|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:2169-2170
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Knightsbridge Wing, St. George's Hospital, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 OQT, United Kingdom, UK,
e-mail: mazin.sarsam{at}stgeorges.nhs.uk
To the Editor:
I appreciate the interest shown by Dr Maxwell and colleagues in my article [1]. We are all aware of the enormous contribution of Professor Duran to the field of mitral valve repair. The purpose of the article, which was focused solely on the technique of inserting artificial chordae and determining their length, was to assist practicing surgeons in this field. The technique is similar but not identical to the one described by Duran [2] in that the anchoring of the suture to the papillary muscle is different, as is anchoring the suture to the edge of the anterior leaflet. However, the principle for measuring the length of the chordae is the same.
Since publication, the technique has been modified in that my associates and I no longer use a single suture but two simple sutures to approximate the anterior and posterior mitral valve leaflets, one on each side of the double-armed Gore-Tex suture. This prevents the Gore-Tex suture from sliding and produces a more accurate length.
Soon after my article was published, I received an e-mail from Dr Robert Frater, who pioneered the technique of polytetra+fluoroethylene artificial chordae. He brought to my attention the first time the principle by which chordal length is determined was reported [3], and I later found a reference to the same principle in a discussion on deciding how to shorten an elongated chorda by Dr Frater [4].
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |