ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Bahaaldin Alsoufi
Irving Shen
Ross Ungerleider
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alsoufi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alsoufi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:15-21
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

Extracorporeal Life Support in Neonates, Infants, and Children After Repair of Congenital Heart Disease: Modern Era Results in a Single Institution

Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MDa, Irving Shen, MDa, Tara Karamlou, MDa, Carmen Giacomuzzi, CCPa, Grant Burch, MDb, Michael Silberbach, MDb, Ross Ungerleider, MDa,*

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
b Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon

Accepted for publication February 1, 2005.

* Address reprints to Dr Ungerleider, Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, DC 8 South, Portland, OR 97239 (Email: ungerlei{at}ohsu.edu).

Presented at the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 13–15, 2003.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support has assumed a very effective role in the support of patients with refractory heart failure after repair of congenital heart disease, with hospital survival between 37% and 42%. We reviewed our results of different applications of extracorporeal life support in the last 2 years.

METHODS: Between January 2001 and October 2003, 671 patients underwent surgery for congenital heart disease at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital and clinic charts of the patients who required extracorporeal life support postoperatively, and studied the factors associated with survival.

RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (5.36%) received extracorporeal life support after surgery, between 1 day and 8 years of age (age < 30 days, n = 34). We divided the patients into four groups. Group 1 consisted of 13 patients who were electively placed on ventricular support without an oxygenator (univentricular assist device) after repair of single-ventricle disease. Group 2 consisted of 16 patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after surgery for failed hemodynamics. Group 3 consisted of 2 patients who required left ventricle support (left ventricular assist device) after surgery for two-ventricle disease but who did not require biventricular (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) support. Group 4 consisted of 5 patients who required conversion from ventricular assist device to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Overall, 28 patients were weaned successfully (78%), and 24 survived to discharge (67%). Hospital survival in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 100%, 50%, 100%, and 20%, respectively. Univariate factors associated with survival were age, weight, ventricular assist device type, duration, single-ventricle disease, reexploration, number of complications, and specific complications such as sepsis, renal failure, and pulmonary failure.

CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal life support utilization was expanded to include different applications with different outcomes. The extracorporeal life support registry should be altered to reflect those changes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Since extracorporeal life support (ECLS) was used for the first time in supporting the heart after repair of tetralogy of Fallot by Soeter and colleagues in 1973 [1], the use of ECLS for postcardiotomy mechanical support has achieved great importance in the treatment of congenital heart disease in neonates and children, and it became an invaluable tool in the postoperative management in all major centers performing pediatric cardiac surgery. Despite improved outcomes with the use of ECLS, these results remain inferior to those of respiratory ECLS. In the most recent available ECLS registry database from July 2003, the survival rate for neonates and children after cardiac ECLS was 37% and 42%, respectively, compared with survival of 77% and 55% after respiratory ECLS in neonates and children, respectively [2].

Extracorporeal life support is used in congenital heart surgery for several indications, including failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), hemodynamic collapse before or after surgery, pulmonary hypertension, as a bridge for transplantation, and finally, in some centers including ours, routinely after surgical repair of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and its variants after successful weaning from CPB.

The indications, timing, and threshold for utilization of ECLS are different in many centers, as is the type of support chosen between different programs. Hospital survival is variable depending on the support required. In addition, multiple other factors that have been identified in previous studies affect the outcome of patients after ECLS.

The results of ECLS from different programs are combined together at the ECLS registry database, and the outcomes of different types and indications of ECLS are mixed together. We propose to separate the outcomes of various types and applications of ECLS to predict results more accurately and help toward establishing useful guidelines. We summarize our experience with ECLS in the last 2 years after repair of congenital heart disease. Our purpose is to identify factors affecting survival, including the various types and indications of support postoperatively.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We conducted a retrospective review of neonates and children after repair of congenital heart disease in our institution between January 2001 and October 2003. Six hundred seventy-one patients underwent cardiac surgery during that period, with an overall hospital mortality of 2.83%. Extracorporeal life support was used in 36 patients (5.36%) postoperatively. The hospital records, operative reports, perfusion, intensive care unit (ICU), and clinic notes were used to collect the data of interest. Institutional review board approval was provided before publication of this manuscript and report of the information.

We divided the patients in our study into four groups on the basis of the type of ECLS required. Group 1 included 13 patients who received elective mechanical support after repair of single-ventricle disease (eg, HLHS). The shunt was left open and the lungs remained ventilated; thus, an oxygenator was not used. After completion of surgical repair, patients in group 1 were rewarmed, separated from CPB, and treated with a period of modified ultrafiltration. Atrial and neoaortic cannulas were then attached to a ventricular assist device (VAD) circuit, and the flow rate was slowly increased to 200 mL·kg–1·min–1. Protamine sulfate was administered, and hemostasis was achieved. Sternums were left open and covered with Eshmark dressing, and the patients were transported to the ICU. Heparin intravenous infusion was restarted in the ICU after several hours once hemostasis was complete. Activated clotting time was maintained between 160 and 180 seconds. The systemic-to-pulmonary shunt was left open in all cases [3]. The patients were ventilated to achieve an arterial oxygen partial pressure between 30 and 45 mm Hg and an arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure between 35 and 45 mm Hg. Once the systemic perfusion by physical examination and the lactate level became normal (<2 mmol/L), VAD flow rate was weaned to zero, and the cannulas were removed. Chests were closed in the ICU. If chest closure resulted in significant elevation of the central venous pressure, it was delayed for 1 to 2 days after decannulation.

Group 2 included 16 patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for hemodynamic or pulmonary support after surgery for single-ventricle or double-ventricle defects. Group 3 was confined to 2 patients in whom ECLS was used to support the left ventricle (left VAD) after repair of double-ventricle anatomy. Left VAD was provided for group 3 patients using a roller pump with flows maintained at 100 mL·kg–1·min–1, or at whatever level return to the left atrium allowed. After hemostasis was adequate, heparin was administered in the ICU to keep activated clotting time between 180 and 200 seconds, sternums were left open, and the incision was covered with Eshmark. Flows were weaned to zero, and the patients had their cannulas removed and chests closed in the ICU when the left ventricle recovered. Finally, group 4 included 5 patients who needed conversion from VAD to ECMO by adding an oxygenator to the ECLS circuit postoperatively (VAD-ECMO) for either single-ventricle or double-ventricle anatomy.

In the ECMO groups (2 and 4), the cannulation sites were the right or common atrium for venous outflow and the aorta or neoaorta for arterial inflow. Atrial and aortic cannulas were then attached to an ECLS circuit, which consisted of a roller pump and membrane oxygenator. The flow rate ranged between 100 and 200 mL·kg–1·min–1 depending on whether the patient had a patent shunt with systemic and pulmonary circuit in series (100 mL·kg–1·min–1) or parallel (200 mL·kg–1·min–1). Sternums were left open and covered with Eshmark. Heparin was administered to maintain activated clotting time between 180 and 220 seconds. Weaning was done by decreasing flow rates, institution of inotropic support, and adjusting ventilation with observation of the hemodynamics, saturations, acid-base status, and perfusion and echocardiographic findings. The patients had their cannulas removed in the ICU, and the chest was closed at a later date if needed in the ICU as well.

We performed data analysis using SPSS for Windows, version 11.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL). Frequency distributions were analyzed for all data. Normally distributed continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data were expressed as counts and proportions. Unrelated two-group comparisons were performed with unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t tests for means of normally distributed variables with Wilcoxon rank sum tests for skewed data. The {chi}2 or Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences among the categorical data.

Bivariate comparisons were then made between the following variables and 30-day mortality, our main outcome measure using the {chi}2 test: age less than 10 days, weight less than 3.0 kg, single-ventricle versus double-ventricle disease, ECLS duration less than 180 hours, ECLS type, need for reexploration, and number and type of complications. Because of the small number of patients, the power to detect a significant difference is limited, and a multivariate analysis was not performed.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Six hundred seventy-one patients underwent surgery for congenital heart disease during that time period. Thirty-six patients required ECLS postoperatively (5.36%). Overall, 28 patients (78%) were weaned off ECLS successfully, with 24 (67%) surviving to be discharged from the hospital. There were 21 boys and 15 girls in our series. Their ages ranged between 1 day and 8 years, with the majority (n = 34) of patients younger than 30 days (neonates). Their weight ranged between 1.7 and 26 kg, with a mean weight of 4.42 ± 4.57 kg.

The most common preoperative diagnosis was HLHS variant in 16 patients (44%). Other common diagnoses included variants of transposition of the great arteries in 5 patients, 3 patients with variants of double-outlet right ventricle, 2 patients with tricuspid atresia, 2 patients with tricuspid atresia and transposition of the great arteries, 2 patients with total anomalous pulmonary venous connection, 2 with unbalanced atrioventricular canal, and 4 other causes including Ebstein anomaly, mitral valve deformity, tetralogy of Fallot, and a patient after the Glenn procedure for a single ventricle.

Indications for ECLS support included failure to wean from bypass in 17 patients (47%), cardiac arrest in the ICU after surgery in 4 patients (11%), and finally routine use of ECLS after successful weaning from CPB in 15 (42%) patients. Standard ECLS indications (failure to wean from CPB and cardiac arrest) were present in 21 patients (3.12% of total patients after cardiotomy).

Extracorporeal life support was initiated in the operating room in 32 patients (88.9%) and in the pediatric ICU in 4 patients (11.1%). In addition, 1 patient required ECMO for the second time after weaning from ECLS that was started in the operating room the first time. Table 1 shows the survival of patients in relation to their preoperative diagnosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Diagnosis and Survival
 
Patients in group 1 (uni-VAD) and group 3 (left VAD) had 100% hospital survival rate. Meanwhile, the ECMO group had weaning and hospital survival rate of 69% and 50%, respectively. In patients who required conversion from VAD to ECMO, the weaning rate was 40%, and only 1 patient (20%) survived to discharge. This was a patient who required conversion to ECMO because of unexplained hypoxia that was the result of a mucus plug diagnosed after the conversion (Fig 1).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Weaning and survival to discharge in different groups of patients. (ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; LVAD = left ventricular assist device; uni-VAD = univentricular assist device; VAD-ECMO = ventricular assist device-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.)

 
The ECLS support times were 16 to 187 hours (mean, 80.3 hours) in survivors versus 100 to 540 hours (mean, 228.6 hours) in nonsurvivors. All the patients in groups 1 and 3 required VAD less than 180 hours, whereas all the patients who required ECLS more than 180 hours were in groups 2 and 4 (Fig 2).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Extracorporeal life support duration in different groups of patients. (ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; LVAD = left ventricular assist device; uni-VAD = univentricular assist device; VAD-ECMO = ventricular assist device-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.)

 
Causes of death in our series included discontinuation of support in 6 patients owing to failure to wean them off ECLS after multiple attempts and prolonged duration of support. In addition, support was terminated in 2 other patients, one with severe intracranial hemorrhage and the other with severe diffuse thrombosis as a result of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Four children were weaned successfully; however, they died before discharge as a result of sepsis in 2 and cardiac arrest in the other 2.

Complications recorded in our series included arrhythmias requiring intervention in 16% of our patients, renal failure requiring the addition of a hemofilter in 22%, clinical sepsis in 25%, pulmonary hemorrhage and failure in 19%, bleeding requiring reexploration in 25%, intracranial hemorrhage in 8%, gastrointestinal bleeding in 5%, mechanical problems requiring changing parts of the ECLS circuit in 14%, mediastinitis in 3%, and finally 1 patient who died as a result of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia complications. Table 2 summarizes these complications.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Postoperative Complications and Survival
 
The mean number of complications in our series was 1.53 ± 1.46. Overall, 11 patients had no complications whereas 3 patients had more than four complications. All of the patients in groups 1 (uni-VAD) and 3 (left VAD) had zero, one, or two complications only. All the patients who had more than two complications were in groups 2 (ECMO) and 4 (VAD-ECMO conversion; Fig 3).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Number of complications in each group after extracorporeal life support. (ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; LVAD = left ventricular assist device; uni-VAD = univentricular assist device; VAD-ECMO = ventricular assist device-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.)

 
In addition, the majority of patients (8 of 9) who underwent reexploration for bleeding or surgical reintervention in our series (shunt revision, repair of residual defect such as ventricular septal defect, coarctation of the aorta, and so forth) were in the ECMO (group 2) or VAD/ECMO (group 4) groups (Fig 4). Only 1 patient in group 1 (uni-VAD) and none in group 3 (left VAD) underwent reexploration. This patient underwent a Norwood operation and required reexploration twice for bleeding and shunt revision; he survived and already has undergone a successful Glenn cavopulmonary shunt operation.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. The incidence of reexploration in different groups of extracorporeal life support.

 
Factors positively associated with survival included age older than 10 days (p = 0.018) and weight greater than 3 kg at time of surgery (p = 0.007). In addition, other factors associated with survival were single-ventricle versus double-ventricle disease (p = 0.050), the duration of ECLS less than 180 hours (p = 0.005), type 1 or 3 ECLS (p = 0.003), fewer than two perioperative complications (p < 0.001), and freedom from renal failure, sepsis, pulmonary hemorrhage, or insufficiency (p < 0.001).

Reexploration for bleeding alone was not a significant factor affecting survival; however, reexploration for surgical reintervention (residual defect, shunt revision, and so forth) affected survival significantly. Table 3 shows the effect of multiple variables on survival.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Univariate Model Fit for Survival ({chi}2)
 
Multivariate analysis did not reveal any factor independently associated with mortality at a probability level of 0.05 or less.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Extracorporeal life support is an invaluable tool in the care of neonates and children after surgery for congenital heart disease. Indications for the use of ECLS in the pediatric population include cardiac support before surgical correction [4], severe myocardial dysfunction as a bridge to recovery [5, 6] or as bridge to transplantation [7–9], treatment of pulmonary hypertension [10], cardiac support after surgery for congenital heart disease [4, 7, 8, 11–16], after transplantation [17], and finally routinely after surgical repair of hypoplastic left heart syndrome as it is practiced in our program [3, 18].

The results for cardiac ECLS in neonates and children are inferior to those of pulmonary ECLS in the same age group [2, 19]. In the most recent ECLS registry database (July 2003), the survival rate for neonates and children after cardiac ECLS was 37% and 42%, respectively, compared with survival of 77% and 55% after respiratory ECLS in neonates and children, respectively.

Several factors that influence survival have been identified in previous reports [4, 8, 11–14]. Those include patient factors such as age, weight, and diagnosis (eg, ALCAPA [anomalous origin of left coronary artery from pulmonary artery], HLHS). Some studies found single-ventricle disease to be associated with worse prognosis whereas others found that biventricular disease patients had lower survival rate [11, 12].

Patients requiring ECLS without the use of an oxygenator (VAD) as in groups 1 and 3 had fewer complications compared with patients requiring ECMO and the use of an oxygenator. The presence of an oxygenator increases the foreign body surface area of the system, resulting in increased activation of the inflammatory cascade, consumption of coagulation factors, hemolysis, and generation of thromboemboli, all contributing to end-organ damage [3, 20, 21].

In addition, when the circuit does not include an oxygenator, it is possible to postpone heparinization to achieve hemostasis. Anticoagulation can be provided several hours after surgery, once hemostasis seems to be secure [22]. This significantly decreases bleeding requiring reexploration, as noted in our series. Only 1 patient in groups 1 and 3 required reexplorations for bleeding compared with 8 patients in groups 2 and 4. The decreased bleeding rate and therefore the transfusion requirements, consumption of coagulation factors, and tissue edema probably contribute to improved outcome in the VAD groups.

Finally, as noted in laboratory and clinical series, maintaining the shunt open in the univentricular shunt-dependent group (versus the formerly recommended protocols of occluding the shunt) maintains the perfusion of the lungs and decreases lung injury after ECLS and therefore pulmonary complications after ECLS [22, 23].

Most of the studies showed that prolonged duration of ECLS and emergence of complications, especially renal failure and sepsis, were all factors that have a significant negative impact on survival. Some studies have reported that the institution of ECLS in the operating room for failure to wean from CPB was associated with better survival [11], whereas others reported that patients who had a brief period of hemodynamic stability before the need for ECLS had better prognosis [4, 12, 16]. The difference in the outcomes of all those studies reflects the different practices of ECLS among different centers and also the disadvantages of single-center retrospective studies, including lack of randomization and small sample sizes.

Our experience with applying ECLS for different requirements provides some explanation of the variable results and conclusions reported in previous studies. It seems clear that when ECLS is provided to support ventricular function without the need for an oxygenator, prognosis in terms of complications and hospital survival are significantly better than when patients require biventricular support and the addition of an oxygenator.

This is not intended to simply be a review of VAD versus ECMO. In 1998, Thuys and colleagues [24] reported only moderate success with VAD after cardiac surgery for infants, and their results were not substantially different from results from other applications of ECLS. The number of patients who required VAD in our series (group 3, 2 patients) is too small to make conclusions about the efficacy of VAD versus ECMO.

Patients in our group 1 (VAD applied electively for HLHS and its variants) have been reported elsewhere and constitute a unique group. If we exclude them from our analysis, then our results would be very similar to other reported studies with 15 of 23 (65%) patients being weaned and 11 of 23 (48%) patients surviving to discharge. Nevertheless, this group represents a group of patients who may confound database information as the use of ECLS to provide elective hemodynamic support after cardiac surgery expands in the future.

In the 1970s, the use and indications of intrathoracic balloon pump to support failing adult hearts was expanded as it was applied to more "salvageable" patients. of Intrathoracic balloon pump became an often-used and successful part of the cardiac surgery toolbox.

We believe that application of circulatory support after neonatal cardiac surgery has numerous benefits for patients that may not be measurable simply as survival. Brain recovery after CPB exposure in hypoxic patients (such as is typical after a Norwood procedure for HLHS) is flow-dependent, and the cardiac output support from routinely applied postoperative VAD may be beneficial. Our question is whether it confounds the ECLS database to lump these patients, who have a clearly different outcome than patients exposed to more conventional applications of ECLS, into the same data set.

This study also emphasizes that the prognosis for infants with single-ventricle disease who can be managed with an open shunt (group 1) and normal ventilation is substantially different from infants with single-ventricle disease who despite an open shunt require an oxygenator to support pulmonary function.

Finally, we present these data to illustrate that application of ECLS is changing. There are patients who can be managed with ECLS electively or semielectively (failing but not failed hemodynamics) who can have short (<180 hours) duration of ECLS and consequently fewer complications. When ECLS becomes prolonged, more complications ensue, and the prognosis for survival is markedly worse. These patients comprise a different population with respect to outcome and possibly should be recorded in some separate way.

The ECLS registry plays an excellent role in combining results from different, experienced centers and sharing results in terms of weaning and survival rates after surgery for different diseases, indications, and procedures. In addition, it provides information about the expected ECLS complications. It does not differentiate among different types of ECLS, timing, and clinical scenarios leading to ECLS. Combining the data from different institutions, taking into consideration the various applications of ECLS described in this review, would reflect more accurately the clinical course and outcome of cardiac support and may help in establishing guidelines and protocols that can be applied in diverse medical centers with reproducible results and therefore may help with better utilization of expensive resources.

The role of ECLS after pediatric cardiac surgery is expanding to include new and different applications. Its role is not limited to the support of children with refractory cardiac failure after repair of congenital heart disease. There are elective and semielective indications for the institution of ECLS postoperatively that influence not only patients’ survival but also recovery and neurologic outcome. Hospital survival after ECLS is variable depending on the patient’s condition and the type of support required. Patient factors as age, weight, and disease may affect outcome. The duration of support required exposes the patients to increased risk of complications and affects their outcome. Survival after VAD is better than survival after ECMO, and this is especially true when ECMO follows conversion from VAD.

It is extremely helpful to accumulate data from different centers and to combine the experience of different programs to learn more about the applications of ECLS and predict the outcome of patients requiring this support. However, national database entry could be altered to reflect different applications of ECLS. Doing so will help provide guidelines for the use of ECLS and better utilization of resources.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
DR D. GLENN PENNINGTON (Johnson City, TN): I want to congratulate you on an excellent series. Having been involved in this type of support for children and neonates for many years, I certainly applaud these excellent results. I had a couple of questions relating to your conclusion.

I think you concluded that the result depended upon the type of support. I would challenge that a bit and say that the type of support depended upon what was required in the patient. For example, my suspicion is that the patients on this system without the oxygenator and the patients requiring only left ventricular assist devices may have had left ventricular failure without severe biventricular failure, and, of course, those are always the ones most likely to survive in any such series.

The other difference, of course, between this series and one you might have heard here 5 years ago is that you now have a large number of hypoplastic left heart patients. It wasn’t clear to me exactly the mortality rate in that group and whether that made a difference in terms of overall improvement in results.

I thought this was a great paper.

DR ALSOUFI: Thank you, Doctor Pennington. I agree with you that those who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) probably are patients who have biventricular failure or combined cardiac and respiratory failure, and those patients are sicker to begin with. However, we don’t think that this is the only reason why patients requiring ventricular assist device (VAD) alone without the oxygenator have a better prognosis than patients with ECMO. We believe that ECMO patients have more complications compared with the VAD patients, and, as I mentioned, the number of complications affected the survival.

We believe that omitting the oxygenator will help us, first, to wait a few hours without starting the anticoagulation until hemostasis is achieved, thus decreasing the complication of bleeding. In addition to that, we use smaller circuits with less foreign surface and there is no oxygenator. This will help decrease the inflammatory cascade, the activation of coagulation factors, and thromboemboli. We believe that will decrease the end-organ damage that can happen in patients with extracorporeal life support (ECLS).

Doctor Ungerleider’s group has proved in the past that leaving the shunt open will lead to excellent survival, and allows the patient’s lungs to act as their own "oxygenator." Following a Norwood operation, the patients who had the shunt open with omission of the oxygenator had excellent survival that approaches 90% currently. So we believe that the oxygenator itself and the ECMO circuits do have their own share of complications and they probably will affect survival, but I do agree with you, in most collected series, those patients are also sicker to begin with.

DR JAMES A. QUINTESSENZA (St. Petersburg, FL): Excellent presentation, and your group obviously is to be congratulated for your expertise with small children, especially single-ventricle babies and their ventricular support. The question I have is regarding renal failure in these patients.

I think your data show that there is an extremely high mortality once renal failure occurs, and that has been our experience as well. Can you give us a little insight into the way you manage renal failure or your use, for example, of ultrafiltration on the VAD or on the ECMO circuits and what kind of tricks you might have to prevent renal failure? Very nice talk.

DR ALSOUFI: Well, we do use the VAD in the beginning to optimize the cardiac output following surgery and we wean the VAD once we have the lactic acid level below 2 mmol/L. As end-organ perfusion improves, we normally see adequate renal function, especially in patients who have not had periods of hypoperfusion preceding the application of ECLS. If the patient has adequate perfusion on ECLS and there is persistent renal dysfunction, we may start a hemofilter to remove fluids or normalize electrolytes while nutrition is being increased. In patients with transient renal dysfunction, the VAD support of cardiac output seems to improve renal perfusion, and renal dysfunction is ordinarily not a problem.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We would like to thank Benjamin Chan, MS, for statistical assistance. Also, we would like to extend our appreciation to all the perfusionists, anesthesiologists, nurses, physician assistants, cardiologists, and pediatric ICU staff who contributed on a daily basis to the care of these complex patients and the success of our program.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Soeter JR, Mamiya RT, Sprague AY, et al. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for cardiorespiratory failure after tetralogy correction J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973;66:214-218.[Medline]
  2. The July 2003 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) Registry Report International Summary. 2003Ann Arbor, MI,.
  3. Darling EM, Kaemmer D, Lawson DS, et al. Use of ECMO without the oxygenator to provide ventricular support after Norwood stage I procedures Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:735-736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Walters 3rd HL, Hakimi M, Rice MD, et al. Pediatric cardiac surgical ECMOmultivariate analysis of risk factors for hospital death. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:329-336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dalton HJ, Siewers RD, Fuhrman BP, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac rescue in children with severe myocardial dysfunction Crit Care Med 1993;21:1020-1028.[Medline]
  6. Duncan BW, Bohn DJ, Atz AM, et al. Mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of children with acute fulminant myocarditis J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:440-448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Del Nido PJ, Armitage JM, Fricker FJ, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support as a bridge to pediatric heart transplantation Circulation 1994;90(5 Suppl 2):II-66-II-69.
  8. Duncan BW, Hraska V, Jonas RA, et al. Mechanical circulatory support in children with cardiac disease J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:529-542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Del Nido PJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac support in children Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:336-339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dhillon R, Pearson GA, Firmin RK, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the treatment of critical pulmonary hypertension in congenital heart disease Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:553-556.[Abstract]
  11. Aharon AS, Drinkwater Jr DC, Churchwell KB, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children after repair of congenital cardiac lesions Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:2095-2101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kulik TJ, Moler FW, Palmisano JM, et al. Outcome-associated factors in pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenator after cardiac surgery Circulation 1996;94(9 Suppl):II-63-II-68.
  13. Black MD, Coles JG, Williams WG, et al. Determinants of success in pediatric cardiac patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:133-138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Pizarro C, Davis DA, Healy RM, et al. Is there a role for extracorporeal life support after stage I Norwood? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:294-301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Langley SM, Sheppard SV, Tsang VT, et al. When is extracorporeal life support worthwhile following repair of congenital heart disease in children? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:520-525.
  16. Raithel SC, Pennington DG, Boegner E, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children after cardiac surgery Circulation 1992;86(5 Suppl):II-305-II-310.
  17. Galantowicz ME, Stolar CJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for perioperative support in pediatric heart transplantation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:148-151.[Abstract]
  18. Ungerleider RM, Shen I, Yeh T, et al. Routine mechanical ventricular assist following the Norwood procedureimproved neurological outcome and excellent hospital survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:18-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bartlett RH, Roloff DW, Custer JR, et al. Extracorporeal life supportthe University of Michigan experience. JAMA 2000;283:904-908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Fink SM, Bockman DE, Howell CG, et al. Bypass circuits as the source of thromboemboli during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation J Pediatr 1989;115:621-624.[Medline]
  21. Steinhorn RH, Isham-Schopf B, Smith C, et al. Hemolysis during long-term extracorporeal membrane oxygenation J Pediatr 1989;115:625-630.[Medline]
  22. Jaggers JJ, Forbess JM, Shah AS, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for infant postcardiotomy supportsignificance of shunt management. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1476-1483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chai PJ, Williamson JA, Lodge AJ, et al. Effects of ischemia on pulmonary dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:731-735.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Thuys CA, Mullaly RJ, Horton SB, et al. Centrifugal ventricular assist in children under 6 kg Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:130-134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. Bautista-Hernandez, R. R. Thiagarajan, F. Fynn-Thompson, S. K. Rajagopal, D. E. Nento, V. Yarlagadda, S. A. Teele, C. K. Allan, S. M. Emani, P. C. Laussen, et al.
Preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to cardiac surgery in children with congenital heart disease.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1306 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
W. C. Oliver
Anticoagulation and Coagulation Management for ECMO
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2009; 13(3): 154 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Alsoufi, O. O. Al-Radi, C. Gruenwald, L. Lean, W. G. Williams, B. W. McCrindle, C. A. Caldarone, and G. S. Van Arsdell
Extra-corporeal life support following cardiac surgery in children: analysis of risk factors and survival in a single institution
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 1004 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
D Picarelli, C. Kreutzer, M Barboza, S Antunez, G Pose, G Touya, L Liguera, D Abdala, and G Echegaray
Post-cardiotomy circulatory support with the Terumo Baby - Rx tm oxygenator in a newborn
Perfusion, November 1, 2007; 22(6): 377 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. Alsoufi, O. O. Al-Radi, R. I. Nazer, C. Gruenwald, C. Foreman, W. G. Williams, J. G. Coles, C. A. Caldarone, D. G. Bohn, and G. S. Van Arsdell
Survival outcomes after rescue extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric patients with refractory cardiac arrest.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2007; 134(4): 952 - 959.e2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. K. Allan, R. R. Thiagarajan, P. J. del Nido, S. J. Roth, M. C. Almodovar, and P. C. Laussen
Indication for initiation of mechanical circulatory support impacts survival of infants with shunted single-ventricle circulation supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2007; 133(3): 660 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. L. Hannan, J. W. Ojito, M. A. Ybarra, M. C. O'Brien, A. F. Rossi, and R. P. Burke
Rapid Cardiopulmonary Support in Children With Heart Disease: A Nine-Year Experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1637 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Bahaaldin Alsoufi
Irving Shen
Ross Ungerleider
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alsoufi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alsoufi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS