ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michael D. Diodato
Sunil M. Prasad
Sydney L. Gaynor
Jennifer S. Lawton
Ralph J. Damiano, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diodato, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diodato, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:620-627
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Donor heart preservation with pinacidil: the role of the mitochondrial KATP channel

Michael D. Diodato, MDa, Nirav R. Shaha, Sunil M. Prasad, MDa, Sydney L. Gaynor, MDa, Jennifer S. Lawton, MDa, Ralph J. Damiano, Jr, MDa*

a Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Accepted for publication February 23, 2004.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Damiano, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8234, St. Louis, MO, USA 63110
e-mail: damianor{at}msnotes.wustl.edu

Presented at the Thirty-ninth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 31-Feb 2, 2003.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Pinacidil solutions have been shown to have significant cardioprotective effects. Pinacidil activates both sarcolemmal and mitochondrial potassium-adenosine triphosphate (KATP) channels. This study was undertaken to compare pinacidil solution with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution and to determine if the protective effect of pinacidil involved mitochondrial or sarcolemmal KATP channels.

METHODS: Thirty-two rabbit hearts received one of four preservation solutions in a Langendorff apparatus: (1) UW; (2) a solution containing 0.5 mmol/L pinacidil; (3) pinacidil with Hoechst-Marion-Roussel 1098 (HMR-1098), a sarcolemmal channel blocker; and (4) pinacidil with 5-hydroxydecanote, a mitochondrial channel blocker. Left ventricular pressure-volume curves were generated by an intraventricular balloon. All hearts were placed in cold storage for 8 hours, followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion.

RESULTS: Postischemic developed pressure was better preserved by pinacidil than by UW. This cardioprotective effect was eliminated by 5-hydroxydecanote and diminished by HMR-1098. Diastolic compliance was better preserved by pinacidil when compared with UW. This protection was abolished by the addition of 5-hydroxydecanote and moderately decreased by HMR-1098.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the superiority of pinacidil over UW after 8 hours of storage. The cardioprotective role of pinacidil is mediated primarily by the mitochondrial KATP channel.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 
One of the gold standard solutions for donor organ preservation has been the University of Wisconsin Solution (UW), developed by Folkert Belzer in the late 1960s [1]. With the increasing need for acceptable donor organs, the safe storage of donor hearts has become an increasingly important avenue for scientific inquiry. Currently, hearts are stored for a maximum of 4 hours for orthotopic heart transplantation. Patient survival has been inversely correlated with donor heart extracorporeal cold ischemic time [2]. Extension of the cold storage time would allow for human leukocyte antigen typing that would increase long-term graft survival [3] and expansion of the geographic donor pool area.

Over the last decade, our laboratory has shown the benefits of using the nonspecific potassium-adenosine triphosphate (KATP) channel agonist, pinacidil, in the preservation of cardiac function and physiology [46] after global ischemia. It also has been shown that hyperpolarized cardiac arrest using a KATP channel opener is beneficial in the maintenance of cardiac energy stores after prolonged ischemia and cold storage [7]. Two separate KATP channels are abundantly present in the heart, one on the sarcolemma and the other on the mitochondrial membrane. Both have been shown to play a role in cardiac protection mediated by KATP agonists. The present study was designed to investigate pinacidil as a preservation solution and to determine which KATP channel is responsible for the cardioprotection it offers.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental subjects
Adult New Zealand white rabbits of either sex, weighing 3 to 5 kg, were utilized. All animals received humane care in AAALAC-accredited (#00036), US Department of Agriculture–registered (#52-R-007) facilities in compliance with "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animals Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication 85-23, revised 1985).

Animal preparation
Anesthesia was accomplished through an intramuscular injection of acepromazine (1 mg/kg) and xylazine (17.5 mg/kg), followed by ketamine (62.5 mg/kg). A tracheotomy was performed and mechanical ventilation (Model 683; Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, MA) was implemented through an endotracheal tube. Intravenous heparin was administered (3,000 U) through an ear vein. Sternotomy and rapid cardiectomy were performed, and the aorta cannulated and rapidly attached to a crystalloid perfusion column. A polyethylene vent (inside diameter, 0.86 mm) was inserted through the apex of the left ventricle.

A fluid-filled latex balloon was inserted into the left ventricle and secured to the mitral valve annulus with a pursestring suture of 5-0 Prolene (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). The intraventricular balloon was connected through polyethylene tubing to a pressure transducer (model P23ID; Gould Instrument Systems, Valley View, OH) and amplifier (model 20-4615-50; Gould). Two needle electrodes were placed on the LV epicardium to monitor the bipolar ventricular electrogram. The signal was filtered between 0.05 and 1,000 Hz. Two other electrodes were secured to the right atrial appendage and connected to a pacemaker (model 5320; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). Heart rate was maintained at a constant rate of 190 to 205 beats per minute with the pacemaker. The pressure and electrogram tracings were displayed continuously and digitized in real time on a personal computer (Compaq Computer, Houston, TX) using a waveform recording system (WinDAQ/400; DATAQ Instruments, Akron, OH) at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. A needle temperature probe (model BAT 8; Bailey Instruments, Saddle Brook, NJ) was placed in the right ventricle for myocardial temperature monitoring (model TM147T; Electromedics, Parker, CO). The heart was enclosed in a plastic jacket and was maintained at 37°C by a water-jacketed beaker connected to a warm-water bath (model D1/L; Haake, Berlin, Germany).

Experimental preparation
The isolated rabbit heart was suspended through an aortic cannula at a column height of 70 cm and perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffered solution (37°C) using a Masterflex Model 7520-10 roller pump (Cole Parmer, Chicago, IL). The Krebs-Henseleit solution consisted of the following (in mmol/L distilled water): NaCl, 118.5; NaHCO3, 25.0; KCl, 3.2; KH2PO4, 1.2; MgSO4, 1.2; CaCl2, 2.5; and glucose, 5.5. The Krebs-Henseleit solution was maintained at a strict pH range between 7.40 and 7.48 by bubbling with a gas mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. An inline ultrasonic flow probe (model T101; Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) measured flow of the Krebs-Henseleit solution down the perfusion column. A separate 70-cm cardioplegia arrest column was maintained at 4°C by water-cooling jackets.

Experimental protocol
The isolated rabbit hearts underwent a 30-minute equilibration period after mounting onto the Langendorff circuit. Baseline LV pressure–volume curves were generated by inflating the left ventricle balloon. Hearts were excluded from the study if they were unable to generate pressures of at least 80/10 mm Hg during baseline data acquisition. Intracavitary LV pressures and bipolar LV electrograms were recorded by more than 7 balloon volumes, each corresponding to a fixed, intracavitary LV end-diastolic pressure (EDP), namely, 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 mm Hg). Coronary flow was measured at each of these LV pressures. After baseline data acquisition, the left ventricle balloon was deflated to generate an EDP of 2.5 mm Hg.

After baseline data acquisition, hearts were arrested with 50 mL of hypothermic (4°C) solution followed by 8 hours of hypothermic (7°C to 8°C) storage in 50 mL of the same solution. Hearts were randomly allocated to receive one of four solutions: (1) UW (n = 8); (2) Washington University Solution (WashU) containing 0.5 mmol/L pinacidil (n = 8); (3) WashU with 100 µmol 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD) solution (n = 8); or (4) WashU with 100 µmol HMR-1098 (n = 8) solution. After arrest, all remaining fluid was evacuated from the left ventricle balloon.

Each heart was returned to the Langendorff circuit and reperfused for 60 minutes (37°C) after storage. After reperfusion, LV pressure–volume measurements were generated using the same balloon volumes employed for baseline data acquisition. The percent recovery of developed pressure, diastolic pressure–volume relationships and perfusate flow were compared between treatment groups. After reperfusion data acquisition, a portion of the left ventricle apex was excised, blotted, and weighed with a balance (Model TM 400; Mettler Instruments, Hightstown, NJ) and then dried in an oven (Isotemp Model 625G; Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX) until a constant dry weight was reached. Myocardial edema was expressed as percent tissue water according to the equation: percent tissue water = (wet weight – dry weight) / wet weight x 100.

Solution preparation
The UW solution was purchased in the form of ViaSpan (Du Pont Merck Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE). The UW solution was modified with the standard 0.016 g/L of dexamethasone, 200,000 U/L penicillin, and 40 U/L insulin. Each component of the WashU solution was added directly to deionized water (Table 1). Pinacidil was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO). The pinacidil solution was titrated to pH 7.65 with KOH and filtered. This solution was further modified to produce the final two experimental solutions by adding 100 µmol of the specific mitochondrial channel blocker, 5-HD, or the specific sarcolemmal channel blocker, HMR-1098. The 5-HD was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO). The HMR-1098 was a generous gift from Aventis Pharmaceuticals (Frankfurt, Germany).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. A Comparison Between Washington University Solution and University of Wisconsin Solution

 
Data analysis
Digitized pressure waveforms were analyzed using commercial software programs (Spectrum 2.0; Triton Technology, San Diego, CA; and Microsoft Excel 97; Microsoft, Redmond, WA). The end-systolic, end-diastolic, and developed pressures were measured as described previously [8].

Systolic function
Systolic function was evaluated using both recovery of developed pressure (DP) and maximal +dP/dT.

Recovery of developed pressure
The recovery of DP was calculated as the ratio of the postischemic DP to the baseline DP at the corresponding balloon volume. The average percent recovery of DP (% DP) was calculated by a program developed in our laboratory by means of the trapezoidal rule [9].

Maximal systolic +dP/dT
The systolic maximal +dP/dT (ddmax) of a beat was calculated as the maximum derivative of left ventricular pressure during systolic contraction. The mean ddmax was calculated by averaging 20 seconds of data. Average ddmax values were obtained for each balloon volume at baseline and after reperfusion (postischemic). The ddmax versus balloon volume data for baseline and postischemic data were fitted to second-order polynomial regressions. Each regression was integrated to calculate area under the curve (AUC) ranging from minimum to maximum matched balloon volume. To express the systolic contractile function over multiple LV volumes, the percent recovery of maximal systolic +dP/dT was calculated as a ratio of the postischemic AUC divided by the baseline AUC multiplied by 100.

Diastolic properties
The diastolic properties of the left ventricle were evaluated using minimal diastolic –dP/dT and percent change of baseline EDP at a fixed volume.

Minimal diastolic –dP/dT
The minimal –dP/dT (ddmin) of a beat was calculated as the minimal derivative of LV pressure during diastolic relaxation. The mean ddmin was calculated as the mean of 20 seconds of data. Average ddmin values were obtained for each balloon volume at baseline and after reperfusion (postischemic). The ddmin versus balloon volume data for baseline and postischemic data were fitted to second-order polynomial regressions. Each regression was integrated to calculate AUC ranging from minimum to maximum matched balloon volume. The percent recovery of minimal diastolic –dP/dT was calculated as a ratio of the postischemic AUC divided by the baseline AUC multiplied by 100.

Percent change in EDP at a fixed volume
The percent change in EDP at a fixed volume was calculated by taking the mean of 20 seconds of data and recording the EDP at that volume both at baseline and reperfusion. The values were compared by dividing the reperfusion diastolic pressure with the baseline diastolic pressure and multiplying by 100.

Recovery of coronary flow
Coronary flow was recorded continuously through out the data acquisition period. It was measured through an in-line flow probe and subsequently averaged. Reperfusion coronary flow was divided by preischemic coronary flow and the quotient multiplied by 100.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the computer software SigmaStat (version 2.03; Jandel, San Rafael, CA) and Excel 97 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). A paired t test was used to compare preischemic to postischemic endpoints within groups. A Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks was used to compare means between groups. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was at the level of p less than 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 
Coronary flow
Postischemic flow data showed a significant decrease in all groups from baseline. Postischemic recovery of coronary flow in hearts arrested and stored in the WashU solution (79% ± 7%) was significantly better when compared with those hearts stored in the UW solution (49% ± 5%; p = 0.002) or in the WashU solution with 5-HD, a selective mitochondrial KATP channel antagonist, added (19% ± 7%; p < 0.001; Fig 1). There was no statistical difference between WashU and WashU with HMR-1098, a selective sarcolemmal KATP channel antagonist (66% ± 5%). The percent recovery of coronary flow was significantly depressed in the WashU group with 5-HD when compared with both the UW (p = 0.003) and the WashU with HMR-1098 groups (p < 0.001).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Percent recovery of coronary flow. Data are presented as percentages ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus WashU. #p < 0.05 versus 5-HD. (HMR-1098 = Hoechst-Marion-Roussel 1098; 5-HD = 5-hydroxydecanoate; UW = University of Wisconsin Solution; WashU = Washington University Solution.)

 
Postischemic systolic function
The WashU solution had significantly better recovery of DP (77% ± 4) when compared with UW solution (p < 0.001). The improved protection of systolic function seen with WashU was completely abolished by adding the mitochondrial KATP channel blocker, 5-HD. Additionally, the 5-HD group (11% ± 2%) was inferior to both the UW group (p < 0.001) and the HMR-1098, a selective sarcolemmal KATP channel blocker, group (60% ± 2%, p < 0.001). The percent recovery of DP in the WashU solution with HMR-1098 group remained significantly higher than the UW group (48% ± 2%, p = 0.003; Fig 2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Percent recovery of developed pressure. Data are presented as percentages ± SEM. *p < 0.001 versus WashU. #p = 0.003 versus UW. +p < 0.001 versus 5-HD. (HMR-1098 = Hoechst-Marion-Roussel 1098; 5-HD = 5-hydroxydecanoate; UW = University of Wisconsin Solution; WashU = Washington University Solution.)

 
The percent recovery of maximal +dP/dT was better preserved with WashU (81% ± 3%) when compared with all other groups (p < 0.001), including UW. The 5-HD group had the lowest percent recovery of maximal +dP/dT (7% ± 3%, p < 0.001). Once again, the protection conferred by pinacidil was completely abrogated by the addition of 5-HD. There was no statistical difference between the HMR-1098 group (55% ± 5%) and the UW group (46% ± 5%; Fig 3).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Percent recovered plus dP/dT. Data are presented as percentages ± SEM. *p < 0.001 versus WashU. #p < 0.001 versus 5-HD. (HMR-1098 = Hoechst-Marion-Roussel 1098; 5-HD = 5-hydroxydecanoate; UW = University of Wisconsin Solution; WashU = Washington University Solution.)

 
Postischemic diastolic properties
Percent recovery minimal –dP/dT was used to analyze active relaxation. The WashU hearts recovered at 110% ± 1%, which was significantly better than the percent recovery observed in either of the UW (54% ± 6%, p < 0.001) or 5-HD (9% ± 4%, p < 0.001) groups. The selective mitochondrial KATP channel blocker, 5-HD, eliminated the beneficial effects of pinacidil. Active diastolic compliance was significantly better preserved in the HMR-1098 group (62% ± 6%) than in the 5-HD group (p < 0.001; Fig 4).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Percent recovered minus dP/dT. Data are presented as percentages ± SEM. *p < 0.001 versus WashU. #p < 0.001 versus HMR-1098. (HMR-1098 = Hoechst-Marion-Roussel 1098; 5-HD = 5-hydroxydecanoate; UW = University of Wisconsin Solution; WashU = Washington University Solution.)

 
Passive diastolic compliance was measured using the percent increase in EDP at a fixed volume. The WashU solution (240% ± 77%) provided superior maintenance of diastolic compliance when compared with all other solutions (p = 0.011 versus UW, p < 0.001 versus 5-HD, and p = 0.024 versus HMR-1098). The 5-HD group (1160% ± 137%) provided significantly less protection when compared with all other groups (p = 0.040 versus UW, p = 0.021 versus HMR-1098), further emphasizing that blocking the mitochondrial KATP channel reverses the cardioprotection given by pinacidil. The HMR-1098 also significantly decreased compliance when compared with WashU (Fig 5).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Percent change diastolic pressure at a fixed balloon volume. Data are presented as percentages ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus 5-HD. #p < 0.05 versus WashU. (HMR-1098 = Hoechst-Marion-Roussel 1098; 5-HD = 5-hydroxydecanoate; UW = University of Wisconsin Solution; WashU = Washington University Solution.)

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 
Pinacidil is a nonspecific potassium channel opener that opens both the mitochondrial and sarcolemmal KATP channel [10]. It has been shown that hyperpolarized arrest with pinacidil avoids many of the adverse cellular sequelae of depolarized cardioplegia by arresting the heart at the natural resting membrane potential [11]. Previous reports have suggested that the mitochondrial KATP channel plays the most important roll in the cardiac protection seen with KATP channel openers [1214].

In agreement with our prior work, pinacidil provided superior systolic and diastolic myocardial protection to an ischemic heart during prolonged cold storage when compared with the standard, hyperkalemic, depolarizing UW solution. The primary mediator of this cardiac protection appears to be the mitochondrial KATP channel. When 5-HD was added to the WashU solution, blocking the mitochondria KATP channel, the superior myocardial protection seen with pinacidil was eliminated. In contrast, when the sarcolemmal KATP channel was blocked by the addition of HMR-1098, the benefits of pinacidil were decreased but remained better than the UW solution, in most instances. Although not to the extent of the mitochondrial KATP channel, however, our data revealed that the sarcolemmal KATP channel played a significant role in the cardioprotection provided by pinacidil including compliance, contractility and developed pressure. These findings have been supported by other groups [15, 16]. Further studies will be required to determine the time course and precise mechanisms involved in the myocardial protection afforded by potassium channel openers and mediated by both the mitochondrial and sarcolemmal KATP channels.

When systolic function was investigated, the WashU solution was significantly superior to UW solution. Developed pressure was better protected by the hyperpolarized arrest of the WashU solution when compared with that of the UW solution. Once again, the presence of 5-HD abolished the beneficial effects of pinacidil, and the presence of HMR-1098 lessened but did not eliminate pinacidil's myocardial protection. Furthermore, 5-HD lowered myocardial protection to levels below those observed in the UW solution. These data were repeated when contractility was examined using the +dP/dT. Our laboratory has shown the beneficial effects of pinacidil on systolic function in the past [4, 8]. These results were recently confirmed by Ikizler and associates [20] as it was shown that pinacidil improved systolic indicators when added to custadiol after 60 minutes of cold storage. Additionally, it has been shown that 5-HD abolishes the systolic benefits of diazoxide, a selective mitochondrial KATP channel opener, and ischemic preconditioning [21, 22]. In this study, we observed repeatedly that the addition of a mitochondrial KATP channel blocker, 5-HD, not only reversed the effects of hyperpolarized arrest but also actually lowered recovery of systolic function to levels less than that seen after depolarized arrest.

The diastolic properties of active relaxation and passive compliance were studied by using –dP/dT and percent change of EDP at a fixed volume, respectively. The WashU solution was superior to the UW solution when these properties were compared. The addition of 5-HD completely abrogated the diastolic protection provided by the pinacidil as well as the protection afforded by UW solution. The addition of HMR-1098 significantly lowered the diastolic protection seen with hyperpolarized arrest but remained equivalent or superior to that observed with UW solution. Our laboratory has previously shown that the active compliance of the heart was better maintained by a pinacidil containing solution after cold storage and nonsurgical ischemia [8]. Recently, other groups have also shown the diastolic benefits of hyperpolarized arrest with potassium channel openers [23]. Additionally, Lin and colleagues [24] showed that the –dP/dT was improved with pinacidil but reversed with glibenclamide, a sulfonurea compound known to block KATP channels. Our study is unique in showing that the opening of the KATP channels beneficially effects the passive compliance of the heart as well.

The WashU solution maintained coronary flow better than all of the solutions, particularly UW solution. When the mitochondrial KATP channel blocker, 5-HD, was added to the solution, the protective effects of the pinacidil were eliminated. In contrast, when the sarcolemmal KATP channel blocker, HMR-1098 was added to the solution, a decrease in coronary flow was observed but the solution still possessed superior protection to UW. It has been shown that potassium channel openers when used in cardioplegia hyperpolarize endothelial cells and cause smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilatation [17]. In a previous study, hypoxia and reoxygenation reduced the relaxation mediated by endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in the coronary microartery. This function was restored by either hypoxic preconditioning or by a KATP channel opener [18]. Matsuda and associates [19] showed that high potassium cardioplegia augmented the coronary calcium-mysosin light chain pathway and resulted in vasoconstriction. Pinacidil effectively blocked the activation of this pathway and maintained adequate vasorelaxation during cardioplegia [19]. The WashU solution, with both reduced potassium concentration as well as pinacidil, is ideal for the maintenance and restoration of the cardiac epithelium after cold storage.

The WashU solution containing pinacidil offers promise in extending the cold storage time for heart transplantation. That could have substantial clinical benefits by expanding the number of hearts available for transplant, thereby lessening waiting list time and the number of deaths while waiting. Human leukocyte antigen typing could also be safely performed allowing for better matches and less immunosuppression therapy. Continued research in larger animal transplant models will need to be conducted before clinical implementation. The search for the exact mechanism of the cardioprotection pinacidil confers will also need further attention. However, the WashU solution offers much hope for the future of producing a solution designed specifically for the successful cold storage and preservation of human hearts.

Study limitations
The Krebs-Henseleit–perfused Langendorff preparation was used in this study because it allowed for analysis of intervention of the isolated heart without humoral, neural, adrenergic, or anesthetic influences. This preparation is less complicated than a blood-perfused parabiotic preparation because of the independence from physiologic variations produced by the support animal. Moreover, for long-term preservation of hearts, the maintenance of the support animal becomes logistically difficult. The findings of this study should be interpreted with caution, however, as the current preparation lacked blood perfusion and the important dynamics of the intact organism. As with any experimental results, these findings should be extrapolated with caution to the clinical setting.

Moreover, the precise contribution of each component of the pinacidil vehicle is not fully known. Isolated comparison of the individual components, which differed between the hyperpolarizing pinacidil and UW solutions, was not performed. The differences between solutions in ionic concentrations of potassium, calcium, and magnesium available to the cell should not, however, affect the protective mechanism observed with the pinacidil. Specifically, the potassium was kept low in the WashU solution to prevent the depolarization of the myocardial cells. A small amount of calcium was added to prevent calcium paradox, a phenomenon observed in mammalian cells upon reperfusion. The function of the magnesium in both solutions is to displace calcium from the sarcolemma. The UW solution did provide a clinical frame of reference for comparison in these studies, as many investigators consider it the "gold standard" for donor organ preservation. Furthermore, we were unable to directly relate the improved cardioprotective efficacy of pinacidil compared with UW to prevention of intracellular calcium accumulation, cell swelling, or promotion of glycolytic flux, because these endpoints were not measured. These limitations will serve as the focus for future studies.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant T32HL07776.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 
DR MARSHALL L. JACOBS (Philadelphia, PA): My compliments for an elegant experiment and a very fine presentation. I have two very brief questions. Was the addition of Pinacidil the only thing that differentiated the Washington University solution from the Wisconsin solution? And then I would ask you to speculate, if you might, why your results for the Wisconsin solution with respect to preservation of systolic and diastolic properties seemed so much less optimal than so many studies 4 and 8 and 10 years ago when it was initially compared to Stanford preservation solution and touted as the latest and greatest.

DR DIODATO: In order to investigate the role of Pinacidil in our solution we actually performed a second set of experiments, which were presented at the ISHLT in April. In these experiments, we removed Pinacidil from the Washington University solution and we then placed it in the University of Wisconsin solution. We compared the 4 groups in the following way—the University of Wisconsin, Washington University, normal; Washington University without Pinacidil; and University of Wisconsin with Pinacidil. We saw the recovered function in the Washington University solution without the Pinacidil decreased to the University of Wisconsin levels. With the addition of Pinacidil to the University of Wisconsin solution, we did see a slight but not significant increase in preservation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions. We did not, however, test any of the other components of the solution individually.

DR JACOBS: The second question really was why does Wisconsin solution work poorly in St. Louis and well in Wisconsin?

DR DIODATO: I cannot answer that question. The initial studies from 10 years ago were done at shorter time periods, 4 hours. I know in previous work from our laboratory, Dr Hoenicke showed that after 12 hours of cold storage, Washington University solution had a much greater recovery of function than the University of Wisconsin, which had almost no recovery of function.

DR PEDRO J. DEL NIDO (Boston, MA): If I could just follow up on that question, having done some experiments with UW solution, most people use UW with low potassium as compared to what you used, which as 120 mM KCl. There is at least theoretical evidence that you get endothelial injury in myocardium after prolonged exposure as opposed to liver. My question relates more to mechanism; it has been proposed that KATP channels play a protective role in preventing apoptosis. You have a relatively short reperfusion period, so you haven’t addressed that question really. Is there a possibility that you’re going to see much more injury if you reperfuse these animals for longer and that the differences may not be so great if you had a longer period of reperfusion because you are not going to see apoptosis in a relatively short period of reperfusion.

DR DIODATO: Those are both great points. We are actually looking at longer periods of reperfusion, and we are also planning to look at these solutions on a single cellular level to look for mechanisms of apoptosis.

DR DEL NIDO:The one difference that I noticed is you have a markedly increased buffering capacity in your solution. There is histidine in the solution and that has been shown to be a good cardioprotective mechanism. UW solution has no buffering capacity. Do you have an idea whether that contributed anything in your model?

DR DIODATO: Well, we believe it did. Again, in order to find out exactly how much that did contribute to the cardioprotection we observed, we would have to remove all of the other confounding variables and test each one at a time. We did not do that for this experiment.

DR RICHARD N. GATES (Orange, CA): I have just one question. In this model, which is very well controlled, one potential oversight might be that you are actually testing the ability of these two solutions to protect a heart that has been perfused with crystalloid for 30 minutes. Ideally, it would have been nice to initially arresting the heart directly in the chest cavity with either solution. Have you done any experiments where you have compared these two solutions with a direct in-chest blood perfused heart?

DR DIODATO:We have not done that at this time, but we are looking to move the experiment to a larger animal model and perform heart transplants at that time. That is part of our next series of experiments.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Belzer F.O., Ashby B.S., Dunphy J.E. 24-hour and 72-hour preservation of canine kidneys. Lancet 1967;7515:536-538.
  2. Darracott-Cankovic S., Stovin P.G., Wheeldon D., Wallwork J., Wells F., English T.A. Effect of donor heart damage on survival after transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1989;3:525-532.[Abstract]
  3. Duquesnoy R.J., Cramer D.V. Immunologic mechanisms of cardiac rejection. Cardiovasc Clin 1990;20:87-103.[Medline]
  4. Lawton J.S., Harrington G.C., Allen C.T., Hsia P.W., Damiano R.J., Jr Myocardial protection with pinacidil cardioplegia in the blood-perfused heart. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1680-1688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hoenicke E.M., Sun X., Strange R.G., Jr, Damiano R.J., Jr Donor heart preservation with a novel hyperpolarizing solution: superior protection compared with University of Wisconsin solution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:746-754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hoenicke E.M., Peterseim D.S., Ducko C.T., Sun X., Damiano R.J., Jr Donor heart preservation with the potassium channel opener pinacidil: comparison to University of Wisconsin and St. Thomas' solution. J Heart Lung Transplant 2000;19:286-297.[Medline]
  7. Fukuda H., Luo C.S., Gu X., et al. The effect of K(atp)channel activation on myocardial cationic and energetic status during ischemia and reperfusion: role in cardioprotection. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2001;33:545-560.[Medline]
  8. Hoenicke E.M., Damiano R.J., Jr Superior 12-hour heart preservation with pinacidil hyperpolarized solution compared to UW solution. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:1106-1109.[Medline]
  9. Jayawant M., Stephenson E.R., Jr, Damiano R.J., Jr Advantages of continuous hyperpolarized arrest with pinacidil over St. Thomas' Hospital solution during prolonged ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:131-138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hu H., Sato T., Seharaseyon J., et al. Pharmacological and histochemical distinctions between molecularly defined sarcolemmal KATP channels and native cardiac mitochondrial KATP channels. Mol Pharmacol 1999;55:1000-1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Liu H., Zhang H.Y., Zhu X., Shao Z., Yao Z. Preconditioning blocks cardiocyte apoptosis: role of K(ATP) channels and PKC-epsilon. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 2002;282:H1380-1386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ozcan C., Bienengraeber M., Dzeja P.P., Terzic A. Potassium channel openers protect cardiac mitochondria by attenuating oxidant stress at reoxygenation. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 2002;282:H531-539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gross G.J., Fryer R.M. Sarcolemmal versus mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ channels and myocardial preconditioning. Circ Res 1999;84:973-979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chambers D.J., Hearse D.J. Developments in cardioprotection: "polarized" arrest as an alternative to "depolarized" arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1960-1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tsuchida A., Miura T., Tanno M., et al. Infarct size limitation by nicorandil: roles of mitochondrial K(ATP) channels, sarcolemmal K(ATP) channels, and protein kinase C. Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1523-1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. D'hahan N., Moreau C., Prost A.L., et al. Pharmacological plasticity of cardiac ATP-sensitive potassium channels toward diazoxide revealed by ADP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:12162-12167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. He G.W. Potassium-channel opener in cardioplegia may restore coronary endothelial function. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1318-1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ren Z., Yang Q., Floten H.S., He G.W. Hypoxic preconditioning in coronary microarteries: role of EDHF and K+ channel openers. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:143-148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Matsuda N., Morgan K.G., Sellke F.W. Effects of pinacidil on coronary Ca(2+)-myosin phosphorylation in cold potassium cardioplegia model. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 2000;279:H882-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ikizler M., Dernek S., Sevin B., Maxey T.S., Kural T. Improved myocardial function with the addition of pinacidil to custadiol. Transplantation 2002;74:1666-1671.[Medline]
  21. Feng J., Li H., Rosenkranz E.R. Diazoxide protects the rabbit heart following cardioplegic ischemia. Mol Cell Biochem 2002;233:133-138.[Medline]
  22. Nozawa Y., Miura T., Miki T., Ohnuma Y., Yano T., Shimamoto K. Mitochondrial K(ATP) channel-dependent and -independent phases of ischemic preconditioning against myocardial infarction in the rat. Basic Res Cardiol 2003;98:50-58.[Medline]
  23. Jilkina O., Kuzio B., Grover G.J., Kupriyanov V.V. Effects of K(ATP) channel openers, P-1075, pinacidil, and diazoxide, on energetics and contractile function in isolated rat hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2002;34:427-440.[Medline]
  24. Lin R., Zhu X., Zhang Z., Kang M., Xia Q. Myocardial protection of immature rabbits with an ATP-sensitive K+ channel opener pinacidil. Chin Med J (Engl) 2001;114:1184-1188.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. Scatena, P. Bottoni, G. Botta, G. E. Martorana, and B. Giardina
The role of mitochondria in pharmacotoxicology: a reevaluation of an old, newly emerging topic
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): C12 - C21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michael D. Diodato
Sunil M. Prasad
Sydney L. Gaynor
Jennifer S. Lawton
Ralph J. Damiano, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diodato, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diodato, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation - heart


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS