|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:512-517
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
* Address reprint requests to Dr Sie, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Isala Klinieken, Groot Wezenland 20, Zwolle 8011 JW, The Netherlands
e-mail: hauw.sie{at}hccnet.nl
Presented at the Thirty-ninth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 31Feb 2, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Between November 1995 and June 2001, 200 patients with mainly structural heart disease and chronic atrial fibrillation underwent intraoperative radiofrequency linear ablation in both atria with concomitant cardiac surgery.
RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5% (7 patients) and during the mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 12 to 80) 27 patients (13.5%) died. Eight patients (4%) were lost from follow-up and complete data were available in 158 survivors. Sinus or atrial rhythm was present in 116 patients (73.4%) and an atrial driven rhythm in 10 patients (6.3%) with an atrioventricular pacemaker. Atrial fibrillation or flutter was documented in 32 patients (20.3%). Antiarrhythmic drugs were used in 49% of survivors who were free of atrial fibrillation or flutter.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative radiofrequency endocardial ablation is an effective technique to eliminate atrial fibrillation with promising long-term results.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Surgical procedure
In all patients cardiopulmonary bypass was used with standard aortic cannulation, bicaval cannulation, and moderate hypothermia. Part of the radiofrequency maze was performed during crossclamping of the aorta and cardioplegic arrest with cold crystalloid cardioplegia. The radiofrequency maze procedure and postoperative management were described in detail previously [12]. In summary the radiofrequency ablation part of the surgical procedure is as follows: most of the atrial incisions currently used in the Cox maze III were replaced by radiofrequency ablation lines except for two incisions in the right atrium and a standard left atrial incision in Waterston groove and these incisions were used to enter both atrial cavities. Both the right atrial appendage and the left atrial appendage were excised. In redo operations the left atrial appendage was electrically isolated by a circumferential radiofrequency ablation line around the orifice and subsequently closure of the cul-de-sac with polypropylene. In contrast to the Cox maze III the right and left islands of pulmonary veins were isolated separately and interconnected with an additional line in the left atrial roof to preserve the posterior atrial wall in between (Fig 1).
In addition isolation of the coronary sinus at the posterior wall of the left atrium (Fig 1) along with a linear ablation lesion from the tricuspid valve area to inferior vena cava (IVC/TV-isthmus) was performed also (Fig 2).
Postoperative care was similar as for routine cardiac surgery. Postoperative atrial arrhythmias were treated with sotalol 80 to 120 mg daily or amiodarone 200 mg daily and combined with direct-current cardioversion whenever necessary. Antiarrhythmic drugs were tapered gradually after cardiac rhythm was considered stable. Anticoagulation therapy was given for at least 3 months and discontinuation of medication was at the discretion of the referring cardiologist. The presence of atrial contraction as documented by transthoracic and transesophageal Doppler echocardiography was performed at 3 and 6 months after surgery and related to the electrocardiogram. After 6 months patient status was determined yearly by screening records of outpatient visits and correspondence with referring cardiologist.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In other reports on intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of AF during concomitant cardiac surgery, each containing a limited number of patients with a total number of 216 patients, the follow-up ranged from 1 to 19 months [13, 1619]. The authors reported freedom of AF between 76% and 92%. However many patients included in these series had a history either of paroxysmal AF or duration of chronic AF of less than one year. Chua and associates [2] and Obadia and coworkers [7] concluded that in patients with intermittent AF or arrhythmia duration of less than 1 year, mitral valve surgery alone is more likely to restore sinus rhythm in the majority of patients. We included only patients with a history of at least 1 year of AF in whom it is unlikely that sinus rhythm will be restored spontaneously after valve surgery. Another large single center report is from Mohr and associates [20]. They performed radiofrequency ablation of AF, average duration 7.8 ± 5.2 years, in 234 patients with or without structural heart disease (30%). At 12 months of follow-up 69.7% of patients with mitral valve surgery (30 of 43) and 61.9% of patients with other surgical procedures were in sinus rhythm. In our study group sinus or atrial rhythm was present in about 80% of survivors who had had mitral valve related surgery and in as many as 67% in other types of cardiac surgery. In previous reports on the surgical Cox maze procedure in patients with mitral valve diseases recovery of sinus rhythm was reported in 63% to 90% of patients during follow-up that ranged from 12 to 56 months [2124].
Nevertheless there are questions yet to be answered with regard to intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation such as, the 42% freedom from AF in our patients in whom only CABG was performed as the primary reason for surgery, which is much lower than in patients with mitral valve surgery. Pasic [13] concluded that the presence of coronary artery disease influences success rate. Is this finding related to a different type of substrate? In which patients is radiofrequency ablation confined to the left atrium an alternative to the radiofrequency modified maze procedure and what is the best set of ablation lesions in relation to the underlying cardiac disease?
Limitations of the study
One of the limitations with using radiofrequency, microwave, or cryoenergy to treat AF is that it is not possible to verify transmurality of the linear lesions at the time of energy delivery. Electrical activity may still traverse nontransmural lesions created endocardially on the epicardial surface of the atrium or through gaps in the ablation lines. However given that there is no real-time method to document complete conduction block one may speculate on the importance of functional block in these ablation lesions on clinical outcome. The radiofrequency modified maze however simplifies the classic cut-and-sew maze operation with long-term results similar to other reports as discussed in the previous chapter. The results of this observational study with a relatively large number of patients are from a single center performed by one same surgeon and multicenter studies are needed. Almost half of the patients are still on antiarrhythmic drugs at latest follow-up because the decision to cease medication was at the discretion of referring physicians. With regard to patients who underwent nonmitral valve surgery and radiofrequency ablation of AF the limited number of patients do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of this treatment to eliminate the arrhythmia in this particular group of patients.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DR SIE: Well, as you have seen on one of the slides, I mentioned that collateral damage was zero, and I know about the reports of esophageal damage, and I can say that they have been using a different type of energy. First they have been using non-irrigated or dry radiofrequency, secondly they used another lesion pattern: the so called "anchoring" type of ablation, which means that you have to go inside the pulmonary vein and then connect all these pulmonary veins with each other. With non-irrigated or dry radiofrequency energy, to get a transmural lesion you have to use high power settings, and if you do that on the left atrium and going down inside the pulmonary veins, which has a much thinner wall than the atrium itself, one can imagine that the same power setting can easily perforate the PV wall. This is very hard to control. Beside that the PV is in closer vicinity to the esophagus. Whether with or without an echo probe in the esophagus with this technique perforation is more likely to occur. We didn't even have one single perforation and we still keep the esophagus probe in situ during the whole operation.
DR CAMERON: You don't withdraw it?
DR SIE: We don't withdraw it, and we haven't seen any problems until now in over 280 patients.
DR JOSEPH BAVARIA (Philadelphia, PA): I thought this was an outstanding paper and has ramifications on our specialty that are impressive. My question: did all 200 patients get both left atrial and right atrial incisions?
DR SIE: Yes. As I stated in the beginning, I consider the maze procedure as the gold standard and I am much in favor of doing the biatrial full maze. It covers all types of atrial fibrillation and not only the paroxysmal or the near paroxysmal AF, but it covers all, and that is still our philosophy. We only have one chance. I don't want to go back.
DR BAVARIA: Do you have any experience whatsoever with just the left atrial modified RF ablation maze?
DR SIE: No.
DR BAVARIA: And the third question: What were your antiarrhythmic drugs? Were your patients on amiodarone and what was the percentage of patients on amiodarone or other antiarrhythmics in your trial?
DR SIE: The first choice of antiarrhythmic drugs postoperatively is sotalol, and if they cannot tolerate that, we switch over to amiodarone. At the latest follow up approximately 50% are on antiarrhythmic drugs.
DR RICHARD SHEMIN (Boston, MA): I think the great strength of this paper is that you have used a combination of incisions and radiofrequency lesions to perform the Maze procedure as Dr Cox has described it. I would be interested in how much CPB and cross clamp time did it take using this kind of hybrid approach? What was the operative time to do this?
DR SIE: The additional procedure time that we needed, for instance, the left-sided ablation, in the mitral valve procedure when you are supposed to open the left atrium anyway is approximately 14 minutes of extra cross-clamp time. If you do a CABG procedure, of course you have to open up the left atrium additionally and to cut off the left atrial appendage. Then it will be more than that, of course.
DR SHEMIN: Also, did you have a standard time point, like three months postop, when you determined whether the patient was in sinus rhythm or not as your end point?
DR SIE: Yes.
DR SHEMIN: Did you ever see any patient who at that point in time was in sinus rhythm lapse back into atrial fibrillation with further drug manipulation or withdrawal?
DR SIE: Yes. We considered six months as a cutoff point for success or failure, and during the follow-up there were several patients who went back in atrial fibrillation temporarily and reverted into sinus rhythm spontaneously or with electrical cardioversion or with increasing the medication or just by giving back the medication which was abandoned earlier.
DR RALPH DAMIANO (St. Louis, MO): Dr Sie, congratulations on not only a large series and very nice results but continuing to closely follow these patients because I think we are going to learn a lot from what you have done. I recently had the privilege of being able to review the entire Washington University experience, many of which were Dr Cox's patients who underwent the Cox-maze III, and the 10-year success rate with a maze and a concomitant procedure was 97% of patients in sinus rhythm. Your rate is lower than that, and I wonder if you could maybe elucidate for us in the patients who did recur an atrial fibrillation or flutter what were the arrhythmias?
And in looking at those patients, do you think the problem was that you weren't transmural with the lesion, or I wonder if you have been able to identify in your large number of patients what patients were more prone to failure and why?
DR SIE: Well, it is obvious that transmurality is probably the problem that we encountered in some of the patients. I remember some of the patients who had a very thick walled atrium that I was very tempted to do the full Cox-maze, but I didn't do it, and afterwards I regretted that because this patient went into AF very soon after the operation.
I think that transmurality is one of the issues, and there are some reports that indicate that probably transmurality is not necessary to get a conduction block, but in the cases that we had, those were patients with thick or calcified atrial wall or an atrial wall which was covered by thrombi, and probably in those cases it doesn't work very well.
We encountered some patients who had atrial flutter, two of them on the left side around the mitral valve annulus, and probably there was gap in one of the lines and the cardiologist could not terminate that flutter. In four other patients they managed to terminate the flutter because it was on the right side, around the tricuspid valve, and, again, I think it was a problem of a gap in one of the lines.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Louagie, M. Buche, P. Eucher, J.-C. Schoevaerdts, M. Gerard, J. Jamart, and D. Blommaert Improved patient survival with concomitant Cox Maze III procedure compared with heart surgery alone. Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 440 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. Beukema, H. T. Sie, A. R. Ramdat Misier, P. P. H.M. Delnoy, H. J.J. Wellens, and A. Elvan Intermediate to Long-Term Results of Radiofrequency Modified Maze Procedure as an Adjunct to Open-Heart Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1409 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vicol, D. Kellerer, P. Petrakopoulou, I. Kaczmarek, P. Lamm, and B. Reichart Long-term results after ablation for long-standing atrial fibrillation concomitant to surgery for organic heart disease: Is microwave energy reliable? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1156 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. Beukema, H. T. Sie, A. R. R. Misier, P. P. Delnoy, H. J.J. Wellens, and A. Elvan Predictive factors of sustained sinus rhythm and recurrent atrial fibrillation after a radiofrequency modified Maze procedure Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 771 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Onorati, A. Curcio, G. Santarpino, D. Torella, P. Mastroroberto, L. Tucci, C. Indolfi, and A. Renzulli Routine ganglionic plexi ablation during Maze procedure improves hospital and early follow-up results of mitral surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 408 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chaiyaroj, T. Ngarmukos, and P. Lertsithichai Predictors of Sinus Rhythm after Radiofrequency Maze and Mitral Valve Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, August 1, 2008; 16(4): 292 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Onorati, A. Esposito, G. Messina, A. di Virgilio, and A. Renzulli Right Isthmus Ablation Reduces Supraventricular Arrhythmias After Surgery for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 39 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Deneke, K. Khargi, B. Lemke, T. Lawo, M. Lindstaedt, A. Germing, T. Brodherr, L. Bosche, A. Mugge, A. Laczkovics, et al. Intra-operative cooled-tip radiofrequency linear atrial ablation to treat permanent atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2007; 28(23): 2909 - 2914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Gillinov Choice of Surgical Lesion Set: Answers From the Data Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1786 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. El Oumeiri, C. Stefanidis, A. Sabry, M. Antoine, J.-M. De Smet, D. De Canniere, and J.-L. Jansens Long-term follow-up after endocardial radiofrequency modified Nitta procedure for concomitant atrial fibrillation treatment Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2007; 6(3): 319 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Stulak, J. A. Dearani, T. M. Sundt III, R. C. Daly, C. G.A. McGregor, K. J. Zehr, and H. V. Schaff Superiority of cut-and-sew technique for the Cox maze procedure: Comparison with radiofrequency ablation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 1022 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Doty, D. B. Doty, K. W. Jones, J. H. Flores, M. Mensah, B. B. Reid, S. E. Clayson, G. Snow, E. Righter, and R. C. Millar Comparison of standard Maze III and radiofrequency Maze operations for treatment of atrial fibrillation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 1037 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Onorati, M. Bilotta, F. Borrello, M. Vatrano, A. di Virgilio, M. C. Comi, F. Perticone, and A. Renzulli Successful radiofrequency ablation determines atrio-ventricular remodelling and improves systo-diastolic function at tissue Doppler-imaging Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 414 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Shemin, J. L. Cox, A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, and C. R. Bridges Guidelines for Reporting Data and Outcomes for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1225 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Martin-Suarez, B. Claysset, L. Botta, M. Ferlito, D. Pacini, C. Savini, G. Marinelli, and R. DiBartolomeo Surgery for atrial fibrillation with radiofrequency ablation: four years experience Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2007; 6(1): 71 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Badhwar, J. D. Rovin, G. Davenport, J. C. Pruitt, R. R. Lazzara, G. Ebra, and G. H. Dworkin Left Atrial Reduction Enhances Outcomes of Modified Maze Procedure for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation During Concomitant Mitral Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1758 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Giamberti, M. Chessa, S. Foresti, R. Abella, G. Butera, C. de Vincentiis, M. Carminati, L. Menicanti, and A. Frigiola Combined atrial septal defect surgical closure and irrigated radiofrequency ablation in adult patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1327 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jahangiri, G. Weir, K. Mandal, I. Savelieva, and J. Camm Current strategies in the management of atrial fibrillation. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 357 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Rogers, G. D. Angelini, L. A. Culliford, R. Capoun, and R. Ascione Coronary surgery in patients with preexisting chronic atrial fibrillation: early and midterm clinical outcome. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1676 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E.W. Hemels, Y. L. Gu, A. E. Tuinenburg, P. W. Boonstra, A. C.P. Wiesfeld, M. P. van den Berg, D. J. Van Veldhuisen, and I. C. Van Gelder Favorable long-term outcome of maze surgery in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1773 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Barnett and N. Ad Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1029 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Doukas, N. J. Samani, C. Alexiou, M. Oc, D. T. Chin, P. G. Stafford, L. L. Ng, and T. J. Spyt Left Atrial Radiofrequency Ablation During Mitral Valve Surgery for Continuous Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, November 9, 2005; 294(18): 2323 - 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Chen, J.-P. Chang, C.-J. Chen, C.-H. Yang, W. C. Hung, M. Fu, and K.-H. Yeh Atrial Pacemaker Complex Preserved Radiofrequency Maze Procedure Reducing the Incidence of Sick Sinus Syndrome in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2571 - 2575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Gammie, J. C. Laschinger, J. M. Brown, R. S. Poston, R. N. Pierson III, L. G. Romar, K. L. Schwartz, M. J. Santos, and B. P. Griffith A Multi-Institutional Experience With the CryoMaze Procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 876 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ninet, X. Roques, R. Seitelberger, C. Deville, J. L. Pomar, J. Robin, O. Jegaden, F. Wellens, E. Wolner, C. Vedrinne, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with off-pump, epicardial, high-intensity focused ultrasound: Results of a multicenter trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2005; 130(3): 803 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Deneke, K. Khargi, K.-M. Muller, B. Lemke, A. Mugge, A. Laczkovics, A. E. Becker, and P. H. Grewe Histopathology of intraoperatively induced linear radiofrequency ablation lesions in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2005; 26(17): 1797 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chaput, D. Bouchard, P. Demers, L. P. Perrault, R. Cartier, M. Carrier, P. Page, and M. Pellerin Conversion to sinus rhythm does not improve long-term survival after valve surgery: insights from a 20-year follow-up study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 206 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bugge, I. A. Nicholson, and S. P. Thomas Comparison of bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo experimental model Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 28(1): 76 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Halkos, J. M. Craver, V. H. Thourani, F. Kerendi, J. D. Puskas, W. A. Cooper, and R. A. Guyton Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation During Concomitant Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Gillinov, P. M. McCarthy, E. H. Blackstone, J. Rajeswaran, G. Pettersson, J. F. Sabik III, L. G. Svensson, D. M. Cosgrove, K. M. Hill, G. V. Gonzalez-Stawinski, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with bipolar radiofrequency as the primary modality J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2005; 129(6): 1322 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Lang, V. Santinelli, G. Augello, A. Ferro, F. Gugliotta, S. Gulletta, G. Vicedomini, C. Mesas, G. Paglino, S. Sala, et al. Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve prostheses and enlarged atria: Safety, feasibility, and efficacy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2005; 45(6): 868 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Dora, P. K. Varma, C. Parija, K. Nair, R. Sreedhar, K. S. Neelakandhan, and J. Tharakan Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia after radiofrequency maze procedure: Report of two cases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 446 - 447. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |