|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:90-98
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Accepted for publication February 4, 2003.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Pacini, c/o Unità Operativa di Cardiochirurgia, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
e-mail: dpacini{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Between October 1978 and May 2001, 274 patients (79.6% male and 20.4% female) with a mean age of 53.5 years underwent composite graft replacement of the aortic root. One hundred sixty-one patients (70.8%) had annuloaortic ectasia and 46 (16.8%) aortic dissection. The classic Bentall technique was used in 94 patients (34.3%), the "button technique" in 172 patients (62.8%), and the Cabrol technique in 8 patients (2.9%).
RESULTS: The early mortality rate was 6.9% (19 of 274 patients). Cardiopulmonary bypass time longer than 180 minutes and associated coronary artery bypass grafting were found to be independent risk factors of early mortality. The actuarial survival rate was 77.7% at 5 years and 63% at 10 years. The independent risk factors for late mortality were coronary artery disease, chronic renal failure, and postoperative dialysis. The actuarial freedom from reoperation on the remaining aorta was higher among patients without Marfan syndrome (94.6% versus 79.6% at 10 years, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Composite valve graft replacement can be performed with low hospital mortality and morbidity. The button technique offers some advantages and should be used whenever possible. In case of acute aortic dissection root replacement is usually not necessary. Marfan patients should be treated with early root replacement before dissection occurs.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most common indication for operation was annuloaortic ectasia (161 patients, 58.8%). Thirty-nine patients (14.2%) had previously undergone surgical intervention on the aortic valve or ascending aorta or both. They required reoperation because of progressive dilatation of the Valsalva sinuses in 34, prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis in 4, and acute aortic dissection in 1. The patients profiles are reported in Table 1.
|
For the first 94 patients (34.3%) the classic Bentall operation [1] with inclusion and wrapping technique was used. In 1994 the Bentall procedure was abandoned in favor of the "button technique" [24]. Since then it has been used in 172 patients (62.8%). The coronary reimplantation suture lines were rarely reinforced externally with a Teflon strip. The Cabrol technique [5, 6]was used in 8 patients (2.9%). This method of coronary reimplantation was utilized only in case of extreme aortic dilatation or reoperation because of difficult mobilization and approximation of coronary arteries to the aortic graft.
In case of acute aortic dissection a hemiarch replacement was usually performed using the open technique. Nevertheless 3 patients required a total arch replacement. In 4 patients the dissection was limitated to the ascending aorta and a closed distal anastomosis was performed. The continuity between the separated layers of the aorta was restored using gelatin-resorcine-formaldehyde glue (GRF) and the distal anastomosis was furtherly reinforced with an inner and outer felt strip of Teflon.
Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 23 patients (8.4%), mitral valve replacement in 5 (1.8%), extra-anatomic aorto-aortic bypass in 2, and atrial septal defect repair in 1. Thirty-one patients (11.3%) had associated aortic arch replacement.
Cerebral protection was obtained with deep hypothermia with circulatory arrest (DHCA) in 15 patients, DHCA and retrograde cerebral perfusion in 1, and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion with moderate systemic hypothermia in 26 [7]. Mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was 153 ± 49.1 minutes (range, 92 to 425), and mean aortic cross-clamp time was 106.6 ± 32.4 minutes (range, 55 to 305).
A Björk-Shiley composite graft prosthesis (Shiley Inc., Irvine, CA) was used in 80 patients (29.2%); a Sorin composite graft (Sorin Biomedica S.P.A., Saluggia, Italy) in 56 (20.4%); a St. Jude composite graft (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN) in 35 (12.8%); a Carbomedics composite graft (Carbomedics Inc., Austin, TX) in 70 (25.6%); and an ATS (ATS Medical Inc., Minneapolis, MN) in 33 (12%).
Follow-up
Of all hospital survivors, 239 (93.7%) were available for follow-up in intervals ranging from 3 months to 265 months (mean, 62.7) with a total of 1,431 patients-years. Follow-up information was obtained by our direct examination or by correspondence with the patient. The date of last inquiry was between May and October 2001. Postoperative complications were analyzed according to the "Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations" [8].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 8.0 Statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD and were compared with unpaired two-tailed t test. Categorical variables were analyzed with a
2 test or Fishers exact test where appropriate. All variables that achieved p less than 0.2 in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate model and examined by stepwise logistic regression for early mortality, and Cox multivariate analysis for late mortality. All variables analyzed are shown in Table 2.
Survival and event-free data were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier actuarial techniques for estimation of survival probabilities and compared with log-rank tests.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fifteen patients (5.5%) sustained respiratory insufficiency requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (more than 48 hours). Sepsis occurred in 15 patients (5.5%) and was associated with an increased risk of early mortality (p = 0.014). Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis observed in 9 patients (3.3%) was associated with a higher mortality rate (44.4% compared with 5,7%; p = 0.002). Nine patients (3.3%) required rethoracotomy for bleeding: 6 (5.9%) underwent the classic Bentall or Cabrol procedure and 3 (1.7%), the button technique. Permanent neurologic deficits developed in 4 patients (1.5%).
Late mortality
There have been 57 late deaths (22.3%). The main cause of death was chronic heart failure. The other causes of late death are listed in Table 4.
Overall actuarial survival of the 274 patients is shown in Figure 1.
The survival rate was 77.7% at 5 years, 63% at 10 years, and 33.4% at 20 years. The survival rate of the patients with Marfan syndrome was lower than that for the remaining patients (61.9% versus 58.8% and 57.7% versus 29.4% at 10 and 15 years respectively) but the difference was not significant (p = 0.785; Fig 2A).
Moreover Marfan patients with dissection demonstrated a 10-year survival of only 42.2% ± 13.4% whereas no-dissection Marfan patients demonstrated a long-term survival of 64% ± 26.3%.
|
|
|
Univariate analysis (Table 5) showed a significant association between late death and NYHA III-IV (p = 0.004) associated coronary artery disease (p = 0.05), endocarditis (p = 0.031), chronic renal insufficiency (p = 0.032), and postoperative dialysis (p = 0.028).
|
Late morbidity
Thromboembolic events (TE) occurred in 9 patients (3.3%) and all of them had a stroke. Two patients died. The linearized rate of TE was 0.63/100 patient-years. Figure 3A
shows the actuarial freedom from TE. At 15 years the actuarial freedom from TE was 90.9% ± 3.1%.
|
In 5 patients (1.8%) prosthetic valve endocarditis developed (1 early and 4 late). Two patients underwent reoperation (1 died) and 3 were treated with medical therapy (1 survivor). The linearized risk per 100 patient-years of prosthetic valve endocarditis (early and late) was 0.35. The actuarial freedom from endocarditis is shown in Figure 4A.
|
Thromboemboic events, anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, prosthetic valve endocarditis, and reoperations for pseudoaneurysms were reviewed to evaluate overall valve graft-related morbidity. The actuarial estimate of percentage of patients free of any valve graft-related complications is shown in Figure 5.
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our retrospective analysis confirms, in agreement with other recent reports [1417], that this surgical procedure presents a low operative risk. We found CPB time longer than 180 minutes and associated CABG to be independent risk factors of early mortality.
In 1994 we abandoned the original Bentall operation with the inclusion technique and introduced the button technique [24] with several features that may reduce the incidence of early and late complications. Hemostasis may be improved by avoiding aortic wall wrapping. Since this modification repeat thoracotomy for bleeding has been reduced from 5.9% to 1.7%. Other factors such as the use of preclotting woven aortic graft, improved surgeon experience, and more accurate use of eparine and protamine may have contributed to the reduction of intraoperative bleeding.
The button technique without complete aortic wall wrapping may prevent late pseudoaneurysm formation [24] secondary to dehiscence of the suture line of the aortic annulus, distal graft anastomosis, or mainly at the coronary ostial anastomosis particularly at the left coronary ostium in patients with Marfan syndrome or with aortic dissection [12, 18]. Kouchoucos and associates [3] have suggested that blood accumulation within the wrapped perigraft space results in increased tension on the anastomosis when the inclusion and wrap technique is used. We also believe that the circumferential resection of the distal part of the ascending aorta reinforced with two Teflon strips can reduce the stress along the suture line between composite prosthesis and aorta.
We rarely performed coronary reimplantation according to the Cabrol technique [5, 6]; it was used for patients who had undergone reoperation or for cases of extreme aortic dilatation because of difficult mobilization and approximation of the coronary arteries to the aortic graft. One of the greatest technical difficulties with this technique is the sizing and orienting of the graft between the right and left main coronary arteries to prevent kinking and subsequent myocardial ischemia or infarction. In our experience it was associated with a high early mortality rate (3 of 8, 37.5%) and a high incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. Therefore since 1994 we have not used the Cabrol technique, and detachment and mobilization of the coronary arteries could be easily performed using the button technique.
As cardiovascular manifestations are the most important causes of death among Marfan patients, the survival of these patients depends on the prevention and control of these complications. A recent study [19] showed life expectancy improvement among patients with Marfan syndrome who had undergone surgical repair for aortic aneurysms. Now the median cumulative probability of survival is 61 years whereas 30 years ago, it was 47 years.
In our series the survival rate including 30-day mortality of the Marfan patients was slightly lower than that of the remaining patients (at 10 years 58.8% ± 14.6% versus 61.9% ± 4.6%) without statistical difference (p = 0.785). A factor that influenced the late survival of the Marfan patients was the presence of aortic dissection: at 10 years the survival rate of the Marfan patients with aortic dissection was 42.2% whereas that for the Marfan patients without dissection was 64%. Late mortality was associated with associated CAD, chronic renal failure, and postoperative dialysis.
Although some researchers have found long-term survival to be statistically less favorable among patients with aortic dissection at the time of root replacement [16] it was not a predictor of late mortality in our series. That may be due to a low rate of patients with Marfan syndrome in our series (12.8%) compared with that reported in the literature (69.3%) [16].
Crawford [2] underlined in a large series of patients with dissection or aneurysm of the ascending aorta or aortic arch that diseases of the aorta are often part of a more diffuse degenerative process. The same author [20] reported an elevated incidence of operation on the remaining aorta among patients with Marfan syndrome who underwent composite graft or aortic valve replacement. A recent paper [21] confirmed a significant progression of the disease in the remaining aorta in Marfan patients who had previously undergone composite graft replacement. Seventeen of the 48 patients studied by magnetic resonance imaging had a significant increase in diameter of the aorta with a mean rate of dilation of 2.3 ± 3.3 mm per year. Surgical intervention was necessary in 14 of them.
In our study the rate of freedom from reoperation on the remaining aorta of the patients with Marfan syndrome was lower than of the other patients at 10 years (79.6% ± 13.6% versus 94.6% ± 2.6%) and the difference was significant (p = 0.008). Moreover all Marfan patients reoperated on during follow-up had aortic dissection. According to this, all patients who have undergone aortic root replacement should be periodically evaluated by computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, or transesophageal echocardiography to detect the development of false aneurysms or the progression of the disease in the remaining aorta, particularly in patients with Marfan syndrome or with aortic dissection.
Despite refinements in the design of cardiac prostheses and in anticoagulation management, mechanical valve replacement is still associated with a variety of valve-related complications often leading to serious disability or death. In our series the rate of valve-related complications was low. Anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was the most common late complication with a rate of 0.91 events per 100 patient-years, followed by thromboembolisms (0.63/100 patient-years). Endocarditis was a serious complication with a high mortality rate (60%). It is our standard policy to replace the infected composite graft or prosthesis with a cryopreserved homograft root. Conservative treatment failed to eradicate infection in all patients treated except for 1 patient. Appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis remains the main preventative measure.
To avoid the disadvantages of prosthetic heart valves the valve-sparing procedure has been introduced [22]. Patients with aortic root aneurysm often have normal or minimally diseased aortic cusps that can be preserved. Actually the valve-sparing operation has become our treatment of choice for aortic root aneurysm with normal aortic valve and in the past 24 months we have performed 24 procedures. However the current series does not include these patients and it reports only our experience with composite valve graft replacement.
Four patients (1.5%) required reoperation for pseudoaneurysm formation at the coronary suture lines: in 2 patients the original Bentall operation was used (2.1%) and in the other 21 of them with Behçets diseasethe button technique was used (1.2%). All patients underwent successful reoperation. Techniques used for reattachment of coronary arteries did not influence the incidence of reoperation for pseudoaneurysm during follow-up. Because not all patients were evaluated by diagnostic imaging studies such as magnetic resonance, computed tomography, or angiography the real incidence of pseudoaneurysm formation is unknown and may be higher.
When a pseudoaneurysm is detected it should be repaired before progressive dilation, adherence to the sternum, or rupture because all these situations, which require urgent or emergent operation, are associated with high operative risk [3]. Hahn and associates [23] reported no early deaths in a limited series of patients who had undergone aortic root reoperation for pseudoaneurysm or endocarditis but no operations were done emergently. In a study of 81 patients who had undergone reoperation on the aortic root or ascending aorta Kouchoukos and colleagues [24] presented an early mortality rate of 12.5% in 16 patients reoperated on for false aneurysm. In the same report reoperation for false aneurysm was a significant predictor of late mortality.
Eighteen of the 274 patients (66%) who underwent aortic root replacement had acute type A dissection. This number represents fewer than 10% of all patients operated on for acute type A dissection during the same period. We believe along with Elefteriades [25] that the vast majority of aortic dissections can be treated appropriately with a simple supracoronary hemiarch replacement and the aortic valve can be left alone or the commissures can be resuspended. Long-term survival after root replacement for acute aortic dissection was found to be statistically less favorable [10]. Composite graft replacement should be limitated to cases of frank annuloaortic ectasia, Marfan syndrome, and severe destruction of the proximal aorta.
Finally we should mention some limitations of the current investigation. First, this is a retrospective study over a long period of time in which many factors changed and could not be accounted for with the multivariate statistical techniques. Second, owing to incomplete data collection during the earlier years some important variables such as left ventricular function and intraoperative myocardial protection were not included in the analysis. Therefore the influence of these variables on early and late mortality could not be studied.
In summary composite valve graft replacement can be performed with low rates of hospital mortality and morbidity. The button technique offers some advantages and should be used whenever possible. In case of acute aortic dissection root replacement is usually not necessary. Patients with Marfan syndrome should undergo early root replacement before aortic dissection occurs. Valve-related complications have a low incidence but often lead to disability or death. A careful follow-up is extremely important for evaluating the prosthetic aortic segment, the proximal and distal anastomosis, the morphology, and the diameter of the reimplantated coronary arteries and the remaining segments of the aorta.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Nakahira, T. Shibata, Y. Sasaki, H. Hirai, K. Hattori, M. Hosono, S. Ehara, and S. Suehiro Outcome After the Modified Bentall Technique With a Long Interposed Graft to the Left Coronary Artery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 109 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Almeida, T. Pinho, N. P. Oliveira, J. Almeida, F. Macedo, A. R. Sousa, and M. J. Maciel A case of acute heart failure due to giant aortic pseudoaneurysm with fistulization to the right ventricle after a modified Bentall operation Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 716 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-H. Song, Y. Tokuda, T. Nakayama, and K. Hattori A Simple Method of Inspection of Proximal Bleeding in Bentall Procedure Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, August 1, 2008; 16(4): 329 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Achneck, J. A. Rizzo, M. Tranquilli, and J. A. Elefteriades Safety of Thoracic Aortic Surgery in the Present Era Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1180 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kalkat, M.-B. Edwards, K. M. Taylor, and R. S. Bonser Composite Aortic Valve Graft Replacement: Mortality Outcomes in a National Registry Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-301 - I-306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stalder, S. Staffelbach, F. F. Immer, L. Englberger, P. A. Berdat, F. S. Eckstein, and T. P. Carrel Aortic Root Replacement Does Not Affect Outcome and Quality of Life Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 775 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Etz, T. M. Homann, N. Rane, C. A. Bodian, G. Di Luozzo, K. A. Plestis, D. Spielvogel, and R. B. Griepp Aortic root reconstruction with a bioprosthetic valved conduit: A consecutive series of 275 procedures J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1455 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N C Radu, E W M Kirsch, M-L Hillion, F Lagneau, L Drouet, and D Loisance Embolic and bleeding events after modified Bentall procedure in selected patients Heart, January 1, 2007; 93(1): 107 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A Ghavidel, M. B Tabatabaei, M. A Yousefnia, G.-R. Omrani, N. Givtaj, and K. Raesi Mortality and Morbidity After Aortic Root Replacement: 10-Year Experience Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2006; 14(6): 462 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Di Bartolomeo, D. Pacini, S. Martin-Suarez, A. Loforte, A. Dell'Amore, M. Ferlito, G. Bracchetti, and G. Bozzetti Valsalva prosthesis in aortic valve-sparing operations Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 294 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Aortic root replacement after previous surgical intervention on the aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending aorta. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 601 - 608. |
||||
![]() |
F. Settepani, A. Eusebio, D. Ornaghi, A. Barbone, E. Citterio, E. Manasse, G. Silvaggio, and R. Gallotti Aortic root replacement with the Carboseal composite valve graft: analysis of risk factors Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2005; 4(4): 360 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Settepani, D. Ornaghi, A. Barbone, E. Citterio, A. Eusebio, E. Manasse, G. Silvaggio, and R. Gallotti Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta: preliminary results Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2005; 4(2): 137 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Gleason, T. E. David, J. S. Coselli, J. W. Hammon Jr, and J. E. Bavaria St. Jude Medical Toronto biologic aortic root prosthesis: Early FDA phase II IDE study results Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): 786 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |