ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas J. Birdas
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birdas, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birdas, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1467
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Correspondence

Pneumonectomy Versus Sleeve Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Thomas J. Birdas, MD

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, South Tower, 14th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15212

(E-mail: tbirdas1{at}aol.com).

To the Editor:

In a very important paper, Deslauriers and colleagues [1] compare the outcomes after sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy in a series of 1,230 consecutive patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. They conclude that sleeve lobectomy is the preferred approach, when feasible, as both the overall survival and the freedom from locoregional recurrences were significantly higher in the sleeve lobectomy group. The authors correctly identify that there are some subtle differences between the two groups that may not easily allow for a direct comparison, an unavoidable bias of a retrospective study. They also point out that survival remained significantly better even when patients with stage I or stage II disease were compared separately.

While this is certainly true in the univariate analysis presented, it is not clear in the manuscript whether a multivariate (proportional hazards) analysis was also performed. Similarly, although the overall rate of locoregional recurrences is higher in the pneumonectomy group, the same confounding variables may play a role, and further statistical analysis could help make the authors' point clearer. This is, without doubt, a very significant contribution in the field of lung cancer surgery, and these observations on the statistical methodology applied may further strengthen the important message conveyed by the paper.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Deslauriers J, Gregoire J, Jaques LF, Piraux M, Guojin L, Lacasse Y. Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy for lung cancer: a comparative analysis of survival and sites or recurrences Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1152-1156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas J. Birdas
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birdas, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birdas, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS