ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Osamu Tagusari
Junjiro Kobayashi
Ko Bando
Kazuo Niwaya
Hiroyuki Nakajima
Takeshi Nakatani
Toshikatsu Yagihara
Soichiro Kitamura
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tagusari, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tagusari, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1304-1311
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Revascularization of the Total Coronary System: Clinical Outcome and Angiographic Evaluation

Osamu Tagusari, MDa,*, Junjiro Kobayashi, MDa, Ko Bando, MDa, Kazuo Niwaya, MDa, Hiroyuki Nakajima, MDa, Takeshi Nakatani, MDa, Toshikatsu Yagihara, MDa, Soichiro Kitamura, MDa

a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

Accepted for publication March 30, 2004.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Tagusari, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan
otagusar{at}hsp.ncvc.go.jp

Presented at the Thirty-ninth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2003.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: We assessed the clinical outcome and conducted an angiographic study of total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization of the total coronary system.

METHODS: Of 382 consecutive patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass between April 2000 and December 2002, 235 patients (193 men and 42 women, mean age 66 ± 9 years) with three-vessel disease underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass with all arterial grafts. A total of 872 vessels were bypassed (average number of grafts 3.7 ± 0.8). The internal thoracic arteries, radial arteries, and gastroepiploic arteries were used for revascularization of 306, 542, and 24 coronary arteries, respectively. Two hundred twenty-five patients underwent revascularization with composite grafts that were connected to the in situ internal thoracic artery (Y configuration 181, I configuration 55, K configuration 27, X configuration 3, T configuration 1); 10 patients underwent revascularization with all in situ grafts.

RESULTS: Three (1.3%) hospital deaths and 1 late death occurred. There were no occurrences of clinical underperfusion syndrome or new intraaortic balloon pump insertion. Cerebral infarction occurred in 2 patients (0.8%). Early postoperative angiography was performed on 833 grafts in 223 patients (95%); the overall patency rate was 98%. Stratified by coronary distribution, the patency rate was 99% (218/221) in the left anterior descending artery, 97% (84/87) in the diagonal artery, 99% (70/71) in the obtuse marginal artery, 98% (262/268) in the posterolateral artery, 98% (167/170) in the posterior descending artery, and 100% (16/16) in the right coronary artery.

CONCLUSIONS: Total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass yielded good clinical results and an excellent patency rate of revascularization for the total coronary system.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
Recently, off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) operation has been widely used and adopted by many surgical groups due to the accumulation of experience and improvement of surgical techniques and stabilization devices [1–4]. However, a major concern still exists in the accuracy of the coronary anastomosis performed with arterial grafts on a beating heart. Another concern is the ability to perform a complete revascularization in patients with multiple-vessel disease using this technique. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing total arterial revascularization for the total coronary system with this approach.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient Selection
Between April 2000 and December 2002, OPCAB was performed in 451 patients, except for 2 patients who were converted from off-pump to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of hemodynamic instability during anastomosis of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Three hundred thirty-two patients had three-vessel disease. Of these patients, 235 patients underwent revascularization with all arterial grafts. The preoperative characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Characteristics (n = 235)

 
Conduit Selection
Basically, we used the radial artery (RA) composite graft in combination with one or both internal thoracic arteries (ITA) for revascularization of the total coronary system. In particular, single ITA and the RA as a composite graft were used for elder patients or patients with poor risks. The gastroepiploic artery (GEA) was harvested in patients whose RA was not available because of a positive Allen's test in the bilateral forearms or chronic renal failure (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL).

Because possible stenosis of the subclavian artery and celiac artery may be a cause of concern, we routinely evaluate by preoperative imaging such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography, or angiography.

Preparation of the Conduits
A conventional, semiskeletonized method was used for the dissection of the ITAs. The RA was harvested from the nondominant arm using an ultrasonic dissection technique [5]. All arterial conduits were wrapped in a sponge soaked with a solution of papaverine hydrochloride. After administration of heparin (1.5 mg/kg), the arterial grafts were divided. A mixture of blood and a solution of papaverine hydrochloride was gently injected into the lumen of the RA to prevent spasm. The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was generally used for revascularization of the LAD, or blood source of the RA as various configurations of the composite graft. When the GEA was harvested, it was used as an in situ graft to the posterior descending (PD) or/and posterolateral (PL) artery. The right internal thoracic artery (RITA) was anastomosed to the LAD as an in situ graft or connected to the RA for extension as an I or Y graft. Y configuration was the most common composite graft for multivessel revascularization. A K configuration was used when the diagonal branch (DG) ran parallel to the LAD. The advantage of the K graft is that it spares the length of RA, because a long RA segment is required to avoid kinking when the RA is used as a Y composite graft sewn on the DG that runs parallel to the LAD in a side-to-side fashion (Fig 1). With this K graft, the other end of the RA extends to the PD with a few side-to-side anastomoses (Fig 2). Sequential bypass of the LITA to DG and the LAD was also performed in our series. However, side-to-side anastomosis between the LITA and the DG is technically demanding on the beating heart when the LITA is small. As for the X graft, the RA can extend fully around the heart from the DG to the right coronary artery (Fig 3). All composite grafts except the I configuration were arranged before the distal anastomoses. In the I configuration, the RA was connected to the RITA after the distal anastomoses to adjust the length of the RITA.



View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Y composite graft. The radial artery (RA) shows kinking when the RA as a Y composite graft is sewn on the diagonal (DG) that runs parallel to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in a side-to-side fashion. (LITA = left internal thoracic artery; OM = obtuse marginal.)

 


View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. K composite graft. The advantage of the K graft is sparing the length of the radial artery (RA), when bypass is necessary for the diagonal (DG) that runs parallel to the left anterior descending artery (LAD). (LITA = left internal thoracic artery; OM = obtuse marginal; PD = posterior descending; PL = posterolateral.)

 


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. X composite graft. In an X graft, the radial artery (RA) can extend fully around the heart from the diagonal (DG) to the posterior descending (PD) artery. (LITA = left internal thoracic artery; OM = obtuse marginal; PL = posterolateral.)

 
Surgical Procedure
A standard median sternotomy was used in all patients. The pericardium was opened and deep pericardial retraction sutures were made. Proper positioning and stabilization of the heart were achieved by pericardial sutures and suction stabilizers (Medtronic Octopus, Starfish, Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) with rotation of the operative table. Transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring were performed to check mitral regurgitation due to extensive left ventricular geometric change and right ventricular outflow obstruction due to the right ventricular geometric change. Only transient proximal compression of the target vessel to control the coronary blood flow was accomplished with a silicone rubber loop. The heart rate and blood pressure control were obtained with diltiazem, landiolol hydrochloride, and norepinephrine. After coronary arteriotomy, an intraluminal shunt was inserted to maintain the coronary blood flow and bloodless operative field. A carbon dioxide saline-blower was also used to eliminate excessive blood from opened coronary vessel. The coronary artery was anastomosed in the order of LAD, DG, obtuse marginal (OM), and PL to the PD. The sequential anastomosis technique is a diamond-shaped (90° crossing) method with the RA, and usually a parallel method with in situ arterial grafts. To prevent arterial spasm, diltiazem (0.5 to 1.0 µg/kg) or nicardipine (0.1 to 0.2 µg/kg) was infused intraoperatively and during the first 16 hours after the operation. Diltiazem (100 to 200 mg/d) or amlodipine (2.5 to 5.0 mg/d) was then prescribed orally in conjunction with aspirin (162 mg/d) from the next morning.

Angiographic Study
In 223 (94.9%) patients, informed consent was obtained and follow-up angiography was performed before hospital discharge by cardiologists. By means of the Cardiovascular Measurement System (QCA-CMS, version 4.1; Medical Imaging System, Leiden, The Netherlands), the stenotic percentage of anastomosis was calculated by comparing the diameter of anastomosis with that of the proximal portion of the graft at the view of the minimum lumen. A percentage stenosis of less than 50% was assessed to be patent [6, 7].

Data Collection and Follow-up
We retrospectively reviewed the data from the operation notes, anesthesia records, clinical histories, laboratory investigations, and cardiac catheterization. This retrospective study was approved by the Internal Review Board of the National Cardiovascular Center. Follow-up data were collected from the medical records of outpatient visits and correspondence with referring physicians. All clinical characteristics were accumulated as a computerized database and analyzed.

Statistical Methods
All values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The discrete variables were analyzed with the Fisher's exact test between two groups and Kruskal-Wallis rank test for more than three groups. Scheffé's test was performed when a significant difference was recognized in the results of the Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical analyses were performed using the software package SPSS 10.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The differences were considered statistically significant when the p value was less than 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
Eight hundred seventy-two distal anastomoses were performed on 235 patients. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.71 ± 0.82 (range 3 to 7). Distal anastomosed sites were 233 LADs, 88 DGs, 73 OMs, 282 PLs, 180 PDs, and 17 right coronary arteries.

Unilateral ITA was used in 127 patients (54.0%) and bilateral ITA in 108 patients (46.0%). The RA was used as a composite graft in 232 patients (98.7%) and the GEA was used as an in situ graft in 16 patients (6.8%). Y, I, K, X, or T configuration was used for the RA composite graft in 181, 55, 27, 3, and 1 patients, respectively. Revascularization with all in situ grafts was performed in 10 patients for 40 distal anastomoses.

Angiographic Study
The patency rates according to coronary distribution, graft materials, and anastomotic fashions are shown in Table 2. The patency rates according to the configurations of the composite graft are also shown in Table 3. The overall patency rate was 98.1% (817/833). Stratified by coronary distribution, the patency rate was 98.6% in LAD, 96.6% in DG, 98.6% in OM, 97.8% in PL, 98.2% in PD, and 100% in the right coronary artery. The patency rate was 98.7% with the LITA, 95.9% with the RITA, 98.5% with the RA, and 88.0% with the GEA. The patency rate was 97.6% with the end-to-side fashion and 98.9% with the side-to-side fashion. The patency rate with GEA was significantly lower than that of the other graft materials (LITA versus GEA, p = 0.001; RA versus GEA, p < 0.001). However, no significant changes were noted in the patency rates between coronary distribution (p = 0.846), anastomotic fashion (p = 0.197), and the configuration of the composite graft (p = 0.779).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Patency for Bypass Distribution, Graft Material and Anastomotic Fashion

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Patency for Configurations of Composite Graft

 
Five of 254 composite grafts (2.0%) showed kinking or stenosis of the LITA just proximal to the composite graft anastomosis site with the RA. Four of 303 ITAs (1.3%) showed stenosis in the middle of the vessel probably due to intraoperative injury.

Evident flow competition was observed in 36 patients. Of those, 24 RA composite grafts and 12 of the LITA distal from the anastomotic site of the composite graft to the target coronary artery were not opacified in angiography of the in situ graft, although the target coronary artery and its anastomotic site were clearly opacified in the native coronary angiography.

Early and Late Mortalities and Morbidities
Table 4 lists the early and late complications. Early death occurred in 3 patients (1.3%) due to intracranial bleeding, aspiration pneumonia, and intestinal hemorrhage. Perioperative myocardial infarction (new Q waves in electrocardiogram [ECG], creatine kinase-MB [CK-MB] more than 50 with ECG change or CK-MB more than 70 without ECG change: normal value less than 11 IU/L in our institute) occurred in 6 patients (2.6%). Two patients had a stroke during rehabilitation, one of which occurred during the postoperative angiographic study. No clinical underperfusion syndrome was noted and new intraaortic balloon pump insertion was not necessary.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Early and Late Results

 
Eleven patients underwent successful percutaneous catheter intervention (balloon angioplasty or coronary stenting), although they were asymptomatic. Balloon angioplasties were performed in the stenosis of the LITA just proximal to the connection of the Y composite graft (Fig 4) in 3 patients, in the stenosis of the middle of the LITA in 4 patients, and in the stenosis of the native coronary artery in 2 patients. Coronary stenting was performed in the stenosis of the RITA just proximal to the connection of the I composite graft (Fig 5) in 1 patient and the stenosis of the middle of the LITA in 1 patient. One patient underwent redo OPCAB before discharge due to occlusion of the LITA to the LAD.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Stenosis of a Y composite graft. Three patients underwent balloon angioplasty, which was performed successfully in the stenosis of the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) just proximal to the connection of the Y composite graft. (RA = radial artery.)

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Stenosis of an I composite graft. Coronary stenting was performed in the stenosis of the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) just proximal to the connection of an I composite graft in 1 patient. (RA = radial artery.)

 
One patient died suddenly 6 months after the operation because of unknown causes. Two patients whose predischarge angiography showed anastomotic stenosis of the LAD returned to the hospital for recurrent angina and underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention 5 months after the operation. One patient with poor left ventricular function was readmitted for congestive heart failure.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
The OPCAB operation is currently considered to be a safe alternative to myocardial revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass [1–4]. However, the ability of total arterial OPCAB for multivessel disease remains controversial. In our series, the total arterial OPCAB for the total coronary system achieved excellent patency in the early postoperative term and showed good clinical results. No significant changes were noted in the patency rates between coronary distributions (p = 0.846), anastomotic fashions (p = 0.197), and the configurations of the composite graft (p = 0.779), except the graft materials. The patency rate with GEA was significantly lower than that of the other graft materials (LITA versus GEA, p = 0.001; RA versus GEA, p < 0.001). The size of the GEA was variable and sometimes too small for multivessel revascularization. This finding may be the result of our performing the sequential bypass graft using small GEA. Recently, when the GEA was essential for revascularization, we have used skeletonized GEA using an ultrasonic scalpel to facilitate visual inspection [8].

Our standard technique to achieve total arterial revascularization for total coronary system is the RA composite graft in combination with one or both ITAs. The RA is used as a material for the free arterial graft because of its easier harvesting and handling. The distal sequential bypass to the coronary arteries, a thicker wall, and wider lumen compared with ITA and GEA allow meticulous anastomosis on the beating heart.

The composite graft technique appears to have advantages over the free graft that is anastomosed to the ascending aorta. First, aorta no-touch OPCAB using a composite graft reduces the incidence of neurologic complications [9, 10]. Second, a composite graft makes more efficient use of the conduit by placing the inflow close to the target coronary arteries [10–12]. Finally, the inflow of the ITA does not expose the free arterial graft to high wall stress, which may cause the early development of intimal hyperplasia [13, 14].

The composite graft technique has the pitfall of total dependence of the coronary bypass flow on the flow of the proximal ITA. We routinely evaluate the subclavian artery and the ITA by preoperative angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography, because stenosis of the proximal ITA or subclavian artery may be a cause of global ischemia. However, the adaptability of the ITA as a blood source of the arterial composite graft is still a potential risk in this technique. Multiple clinical and experimental studies have examined the suitability of the ITA as a blood source of the arterial composite graft [15–21]. From the results of positron emission tomography, Sakaguchi and colleagues [18] documented that the composite Y graft was not as effective as independent grafts for improving the coronary flow reserve soon after bypass grafting. However, most investigations have reported that the flow reserve of the proximal ITA is sufficient for a blood source of composite graft for multiple coronary revascularizations. Indeed, in the present series, there was no hypoperfusion syndrome or need for new intraaortic balloon pump insertion even in the patients whose total coronary artery system was supplied by single ITA.

In general, hypoperfusion syndrome related to the conventional CABG occurs typically 30 to 40 minutes after discontinuation of a cardiopulmonary bypass [22]. It is conceivable that the reactive hyperemia of the myocardium that presents after removal of the aortic clamp [23–25] may require greater conduit flow while the oxygen debt is repaid. This situation might produce a drastic imbalance between graft flow and myocardiac demand, resulting in the hypoperfusion syndrome [17, 26]. In our standard technique, the LAD is revascularized at first by the ITA because it is the most important coronary artery and exposure of the LAD has no major hemodynamic consequences [27]. After revascularization of the LAD, the coronary artery was anastomosed in the order of the diagonal, obtuse marginal, and posterolateral to posterior descending arterial branches with only local ischemia of the target vessel. We predicted that these techniques, which avoid intraoperative global myocardial ischemia, contributed at least partially to avoiding the hypoperfusion syndrome in our patients.

The competitive flow between the native coronary artery and bypass graft is another concern in any composite graft attached to the ITA [28]. This phenomenon was induced by graft–recipient artery mismatch. In 38 patients with composite grafts, the target coronary artery and its anastomotic site were clearly opacified in the native coronary angiography, although the bypass graft to the target coronary artery (ie, the composite graft or the distal ITA of the composite bifurcation) was not opacified in angiography of the in situ graft. Diffuse narrowing of the distal LITA, from the anastomotic site of the composite graft, was recognized in 13 patients who had competitive flow in the distal LITA to the LAD. No definite conclusion has been reached concerning the relationships between the competitive flow, diffuse narrowing, and true graft failure [29–33]. It still remains to be determined whether a particular coronary artery with a noncritical lesion should be grafted prophylactically using the arterial graft for future progression [34]. We prefer to graft to a coronary artery with moderate stenosis in a side-to-side fashion, and the termination of this conduit was to the coronary artery of severe stenosis. When the posterior descending coronary artery had only mild stenosis, we anastomosed the side of the I composite graft to that branch and the end of the I composite graft to the circumflex branches. In our study, no patient with competitive flow of bypass grafts was readmitted for angina or congestive heart failure. Although late follow-up angiography was performed in only 2 cases with competitive flow of the RA composite graft, the RA was patent at more than 1 year after the operation [10]. These results prompted us to conclude that the RA has potential as a physiologically functional arterial graft that can be recruited on demand with progression of the native coronary artery disease.

In conclusion, the total arterial OPCAB for the total coronary system achieved excellent patency in the early postoperative period and showed good clinical results. These results have prompted us to continue performing complete arterial revascularization, although long-term studies are required to provide evidence of the validity of our technique.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
DR CRAIG R. SMITH (New York, NY): One minor technical issue: you obviously carried out many side-to-side sequential anastomoses in this group. Based on your data, do you have any opinion as to whether the sequential anastomoses are better done in a diamond orientation, or in a parallel orientation, or do you do both depending on the circumstances?

DR TAGUSARI: I usually use a diamond anastomosis technique for the radial artery and a parallel fashion for the ITA and GEA.

DR HITOSHI HIROSE (Cleveland, OH): We performed a similar study for patients with three-vessel disease undergoing off-pump CABG and published the results in Surgery last year. Off-pump CABG provided excellent results compared with on-pump CABG and the angiographic results were competitive, as you reported today. I have several questions for the authors. First, what are the inclusion and exclusion criteria for total arterial off-pump CABG? Although the authors stated total arterial bypass is the goal for cardiac surgery, only 52% of the patients received total arterial bypass; what kind of bypass was performed in the rest of 48%? Were they received saphenous vein grafts? How do you select patients undergoing total arterial bypass? Second, only 3% of patients received a gastroepiploic artery graft. Why are the authors not using the gastroepiploic artery?

Thank you.

DR TAGUSARI: I did not include one- and two-vessel disease in this study. All the patients had three-vessel disease. The rate of complete revascularization is 100% in this series. And the next question. The size of the GEA varies; sometimes it was too small to use as a sequential bypass graft. However, recently we have used skeletonized GEA using an ultrasonic scalpel to facilitate visual inspection. We only used saphenous vein graft for the patients more than 80 years old or the patients whose radial artery was not adequate to use, such as chronic renal failure.

DR SMITH: To that question also, I think 52% was the number of patients who received OPCAB out of the total, not the percent that had total revascularization.

DR CHARLES BRIDGES (Philadelphia, PA): I have a couple of questions. One is how soon after surgery did you perform the angiogram? I know you showed one slide where it was performed two days after the operation. Another question I had was how you manage your radial artery patients after the operation, are you using nitrates, calcium blockers, and for how long are you using them? Finally, I wanted to learn a little bit more about the patient characteristics. How sick were your patients? What kind of ejection fractions did they have and how much other comorbid disease did they have? I didn't hear that or see that in your abstract, to get an idea of what kind of results we should expect. And then can you help us with the theory behind composite grafting as opposed to taking, say, a radial artery off the aorta or off of a patch of vein, et cetera, from the aorta? What is the evidence that shows us that composite grafting is theoretically superior to the more routine way, even with arterial grafts? Obviously one reason is that with a composite graft you can graft more territory than you could with just taking things off the aorta. But I was wondering if you could comment on your feeling about that.

DR TAGUSARI: We usually perform postoperative Angiography ten to fourteen days after operation. To avoid spasm of the radial artery, we use intravenous diltiazem or nicardipine until the following morning. Since then, a calcium blocker such as amlodipine has been prescribed for a long time because most of the patients have hypertension. As I have showed on the slide. In 17% of the patients, ejection fraction was less than 35% Long-term follow-up is waiting for evidence that the composite graft is superior to the coronary graft. But, when the radial artery is anastomosed directly to the aorta, it is exposed not only to high blood pressure but also to higher shear stress, which may cause the early development of the intimal hyperplasia. Additionally, we can perform aorta no-touch technique and spare the length of the radial artery and by using as a composite graft.

DR AYHAN OZDEMIR (Bursa, Turkey): The patients you had with low ventricular function, what happened after you did the coronary bypass surgery off-pump? Did their left ventricular function get better or stay the same or worse?

Thank you.

DR TAGUSARI: After the OPCAB, left ventricular function recovered significantly in most cases.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2002;359:1194–1199[Medline]
  2. Cheng W, Denton TA, Fontana GP, et al. Off-pump coronary surgery: effect on early mortality and stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:313–320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Omeroglu SN, Kirali K, Guler M, et al. Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:844–850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation. 2001;104:1761–1766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ronan JW, Perry LA, Barner HB, Sundt TM 3rd. Radial artery harvest: comparison of ultrasonic dissection with standard technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:113–114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. FitzGibbon GM, Burton JR, Leach AJ. Coronary bypass graft fate: angiographic grading of 1400 consecutive grafts early after operation and of 1132 after one year. Circulation. 1978;57:1070–1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ryan TJ, Bauman WB, Kennedy JW, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation. 1993;88:2987–3007[Free Full Text]
  8. Asai T, Tabata S. Skeletonization of the right gastroepiploic artery using an ultrasonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1715–1717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G, et al. Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1387–1393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kobayashi J, Sasako Y, Bando K, et al. Multiple off-pump coronary revascularization with "aorta no-touch" technique using composite and sequential methods. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5:114–118[Medline]
  11. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Luciani N, Maddestra N, Di Nardo E, Angelini R. Composite arterial conduits for a wider arterial myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:185–190[Abstract]
  12. Royse AG, Royse CF, Raman JS. Exclusive Y graft operation for multivessel coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1612–1618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G, et al. Radial artery and inferior epigastric artery in composite grafts: improved midterm angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:517–524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Curtis JJ, Stoney WS, Alford WC Jr, Burrus GR, Thomas CS Jr. Intimal hyperplasia. A cause of radial artery aortocoronary bypass graft failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1975;20:628–635[Abstract]
  15. Delatore JR, Theman TE, Garzia FM. Intraoperative flow rate measurements of T-grafts: calculating a flow reserve. Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2:235–238[Medline]
  16. Markwirth T, Hennen B, Scheller B, Schafers HJ, Wendler O. Flow wire measurements after complete arterial coronary revascularization with T-grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:788–793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Royse AG, Royse CF, Groves KL, Bus B, Yu G. Blood flow in composite arterial grafts and effect of native coronary flow. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1619–1622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sakaguchi G, Tadamura E, Ohnaka M, Tambara K, Nishimura K, Komeda M. Composite arterial Y graft has less coronary flow reserve than independent grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:493–496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Spence PA, Lust RM, Zeri RS, et al. Competitive flow from a fully patent coronary artery does not limit acute mammary graft flow. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:21–26[Abstract]
  20. Tagusari O, Kobayashi J, Bando K, et al. Early adaptation of the left internal thoracic artery as a blood source of y-composite radial artery grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6:E93–98[Medline]
  21. Wendler O, Hennen B, Markwirth T, et al. T grafts with the right internal thoracic artery to left internal thoracic artery versus the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery: flow dynamics in the internal thoracic artery main stem. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:841–848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Loop FD, Thomas JD. Hypoperfusion after arterial bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:812–813[Medline]
  23. Miller MJ. Preconditioning for cardioprotection against ischemia reperfusion injury: the roles of nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species, heat shock proteins, reactive hyperemia and antioxidants—a mini review. Can J Cardiol. 2001;17:1075–1082[Medline]
  24. Morris JJ 3rd, Hamm DP, Pellom GL, Abd-Elfattah A, Wechsler AS. Differential ventricular ischemic injury: an experimental model of right ventricular failure with a variable degree of left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:590–599[Abstract]
  25. Sunderdiek U, Schmitz-Spanke S, Korbmacher B, Gams E, Schipke JD. Preconditioning: myocardial function and energetics during coronary hypoperfusion and reperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2147–2155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Jones EL, Lattouf OM, Weintraub WS. Catastrophic consequences of internal mammary artery hypoperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98:902–907[Abstract]
  27. Torracca L, Schreuder JJ, Quarti A, Ismeno G, Franze V, Alfieri O. Acute effects of beating heart coronary surgery on left ventricular performance. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(suppl):S1348–1352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lust RM, Zeri RS, Spence PA, et al. Effect of chronic native flow competition on internal thoracic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:45–50[Abstract]
  29. Aris A, Borras X, Ramio J. Patency of internal mammary artery grafts in no-flow situations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;93:62–64[Abstract]
  30. Dincer B, Barner HB. The "occluded" internal mammary artery graft: restoration of patency after apparent occlusion associated with progression of coronary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;85:318–320[Medline]
  31. Kitamura S, Kawachi K, Seki T, Sawabata N, Morita R, Kawata T. Angiographic demonstration of no-flow anatomical patency of internal thoracic-coronary artery bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:156–159[Abstract]
  32. Sarabu MR, McClung JA, Fass A, Reed GE. Early postoperative spasm in left internal mammary artery bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44:199–200[Abstract]
  33. Singh RN, Beg RA, Kay EB. Physiological adaptability: the secret of success of the internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;41:247–250[Abstract]
  34. Manninen HI, Jaakkola P, Suhonen M, Rehnberg S, Vuorenniemi R, Matsi PJ. Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1289–1294[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. B. Halbersma, S. C. Arrigoni, G. Mecozzi, J. G. Grandjean, A. P. Kappetein, J. van der Palen, F. Zijlstra, and M. A. Mariani
Four-year outcome of OPCAB no-touch with total arterial Y-graft: making the best treatment a daily practice.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 796 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Parolari, F. Alamanni, G. Polvani, M. Agrifoglio, Y. B. Chen, S. Kassem, F. Veglia, E. Tremoli, and P. Biglioli
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing Off-Pump With On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2121 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. G. Raja
Reply to Aazami and SalehiBias in surgical randomised controlled trials can be minimized but not eliminated
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 28(4): 661 - 661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Osamu Tagusari
Junjiro Kobayashi
Ko Bando
Kazuo Niwaya
Hiroyuki Nakajima
Takeshi Nakatani
Toshikatsu Yagihara
Soichiro Kitamura
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tagusari, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tagusari, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS