|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1143-1145
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom
Accepted for publication April 1, 2004.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Waller, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Rd, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK. (Email: david.waller{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We report the perioperative course of an initial cohort of 10 patients who have undergone right extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma through sternotomy. Owing to the position of heart and pulmonary veins, we have not attempted median sternotomy for left-sided resections.
Our patient selection criteria for extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma follow standard protocols [1, 2]. Computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are used to determine resectability [4], and we now advocate routine cervical mediastinoscopy for staging [5]. Initially, we did exclusively employ the standard exposure through thoracotomy for right-sided resections; over the last 15 months, we have approached selected cases through median sternotomy (10 of 14 patients).
| Technique |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We favor the use of a Gore-Tex patch (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc) to replace the diaphragm. The patch is sutured to the preserved edge of the diaphragm with continuous and interrupted sutures of nonabsorbable monofilament Prolene (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). To facilitate this part of the procedure, we have modified the standard technique by placing four or five interrupted sutures in the most lateral diaphragmatic rim initially that remain untied until all are placed. The anteromedial border of the patch is inserted with two continuous sutures, which meet at the inferior vena cava. During this part of the procedure, we have found that a retractor inserted into the cavity through the future drain site (anterior axillary line) aids access to the most posterior diaphragmatic rim by retracting the liver caudally (Fig 1). The pericardium is replaced on the right side with a loose Prolene mesh patch anchored to the pericardial edges with interrupted monofilament Prolene sutures. Care should be taken to avoid excess tension in the patch that could compromise right atrial venous drainage. Through the sternotomy approach, we patch the pericardium early in the operation before excision of the diaphragm to minimize cardiac displacement and hemodynamic compromise. The finished reconstruction of diaphragm and pericardium is shown in Figure 2.
|
|
Patients recover in our Thoracic High Dependency Unit where cardiac rhythm, arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, and urine output are continuously monitored. The intercostal drain remains clamped during the first postoperative day and is unclamped hourly to monitor postoperative bleeding. The intercostal drain is removed routinely 36 hours after surgery, and the patients are drinking free fluids and starting ambulation within 48 hours after surgery unless complications have arisen.
All procedures were performed for epithelioid or biphasic malignant pleural mesothelioma. The entire procedure was completed through median sternotomy in 7 of the 10 patients. In the other 3 cases, the resection was completed by the addition of a limited low lateral thoracotomy at the level of the eighth intercostal space: in 2 cases, owing to the presence of bulky disease in the costophrenic angle; and in 1 case, owing to severe hemodynamic unstability of the patient due to manipulation of the pericardium to achieve adequate exposure.
Among the 7 patients who underwent the full procedure through median sternotomy, there were no in-hospital or 30-day deaths. There was 1 postoperative death of a patient who underwent resection through sternotomy and thoracotomy owing to perioperative myocardial infarction. The median hospital stay was 10 days (range, 6 to 30). Macroscopic excision was achieved in all procedures, and microscopic complete local excision (R0) was reported in 71% of cases.
There were no local complications related to the median sternotomy in this group of patients. At follow-up, all wounds had healed to satisfaction, and no sternal instability was identified. At a median follow-up of 8 months (range, 1 to 15), 6 of the 7 patients are alive, and we have not encountered tumor progression in the sternotomy scars, although 1 of the patients has developed wound progression on the previous drain site at the level of the anterior axillary line. That was treated with palliative chemoradiotherapy.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have not encountered infective wound complications after median sternotomy in our limited experience. We have also not seen tumor implantation in the incision (well described after other incisions for mesothelioma), perhaps because the skin incision is distant to the pleural boundaries when median sternotomy is employed.
We have only encountered a single report in the literature describing the use of median sternotomy with the adjunct of a supraclavicular incision for a case of malignant pleural mesothelioma with involvement of supraclavicular lymph nodes [8].
Patient selection is important and may be influenced by a learning curve. Two of the patients who needed additional thoracotomy were in the earlier part of our experience and may represent a learning process. With experience, we have developed technical variations in the procedure: use of interrupted sutures to place the diaphragmatic patch, and use of a drain hole to place a retractor during diaphragm replacement and dissection around the inferior vena cavae. We currently consider chest wall involvement and very bulky disease in the costophrenic angle as contraindications for median sternotomy, as they are more easily approached through thoracotomy.
In summary, we report an initial favorable experience, as we have been able to complete the procedure to satisfaction in 70% of cases. To determine the impact of this approach on postoperative pain, ambulation, and recovery as well as long-term follow-up, further studies are required.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. G. Edwards, A. E. Martin-Ucar, D. J. Stewart, and D. A. Waller Right extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant mesothelioma via median sternotomy or thoracotomy?: Short- and long-term results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 31(5): 759 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Wright Pleuropneumonectomy for the Treatment of Masaoka Stage IVA Thymoma. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1234 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Hunt and L. Lang-Lazdunski Is Median Sternotomy an Appropriate Approach to Right Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Mesothelioma? Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 767 - 767. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Waller Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 767 - 767. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |