|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:659-660
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 32-36 Rue des Moulins Gémeaux, 93200 St Denis, France
e-mail: alattar{at}ifrance.com
To the Editor:
I read with interest the article by Sakaguchi and associates [1] on flow reserve in composite arterial Y grafts. The authors conclude that myocardial coronary flow reserve (CFR) in these grafts is not as effective as independent grafts soon after coronary artery bypass grafting. This study carries an important message, especially with the current trends in myocardial revascularization towards exclusive use of arterial grafts.
The authors compared a Y graft versus an independent group, but used a variety of arterial grafts in each, resulting in heterogeneous, small-sized subgroups. Furthermore, whereas positron emission tomographic scan demonstrated significant differences in CFR between groups, this was not associated with any clinical or biochemical (ie, creatine kinase) manifestations. The evaluation took place 2 weeks after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
The use of the internal mammary artery (IMA) in Y grafting should probably be considered separately. Hanet and associates have shown that the vasomotor tone of IMAs responds to myocardial flow demand (induced by tachycardia) by consequent dilatation (compared with venous grafts) [2]. I agree with the authors that the radial and gastroepiploic arteries are muscular arteries with a high propensity to spasm, even though recent work has shown that skeletonized radial arteries harvested with ultrasonic scalpel have improved angiographic results. But the authors advise against composite grafting with the IMAs for fear of flow competition [3]. Nevertheless, the use of the radial artery in composite Y grafts has not adversely affected clinical outcomes in another series of 490 patients [4].
Finally, no less than 12% of IMAs have been shown to increase diameter by 20% to 50% up to 5 years after CABG [2], and the increase in flow is not only due to an increase in velocity [5]. This suggests that the flow rates in Y grafts are probably more dependant on the severity of obstruction in the native coronary arteries grafted than the artery chosen for creating the Y graft, and that flow could be expected to improve with time.
As with bilateral IMA grafting, the evidence of improved patency rates and superior long-term results with arterial conduits will require cohorts in randomized trials with long-term follow-up.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Al-Ruzzeh, M. Bustami, T. Athanasiou, S. George, C. Ilsley, and M. Amrani A Technical Failure Changes a Y-graft into a C-conduit Causing Steal Syndrome Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2006; 14(2): 155 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |