ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Harald Hausmann
Miralem Pasic
Roland Hetzer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potapov, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potapov, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:2112-2114
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


How to do it

New approach in treatment of acute cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support

Evgenij V. Potapov, MDa*, Yuguo Weng, MD, PhDa, Harald Hausmann, MDa, Michael Kopitz, ECCPa, Miralem Pasic, MD, PhDa, Roland Hetzer, MD, PhDa

a Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Accepted for publication March 28, 2003.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Potapov, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
e-mail: potapov{at}dhzb.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
In 12 patients with acute cardiogenic shock who required mechanical circulatory support a short-term Abiomed BVS 5000 extracorporeal assist device was implanted using the inflow and outflow cannulas of the BerlinHeart extracorporeal assist device. In 7 patients suitable for long-term support the Abiomed pumps were later exchanged for BerlinHeart pumps. This approach avoids the risks associated with repeat sternotomy and use of cardiopulmonary bypass and decreases the total costs of patient care.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
In patients with acute cardiogenic shock a cost-effective short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) system is beneficial and can be implanted in a nontransplanting center. However, prediction of outcome is still an unsolved question. Some patients will have multiorgan failure caused by preoperative low cardiac output and die despite adequate circulatory support. In other patients MCS leads to organ recovery and in some patients sustained myocardial recovery occurs.

In patients with organ recovery without myocardial recovery a long-term MCS is necessary as a bridge to transplantation or as a permanent support [1, 2]. Usually, establishing long-term support in these patients involves repeat sternotomy and use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for the exchange of the cannulas, with consequently increased risk for bleeding and infection. In addition the use of two different systems leads to extensive costs. We report a new approach whereby the pumps from the Abiomed BVS 5000 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) short-term assist device are combined with cannulas from the BerlinHeart (BerlinHeart AG, Berlin, Germany) long-term assist device as a first step. If the patient is a suitable candidate for long-term MCS, in the second step exchange of the Abiomed pumps for a BerlinHeart pump was performed in the intensive care unit without repeated sternotomy and use of CPB.


    Technique
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Median sternotomy and cannulation for CPB are performed in the usual manner. In patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock the previously established CPB is continued. The left atrial or left ventricular inflow and aortic outflow cannulas from an extracorporeal, pneumatically driven BerlinHeart assist device are implanted. If biventricular support is necessary right atrial and pulmonary artery cannulas are also implanted. The cannulas are brought through the diaphragm and the skin below the costal arch as described elsewhere [3]. Next the Abiomed BVS 5000 pump is connected to the BerlinHeart cannulas using conventional Abiomed connectors. If a 16-mm apex cannula from the BerlinHeart is used, the 5/8" x 1.5" connector (Polystan, Varlose, Denmark) is introduced between the cannula and the inflow of the Abiomed pump. Once the device fully supports the circulation, CPB is weaned and the right ventricle (if only left ventricular support was established) is supported by low doses of epinephrine and nitric oxide (NO) inhalation of 40 ppm. The heparin is reversed using protamine, two mediastinal tubes are inserted, and the sternotomy is closed in the usual manner.

If only left ventricular support is established, measures to minimize the risk of right ventricular heart failure are initiated, following the standard management. These measures consist of use of NO, restrictive fluid replacement, and restrictive catecholamine use to maintain cardiac output at a level not higher than that necessary for adequate organ perfusion [4]. Anticoagulation therapy with heparin was started 6 hours after cessation of bleeding and the anticoagulation management was performed in accordance with our institutional protocol [5]. To assess the myocardial recovery, echocardiographic studies were performed daily and MCS weaning was performed by reduction of the flow by 0.5 L every 30 minutes until 2 L/min was achieved. The hemodynamic situation was considered stable if under minimal inotropic drug support no increase or only a slight increase of wedge and central venous pressures and no decrease of perfusion pressure or cardiac output occurred.

If during the first 2 weeks of support the weaning attempts were unsuccessful, it was evaluated whether the patient was a candidate for long-term assist device support. The evaluation took into consideration age, neurologic status, signs of systemic infection, organ function, and social situation. If the patient was a suitable candidate for long-term MCS, pump exchange was performed on the intensive care unit. The BerlinHeart pump was primed with sterile saline solution and connected to the drive console. A heparin bolus of 5,000 IE was administered intravenously before pump stop. During the procedure the patient was slightly sedated with a short-acting hypnoticum. After disinfection of the skin and cannulas the Abiomed assist device was stopped, the left-side inflow and outflow cannulas clamped, and the connectors and the Abiomed pump removed from the BerlinHeart cannulas. In the next step the BerlinHeart pump was connected to the cannulas, the clamps removed, and the BerlinHeart assist device started. In patients with biventricular support the same procedure was performed for the right side.

The pump exchange for each side takes approximately 2 to 3 minutes. If necessary, catecholamines were given intravenously as a bolus to maintain stable arterial pressure and cardiac output. In patients with biventricular support the frequency of the counterpump was slowed during the exchange procedure. After the pump exchange the patients were mobilized and weaned from the respirator.

A 28-year-old woman was admitted under cardiopulmonary resuscitation that had lasted for 2 hours for intractable ventricular arrhythmia caused by acute myocarditis. She presented with wide, fixed pupils and no central reflexes were detected. After a short period of stabilization (with QRS complexes >0.8 s) ventricular fibrillation developed. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was again initiated and she was transferred to the operating room where biventricular support was established as described. The patient regained consciousness without any neurologic deficits and the switch to a BerlinHeart pump was performed on the third postoperative day; she was extubated on the next day. Unfortunately after discharge she suffered from intracerebral bleeding and died on the 37th postoperative day.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Between April 2001 and May 2002 the Abiomed BVS 5000 was implanted using BerlinHeart cannulas in 12 patients (10 male). In 5 patients MCS was established in a left ventricular and in 7, in a biventricular configuration. The mean age was 53.4 years (range, 28.6 to 65.6). In 7 patients the implantation was performed for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (in 3 patients after aortic valve replacement for acute endocarditis, in 2 patients after emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction, in 1 patient after double valve replacement, and in 1 patient after mitral valve repair). In patients without previous cardiac surgery the implantation was performed for acute myocardial infarction in 2 patients, cardiogenic shock due to intractable ventricular arrhythmia in 1 patient, and dilated cardiomyopathy because of an unclear neurological situation after prolonged resuscitation in 1 and prolonged severe multiorgan failure in 1 patient.

No myocardial recovery occurred after MCS implantation. In 5 patients profound multiorgan failure occurred despite adequate circulatory support and they died after a median period of 2 days (range, 2 to 17). In 7 patients circulatory support led to recovery of organ function and the patients were judged to be candidates for long-term support. The conversion to BerlinHeart was performed after a median period of 6 days (range, 2 to 13). Six of them were weaned from the ventilator and survived for more than 30 days.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The presented combination of cost-effective short-term and more expensive long-term MCS leads to reduced surgical risk and decreased cost.

Profound acute cardiogenic shock continues to occur in 2% to 6% of cardiac surgical patients and is an important issue for patients with acute myocardial infarction or acute myocarditis. Clinical experience shows the importance of appropriate patient selection and early MCS implantation in these patients [1, 2]. However the most challenging issue concerning short-term MCS is the inability to predict sustained myocardial recovery and recovery of organ function. Approximately 50% of patients requiring short-term MCS are suitable candidates for long-term support. However, bleeding infections and multiorgan failure are major complications in patients after MCS implantation [2, 69]. The conventional technique for conversion to long-term support in these patients involves repeated sternotomy and the use of CPB with subsequently increased risk for infection. Exchange of the cannulas causes additional trauma of the fragile myocardium with increased risk for bleeding. Avoiding these procedures by using the approach presented may therefore lead to significant reduction of life-threatening postoperative complications [8]. Furthermore the larger size of the BerlinHeart inflow cannulas increases blood flow up to 6 L/min provided by the Abiomed device.

Appropriate timing is important for the decision-making process. In all patients myocardial recovery should be assessed daily and the decision on further treatment taken in the first 10 days to reduce the risk of thrombosis of the Abiomed pump with subsequent need for exchange [2].

High costs are the other major concern in the use of MCS. Although the cannulas and pumps of the BerlinHeart device are more expensive than those of Abiomed our analysis showed a significant cost reduction if the new approach was used, while the risk from surgery was reduced and the outcome improved. The additional costs for patients who died result from the use of BerlinHeart instead of Abiomed cannulas. However, in patients in whom the Abiomed pumps are exchanged for Berlin Heart pumps more costs are saved by avoiding a repeat surgical procedure to exchange cannulas. These include the cost of the operating room, CPB use, and additional personnel and equipment. Furthermore this approach could be applied in nontransplanting centers or those using Thoratec VAD cannulas (L. Samuels, M. Loebe, personal communications) with an option for subsequent transfer to a hub center where the conversion to a long-term assist device can be performed [1]. In addition the approach also allows implantation of a left ventricular support system using a left thoracotomy in patients with a previous median sternotomy [10].

The presented approach is suitable for emergency procedures but it should be avoided if fast myocardial recovery is not expected (eg, unsuccessful surgical procedure or chronic heart failure), if the patient primarily fulfilled the criteria for an implantable left ventricular assist device (Novacor, TCI, DeBakey VAD), or if the implantable device is scheduled for use as a long-term support in a second step [1].

We believe that the approach presented leads to decreased risk for infection and bleeding, faster recovery of patients, and significant reduction of costs. Furthermore, this approach could be established in nontransplanting centers and the use of cannulas from other extracorporeal devices (Thoratec) could be taken into consideration.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We would like to thank Anne M. Gale of the Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin for editorial assistance.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Goldstein D.J., Oz M.C. Mechanical support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;12:220-228.[Medline]
  2. Samuels L.E., Holmes E.C., Thomas M.P., et al. Management of acute cardiac failure with mechanical assist: experience with the ABIOMED BVS 5000. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(Suppl):67-85.
  3. Drews T., Loebe M., Hennig E., Kaufmann F., Muller J., Hetzer R. The ’Berlin Heart’ assist device. Perfusion 2000;15:387-396.[Free Full Text]
  4. Potapov E.V., Sodian R., Loebe M., Drews T., Dreysse S., Hetzer R. Revascularization of the occluded right coronary artery during left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:918-922.[Medline]
  5. Koster A., Loebe M., Hansen R., et al. Alterations in coagulation after implantation of a pulsatile Novacor LVAD and the axial flow MicroMed DeBakey LVAD. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:533-537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Holman W.L., Skinner J.L., Waites K.B., Benza R.L., McGiffin D.C., Kirklin J.K. Infection during circulatory support with ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:711-716.
  7. McBride L.R., Naunheim K.S., Fiore A.C., Moroney D.A., Swartz M.T. Clinical experience with 111 thoratec ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1233-1239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Myers TJ, Khan T, Frazier OH. Infectious complications associated with ventricular assist systems. ASAIO J 2000;46:S28–36
  9. Frazier O.H., Rose E.A., McCarthy P., et al. Improved mortality and rehabilitation of transplant candidates treated with a long-term implantable left ventricular assist system. Ann Surg 1995;222:327-338.[Medline]
  10. Pasic M., Bergs P., Hennig E., Loebe M., Weng Y., Hetzer R. Simplified technique for implantation of a left ventricular assist system after previous cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:562-564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Stamm, B. Nasseri, and R. Hetzer
Rescue versus regeneration.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2007; 134(4): 1095 - 1096.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Etz, H. Welp, H. H. Scheld, and C. Schmid
Near fatal infection of a patient with a left ventricular assist device due to unrecognized fetal death
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 722 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Loisance
Mechanical circulatory support systems--future opportunities
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 26(Suppl_1): S48 - S53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Harald Hausmann
Miralem Pasic
Roland Hetzer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potapov, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potapov, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS