|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:56-59
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surge ry, Department of Pediatrics,Sejong General Hospital, Sejong Heart Institute, Bucheon, Korea
b Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Korea
Accepted for publication January 20, 2005.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Woong-Han Kim, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Childrens Hospital, 28 Yongon-Dong, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea; (Email: woonghan{at}korea.com).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made in 35 patients who underwent biventricular repair by one surgeon between November 1997 and January 2004. All patients received intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and follow-up transthoracic echocardiography at 19.1 ± 18.02 months (range, 7 days to 5 years; median, 15.1 months).
RESULTS: In left-sided atrioventricular valve regurgitation, 34.3% (12 of 35) of patients showed discrepancy during follow-up, and 28.6% (10 of 35) showed progression of regurgitation (from grade I to II). In right-sided atrioventricular valve, 11.4% (4 of 35) of patients showed discrepancy, 9.6% (3 of 35) showed progression of regurgitation (from grade I to II).
CONCLUSIONS: In complete atrioventricular septal defects, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography did not show the same findings as that of follow-up transthoracic echocardiography in some cases. However, this discrepancy is not so great as to require reoperation in early to midterm follow-up. Therefore, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography may be used as tool to predict durability of surgical results and to decrease the incidence of reoperation in complete atrioventricular septal defects.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has helped to improve surgical outcomes by providing the surgeon with instant, real-time information about cardiac structure and valvular function [7, 8]. However, it has been suggested that a significant discrepancy exists between intraoperative findings by TEE and follow-up findings by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) [6, 7, 9]. Therefore, intaoperative TEE might not always be predictive of follow-up findings [7, 9].
This study aims to determine whether a discrepancy between intraoperative TEE and follow-up TTE exists and to ascertain whether it is possible to predict follow-up outcomes by the use of intraoperative TEE.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The C-AVSD was of the following types: Rastelli A in 24 patients (68.6%), type B in 3 patients (8.5%), and type C in 8 patients (22.9%). Associated cardiac defects are summarized in Table 1.
|
Echocardiographic Studies
Intraoperative TEE was performed just after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, before chest closure. An Acuson V705B Bi-Plane transesophageal TEE probe for Acuson 128XP system (Malvern, PA) was used with color Doppler flow imaging at 5 MHz. Follow-up TTE studies were performed with a Sequoia 256-7V3C probe for Acuson Sequoia system with color Doppler flow imaging at 5 MHz. The mean interval between intraoperative TEE and follow-up TTE was 19.1 ± 18.02 months (range, 7 days to 5 years; median, 15.1 months). Evaluation of echocardiography was performed by four pediatric cardiologists, but no statistical blinding techniques were employed. Atrioventricular valvular regurgitation assessed by echocardiography was graded as grade I (mild), grade II (mild to moderate), grade III (moderate), and grade IV (severe) according to standard methods [10].
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
As for TR, none of the 35 patients left the operating room with more than grade II. Follow-up TTE studies found that of the 34 patients with grade I or less revealed by intraoperative TEE, 31 patients maintained the same level of regurgitation, but increased regurgitation to grade II occurred in 3. One patient who was initially grade II regurgitation by intraoperative TEE improved to grade I or less regurgitation on follow-up TTE study. Overall, 31 of the 35 patients (88.6%) had no change in the grade of right atrioventricular valvular regurgitation at follow-up. Regarding the rest of the patients (11.4%) who had a discrepancy at follow-up, 1 patient (25%) had improvement, and 3 patients (75%) had increased TR by one grade.
In residual VSD leakage, none of the 35 patients left the operating room with above mild leakage. Intraoperative TEE showed that no VSD leakage was noted in 27 patients, and minimal residual VSD was noted in 8. Follow-up TTE studies revealed that the minimal residual VSD was closed spontaneously in all 8 patients.
In residual ASD, intraoperative TEE showed that no ASD leakage was noted in 33 patients, and minimal residual ASD was noted in 2. Follow-up TTE studies revealed that the minimal residual ASD was closed spontaneously in both patients.
One patient with mild mitral stenosis had progression to moderate mitral stenosis, and in 2 patients, LVOTO was newly developed at follow-up TTE (Table 3).
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rate of progress of MR at follow-up TTE in the study mentioned above [7] was 38%. In our study, the rate of progression was 28.6%, which was rather lower than the other study. In general, ventricular function is not fully recovered at the time of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. The grade of MR and TR changes dramatically according to preload, afterload, and myocardial function after C-AVSD repair [12]. As a result, echocardiographic findings of atrioventricular valvular regurgitation in the operating room may be underestimated. Therefore, this change in hemodynamics may be considered a major cause of the discrepancy between intraoperative and postoperative echocardiographic findings. The discrepancy between the two modalities is also attributed partly to the use of inotropics, filling pressures, ventricular function, atriventricular synchrony in immediate postoperative period and suture line tension adjustment, postrepair ventricular volume and function changes, healing, scarring, and growing during follow-up. In the present study, for 10 of the 35 patients, MR progressed; however, no one underwent reoperation. In other words, the progression was not so significant clinically as to require reoperation. Therefore, intraoperative TEE can predict if there will be significant atrioventricular valvular regurgitation that will require reoperation during the follow-up period in C-AVSD. In addition, the present study shows that intraoperative TEE can predict more accurately the follow-up results in TR, residual VSD, and ASD in C-AVSD.
In 12 patients, the C-AVSD was repaired by direct closure of the VSD followed by pericardial patch closure of the primum ASD. This technique did not result in postoperative LVOTO and residual VSD in our series. This technique made no differences comparing it with the other repair techniques during the early to midterm period. This technique, first done by Wilcox and coworkers [13], was performed for a balanced C-AVSD with a VSD located beneath the inferior bridging leaflet mainly, with no potential LVOTO in echocardiography. This modified technique resulted in equivalent outcomes compared with the two- or one-patch technique [14]. It also did not increase the incidence of LVOTO and residual VSD postoperatively.
In conclusion, intraoperative TEE does not always show the same findings as follow-up TTE in patients with C-AVSD. In spite of this discrepancy, however, none of our cases resulted in reoperation in early to midterm follow-up (1- to 2-year follow-up). Therefore, intraoperative TEE may be used as tool to predict durability of surgical results and to decrease the incidence of reoperation in C-AVSD.
Limitations
The evaluation of MR or TR by intraoperative TEE is confounded by the labile hemodynamic milieu of the operating room. Also, this study was a retrospective study in which the median follow-up was relatively short. Echocardiography was performed by four pediatricians, but statistical blinding techniques were not applied to our study.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Honjo, Y. Kotani, S. Osaki, Y. Fujita, T. Suezawa, A. Tateishi, K. Ishino, M. Kawada, T. Akagi, and S. Sano Discrepancy Between Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography and Postoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography in Assessing Congenital Valve Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2240 - 2246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |