|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1288-1292
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a College of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
b College of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
c Hartford Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
d Hartford Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
e Hartford Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
f University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy and Rhode Island Hospital Department of Pharmacy, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Accepted for publication September 15, 2003.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Coleman, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Pharmacoeconomic and Outcomes Studies Group, College of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Hartford HospitalDrug Information Center, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
e-mail: ccolema{at}harthosp.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: This was a substudy of a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of an amiodarone regimen or an atrial-septal pacing strategy on the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. The association between the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data from the total study population and the amiodarone and placebo subpopulations were explored using multiple logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The following clinical factors were independent predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation in the total population: age (p < 0.001), history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.021), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.008), and high-dose postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use (p = 0.038). Age (p = 0.016), history of mitral regurgitation (p = 0.029), heart failure (p = 0.010), and postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use (p = 0.038) were independent predictors when amiodarone was used, and age was the only predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.024) among patients treated with placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: This subanalysis demonstrates some novel predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation, including diabetes mellitus and postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use. We have also demonstrated that predictors of atrial fibrillation differ when prophylactic amiodarone is used.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The published literature contains limited data, which demonstrate that certain preoperative and postoperative clinical factors are multivariate predictors of POAF. Only age has consistently been shown to be a multivariate predictor of POAF, although many other factors have been suggested [36]. None of these prospective studies evaluated independent predictors of POAF specifically among patients receiving prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy.
This is a planned subanalysis of the second Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial (AFIST II) [7]. Our subanalysis objective was to determine multivariate predictors of POAF in our total CTS population, in which more than 80% received postoperative ß-blockers, as well as in subgroups of CTS patients randomized to either amiodarone or placebo prophylaxis.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 minutes) were prospectively recorded over 5 postoperative days. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected prospectively. In this analysis, we examined the association between the occurrence of POAF and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data from the study population overall and in the amiodarone and placebo populations separately (univariate analysis). All variables with a p value of less than or equal to 0.2 in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. As with univariate analysis, multivariate regression was performed for the total population and separate amiodarone and placebo subpopulations. Variables that were not identified as univariate predictors of POAF, but which have been previously identified as predictors, were also included into the multivariate model. In the multivariate model, variables were selected by stepwise, backward elimination, and a p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for independent predictors of POAF. All statistics were calculated using SPSS v.11.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
The study was approved by the institutional review board in March 2000, and all enrolled patients provided informed consent before randomization.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
650 mg/d], or ibuprofen [
400 mg/three times daily]), history of diabetes, smoking, angina symptoms, or mitral regurgitation as factors for entry into the multivariate model. These factors, in addition to previously reported predictors (ß-blocker intolerance, history of atrial fibrillation [8], and number of grafts anastamosed [9]) were entered into the multivariate model. From these, the clinical factors found to be independent predictors of POAF in the total population were age (p < 0.001), history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.021), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.008), and high-dose postoperative NSAID use (p = 0.038). Negative predictors of POAF included amiodarone use (p = 0.003), history of angina symptoms (p = 0.017), and number of grafts anastamosed (p = 0.042). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for multivariate predictors are presented in Figure 1.
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Age was the only multivariate predictor of POAF present in the total population as well as in the individual amiodarone and placebo groups. Age was actually the only multivariate predictor in the placebo group. Finding that age is an independent predictor of POAF in the total population is consistent with the available literature [36].
Among those treated with prophylactic amiodarone after CTS, patients with a history of heart failure, mitral regurgitation, or postoperative NSAID use were still at increased risk of developing POAF despite prophylaxis. All three of these factors can contribute to an increase in atrial pressure either through backward blood flow through the mitral valve or through increased sodium and fluid retention. Elevated atrial pressure in experimental models leads to induction of atrial fibrillation [10], and the severity of heart failure is associated with the incidence of atrial fibrillation in nonoperative situations [11]. The use of high-dose NSAIDs may also be an indirect marker of pericarditis, which has also been shown in nonoperative situations to induce atrial fibrillation [12]. The use of high-dose NSAIDs was an independent predictor of POAF in the total population as well.
Diabetes mellitus has not been previously identified as a predictor of POAF but was a predictor in our overall population. Diabetes mellitus has been described as an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation among nonoperative patients in the Framingham Heart Study [13]. One explanation for atrial fibrillation in diabetic patients could be related to autonomic neuropathy. Autonomic neuropathy blunts parasympathetic activity, allowing for a state of relative sympathetic excess [14]. Removal of the parasympathetically innervated aortic fat pad during CTS greatly increased the risk of POAF in one study as compared with patients in whom the fat pad was left intact [15]. This surgical parasympathetic withdrawal could induce POAF similarly to autonomic dysfunction in diabetic patients. Interestingly, diabetes mellitus was not an independent predictor of POAF among patients treated with prophylactic amiodarone. This could be expected as amiodarone has antiadrenergic properties, which could help to rebalance myocardial sympathetic and parasympathetic tone.
The finding that history of angina or preoperative ß-blocker use are negative risk factors could relate to the fact that patients possessing these characteristics might be more likely in the postoperative period to receive adequate doses of ß-blockers. The finding that risk of POAF is decreased with increasing number of grafts anastamosed is opposite to what one might expect [9]. We do not have a solid explanation for this finding. However, it may be possible that history of angina, use of preoperative ß-blockers, and larger number of grafts represent the population not undergoing valve surgery. This would make sense because valvular surgery is associated with greater POAF incidence in several studies.
Identification of patient factors associated with the occurrence of POAF may be important because prophylactic strategies targeted to these patients would have a better risk-benefit profile. Our study has determined that even with standard-of-care ß-blocker prophylaxis there are still potent independent predictors for POAF. The patients receiving the addition of amiodarone to standard-of-care therapy also have several independent predictors of POAF remaining. These patients may be good future targets for additional drug, device, or other prophylactic strategy. Unfortunately, our present study does not determine whether or not amiodarone therapy per se is especially beneficial in higher risk patients or not beneficial with the exclusion of the higher risk patients.
The typical limitations of logistic regression analysis apply to our study. First, the results of a logistic regression analysis are partially dependent on the patient variables that were entered into the model. As such, collection and inclusion of different patient data could have changed the findings of our analysis. However, we used accepted methodology and a reputable statistical software package to analyze our data. Another limitation is that logistic regression only demonstrates an association between the dependent and independent variables and does not demonstrate causality. Therefore, these results should be interpreted cautiously. Although this was a prespecified subanalysis of a larger clinical trial, the primary purpose of our design was not to evaluate indicators of POAF. Therefore, results may have been different if the study had been designed specifically for this purpose. Finally, our sample size was relatively small, which could explain some of the unexpected findings in our analysis.
This multivariate analysis of a large prospective study provides insight into the variables that may predict POAF both in the general CTS population and in those receiving a postoperative amiodarone prophylaxis strategy. Age and disorders or drugs that increase atrial pressures are independent predictors of POAF among patients receiving amiodarone prophylaxis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A Howard and B. J Barnes Potential Use of Statins to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2008; 42(2): 253 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L Baker and C M. White Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Preventive Strategies Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2007; 41(4): 587 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Gillespie, K. A. Gryskiewicz, C. M. White, J. Kluger, C. Humphrey, S. Horowitz, and C. I. Coleman Effect of aprotinin on the frequency of postoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2005; 62(13): 1370 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I Coleman, K. A Perkerson, E. L Gillespie, J. Kluger, R. Gallagher, S. Horowitz, and C M. White Impact of Prophylactic Postoperative {beta}-Blockade on Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery Length of Stay and Atrial Fibrillation Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2004; 38(12): 2012 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |