ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mario Gaudino
Franco Glieca
Nicola Luciani
Gianfederico Possati
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1257-1261
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Skeletonization does not influence internal thoracic artery innervation

Mario Gaudino, MDa*, Amelia Toesca, BSb, Franco Glieca, MDa, Fabiana Girola, MDa, Nicola Luciani, MDa, Gianfederico Possati, MDa

a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
b Institute of Human Anatomy, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

Accepted for publication September 8, 2003.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Gaudino, Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
e-mail: mgaudino{at}tiscali.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the effect of surgical harvesting on internal thoracic artery innervation and to assess the eventual presence of denervation supersensitivity in skeletonized grafts.

METHODS: Nineteen patients who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to receive a skeletonized (n = 9) or pedicled (n = 10) internal thoracic artery graft. Immunohistochemical nerve localization using anti–S-100 protein, anti–160-kd neurofilament polypeptide and anti–tyrosine hydroxylase antibodies was performed on distal specimens of arteries to study vascular innervation. Moreover, endovascular vasoactive challenges using serotonin and methylergometrine were performed at early angiographic control to evaluate the eventual presence of denervation supersensitivity.

RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of immunohistochemical specimens revealed lack of difference in the number of positive cells between skeletonized and pedicled arteries for all the antibodies used. No difference in the reaction to serotonin and methylergometrine was found between skeletonized and pedicled arteries.

CONCLUSIONS: Skeletonization does not influence internal thoracic artery innervation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) is associated with technical and clinical advantages (higher conduit length, increased free flow, and reduced risk of postoperative sternal complications) [15]. However, the skeletonized harvesting is thought to be more traumatic for the conduit, and it is conceivably possible that it can result in damage to the ITA innervation and consequent denervation supersensitivity—a hypothesis that, if revealed true, can have important clinical implications especially in the first postoperative days when use of inotropic and vasoactive drugs can be frequent.

This study was designed to compare the effect of surgical harvesting on ITA innervation in pedicled versus skeletonized arteries and to assess the eventual presence of denervation supersensitivity in skeletonized ITA grafts. All observations were performed during the period in which the functional consequences of the different type of surgical harvesting are likely to be more evident and the clinical implications of denervation supersensitivity would be maximal, the first postoperative days.


    Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and included 19 patients who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between January and December 2002 at our institution.

Preoperative inclusion criteria for enrollment were as follows:

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

After enrollment, patients were randomly assigned to receive a skeletonized (n = 9) or pedicled (n = 10) ITA graft. The main preoperative and intraoperative characteristics of the entire series of patients and of the two subgroups are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Characteristics of Patients

 
Surgical technique
All the procedures were performed by the same surgeon using a technique already described in details and in agreement with the description of Cunningham and associates [6] and Gaudino and colleagues [7].

Briefly, when the ITA was harvested as a pedicled conduit, the left pleura was opened for its entire length and the internal thoracic vessels visualized; a longitudinal incision of the internal thoracic fascia (parallel and medial to the medial mammary vein) was then performed along the entire course of the vessel. The ITA branches were clipped proximally and transected using the electrocautery, and the artery and its pedicle (including the endothoracic fascia and the two satellite veins) were isolated from the origin to the epigastric bifurcation.

When the ITA was isolated in a skeletonized fashion, the pleura was left intact. The longitudinal incision of the fascia was performed as for the pedicled ITA. Using the distal end of the electrocautery as a blunt dissector, the surgeon exposed the branches of the ITA, clipped them distally and proximally, and transected them using Pott's forceps, and the artery was isolated alone, without any other surrounding structure.

The coronary artery bypass grafting procedure was then performed in standard fashion with cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and cardioplegic arrest. The ITA was always anastomosed to the left anterior descending coronary artery by using 8-0 polypropylene suture, and complementary venous or radial artery grafts were used for target vessels other than the left anterior descending coronary artery. At the end of the procedure, normal functioning of the anastomosis was assessed with an intraoperative flowmeter.

Immunohistochemical analysis
For immunohistochemistry samples of ITA were obtained from the distal portion of the conduits immediately after harvesting and before surgical dilatation. According to a described immunohistochemistry protocol [7], tissue samples were immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 24 hours. They were then rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), dehydrated in an ascending series of alcohol, and embedded in paraffin by means of xylene. Five-micrometer serial transverse sections were then cut and processed for Mallory's trichrome method modified according to Azan, hematoxylin and eosin, Unna-Tanzer-Livini stain for elastic fibers staining, or immunohistochemical studies. For immunohistochemical experiments, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.5% H2O2 in absolute methanol for 30 minutes at room temperature; slides were then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (20 minutes at room temperature) and incubated with 3% normal goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (30 minutes at room temperature) to block nonspecific binding. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: rabbit polyclonal anti-S100 protein (1:8000; Dako, Italy), rabbit polyclonal anti–tyrosine hydroxylase (1:6000; Chemicon, CA), monoclonal anti–160-kd neurofilament polypeptide (1:500; Amersham, UK).

S-100 protein is a widely used marker for Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system [8]. The 160-kd neurofilament polypeptide is one of the major components of the neuronal cytoskeleton for most mature neurons [9]. Tyrosine hydroxylase is a marker of all catecholaminergic neurons [10, 11].

Control sections were treated with normal rabbit or mouse immunoglobulins at the same concentration used for primary antibodies.

Reactions were revealed by standard avidin-biotin peroxidase complex procedure (Vectastain Elite ABC kit; Vector, Burlingame, CA) using 3,3' diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma, Italy) as chromogen. Sections were examined under a Zeiss Axiophot (Germany) light microscope.

Quantitative analysis of the immunohistochemical data was performed following a previously described methodology [7]. For quantitative analysis, positive cells for the different antibodies that fell into 35 randomly selected 55-µm squares for each patient were counted using a computerized system. For this purpose, images from immunostained sections were captured using a Sony XC77CCD (Sony Corp, Cypress, CA) camera coupled to a Macintosh IIvX (Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA) computer by means of a Scion LG3 (Scion Corp, Frederick, MD) frame grabber. The number of cells marked was then evaluated on the captured images using the public domain software NIH IMAGE 1.59 (developed at the US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, available from the Internet).

Angiographic protocol
Postoperative angiography was performed on the second postoperative day. No patient received inotropic or vasoactive medications during the 24 hours before the procedure. Patients were studied in a fasting state after medication with diazepam (10 mg orally). Selective left ITA angiography was performed by percutaneous left radial or right femoral approach. Internal thoracic 5F or 6F catheters (Boston Scientific Corp, Boston, MA) were used as appropriate to obtain optimal ITA visualization and selective contrast medium injection.

Multiple angiographic views were obtained to detect significant stenosis at any ITA or left anterior descending coronary artery level. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study flow grade was visually estimated separately by two different observers who were blinded to ITA harvesting technique.

Pharmacologic ITA stimulation was then started with a four-point protocol according to a previously described method [12]:

Serotonin hydrochloride at 10−5 mol/L (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Costa Mesa, CA) was selectively injected into the ITA graft at a rate of 3 mL/min for 3 minutes. At the end of the serotonin challenge, 2 mg of isosorbide dinitrate was injected into the conduit. After a 20-minute period, methylergometrine maleate 0.2 mg (Methergin; Novartis Farma, Varese, Italy) was administered intravenously. Again, at the end of the methylergometrine infusion, 2 mg of isosorbide dinitrate was injected into the graft. Drug infusion was always performed under electrocardiographic and invasive blood pressure monitoring.

At the end of each step of the protocol, a cineangiographic run was performed, keeping a fixed angiographic view. Digital angiograms were then analyzed with computerized quantitative angiography (Medis, Neuen, The Netherlands). For each step of the protocol, two vascular segments were measured in end-diastolic frames after proper catheter calibration: proximal left ITA (just distal to the ostium) and preanastomosis left ITA (proximal to the distal anastomosis).

Statistical analysis
Quantitative angiographic data, expressed in millimeters, were normally distributed and are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance for repeated measures was used to test differences between steps; post hoc comparison was performed by Newman-Keuls test. The Student's t test was used to compare the two groups. Relative (percentage) changes in diameter between the skeletonized and pedicled groups were compared by Fisher's exact test. Analysis was conducted with the software Statistica for Windows 4.1 (StatSoft Inc, Tulsa, OK).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
At the end of surgical harvesting all arteries showed good diameter and flow and were judged acceptable for myocardial revascularization by the operating surgeon. In all cases intraoperative flowmeter measurement testified the normal function of the anastomosis: mean graft flow was 38.7 ± 12.1 mL/min in the skeletonized and 26.2 ± 11.8 mL/min in the pedicled group (p = 0.05).

Microscopic analysis
All transverse sections from each specimen stained by histochemical techniques exhibited similar tissue architecture, and no pathologic changes were noted.

S-100 protein immunostaining revealed the presence of myelinated nerve fibers in all examined specimens. These fibers were usually located in the outer third of the adventitia. Tyrosine hydroxylase–positive and 160-kd neurofilament polypeptide–positive nerves were detected in all arteries, independently from the technique of surgical preparation; these fibers were mainly located in the inner two thirds of the adventitia and in the outer media, below myelinated fibers (Figs 1 and 2).



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. S-100 protein immunoreactivity in longitudinal sections from skeletonized (A) and pedicled (B) internal thoracic artery. S-100 protein immunoreactive nerve fibers are confined to the tunica adventitia. (x150 magnification.)

 


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Immunoreactivity of 160-kd neurofilament polypeptide in longitudinal sections from skeletonized (A) and pedicled (B) internal thoracic artery. Nerve fiber immunoreactivity is present in the inner two thirds of the adventitia and in the outer media. (x75 magnification.)

 
Quantitative analysis revealed a lack of difference in the number of positive cells between skeletonized and pedicled arteries for all the antibodies used (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Number of Positive Cells in Pedicled Versus Skeletonized Group

 
Angiographic results
In all cases early postoperative angiography revealed a patent and normal functioning ITA graft.

There was no difference in the reaction to serotonin, isosorbide dinitrate, and methylergometrine between skeletonized and pedicled ITAs (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Internal Thoracic Artery Response to Vasoactive Challenges in Pedicled Versus Skeletonized Group

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Skeletonization of the ITA allows the preparation of longer conduits, increases basal free flow, renders technically easier the performance of sequential anastomosis or complex arterial grafts, and reduces the incidence of sternal infections and dehiscence [15]. However, the skeletonized harvesting implies a more direct contact with the arterial wall (especially with the adventitial layer where vascular nerves are mainly located) and a more pronounced surgical trauma. Although we and others have shown that this trauma does not affect the vascular wall and, in particular, endothelial integrity [7, 13], concerns still exist about a possible detrimental effect of skeletonization on ITA innervation, and as the importance of the neurogenic vasoreactivity in the ITA has recently been demonstrated [14], the hypothesis that skeletonized ITA can be more prone to the development of denervation supersensitivity cannot be ignored.

This hypothesis, if proven true, can have major clinical implications as the use of inotropic and vasoactive drugs is often required in the early postoperative period and could then be particularly dangerous in presence of "hypersensitive" skeletonized conduits.

To clarify this issue we designed the present protocol and decided to perform our observations during the period when the effect of surgical harvesting is more evident (as no healing process has had time to take place) and, at the same time, the eventual presence of denervation supersensitivity would be more detrimental—the first postoperative days.

Immunohistochemical data denied any influence of skeletonization on ITA innervation, and vasoactive challenges ruled out the possibility of denervation supersensitivity among skeletonized ITAs. The vascular innervation appeared well represented in both skeletonized and pedicled arteries, and, in particular, sympathetic nerve fibers were not affected by the type of surgical harvesting (Figs 1 and 2 and Table 2). Moreover, skeletonized and pedicled grafts exhibited similar reaction to the vasoconstrictive stimuli used in the early postoperative period (Table 3), confirming our previous observations [6] and denying the presence of denervation supersensitivity in skeletonized arteries.

As in every in vivo study on the vasoreactivity of coronary artery bypass graft conduits, it is not possible to rule out the possibility that the observed ITA diameter changes after vasoactive drug administration are the consequences of modifications of the resistance of the grafted coronary artery; however, if this is the case, this adaptive effect is likely to have been present in both the skeletonized and pedicled group and does not seem to have the potential to affect the reliability of our observations. Moreover, our immunohistochemical analysis obviously documents the innervation status at the time of surgery and cannot provide any information on the long-term consequences of the harvesting trauma (although the fact that even the results of the vasoactive tests that were performed some days later showed no differences is somewhat reassuring in this regard). Another possible limitation of our protocol is related to the statistical power; however, despite the fact that with 19 cases the possibility of a type II statistical error cannot be excluded, the fact that all p values were far from statistically significant and the reproducibility of the observations in the different patients seems to reduce to a minimum the possibility of this type of bias.

In conclusion, skeletonization does not influence ITA innervation or induce denervation supersensitivity (at least to the vasoconstrictive stimuli we tested). These observations further confirm the absence of detrimental consequences of ITA skeletonization. Skeletonized ITA can be safely used when judged appropriate.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Enrico Guadagni, Institute of Anatomy, Catholic University, Rome, for technical and photographic assistance.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Gurevitch J., Kramer A., Locker C., et al. Technical aspects of double-skeletonized internal mammary artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:841-846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Parish M.A., Asai T., Grossi E.A., et al. The effect of different techniques of internal mammary artery harvesting on sternal blood flow. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1303-1307.[Abstract]
  3. Wendler O., Tscholl D., Huang Q., Schafers H.J. Free flow capacity of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts in coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:247-250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wimmer-Greinecker G., Yosseef-Hakimi M., Rinne T., et al. Effect of internal thoracic artery preparation on blood loss, lung function, and pain. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1078-1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sofer D., Gurevitch J., Shapira I., et al. Sternal wound infection in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral skeletonized internal mammary arteries. Ann Surg 1999;229:585-590.[Medline]
  6. Cunningham J.M., Gharavi M.A., Fardin R., Meek R.A. Considerations in the skeletonization technique of internal thoracic artery dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:947-950.[Abstract]
  7. Gaudino M., Toesca A., Nori S.L., Glieca F., Possati G. Effect of skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery on vessel wall integrity. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1623-1627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cicero T.J., Cowan W.M., Moore B.W., Suntzeff V. The cellular localization of the two brain specific proteins, S-100 and 14–3-2. Brain Res 1970;18:25-34.[Medline]
  9. Liem R.K.H., Yen S.H., Salomon G.D., Shelanski M.L. Intermediate filaments in nervous tissues. J Cell Biol 1978;79:637-645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gaudino M., Giordano A., Santarelli P., et al. Immunohistochemical scintigraphic correlation of sympathetic cardiac innervation in post-ischemic left ventricular aneurysms. J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:601-607.[Medline]
  11. Vracko R., Thorning D., Frederickson R.G. Nerve fibers in human myocardial scars. Hum Pathol 1991;22:138-146.[Medline]
  12. Gaudino M., Trani C., Glieca F., et al. Early vasoreactive profile of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:638-641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Noera G., Pensa P., Lodi R., et al. Influence of different harvesting techniques on the arterial wall of the internal mammary artery graft: microscopic analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;41:16-20.[Medline]
  14. Canver C.C., Cooler S.D., Saban R. Nueurogenic vasoreactive response of human internal thoracic artery smooth muscle. J Surg Res 1997;72:49-52.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Deja, K. S. Golba, M. Malinowski, S. Wos, M. Kolowca, J. Biernat, M. Kajor, and T. J. Spyt
Skeletonization of internal thoracic artery affects its innervation and reactivity
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 28(4): 551 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. A. Fokin, F. Robicsek, T. N. Masters, A. Fokin Jr, M. K. Reames, and J. E. Anderson Jr
Sternal Nourishment in Various Conditions of Vascularization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1352 - 1357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mario Gaudino
Franco Glieca
Nicola Luciani
Gianfederico Possati
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS