although the opening of the LSCA was partially or totally sealed, a small volume of blood still entered the false lumen through the primary tear. Palma and colleagues [10] reported an incidence of type I endoleak of 7.1%. All the patients with type I endoleak underwent conversion to surgery. We think this may be too aggressive. We chose a wait and see policy. Fortunately, the false lumens of the five patients with type I endoleak were partially thrombosed. The diameter of the dissecting aneurysm did not increase. This may be due to the hemodynamic change in the false lumen. The blood pressure and blood velocity in the false lumen are related to the blood volume, which enters the false lumen. When a large entry is turned into a small one, blood volume that enters the false lumen decreases dramatically; the blood pressure and blood velocity in the false lumen may decrease simultaneously. This may explain the partial thrombosis of the false lumen. One of the patients received a cuff implantation 20 months after the first procedure. Close follow-up should be carried out for these patients.
Chronic aortic dissection always has reentry. The reentry or reentries may locate in the descending aorta, abdominal aorta, or iliac artery. In all cases, except that the reentry is in the descending aorta, it is left open. Buffolo and colleagues [11] share the same opinion as the authors. By magnetic resonance angiography or enhanced CT scan, we evaluated all visceral arteries in each patient and found that most visceral arteries arise from the true lumen. The most common artery that arises from the false lumen is the right or left renal artery; so we do not worry about the visceral ischemia. No visceral organ ischemia occurred after stent-graft implantation in our group. In our experience, in some cases the false lumen in the abdominal aorta will still exit, but the diameter of the abdominal aorta seldom increases.
There were seven patients with renal insufficiency before operation. The reasons for this may be as follows. (1) Chronic renal insufficiency. Since most of the patients had hypertension disease, chronic hypertension can, itself, cause renal insufficiency. (2) Some patients had hypovolemic shock; usually patients who had contained rupture. (3) Contrast material used in an MRI or a CT scan may cause damage to renal function. Five patients had renal insufficiency after the procedure. This may be due to the contrast used in the procedure.
The opening of the LSCA was totally sealed in 5 patients. The left radial pulse disappeared 2 or 3 days after the procedure. The blood pressure of the left arm was lowered to 4030 mm Hg. There was no left arm ischemia or steal phenomenon, so the left carotid artery- LSCA bypass was not conducted.
In both acute and chronic dissection, the choice of the stent graft depends on the diameter of the proximal landing zone. Usually we chose a stent graft with a diameter 20% larger than the landing zone. Now we have found that 10% is enough.
Another problem we met is placing the extra-stiff guide wire into the true lumen. Since there was always reentry in the abdominal aorta or iliac artery, when the guide wire advanced up the aorta, it could enter a false lumen. If this happened, we introduced an exchange guide wire through the LSCA and all the way down to the descending aorta, abdominal aorta, iliac artery, and femoral artery. The exchange guide wire would be pulled out of the femoral artery through the arteriotomy. Then the exchange guide wire was replaced by an extra-stiff guide wire. In this way we can ensure that the extra-stiff guide wire is in the true lumen.
Serious complications may develop after stent-graft implantation, but the early results of stent-graft treatment of aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer were satisfactory. Since the stent-graft therapy is still in its early stage, more procedures should be performed and longer follow-up is needed.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. D. Xu, F. J. Huang, J. H. Du, Y. Li, Z. M. Fan, J. F. Yang, X. Y. Yu, and Z. G. Zhang A study of aortic dimension in type B aortic dissection Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 244 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yang, J. Zuo, L. Yang, W. Duan, L. Xiong, M. Zheng, H. Cui, and D. Yi Endovascular stent-graft treatment of thoracic aortic dissection Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 688 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Torregrosa, H. Montes, M. Perez, A. Castello, D. Mata, F. Valera, and A. Montero Transfemoral stent-graft of distal aortic arch complicated with retrograde dissection. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 697 - 698. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Czerny Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 869 - 869. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |