|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:549-555
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Accepted for publication February 6, 2004.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Minami, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University of Bochum, Georgstrasse 11, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
e-mail: kminami{at}hdz-nrw.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Seventy-nine patients (50 men and 29 women. mean age, 68.9 ± 6.9 years; range, 53.3 to 78.7 years) underwent carotid endarterectomy combined with valve replacement from February 1985 to April 2002. Indication of carotid endarterectomy was more than 75% carotid stenosis with or without ulceration. Thirteen patients had history of stroke. Endarterectomy was performed under mild hypothermia with cardiopulmonary bypass in all cases. Positions of replaced valves were aortic in 64 patients, mitral in 10, and mitral and aortic in 5 patients.
RESULTS: There were 8 early deaths (10.1%). Early neurologic complications occurred in 8 patients (10.1%); two late events were observed. Double valve replacement was an independent risk factor for early death (p = 0.039; odds ratio = 25.6). For early stroke we found no statistically significant risk factor. Myocardial infarction (p = 0.022; odds ratio = 3.0) and age more than 70 years (p = 0.03; odds ratio = 2.5) were independent risk factors for premature death; we found no independent risk factor for late stroke. Permanent impairment or death as a stroke consequence was seen in 5 patients, 3 of them had ipsilateral strokes, 2 had contralateral strokes.
CONCLUSIONS: Endarterectomy can be safely performed combined with aortic valve surgery. Concomitant mitral or double valve replacement cannot be judged reliably because of the small number of patients, but they might be a high risk.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Severe extracranial artery stenosis is defined as a more than 90% reduction of the lumen area or more than 70% reduction of the vascular diameter [4]. Severe stenosis of extracranial arteries is found in 1.3% to 16% of preoperative patients requiring cardiac surgery [59]. It is demonstrated to be a most important risk factor for postoperative neurologic complications.
Some authors reported their results after simultaneous surgery of coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy, but the operative outcome of combined valvular surgery and carotid endarterectomy has remained undescribed.
In this study, we review operative and late outcomes after simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and valvular replacement.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Since 1989, in cases of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the cerebral reserve capacity was tested with transcranial Doppler ultrasound (EME GmbH, Überlingen, Germany) to detect functionally relevant stenoses [11]. A pathologic finding was defined as an increase in flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery of less than 20% after carbon dioxide stimulation induced by hypercapnia [1214]. Patients with reduced middle cerebral artery flow response were operated on, regardless of whether carotid artery stenosis was symptomatic or not. Patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and normal middle cerebral artery flow velocity without ulcerations were treated with individual anticoagulation or antithrombogenic drugs, and ultrasonographic short interval follow-up was recommended (Fig 1).
|
Postoperative assessment
A consultant neurologist assessed each case of suspected postoperative neurologic damage. Postoperative course including neurologic status was extracted from the patients' hospital records; follow-up was obtained by questionnaires compiled by the patients' referring physicians, cardiologists, or the patients themselves.
Statistical analysis
Early death and early stroke with persisting neurologic deficit were defined as events within 30 days postoperatively. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. For univariate early events risk factor analysis,
2 and, if appropriate, the two-tailed Fisher's exact tests were used. For multivariate early event analysis, logistic regression was used. Univariate analyses of time-dependent risk factors were done with the Kaplan-Meier method (log rank test) and followed by Cox regression modeling to find independent risk factors. Odds ratios are given with the multivariate analyses results. We used SPSS release 11.5.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) for all statistical calculations.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early death causes were low output syndrome in 2 patients, lethal stroke in 3 patients, multiorgan failure in 1 patient, right ventricular failure in 1 patient, and ventricular fibrillation in 1 patient (Table 2). Double valve replacement was an independent risk factor for early death (p = 0.039; odds ratio = 25.6).
|
Previous myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, concomitant CABG, and age more than 70 years were preoperative risk factors for premature death in the univariate analysis (Fig 2).
|
Actuarial survival was 79.8% ± 0.05%, 58.9% ± 0.08%, and 34.9% ± 0.08% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. See Figure 3 for stratification by valve prosthesis site and overall estimation.
|
Late stroke occurred in 2 patients (1 ipsilateral, 1 contralateral; Table 2). Preoperative absence of sinus rhythm (p = 0.004), double valve replacement (p = 0.040), and contralateral stenosis of 90% or more (p = 0.016) were univariate risk factors. Age more than 70 years and previous myocardial infarction were risk factors for stroke in the entire postoperative course (Table 1); none of them was independent.
Freedom from ipsilateral stroke reached 93.5% ± 2.8% at 7 months; no further ipsilateral stroke was observed throughout the whole follow-up. Freedom from any stroke was 88.4% ± 3.6%, 88.4% ± 3.6%, and 84.1% ± 5.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively (Fig 4). Stroke causing death or permanent impairment occurred in 5 patients. In the long-term course, we observed 93.5% ± 2.8% freedom from this severe complication. Freedom from both death and permanent impairment was 78.5% ± 5.4%, 57.1% ± 8.0%, and 32.3% ± 8.5% after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively.
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Astor and colleagues [1] reported that severe neurologic complications after isolated valvular procedure occur in 3.5% to 8.1%. In our institution, between February 1985 and April 2002, valvular procedure was performed in 8,488 patients, and the incidence of perioperative neurologic deficit was 3.5% [22]. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) collaborators reported on data from 659 patients with 70% to 99% stenosis, 328 of whom underwent carotid endarterectomy without concomitant surgery. The 30-day stroke morbidity and mortality rate for the surgical group was 5.8%. Further, the cumulative risk of any ipsilateral stroke at 2 years was 9% for surgical patients and 26% for patients treated without operation. Study investigators concluded that carotid endarterectomy is highly beneficial to patients with recent hemispheric or retinal transient ischemia or nondisabling strokes and ipsilateral severe carotid stenosis [4].
We previously reported good operative outcomes after simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and CABG operations. The rate of perioperative neurologic deficit was 3.2%, and early mortality rate was 2.6%. Furthermore, a risk factor for early neurologic complication was previous stroke, and for early mortality was age more than 70 years. The risk factors for late neurologic complications were symptomatic carotid stenosis, previous stroke, and bilateral carotid stenosis (>90% stenosis), and for late mortality were previous myocardial infarction, age more than 70 years, previous stroke, and bilateral carotid stenosis (>90% stenosis) [5].
In our study, the rate of perioperative early mortality rate was 2.6%, lethal stroke was 3.1%, and fixed stroke was 1.6% after AVR. We thought carotid endarterectomy combined with AVR could be performed safely and effectively. We found no independent risk factors for late stroke; previous myocardial infarction and age more than 70 years were independent risk factors for premature death.
There is a continuing controversy about the management of patients with concomitant occlusive disease of carotid arteries and heart disease. Three treatment options have been considered: carotid endarterectomy followed by delayed CABG, CABG first with carotid endarterectomy delayed, and combined carotid endarterectomy and CABG under a single operation.
There has been no clear advantage proven for one of these options over another. A meta-analysis using the 16 papers that reported on both the combined and staged procedures revealed a significantly increased risk of the composite end point of stroke or death in patients undergoing the combined procedure, however there was no statistically significant difference between the groups for stroke or death alone [23].
Hertzer and colleagues [24] demonstrated that the stroke rate in the staged (carotid endarterectomy first group and CABG first group) and combined procedures was 4.2%, 14%, and 2.8%, respectively, in the group of patients with unilateral, asymptomatic carotid artery disease. The difference in the stroke rate between the CABG first group and combined procedures was statistically significant. The mortality rate in the staged (carotid endarterectomy first group and CABG first group) and combined procedures was 4.2%, 5%, and 4.2%, respectively, and there was no significant difference.
In the group of patients that had bilateral or symptomatic carotid artery disease, the stroke rate for the combined procedure as compared with the staged procedure (CABG first) was 7.1% and 8.7%, respectively, and the mortality rate was 6.1% and 0%, respectively. This study suggested that the staged procedure (CABG first) should be avoided, and the combined procedure can be performed with low stroke and mortality rates.
In studies that report on more than 200 combined procedures, the stroke rate ranges from 1.0% to 5.1%, and the mortality ranges from 0% to 8.9%. In all of these series, the majority of patients had asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease. However, in those centers that limit the combined procedure to patients with symptomatic or severe bilateral carotid artery disease, the outcomes are more variable. Among these series stroke rates range from 1.7% to 18%, and mortality ranges from 0% to 10.8% [25]. These results suggest that the combined procedure can be done with reasonable safety, patient selection significantly affects the results of the combined procedure, and those patients with severe bilateral or symptomatic carotid artery disease in combination with severe or symptomatic coronary artery disease are at high risk for associated complications.
In the combined procedure most authors repair the carotid artery stenosis before full establishment of CPB. In contrast, we have performed carotid endarterectomy after initiation of CPB because we think that hypothermia and controlled pulsatile perfusion are advantageous for the cerebral perfusion.
Hypothermia decreases cerebral metabolism (oxygen consumption and glucose utilization), and increases the tissue content of adenosine triphosphate [26]. Studies reported that a temperature reduction from 37°C to 28°C reduced cerebral oxygen consumption to 31% to 66% [2729]. Croughwell and associates [30] found that during CPB and the reduction of the patient's body temperature from 37°C to 27°C, cerebral blood flow fell less than cerebral oxygen consumption. This was referred to as a situation of "luxurious cerebral blood flow" accompanied by a reduction of the cerebral arteriovenous oxygen difference. Additionally, general heparinization reduces thromboembolic problems.
Pulsatile perfusion increases cerebral blood flow [31, 32]. Minami and coworkers [33] reported that nonpulsatile perfusion resulted in lower cerebral blood flow, increased capillary closure, sludging, and marked venous constriction with consequent decreased venous return. Some reports [31, 32] have demonstrated a 15% to 19% increase in cerebral blood flow by using pulsatile perfusion. Furthermore, in a stroke model cerebral blood flow increased 55% when circulation was changed from nonpulsatile to pulsatile perfusion [31].
The optimal arterial pressure for cerebral perfusion during CPB under hypothermia is not clearly defined. We keep mean perfusion pressure at 60 to 70 mm Hg (perfusion rate 2.5 to 3.0 L x min1 x m2) for these patients. Tufo and associates [34] found that lowering of systemic arterial blood pressure below 50 mm Hg for longer than 10 minutes resulted in a fourfold increased risk compared with the risk with higher blood pressure. Tanaka and colleagues [35] suggested that when arterial blood pressure during CPB fell below approximately 40 mm Hg, cerebral blood flow might decline appreciably, with a concomitant decrease in cerebral oxygen consumption. In a recent review of concomitant disease of the carotid and coronary arteries, Lazar and Menzoian [36] concluded that cerebral perfusion during CPB in patients with carotid artery stenosis can be safely maintained as long as pressures are kept at at least 50 mm Hg; further neurologic complications of CPB appear to be related more to arteriosclerotic aortic disease than to low flow caused by carotid artery stenosis.
Two patients were found to have pathologic signs in the intraoperative EEG monitoring, and 6 patients showed false-negative results. Hypothermia was expected to make the analysis of the EEG more difficult than in isolated carotid endarterectomy under normothermia [5]. In our series, minor EEG changes were fairly common during carotid endarterectomy, but they were generally not followed by cerebral sequelae. In contrast, most of the EEG changes that occurred after carotid endarterectomy were associated with perioperative strokes [18]. This suggests that the EEG monitoring is useful when carotid endarterectomy is combined with heart surgery.
In conclusion, carotid endarterectomy could be safely and effectively performed combined with aortic valvular replacement using CPB for both procedures. Because of the small number of patients, the risk of concomitant double valve replacement cannot be judged reliably, but it might be elevated.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Zayed, A. Ali, O. Wendler, and H. Rashid Selective Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Disease Prior to Isolated Heart Valve Surgery Angiology, October 1, 2009; 60(5): 633 - 636. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |