|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1876
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St 4 Silverstein Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
e-mail: benjamin.jackson{at}uphs.upenn.edu
To the Editor:
We were intrigued with the biomechanical study of left ventricular (LV) aneurysm by Bartel and colleagues [1]. We are concerned that the physical properties of their experimental model substantially limit the validity and clinical applicability of their conclusions. Specifically, we question the use of a ventricular wall thickness of 0.3 mm. Also, given that prior descriptions of the model appear only in German, in international symposiums, and in dissertations, we wonder what are the Young modulus (Y) and the Poisson's ratio (
) of the rubber model.
The authors draw two principle conclusions from their experimental data. The first is that heart rate has an effect on aneurysmal bulging. However, the authors do not explain why there might be a quadratic dependence on heart rate. Do they have any explanation for this observation? (We considered a resonance phenomenon; however, we estimate a first resonant frequency of the mechanical system of not less than approximately 400 Hz.)
The second conclusion is that stress (
) depends primarily on LV function, whereas the bulging volume of the aneurysm depends on afterload. The implication is that reduction of contractility (eg, ß-blockade) would more likely be beneficialby a mechanism related to LV wall stress reductionthan would afterload reduction alone. However, the authors calculated
as an analytic function of afterload, bulging volume of the aneurysm, and the constant initial conditions (wall thickness and the elliptical axes of the aneurysmal defect in the ventricular wall, (r1 and r2). Therefore, but for experimental error, it is impossible for
to depend less on afterload than does aneurysmal volume.
Using typical material properties for rubber (Y = 2 x 106 Pa and
= 0.5), a LV wall with an initial thickness of 0.6 cm, and boundary conditions similar to those of the model ventricle described in this study, we used two-dimensional finite element analysis (MATLAB; MathWorks, Natick, MA) to determine the regional stress field in the ventricular wall when loaded with a cavity pressure of 150 mm Hg. The resulting deformation and von Mises stress fields are represented in Figure 1.
|
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |