ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Lars G. Svensson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, L. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1751-1753
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


How to do it

Sizing for modified david’s reimplantation procedure

Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhDa*

a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Center for Aortic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Accepted for publication February 14, 2003.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Svensson, Center for Aortic Surgery, Marfan Syndrome and Connective Tissue Disorders Clinic, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk F25, Cleveland, OH, USA 44195
e-mail: svenssl{at}ccf.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Comment
 References
 
The problem of sizing the graft, annulus, and left ventricular outflow tract for the David reimplantation type of aortic valve preserving procedure remains a concern, particularly in patients with Marfan syndrome. To resolve this issue, a modified method used in over 20 patients is described of doing the repair around a Hegar’s dilator. In essence, the size chosen is according to the patient’s normalized annular size based on body surface area. This technique also creates a neosinus in the root.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Comment
 References
 
David and Feindel [1] described the technique of mobilizing the aortic valve and the left ventricular outflow tract and then inserting the valve within a tube graft to preserve the aortic valve in patients undergoing aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysm repairs. The David aortic valve reimplantation procedure for preserving the aortic valve has been found to be durable on midterm follow-up, including in those patients with Marfan syndrome [1, 2]. The difficulty however, has been to choose the correct-sized polyester tube graft for inserting the aortic valve into. Suggestions for sizing, based on the estimated length of the leaflets free margins and the predicted size at the sinotubular ridge, have been difficult to implement.

Thus, a method is described here whereby the patient’s expected normal left ventricular outflow tract size is used for choosing a Hegar’s dilator of the equivalent size and then tying the graft around the dilator. The left ventricular outflow tract and annular size is based on the patient’s calculated body surface area.


    Technique
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Comment
 References
 
The technique used for the David reimplantation procedure is similar to that previously described by David (Figs 1–3) [1, 2]. The aorta is opened and the aortic valve mobilized by cutting the aorta between the valve annulus and the coronary arteries in the two coronary sinuses, and, in the noncoronary sinus, cutting along the annulus, leaving a sufficient margin for sewing the valve into the tube graft. Nine or 10 pledgeted sutures are usually placed in the left ventricular outflow tract from inside to the outside (Fig 1), although the illustration shows more than necessary in most patients.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Mobilized left ventricular outflow tract and aortic valve with pledgeted sutures being passed from the left ventricular outflow tract and through the aortic graft. Note the graft is beveled for the septum.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Tying the sutures around the Hegar’s dilator.

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Completed repair with neosinus and neosinotubular ridge.

 
A Hegar’s dilator is then chosen according to the expected normal size of the left ventricular outflow tract based on the patient’s body surface area. Thus, for a man with a body surface area of 1.5 m2 a 19-mm Hegar’s dilator is used; for 2.0 m2 a 21-mm Hegar’s; and for 2.5 m2 a 23-mm Hegar’s dilator. For females the size is downsized by 2 mm. Thus, for example, a woman with a 2.0 m2 body surface area requires use of a 19-mm Hegar’s dilator.

For most men a 28- or 30-mm diameter collagen-coated polyester graft is used for the aortic replacement while, for women, a 26- or 28-mm graft is usually required. The left ventricular outflow tract sutures are then passed through the polyester graft after the proximal end has been beveled for the ventricular septum. Next, the Hegar’s dilator is then placed in the left ventricular outflow through the aortic valve and the sutures are then tied down around the Hegar’s dilator (Fig 2). This technique has the effect of crimping the proximal polyester graft down to the appropriate size and at the same time a new neosinus is created above the left ventricular outflow tract where the polyester graft is typically 7 to 9 mm larger.

Next, the aortic valve is sewn into position within the polyester graft in the usual manner except the anchoring sutures at the top of the commissures are placed approximately 4 mm apart, thus, also crimping and narrowing the graft at the neosinotubular junction (Fig 3). As long as the graft segment above the neosinotubular ridge is not too long, sewing the valve into place is not restricted. The valve is tested by infusing cardioplegia under pressure into the cross-clamped graft. Generous openings are made for the coronary ostia to allow for some elasticity in the neosinus and in case of reoperation. Once the coronary arteries have been reattached to the neosinuses, the repair is usually completed with a separate tube graft between the ascending aorta graft and aortic arch (Figs 1–3).


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Comment
 References
 
The modified technique for doing the David reimplantation procedure is a useful method of ensuring both that the valve is competent and that aortic valve stenosis does not occur. We have found the David reimplantation procedure to be particular useful in patients with Marfan syndrome, as David has described [1, 2], and also for patients with 3 or 4+ aortic valve regurgitation. Often in these latter patients the leaflets also need to be repaired or the interleaflet angle at the commissures needs to be narrowed.

For those patients, in whom the aortic valve regurgitation is not severe or who have a bicuspid aortic valve, and who do not have Marfan syndrome, we prefer aortic valve remodeling operations. Initially we used the techniques described by David [1, 2] for remodeling, and also by Yacoub [3], but more recently a technique we [4] have described. With careful selection of valve-preserving techniques in 99 patients in conjunction with ascending aorta or aortic arch repairs, we needed to reoperate on 2 remodeling patients because of aortic valve regurgitation, although our follow-up was relatively short. One patient died after surgery (1.0%).

While good early results can be obtained with appropriate valve repair and remodeling or reimplantation operations, late follow-up will be required. Because patients’ ventricles that are hypertrophied or dilated will likely remodel after surgery, the effect of normalizing the left ventricular outflow tract and annulus will need to be followed. The benefits for the patients are that they do not usually require blood thinners and the risk of stroke or endocarditis may also be less in a patient with a native valve as compared with a prosthetic valve [4].

In conclusion, one of the main advantages of this modified David approach is that reimplantation of the valve is more reproducible, particularly because we believe that the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with aneurysmal dilatation of the root is abnormal. Also, reducing the size is a important element in ensuring valve competence, apart from bringing the commissures back into normal alignment and reducing the interleaflet commissure angle. The left ventricular outflow tract is a critical component in repairing and establishing a functioning valve. By crimping and pleating the graft down to a Hegar’s dilator size, the neosinuses of Valsalva that are created probably aid in the normal valvular function and may also reduce the risk of wear and tear on the leaflets in the long term. This neosinus allows for blood to circulate within the sinuses and aid in coaptation of the leaflets during diastole. Creation of a neosinotubular ridge may also further assist in establishing aortic valve competence. Using this technique, we have not had a patient with more than 1+ aortic valve regurgitation in over 20 patients.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Technique
 Comment
 References
 

  1. David T.E., Feindel C.M. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:617-621.[Abstract]
  2. Tambeur L., David T.E., Unger M., Armstrong S., Ivanov J., Webb G. Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:415-419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yacoub M.H., Gehle P., Chandrasekaran V., Birks E.J., Child A., Radley-Smith R. Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:1220-1221.[Free Full Text]
  4. Svensson L.G., Longoria J., Kimmel W.A., Nadolny E. Management of aortic valve disease during aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:778-784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. Labrousse, M. Montaudon, S. Black, and C. Deville
Right Coronary Sinus Fixation Through a Right Ventriculotomy for David's Procedure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 2150 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Maselli, R. De Paulis, R. Scaffa, L. Weltert, A. Bellisario, A. Salica, and A. Ricci
Sinotubular Junction Size Affects Aortic Root Geometry and Aortic Valve Function in the Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedure: An In Vitro Study Using the Valsalva Graft
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1214 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. G. Svensson, E. H. Blackstone, J. Feng, D. de Oliveira, A. M. Gillinov, M. Thamilarasan, R. A. Grimm, B. Griffin, D. Hammer, T. Williams, et al.
Are Marfan Syndrome and Marfanoid Patients Distinguishable on Long-Term Follow-Up?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1067 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Maselli, F. Guarracino, P. Bajona, L. Bellieni, and G. Minzioni
Adjustable Sinotubular Junction for Aortic Valve Reimplantation Procedures
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 700 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Maselli, G. Borelli, A. Amerini, P. Bajona, L. Bellieni, M. Croccia, and G. Minzioni
The ideal theoretical graft oversizing in valve-sparing aortic operations with a standard tubular or a Valsalva graft
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 28(6): 845 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. G. Svensson and E. R. Rodriguez
Aortic Organ Disease Epidemic, and Why Do Balloons Pop?
Circulation, August 23, 2005; 112(8): 1082 - 1084.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Maselli, A. Montalto, G. Santise, G. Minardi, C. Manzara, and F. Musumeci
A normogram to anticipate dimension of neo-sinuses of valsalva in valve-sparing aortic operations
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 831 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. G. Svensson
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 2216 - 2216.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Cartier and M. Chaput
Annulus Sizing in Aortic Remodeling Procedure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 2215 - 2216.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Lars G. Svensson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, L. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS