|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:88-89
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Yale University School of Medicine Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery 121 FMB 333 Cedar St New Haven, CT 06510
(Email: john.elefteriades{at}yale.edu).
In recent years, axillary artery cannulation has gained considerable popularity as a site for arterial perfusion for thoracic aortic surgery, almost to the point of attaching a negative stigma to the use of the femoral artery for this purpose. There is no question that axillary artery cannulation offers significant advantages in specific circumstances, especially when the thoracoabdominal aorta is heavily diseased with mobile atheromatous lesions. In such circumstances, axillary cannulation can avoid the lifting of the aortic "tree bark" that can occur with retrograde femoral perfusion.
This article by Lakew and colleagues serves an important role by reminding us that traditional femoral artery cannulation remains an excellent option for many patients. The authors have wisely restricted their analysis to a well-defined and specific group (ie, those patients undergoing surgery only for chronic aortic aneurysm, not dissection). This specificity permits meaningful results by defining a relatively uniform clinical setting for analysis. Also the number of patients is large and the two techniques (ie, femoral and direct aortic cannulation) are carried out simultaneously during the study period, an advantage compared with other comparative studies. The clinical and stroke results achieved in both groups in this study are superb.
A weakness of this study is the potential for bias based on the surgeons perception of the aortic situation; thus one can safely conclude that femoral cannulation leads to good results in experienced hands. However, it is not safe to conclude that femoral and aortic cannulation are equivalent in all situations, as that would require a prospective, randomized investigation. Another weakness is that the authors did not report or incorporate findings from intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in their evaluation of potential cannulation sites. In the present era, not using that information represents an anachronism.
Another important concept demonstrated by this study is that simple deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with efficient arch surgery produces excellent clinical results with low cerebral complication rates. This point is important to keep in mind vis-à-vis the alternative techniques of retrograde or selective antegrade brain perfusion.
The following additional technical observations deserve consideration in selecting cannulation sites for thoracic aortic surgery:
The article by Lakew and colleagues complements our recent article that demonstrates the safety and utility of femoral artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection [2]. Thus, between these two articles, the good name of the former gold-standard, femoral cannulation, is to some extent restored to its prior status. Femoral cannulation remains quick, easy, and absent of severe mobile atheromas in the descending and abdominal aortas, it is quite safe for both chronic aneurysm and acute ascending aortic dissection.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Wong, J. S. Coselli, L. Palmero, J. Bozinovski, S. A. Carter, D. Murariu, and S. A. LeMaire Axillary Artery Cannulation in Surgery for Acute or Subacute Ascending Aortic Dissections Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2010; 90(3): 731 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |