ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Valerie W. Rusch
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adusumilli, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fong, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adusumilli, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fong, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:409-417
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Thoracic Surgery Directors Association Award

Radiation Therapy Potentiates Effective Oncolytic Viral Therapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer

Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD, Brendon M. Stiles, MD, Mei-Ki Chan, BS, Ting-Chao Chou, PhD, Richard J. Wong, MD, Valerie W. Rusch, MD, Yuman Fong, MD *

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Accepted for publication January 10, 2005.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Fong, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (Email: fongy{at}mskcc.org).

Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, Jan 26–28, 2004.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Replication-competent oncolytic herpes simplex viruses with deletion of the {gamma}134.5 gene preferentially replicate in and kill malignant cells. The {gamma}134.5 gene codes for ICP 34.5, a protein that enhances viral replication, and is homologous to growth arrest and DNA damage protein 34 (GADD34), a radiation-inducible DNA repair gene. We hypothesized that radiation therapy may potentiate efficacy of oncolytic viral therapy by upregulating GADD34 and promoting viral replication.

METHODS: The A549 and H1299 lung cancer cell lines were infected with NV1066, an oncolytic herpes simplex virus, at multiplicities of infection (number of viral particles per tumor cell) of 0.1 to 0.5 in vitro with radiation (2 to 10 Gy) or without radiation. Viral replication was determined by plaque assay, cell-to-cell spread was determined by flow cytometry, cell kill was determined by lactate dehydrogenase assay, and GADD34 induction was determined by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction and Western blot method. Evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity dependence with GADD34 induction is further confirmed by small inhibitory RNA inhibition of GADD34 expression.

RESULTS: Using both the isobologram method and combination index method of Chou and Talalay, significant synergism was demonstrated between radiation therapy and NV1066 both in vitro and in vivo. As a result of such synergism, a dose reduction for each agent (2- to 6,000-fold) can be accomplished for a wide range of therapeutic effect levels without sacrificing tumor cell kill. This effect is correlated with increased GADD34 expression and inhibited by transfection of small inhibitory RNA directed against GADD34.

CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the cellular basis for the clinical investigation of combined use of radiation therapy with oncolytic herpes simplex virus therapy in the treatment of lung cancer to achieve synergistic efficacy while minimizing dosage and toxicity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

The Thoracic Surgery Directors Association (TSDA) Resident Research Award, sponsored by Medtronic, Inc, was established in 1990 to encourage resident research in cardiothoracic surgery. Abstracts submitted to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Program Committee representing research performed by residents were forwarded to the TSDA to be considered for this award. The abstracts were selected by the TSDA Executive Committee consisting of Jeffrey P. Gold, MD, President, John Brown, MD, President-Elect, John H. Calhoon, MD, Secretary/Treasurer, Douglas J. Mathisen, MD, Immediate Past President, Bartley P. Griffith, MD, Councillor-at-Large, George L. Hicks, MD, Councillor-at-Large, and Leslie Kohman, MD, Councillor-at-Large.

The Fourteenth Annual TSDA Resident Research Award was given to Prasad S. Adusumilli, a resident at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York. He received a monetary award of $2,500 and an engraved desktop award.

The TSDA, with support by Medtronic, Inc, makes this award annually, using the above selection procedure. The resident author of the selected study is recognized at the STS meeting.

 

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States [1]. An estimated 173,770 new patients were expected to be diagnosed with lung cancer in the year 2004, one third with advanced disease that is unresectable [1]. All patients with unresectable lung cancer die of this malignancy despite current therapies. Therefore, ongoing investigation is directed at finding effective novel therapies for this common cancer. Currently, radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in the treatment of inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer in achieving local control and in the relief of symptoms of metastatic disease [2]. However, higher doses of radiation needed to achieve local control [3, 4] are associated with significant toxicity [5]. Thus, therapies are also sought that may synergize with RT to increase the tumor response and to decrease toxicities.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-mediated oncolysis and gene therapy have emerged as promising treatment modalities against cancer [6–11]. Oncolysis results from the replicative life cycle of the virus, which lyses infected tumor cells and releases viral progeny for further infection and killing of neighboring cancer cells. NV1066 is one such multimutated replication-competent oncolytic HSV-1 virus, which carries a gene for the marker protein enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). We have previously demonstrated the efficacy of NV1066 and its predecessor NV1020 in the treatment of lung cancer both in vitro and in vivo [12, 13]. NV1066 has deletions from the internal repeat sequences, which result in deletion of one copy of each of the genes for ICP0, ICP34.5, and ICP4 [14, 15]. These deletions attenuate the virus and help to ensure that it preferentially replicates within cancer cells. One of these genes, HSV-1 {gamma}134.5, which codes for ICP34.5, has significant homology at its carboxy-terminus to a radiation-inducible gene, GADD34 (growth arrest and DNA damage repair gene) [16–19]. Therefore, we hypothesized that radiation-induced upregulation of GADD34 in tumor cells would functionally complement the {gamma}134.5 deletions in NV1066 and increase viral tumoricidal activity.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Cell Culture
The human non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines A549 (p53 +), H1299 (p53 ), and Vero cells (from the African green monkey kidney) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). All cells were maintained in appropriate media as recommended by ATCC and were incubated in a humidified incubator supplied with 5% carbon dioxide.

Viruses
NV1066 is a replication-competent attenuated HSV-1 oncolytic virus with deletion of a single copy of the viral gene {gamma}134.5. G207 and NV3616 are replication-competent attenuated HSV-1 mutant viruses that have been characterized previously [19–21]. G207 is attenuated by deletion of a 1-kilobase coding sequence from both {gamma}134.5 loci and a deletion of ICP6, a gene coding for the enzyme ribonucleotide reductase. R3616 contains the same mutation in the {gamma}134.5 loci, but the ICP6 gene is intact, preserving ribonucleotide reductase function. Viral stocks were propagated on Vero cells, harvested by freeze-thaw lysis and sonication, and titered by standard plaque assay.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay
A549 and H1299 cells were plated in 24-well flat-bottom plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin lake, NJ) in 1 mL of media. Cells were treated with media alone (control wells), radiation alone (137Cs source irradiator, 224 cGy/min), NV1066 alone, or combination therapy using both RT and NV1066. NV1066 infection was carried out at multiplicities of infection (MOI: number of viral plaque forming units per tumor cell) of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 in a total volume of 100 µL of medium. Combination therapy was performed using serial dilutions of RT (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy) and NV1066 (MOI 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) in a 1:20 ratio for both cell lines. These ratios were determined by estimating the dose necessary to kill 50% of the cells for each therapy in initial experiments and by using these doses to determine the ratio of combination therapy. Typically cells were plated overnight, radiated in the morning, and infected with virus within 2 hours of radiation. Percent survival for each group was determined on each day for 7 days after treatment using a standard lactate dehydrogenase release bioassay. Results were expressed as surviving fraction, from the measured absorbance of treated cellular lysates, compared with that of untreated, control cellular lysates. All samples were tested in triplicate. Experiments were repeated at least three times to ensure reproducibility. Cytotoxicity assays were also performed with A549 and H1299 cells using G207 or NV3616 virus with and without radiation.

Quantitative Analysis of Synergy Between Radiotherapy and NV1066
The combination effects of two therapies in terms of synergy, additivity, or antagonism were analyzed by the median effect plot using the multiple therapeutic effect analysis of Chou and Talalay [22]. This method defines the expected additive effect of two (or more) agents and then quantifies synergism or antagonism by determining how much the combination effect differs from the expected additive effect. Data were also analyzed by the isobologram technique, which is dose oriented. Both the median plot effect and isobologram method are described in detail elsewhere [23]. Another calculation available using the combination index method is the dose-reduction index (DRI). The DRI is a determination of the fold of dose reduction allowed for each drug when given in synergistic combination as compared with the concentration of single agent that is needed to achieve the same effect level. A DRI greater than 1 signifies a favorable reduction in toxicity while still maintaining therapeutic efficacy.

In Vitro Viral Growth Analysis
The ability of NV1066 to replicate within A549 and H1299 cells in the presence or absence of radiation was evaluated by viral growth analysis, with 5 x 104 cells per well plated into six-well plates. Cells were then infected with either NV1066 (MOI 0.01, 0.05, or 0.1) alone, or with NV1066 and RT (2 Gy). Cells and media were harvested at 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 hours after infection. After three cycles of freeze-thaw lysis, standard plaque assay was performed on Vero cells to evaluate viral titers. All samples were performed in triplicate.

Vector Spread Assay
Vector propagation as analyzed by EGFP expression was determined by fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis at a viral infective dose of MOI 0.1 and 0.5 after 0, 2.5, 5, or 10 Gy of radiation. Percentage of EGFP-positive live cells at 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 108 hours after radiation compared with control cells without radiation was plotted to derive the EGFP-expression trend. Cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin in 0.02% EDTA, centrifuged, washed in phosphate-buffered saline solution, and brought up in 100 µL of phosphate-buffered saline solution. Five microliters of 7-amino-actinomycin D (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) was added as an exclusion dye for cell viability. Data for EGFP expression were acquired on a FACS Calibur machine equipped with Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Results are reported as percent of live cells expressing EGFP. All samples were performed in triplicate.

Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis for GADD34 in Cells Treated With Radiation
Samples containing 1 x 105 A549 and H1299 cells per well were plated in six-well plates and were incubated for 12 hours. Cells were treated with a radiation dose of 5 Gy. Each sample was performed in triplicate. After 48, 72, and 96 hours of incubation, the cells from each well of the plate were collected after washing with cold phosphate-buffered saline solution and frozen for RNA collection. The RNA from each sample was collected and isolated with an RNeasy protect kit (QIAGEN Inc, Valencia, CA) using the manufacturer’s protocol. GADD34 in each sample is measured quantitatively by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction using an SYBR green fluorophore with a Bio-Rad iCycler iQ detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and normalized by corresponding 18S ribosomal RNA. For GADD34, the following primers were applied: GADD34 forward, 5'-GGA GGA AGA GAA TCA AGC CA-3'; GADD34 reverse, 5'-TGG GGT CGG AGC CTG AAG AT-3'. For 18S RNA: 18S forward, 5'-GTA ACC CGT TGA ACC CCA TT-3'; 18S reverse, 5'-CCA TCC AAT CGG TAG TAG CG-3'. A comparison between each treatment sample and the control group, which did not receive any radiation, is made to determine GADD34 upregulation. For ease of interpretation, semilogarithmic plots of actual GADD34 values were omitted, and the results were represented as fold increase in the treatment sample compared with the control group.

GADD34 Small Inhibitory RNA Transfection
Duplex small inhibitory RNAs (siRNAs) targeting human GADD34 outside the viral homology domain were designed and tested for the ability to decrease GADD34 expression. After preliminary experiments, the following sequence targeting from codon 635 was chosen for further experiments: 5-GUCAAUUUGCAGAUGGCCATTUGGCCAUCUGCAAAUUGACTT-3. A549 and H1299 cells were plated at a concentration of 5 x 104 per well in 24-well plates 12 hours before transfection in appropriate medium without antibiotics. Standard siRNA transfection protocol as described before was used [24]. Cells in the wells that were exposed to only Oligofectamine transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were used as controls.

Western Blot
A549 cells (nontransfected and GADD34 siRNA-transfected) were incubated overnight and radiated in the morning with either 5 or 10 Gy. Cells with no radiation served as controls. Cells were lysed and collected with Cell Lysis Buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc, Beverly, MD). Equal amounts of proteins were resolved on 10% sodium dodecylsulfate–polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories) under reducing conditions and blotted on polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Schleicher & Schuell Bioscience, Keene, NH). Expression of proteins was determined by using primary rabbit polyclonal anti-human GADD34 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and primary goat polyclonal anti-human actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). A secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used to visualize the expression level of GADD34 and actin on chemiluminescence film (Hyperfilm; Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, England) by application of an ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection System (Amersham Biosciences).

Establishment and Treatment of Flank Tumors
Athymic male mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD) and were provided with food and water ad libitum. All animals received humane care in accordance with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH)," and the animal protocols were approved by the animal care committee of the institution. Mice were anesthetized with a mixture of 70 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine administered intraperitoneally. H1299 flank tumor establishment and tumor measurements were conducted by the antitumor division of Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute core facility who were blinded to the treatment arms. Mice were examined daily until tumor nodules reached approximately 250 mm3 volume, at which time they were randomized into four groups (n = 6 per group): (1) untreated controls, (2) 5 Gy RT alone, (3) single intratumoral injection of 1 x 107 plaque-forming units (pfu) NV1066 alone, and (4) 5 Gy RT followed by a single intratumoral injection of 1 x 107 pfu NV1066 (24 hours later). Mice were shielded with lead when flank tumors were exposed to external beam radiation. The length and width of the tumors were measured every 3 days for 32 days. Tumor volume was calculated by the formula for an ellipsoid volume, [(4/3) x ({pi}) x (length/2) x (width/2)2]. Animals were sacrificed if the greatest tumor dimension exceeded 4 cm or if there was skin ulceration.

Statistical Analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Comparisons among groups were made using the two-tailed Student’s t test. The analysis of variance test, when appropriate, was used to identify statistical significance for multiple comparisons.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Radiotherapy and NV1066
Both radiotherapy and NV1066 demonstrate dose-dependent cytotoxicity against A549 and H1299 lung cancer cells. Combination therapy killed more tumor cells than either single agent alone and showed greater efficacy than the expected additive effect by day 7 in both cell lines (p = 0.002). Cytotoxicity derived by lactate dehydrogenase release assay on each day up to day 7 is represented for A549 (Fig 1A) and H1299 (Fig 1B) cells. Synergistic cytotoxicity (p < 0.01) is demonstrated with other {gamma}134.5 deletion HSV mutants G207, and NV3616 in A549 and H1299 cell lines (data not shown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Cytotoxic effect of NV1066, radiation therapy, or both on A549 and H1299 cells in vitro. A549 (A) or H1299 (B) cells were treated with radiation therapy (4 Gy), NV1066 (multiplicity of infection, 0.2), or the combination. Results for the treated groups are expressed as cell survival compared with untreated control cells grown under identical conditions.

 
Pharmacologic Analysis of Synergy Between Radiotherapy and NV1066
Chou and Talalay analysis demonstrated that the combination index values remained less than 1 for the entire range of fraction affected values for both the A549 and H1299 cells (Table 1). Moderate synergism was demonstrated for the H1299 cell line, whereas strong synergism was demonstrated for the A549 cell line. The DRI was calculated for each fraction affected value. For the A549 cell line the radiation dose could be lowered 1- to 6,160-fold and the NV1066 dose could be lowered 6- to 11-fold when given as combination therapy. For the H1299 cell line, both radiation and NV1066 dose could be lowered twofold to ninefold and still achieve the same tumor killing when given as combination therapy. Dose-reduction index values greater than 1 indicate that a reduction in toxicity can be achieved without loss of efficacy. Isobolograms were constructed for the doses of radiotherapy and NV1066 necessary to kill 75%, 50%, and 25% of cells (data not shown). Experimental combination data points at drug and viral concentrations were well below the expected additive effect line for each of these fraction affected values (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75). These studies confirm synergism between radiotherapy and NV1066 for both cell lines across a wide range of therapeutic doses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Radiation and Viral Doses Needed To Kill Various Fractions of A549 and H1299 Cells
 
In Vitro Viral Growth Analysis
NV1066 replicated well in both A549 and H1299 cells. In the A549 cell line, after 2 Gy of radiation, a 16-fold increase in viral titers compared with NV1066 infection alone (MOI 0.01) was observed during 7 days after infection. At higher concentrations of virus, there was a 12-fold (MOI 0.05) and tenfold (MOI 0.1) increase in viral yields in the presence of radiation (2 Gy; p = 0.02). In the H1299 cell line, a sixfold increase in viral titers (MOI 0.1) was observed after 2 Gy of radiation compared with without radiation. Lower fold increases in viral yield measured with combination therapy at higher concentrations (MOI) of virus may be secondary to significant loss of cellular substrate at earlier times.

Vector Spread After NV1066 Infection and Radiation
Radiation increased the expression of EGFP-positive cells, indicating better viral propagation among both cell lines. In A549 cells infected at an MOI of 0.5, radiation of 5 Gy increased EGFP-positive cells to 37% ± 4%, and 10 Gy increased EGFP-positive cells to 44% ± 5% when compared with cells infected without radiation, which increased only 23% ± 2% (p < 0.001) after 12 hours.

Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis for GADD34
Samples containing RNA extracted from cells that were not treated with radiation served as negative controls, whereas RNA extracted from U937 cells radiated at 20 Gy was used as positive controls in real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction analysis for GADD34. In A549 cells, 5 Gy of radiation increased GADD34 by 1.12-fold (48 hours), 3.49-fold (72 hours), and 5.04-fold (96 hours; p = 0.02). In H1299 cells, 5 Gy of radiation increased GADD34 by 2.92-fold (48 hours), 2.04-fold (72 hours), and 1.69-fold (96 hours; Fig 2).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. GADD34 elevation after radiation. A549 cells (A) or H1299 (B) cells were radiated (5 Gy), and GADD34 expression was measured by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction at various times.

 
GADD34 Knock-Down by Small Inhibitory RNA Eliminates Synergistic Cytotoxicity
Expression of GADD34 is successfully downregulated by siRNA for GADD34 compared with nontransfected A549 cells (Fig 3A). Downregulation of GADD34 eliminated synergistic cytotoxicity as demonstrated in Figure 3B. Western blot analysis confirmed radiation-induced upregulation of GADD34 protein and its inhibition by GADD34 siRNA (Fig 4).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Knock-down of GADD34 upregulation by small inhibitory RNA (siRNA). (A) GADD34 levels were determined by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction in A549 cells with and without siRNA transfection. In cells transfected with siRNA, GADD34 levels were indistinguishable from control (no radiation) cells, whereas nontransfected cells had a sixfold increase in GADD34 levels. (B) A549 cells were treated with radiation therapy (2 Gy), NV1066 (multiplicity of infection [MOI], 0.05), or the combination, with or without transfection with siRNA. Knock-down of GADD34 upregulation by siRNA eliminated the synergistic cytotoxicity in transfected cells.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Western blot analysis to confirm GADD34 upregulation after radiation and its inhibition by GADD34 small inhibitory RNA (siRNA). A549 nontransfected and GADD34 siRNA-transfected cells were radiated with 5 or 10 Gy. Cells with no radiation served as control. GADD34 protein expression was quantified by Western blot analysis. Radiation upregulated GADD34 protein expression, and GADD34 siRNA knocked down the upregulation in siRNA-transfected cells.

 
Antitumor Effect of NV1066 and Radiation on H1299 Flank Tumor Volume In Vivo
The H1299 cell line was selected for in vivo flank tumor experiments because this cell line is relatively less sensitive to NV1066 and the synergistic effect is less compared with A549 in vitro. The improved tumor killing by NV1066 and radiation was demonstrated in a xenogeneic flank tumor model established in athymic mice after treatment with 5 Gy of radiation and 1 x 107 pfu of NV1066 (Fig 5). Combination therapy was significantly better than single-agent therapy (p = 0.01). Thirty-two days after treatment, in mice with combination therapy, mean flank tumor volume changed to 280 ± 112 mm3 from 250 mm3 compared with mice treated with NV1066 alone (1,070 ± 231 mm3), radiation alone (1,987 ± 312 mm3), or the control untreated mice (3,879 ± 600 mm3). The experiment was terminated after 32 days because of the overgrowth and ulceration of flank tumors.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Antitumor effect of radiation, NV1066, or the combination on H1299 flank tumor volume in vivo. Flank tumors were grown in athymic mice and treated with (1) no treatment, (2) 5 Gy of external beam radiation, (3) single injection of 1 x 107 plaque-forming units of NV1066 intratumorally, or (4) combination of therapies. Tumors treated with a combination of therapies had smaller average tumor volume than either treatment alone. Results represent the average of the sample group (n = 6 per group) and are shown with standard errors of mean.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The current study demonstrates that radiation-induced GADD34 upregulation greatly enhances replication and antitumor efficacy of a {gamma}134.5-deficient HSV oncolytic virus. The genotoxic response to DNA damage by radiation results in complex cellular events that direct DNA repair. A series of five growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible (GADD) genes have been identified in mammalian cells in response to ionizing radiation, medium-depletion, and alkylating agents [17, 18]. As noted in other studies [18, 19], the fact that RT results in high expression of GADD34 was confirmed in our study and is central to our strategy of combining radiation therapy with oncolytic viral therapy.

NV1066 is an attenuated multimutant HSV-1 that has demonstrated cytotoxic activity against a wide variety of tumor cell types, including lung cancer. Strategic deletions have been made within the genome of NV1066 to improve the safety of this vector. One such deleted gene, {gamma}134.5, is a neurovirulent gene that codes for the protein ICP34.5, which functions to preclude the shutoff of protein synthesis that occurs as part of the host defense response to cellular infection by viruses. Expression of ICP34.5 produces a cellular milieu greatly favoring viral replication. There is great homology between the carboxy terminus of the mammalian GADD34 and ICP34.5 proteins [17]. The mammalian GADD34 gene has also been shown to complement viral {gamma}134.5 mutants and to permit viral growth in cultured cells. Our hypothesis that RT and oncolytic viral therapy are synergistic is confirmed by the increased cytotoxicity and the increased viral proliferation seen with combination treatment. The hypothesis that elevated GADD34 is at least partly responsible for such enhanced tumoricidal activity was indeed confirmed by increased GADD34 expression with RT and by GADD34 inhibition experiments using siRNA. Moreover, similar synergistic tumoricidal activity with RT was demonstrated for G207 and NV3616, two other viruses with {gamma}134.5 deletions.

Recent attempts have been made to restore the {gamma}134.5 gene into viral mutants as deletion of this gene markedly reduces cytotoxicity [25, 26]. In particular, investigators have attempted to insert the {gamma}134.5 genes under control of a transcriptionally regulated promoter to facilitate selective gene expression in rapidly dividing cells. Although this approach is promising, insertion of the entire {gamma}134.5 gene may theoretically restore neurovirulence and virulence in other nonmalignant cells in addition to providing any improvements in tumor cell kill. Our approach of inducing GADD34 function to replace the ICP34.5 function may provide a superior safety profile. Using RT in this strategy provides a selective means of restoring the GADD34 phenotype in tumor cells without the potential risk of increasing neurovirulence or enhancing viral replication in nonmalignant cells. Furthermore, such combination therapy may prove efficacious for tumor cells that may be resistant to either virus or radiotherapy alone.

Synergy was examined in this study using the combination index and isobologram methods of Chou and Talalay [27, 28]. This type of analysis is one of the few methods available that determines synergy on the basis of an extrapolated equation. The possibility of predicting false-positive synergistic interactions, a problem inherent in many other methods, is minimized as the analysis takes into account both the potency and shapes of the dose–effect curves in precisely analyzing two therapeutic combinations. Synergistic therapeutic efficacy was demonstrated using two different cell lines with varying sensitivities to virus and radiotherapy. From these data, a significant DRI was also demonstrated. Ultimately, the DRI is the most important variable in determining the clinical applicability of combination therapy because potential toxicity can be reduced without sacrificing any therapeutic effect.

Higher doses of radiation have been to shown to achieve better local control in advanced lung cancer at the cost of enhanced toxicity. Enhanced acute toxicities can lead to treatment interruptions, delays, or alterations in the schedule of radiation delivery, resulting in reduction in total dose, thereby potentially compromising the effectiveness of the definitive treatment modality. Dose reduction achieved because of synergistic cytotoxicity may reduce treatment-related toxicities. Studies of malignant glioma in mice have demonstrated that radiation increases viral persistence, furthering the idea that the two therapies can be considered interactive [21, 26]. Our studies confirmed, in a very different tumor type, namely lung cancer, that a significantly greater reduction in volume of tumors can be achieved with such combined radiation and viral therapy. The significantly enhanced oncolytic effects of the combined treatment correlate with enhanced replication of virus in irradiated tumor cells.

In our study, the synergistic efficacy of radiation therapy with oncolytic viral therapy is demonstrated in both p53-positive and p53-negative cell lines. Previous studies have demonstrated in many cancer cell lines that expression of GADD34 is independent of p53 status of the tumor [16, 29, 30]. Therefore, the synergistic efficacy with radiotherapy and oncolytic HSV therapy is independent of p53 status of the tumor, an important limitation in other novel therapies for lung cancer.

The data from these studies provide a cellular basis for the synergistic actions of RT and oncolytic viral therapy. These data are strong support for future clinical investigation of such combined therapy for lung cancer that aim to increase efficacy while minimizing toxicity.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
DR JACK A. ROTH (Houston, TX): This is very nice work. One issue is the immunogenicity of the herpes simplex virus. I wondered if you’ve looked at this in a syngeneic model system that’s immunocompetent, and if an immune response to the herpes simplex in any way interferes with the sensitizing effect. This would be important if the virus must be administered in several sequential courses.

DR ADUSUMILLI: Thank you very much, Dr Roth, for your comments and question. Our laboratory has in fact performed biodistribution studies in a colorectal cancer liver metastasis animal model using radiolabeled herpes simplex virus. In naïve mice, excellent viral uptake is demonstrated selectively by tumor cells irrespective of the route of administration. In mice with prior immunity (induced by prior administration of wild-type virus), no difference in viral uptake is noted when the virus is administered regionally. Preimmunity resulted in decreased viral uptake after systemic administration. This might be overcome with combination therapies such as in the current study, in which we have demonstrated that radiation therapy enhances viral replication by several-fold even after a very low dose of viral infectivity. In addition, oncolytic virus can be administered regionally in thoracic malignancies as demonstrated in this presentation and in several other animal models from our laboratory. In human beings, virus can be administered via bronchoscopy to centrally located tumors, by computed tomographic-guided needle injection to peripheral tumors, and by direct instillation into the pleural cavity in patients with disseminated lung cancer or mesothelioma.

DR THOMAS A. D’AMICO (Durham, NC): Prasad, are there other ways to stimulate the induction of GADD34, or is your strategy really limited to locally advanced lung cancer with no mechanism to ameliorate the systemic disease?

DR ADUSUMILLI: Thank you Dr D’Amico. GADD34, growth arrest and DNA damage repair gene, is shown to be upregulated in cancer cells by several other cellular stress response causative agents such as chemotherapeutic agents in addition to radiation therapy. We have shown from our laboratory that GADD34 induction by chemotherapeutic agents such as gemcitabine, mitomycin C, and cisplatin results in synergistic anticancer activity by oncolytic herpes viruses in the treatment of lung cancer, mesothelioma, gastric, and transitional cell bladder cancer. We anticipate that such clinically relevant combination therapies can complement current adjuvant modalities in the treatment of advanced thoracic malignancies.

DR THOMAS K. WADDELL (Toronto, Ontario, Canada): Prasad, is it possible to use this phenomenon to target the viral killing to areas that are treated with radiation? In other words, once the cells are activated, the GADD34 is upregulated, do they simply become viral producers, that then systemically more virus is produced throughout the whole animal, or is the production of virus limited to the local area which has undergone radiation?

Dr ADUSUMILLI: Thank you Dr Waddell. GADD34 upregulation enhances viral replication in the irradiated cells. The cell-to-cell spread is mostly by direct contact. The virus used in this study, NV1066, carries a transgene for enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). As a result, the infected cells emit green fluorescence, which can be detected and quantified by flow cytometry. In this study we also conducted viral propagation studies by measuring the percentage of EGFP-expressing cancer cells after viral infection with and without radiation. These studies have shown enhanced viral propagation in cells that are radiated and infected. In other animal experiments when the virus injected either systemically or locally into the tumor, after viral replication, there is minimal persistence or propagation of virus in the systemic circulation as the virus does not infect or replicate in normal cells. This is confirmed by other investigators such as Advani et al. In the malignant glioma flank tumor animal model, they have shown by immunohistochemistry that enhanced viral presence is mostly confined to the areas adjacent to the needle track of injection after radiation, which confirms the fact that the viral propagation is mainly local rather than systemic.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The authors thank Yuhong She, MD, and Wong Wai, MS, of the Anti-Tumor Core Facility, and Scott Tuorto of the Department of Surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for their assistance with this project. We also thank Brian Horsburgh, PhD, and Medigene, Inc, for constructing and providing us with the NV1066 virus. This project is supported in part by AACR-AstraZeneca Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation fellowship (PSA), grants R01 CA76416 and R01 CA/DK80982 (YF) from the National Institutes of Health, grant MBC-99366 (YF) from the American Cancer Society, grant BC024118 from the US Army (YF), grant IMG0402501 from the Susan Komen Foundation (YF), and grant 032047 from Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (YF).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Cancer Facts & Figures. 2004Available at: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT?CAFF_finalPWSecured.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2004.
  2. Sirzen F, Kjellen E, Sorenson S, Cavallin-Stahl E. A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in non-small cell lung cancer Acta Oncol 2003;42:493-515.[Medline]
  3. Cox JD, Sause WT, Byhardt RW, Komaki R, Perez CA, Pajak TF. Dose intensity of radiation therapy in non-small cell carcinoma of the lunga review of RTOG data and strategies. Lung Cancer 1994;10(Suppl 1):S161-S166.
  4. Perez CA, Pajak TF, Rubin P, et al. Long-term observations of the patterns of failure in patients with unresectable non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung treated with definitive radiotherapy. Report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Cancer 1987;59:1874-1881.[Medline]
  5. Rosenzweig KE, Yorke E, Jackson A, et al. Results of a phase I dose escalation study in the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57(2 Suppl):S417-S418.
  6. Mineta T, Rabkin SD, Yazaki T, Hunter WD, Martuza RL. Attenuated multi-mutated herpes simplex virus-1 for the treatment of malignant gliomas Nat Med 1995;1:938-943.[Medline]
  7. Fong Y, Kemeny N, Jarnagin S, et al. Phase 1 study of a replication-competent herpes simplex oncolytic virus for treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases. Vol. 2. 2002Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 38th Annual Meeting, Part 1, 8a, abstract 27.
  8. Stiles BM, Bhargava A, Adusumilli PS, et al. The replication-competent oncolytic herpes simplex mutant virus NV1066 is effective in the treatment of esophageal cancer Surgery 2003;134:357-364.[Medline]
  9. Stanziale SF, Stiles BM, Bhargava A, Kerns SA, Kalakonda N, Fong Y. Oncolytic herpes simplex virus-1 mutant expressing green fluorescent protein can detect and treat peritoneal cancer Hum Gene Ther 2004;15:609-618.[Medline]
  10. Stanziale SF, Fong Y. Novel approaches to cancer therapy using oncolytic viruses Curr Mol Med 2003;3:61-71.[Medline]
  11. Kooby DA, Carew JF, Halterman MW, et al. Oncolytic viral therapy for human colorectal cancer and liver metastases using a multi-mutated herpes simplex virus type-1 (G207) FASEB J 1999;13:1325-1334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ebright MI, Zager JS, Malhotra S, et al. Replication-competent herpes virus NV1020 as direct treatment of pleural cancer in a rat model J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:123-129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Stiles BM, Adusumilli PS, Bhargava A, et al. Minimally-invasive in vivo imaging of an oncolytic herpes simplex mutant expressing green fluorescent protein Mol Ther 2003;7:S453abstract 1172.
  14. Stanziale SF, Petrowsky H, Adusumilli PS, et al. Infection with oncolytic herpes simplex virus-1 induces apoptosis in neighboring human cancer cellsa potential target to increase anticancer activity. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3225-3232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wong RJ, Joe JK, Kim SH, Shah JP, Horsburgh B, Fong Y. Oncolytic herpesvirus effectively treats murine squamous cell carcinoma and spreads by natural lymphatics to treat sites of lymphatic metastases Hum Gene Ther 2002;13:1213-1223.[Medline]
  16. Hollander MC, Zhan Q, Bae I, Fornace Jr AJ. Mammalian GADD34, an apoptosis- and DNA damage-inducible gene J Biol Chem 1997;27213731–7.
  17. Hollander MC, Poola-Kella S, Fornace Jr AJ. GADD34 functional domains involved in growth suppression and apoptosis Oncogene 2003;22:3827-3832.[Medline]
  18. Hollander MC, Sheikh MS, Yu K, et al. Activation of GADD34 by diverse apoptotic signals and suppression of its growth inhibitory effects by apoptotic inhibitors Int J Cancer 2001;96:22-31.[Medline]
  19. Stanziale SF, Petrowsky H, Joe JK, et al. Ionizing radiation potentiates the antitumor efficacy of oncolytic herpes simplex virus G207 by upregulating ribonucleotide reductase Surgery 2002;132:353-359.[Medline]
  20. Bennett JJ, Delman KA, Burt BM, et al. Comparison of safety, delivery, and efficacy of two oncolytic herpes viruses (G207 and NV1020) for peritoneal cancer Cancer Gene Ther 2002;9:935-945.[Medline]
  21. Advani SJ, Chung SM, Yan SY, et al. Replication-competent, nonneuroinvasive genetically engineered herpes virus is highly effective in the treatment of therapy-resistant experimental human tumors Cancer Res 1999;59:2055-2058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Chou TC, Talalay P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationshipsthe combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul 1984;22:27-55.[Medline]
  23. Bennett JJ, Adusumilli P, Petrowsky H, et al. Up-regulation of GADD34 mediates the synergistic anticancer activity of mitomycin C and a gamma134.5 deleted oncolytic herpes virus (G207) FASEB J 2004;18:1001-1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. The siRNA user guide. 2004Available at: http://www.rockefeller.edu/labheads/tuschl/sirna.html. Accessed October 30, 2004.
  25. Kramm CM, Chase M, Herrlinger U, et al. Therapeutic efficiency and safety of a second-generation replication-conditional HSV1 vector for brain tumor gene therapy Hum Gene Ther 1997;8:2057-2068.[Medline]
  26. Chung RY, Saeki Y, Chiocca EA. B-myb promoter retargeting of herpes simplex virus gamma34.5 gene-mediated virulence toward tumor and cycling cells J Virol 1999;73:7556-7564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Chou TC. Assessment of synergistic and antagonistic effects of chemotherapeutic agents in vitro Contrib Gynecol Obstet 1994;19:91-107.[Medline]
  28. Chou TC. Quantitation of synergism and antagonism of two or more drugs by computerized analysisNew York: Academic Press; 2004. pp. 223-244.
  29. Amundson SA, Myers TG, Scudiero D, Kitada S, Reed JC, Fornace Jr AJ. An informatics approach identifying markers of chemosensitivity in human cancer cell lines Cancer Res 2000;60:6101-6110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Fornace Jr AJ, Amundson SA, Bittner M, et al. The complexity of radiation stress responsesanalysis by informatics and functional genomics approaches. Gene Expr 1999;7:387-400.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. S. Adusumilli, D. P. Eisenberg, B. M. Stiles, S. Chung, M.-K. Chan, V. W. Rusch, and Y. Fong
Intraoperative localization of lymph node metastases with a replication-competent herpes simplex virus.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1179 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Valerie W. Rusch
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adusumilli, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fong, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adusumilli, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fong, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS