|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:73-76
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
Accepted for publication August 28, 2003.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Kherani, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 177 Ft Washington Ave, MHB 7GN-435, New York, NY, USA 10032
e-mail: khera001{at}mc.duke.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: This study involved patients undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair at a single institution from 1997 to 2003. Preoperative and postoperative echocardiograms were compared. Postoperative morbidity was examined including need for reoperation and long-term medical management. Thirty-day survival and long-term actuarial survival were also determined.
RESULTS: Seventy-one patients comprised this study. Mitral regurgitation on echocardiogram went from 3.43 ± 0.86 to 0.39 ± 0.61 (p < 0.001) following repair. Thirty-day mortality was 3 of 71 (4.2%) patients. Actuarial survivals at 24 and 60 months were 84.5% and 58.3%, respectively; adjusted excluding noncardiac death they were 89.5% and 82.3%, respectively. Forty (56.3%) patients had concomitant ring placement and experienced similar survival to those repaired with the bow-tie stitch alone. Home telephone follow-up was conducted, and current medical therapy was determined on 51 patients; 59% were on a ß-blocker, 31% were on an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, 27% were on a diuretic, and 22% were on digoxin. All were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II. Three patients (4.2%) underwent mitral valve reoperation after a mean of 299 ± 429 days. In no case did the bow-tie suture rupture.
CONCLUSIONS: Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair is a valuable tool in the armamentarium available to treat complex cases of mitral insufficiency or as an adjunct to standard repair techniques that fail to achieve an acceptable result.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1996, we initiated a program incorporating the edge-to-edge repair in select cases. Our first-year experience demonstrated the importance of patient selection as patients with related abnormalities, such as severely fibrotic chordae or ischemic papillary muscles, had complicated postoperative courses. This was an ill population whose disease was defined by much more than just valvular disease. Since this time, we have considered both conditions contraindications to edge-to-edge repair. Following this initial period, we have found the edge-to-edge repair to be a simple yet effective addition to, or substitution for, conventional annuloplasty. This study highlights our medium-term experience with the procedure since the initial 12-month period, during which time we learned what type of patient could best benefit from this intervention.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Telephone follow-up was then conducted to assess the patients' current status and medical regimen. Ninety-one percent (51 of 56) of all living patients were contacted (fifteen had died). In five patients, where the patient or family could not be contacted, the Social Security Death Index was reviewed (found at http://ssdi.genealogy.rootsweb.com/) to determine whether the patient was alive.
Methods
Traditionally, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was performed on all patients immediately following the induction of anesthesia [6]. For patients undergoing operations not requiring left atriotomy, the 4-0 Prolene repair suture was placed via a transventricular or transaortic approach. The remaining patients usually underwent a more traditional mitral valve repair with an annuloplasty or quadrangular resection before use of an edge-to-edge suture. In these cases, following placement of the aortic cross-clamp, a saline-filled bulb syringe was used to assess the malfunctioning valve by distending the ventricle. This was repeated following the initial repair. If residual leakage was identified, the suture was placed at the most cephalad point where the leaflets should have met, ensuring the largest possible area of coaptation and resulting in a double orifice valve that resembles a bow-tie. This suture was often at the exact midpoint between the commissures, although mal-coapting leaflets were addressed with paracentrically placed sutures. Before sternal closure, cold saline was injected to confirm competence of the repair and transesophageal echocardiography was performed to confirm satisfactory mitral valve function.
Statistical analysis
Data were represented as frequency distributions and percentages. Values of continuous variables were expressed as a mean + standard deviation (SD). Continuous variables were compared using paired t tests, whereas categorical variables were compared by means of
2 tests. For all analyses, a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival along with a log-rank p value when comparing groups. All data were analyzed utilizing SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Of the 71 patients, 18 (25%) had echocardiograms done at our institution at least 4 weeks following their repair (12 with an annuloplasty ring and 6 without). Overall, these patients had a mean mitral regurgitation of 1.17 ± 1.04 at 259.06 ± 374.63 days following surgery. Mean mitral regurgitation of those with an annuloplasty ring was 1.0 ± 0.95 (at 340.75 ± 436.92 days), compared to 1.5 ± 1.23 (at 95.67 ± 95.63 days), for those without a ring (p = 0.406).
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Standard approaches to mitral repair were pioneered in the 1970s and the long-term experience with the procedure in nonrheumatic patients was reported by Braunberger and colleagues [14]. Their experience demonstrated a 20-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of 48%, which is similar to the survival rate of the normal population of the same age. Thus, when studying the efficacy of a type of mitral valve repair success hinges upon more than favorable survival, which is expected. Freedom from reoperation and quality of life determine success and, in these areas, we found the edge-to-edge repair to prove its value. When standard repair techniques fail, several adjunct techniques have been attempted, including the use of polytetrafluoroethylene substitute chordae tendinae, chordal transposition, chordal shortening, and even the cutting of secondary and tertiary chordae. No long-term results are available for these approaches although favorable early results have been reported in several series [15, 16]. The bow-tie technique facilitates repair of complex mitral valve pathology especially when speed and ease of repair are critical; additionally, it can serve as a valuable adjunct in repairing mitral regurgitation that is noted intraoperatively following standard annuloplasty, without causing obstruction or negatively impacting valve hemodynamics [17].
At our institution, we sometimes use edge-to-edge suture placement for repair of the mitral valve when access via the left atrium is not available; especially in cases of mixed aortic stenosis and significant mitral regurgitation when we believe that aortic valve replacement alone will not address the mitral regurgitation. The technique is also of value for inferior basilar aneurysms when involvement of the papillary muscles is present and some degree of preoperative MR is present. For transatrial approaches, we typically attempt a standard repair first; however, if severe bileaflet prolapse is present, success has been demonstrated with the primary use of this suture rather than posterior quadrangular resection [18]. However, in most cases we use this technique only when recurrent leakage through the leaflets on saline testing is evident together with prolapse of the anterior leaflet over the mitral ring prosthesis. Other centers have been more aggressive in using this approach earlier and for primary MV failure [18] and with increasing experience, we believe this approach may have merit. In particular, as less invasive approaches become more feasible, such as with transthoracic robotic or percutaneous access, the use of innovative solutions offered by this repair become appealing. Nevertheless, several pitfalls should be avoided. First, although we have not experienced primary failure of the bow-tie suture, the repaired valves do sometimes leak. This is especially common if catastrophic injury, such as rupture, has occurred to the papillary muscles. The bow-tie suture tethers together the anterior and posterior leaflets, but if the chordal mechanism underlying both is defective, the repair is more apt to fail. Second, the leaflet mechanisms need to be pliable and of adequate quantity in order to allow wide opening during diastole. If the leaflets are congenitally foreshortened or thickened, as in rheumatic disease, use of the bow-tie suture should be discouraged. Finally, the need for use of a mitral annuloplasty ring in these repairs is unclear. Some centers have historically avoided use of rings in their repairs, although most repairs today involve an annuloplasty. When placement of a ring is cumbersome, we have had reasonable success with sole use of the bow-tie approach. This experience gives us more confidence with isolated placement of an edge-to-edge mitral suture in select cases (eg, in the presence of a calcified mitral annulus), where use of the ring may be difficult. Similarly, use of an isolated suture reduces the foreign body material burden in cases of endocarditis.
The largest reported series is Alfieri and colleagues' [18] 7-year experience with 260 patients. It yielded a 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival of 94.4% and freedom from reoperation of 90.0%. Our results from this, the third-largest reported series, lend further support that this technique is effective in the medium-term with patients not only demonstrating good medium-term survival, which is expected of mitral valve repair, but also a high degree of freedom from reoperation. With careful patient selection, the edge-to-edge repair is a valuable addition to the armamentarium available to surgeons in treating mitral regurgitation.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. W.M. Fedak, P. M. McCarthy, and R. O. Bonow Evolving Concepts and Technologies in Mitral Valve Repair Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 963 - 974. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Padera Jr. and F. J. Schoen Pathology of Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 111 - 178. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Davidson and D. S. Baim Percutaneous Catheter-Based Mitral Valve Repair Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1101 - 1108. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Feldman and M. B. Leon Prospects for Percutaneous Valve Therapies Circulation, December 11, 2007; 116(24): 2866 - 2877. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kuduvalli, S. V. Ghotkar, A. D. Grayson, and B. M. Fabri Edge-to-Edge Technique for Mitral Valve Repair: Medium-Term Results With Echocardiographic Follow-Up. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1356 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Oc, G. Doukas, C. Alexiou, B. Oc, L. Hadjinikolaou, A. W. Sosnowski, and T. J. Spyt Edge-to-Edge Repair With Mitral Annuloplasty for Barlow's Disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1315 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Fann, F. G. St. Goar, J. Komtebedde, M. C. Oz, P. C. Block, E. Foster, J. Butany, T. Feldman, and T. A. Burdon Beating Heart Catheter-Based Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Procedure in a Porcine Model: Efficacy and Healing Response Circulation, August 24, 2004; 110(8): 988 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |