ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheatley, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wheatley, G. H., III
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:382
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Correspondence

A Recent Graduate’s Perspective on Residency Training

Grayson H. Wheatley, III, MD

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5939 Harry Hines Blvd, HA-9, Suite 135, Dallas, TX 75390

(Email: gwheat{at}parknet.pmh.org).

To the Editor:

I read with interest the editorial by Kron and Mathisen [1] reviewing the many challenges facing cardiothoracic surgeons today and describing how those issues relate to residency training. Their valuable insights both as program directors of leading residency training programs and as educators at the national level give their remarks a degree of importance that all residents (including those involved in residency education) should carefully consider. I would like to respond to a few of their comments from the perspective of someone who has recently completed residency training in cardiothoracic surgery and is starting a career in this exciting field.

Of utmost concern among all residents is finding a job upon completion of training. Many variables factor into the complex equation of obtaining suitable employment, such as job availability or market forces, educational background, quality and breadth of technical skills, involvement with research activities, and extracurricular honors. Graduating residents have almost no influence on the market forces effecting job availability. Therefore, assistance with finding a rewarding job can be addressed at the individual resident or training program level.

Residents must be individually challenged to become even more competitive job candidates than before by directing their energies into the factors that can have the most impact. With the recent implementation of duty hour restrictions, residents have the opportunity to become increasingly involved with research projects that can lead to more peer-reviewed publications and developing specialized areas of knowledge. In addition, there is ample opportunity for residents to distinguish themselves by working with their program director to implement new educational resources into their own program’s residency curriculum. At the national level, the Thoracic Surgery Residents Association is always searching for motivated residents to assist with resident training issues.

At the same time, training programs and residents must be continually looking ahead to identify future needs of the specialty. One area of future growth appears to be catheter-based interventions. Currently, few, if any, cardiothoracic surgery training programs offer formalized training in abdominal or thoracic stent deployment, carotid stenting, or peripheral vascular interventions. Cardiothoracic surgeons need to embrace these emerging endovascular technologies in order to maintain viability of our specialty. As a result, I believe that residency training programs will soon be forced to include an endovascular training component in their curricula. The American Board of Thoracic Surgery could accelerate this process in the near future by first suggesting, and then requiring, a certain number of endovascular procedures to be included as part of the certification process. Acquiring new endovascular skills during residency, and becoming better prepared to compete with other specialties may even increase resident satisfaction with their current residency. In the meantime, residents should express interest to their program director about these new technologies and even independently seek additional training from qualified cardiothoracic or vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, or cardiologists.

In conclusion, opportunity comes from change. Residents and training programs must use this opportunity to redefine resident education and meet the demands of the changing marketplace. The future of our specialty depends on it.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Kron IL, Mathisen D. Caring for the residentsthe view of two program directors. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:17.[Free Full Text]

Related Article

Reply
Irving Kron, William H. Muller, Jr, Douglas Mathisen, and Hermes C. Grillo
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005 80: 382. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheatley, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wheatley, G. H., III
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS