|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1775-1780
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Section of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Chicago Childrens Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
b Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Childrens Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Accepted for publication January 10, 2002.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Bacha, Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Childrens Hospital, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 5040, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
e-mail: ebacha{at}surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: The acute hemodynamic effects of MSVP after congenital heart surgery were assessed. Twenty-nine patients (aged 1 week to 17 years) with prolonged QRS interval had atrial and ventricular unipolar epicardial temporary pacing leads placed at surgery. Group 1 consisted of patients with a single ventricle (n = 14); group 2 included patients with two-ventricle anatomy (tetralogy of Fallot, ventricular septal defect) undergoing ventricular surgery (n = 10); and group 3 included patients with two-ventricle anatomy undergoing other cardiac surgery (n = 5). At a mean postoperative day 1 (range, 0 to 6), blood pressure, systemic and mixed venous oxygen saturations, electrocardiograms, and echocardiograms were obtained before and after 20 minutes of MSVP.
RESULTS: The QRS duration decreased with MSVP in all patients (mean, 23%, p < 0.005). Systolic blood pressure improved in all patients (mean, 9.7%, p < 0.005). Cardiac index improved in 19 of 21 patients tested, with no change in 2 patients (mean, 15.1%, p = 0.0001). In 2 patients, MSVP facilitated weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Echocardiographic mitral or tricuspid valve inflow was not significantly different with MSVP.
CONCLUSIONS: Multisite ventricular pacing results in improved cardiac index and increased systolic blood pressure, and it can also facilitate weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Multisite ventricular pacing may be used as adjunct to standard postoperative treatment of cardiac dysfunction after congenital heart surgery.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiac resynchronization therapy through multisite ventricular pacing (MSVP) has recently emerged as adjunctive therapy for heart failure in adults [1, 2]. Bundle branch block or interventricular conduction delay occurs in 15% of adults with heart failure and results in asynchronous contraction of the left ventricle and suboptimal mechanical function [3]. A significant number of children with congenital heart disease have either interventricular conduction delay or right bundle branch block (RBBB). For example, RBBB occurs in 30% to 80% of patients during the immediate period after ventricular septal defect repair [4, 5]. Multisite ventricular pacing attempts to reestablish synchronous contraction of the left ventricle by pacing the right and left ventricles simultaneously. In adults, this is achieved with standard placement of a right ventricular (RV) apex pacing lead as well as a transvenous coronary sinus lead to pace the left ventricle. Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been shown to improve cardiac index (CI), quality of life, and VO2 max in both acute and chronic studies of adults with low ejection fraction and prolonged QRS duration [1, 2, 68]. Single and multisite pacing in the pediatric population has been limited to those with RBBB or RV conduction delay but has resulted in increased blood pressure in the acute setting [9].
The objective of this study was to assess the potential acute benefit of MSVP in all patients with prolonged QRS duration after surgery for congenital heart disease.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The leads were then attached to a dual chamber temporary pacemaker (Medtronic model 5388 [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN]). One atrial lead was placed in the negative atrial pole and one in the positive atrial pole for standard bipolar pacing and sensing. Next, one of the ventricular leads was placed in the positive ventricular pole (either the midanterior RV free wall or the midline lead, based on the anatomy) and the remaining two ventricular leads were placed together into the negative ventricular pole. This allowed for simultaneous stimulation of the lateral RV free wall and RVOT for patients with two ventricles, and right and left lateral walls for those patients with single ventricle anatomy.
The second part of the pacing protocol took place in the intensive care unit on mean postoperative day 1 (range, 0 to 6) except in 2 selected patients. In these 2 patients the pacing portion of the protocol was performed in the operating room to assist with weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. The timing of the study in the postoperative period was performed when the hemodynamic, ventilatory, and sedation status and fluid balance were stable and would not vary during the study period potentially affecting the results. Furthermore, the effects of pacing on the sedation status of each patient was observed during the study to assure that blood pressure and cardiac output were not influenced by any discomfort caused by pacing. Twenty-five of the patients were sedated and ventilated during the study and 4 patients were awake and on minimal sedation. No patient had "traditional" indications for pacing such as AV block or bradycardia. Baseline (nonpaced) data included single lead rhythm strips, blood pressure, systemic oxygen saturations, mixed venous oxygen saturation obtained from existing central lines (atrial lines if atrial septum was intact or internal jugular venous line), and serum lactate level.
Multisite ventricular pacing was then performed for 20 minutes. Using the set-up described, the pacemaker was set in the DDD mode with the lower rate limit less than the intrinsic rate to allow for atrial sensing of the intrinsic rhythm. The AV interval was then adjusted to achieve the narrowest QRS duration with ventricular pacing. Confirmation of ventricular capture from both sites was confirmed by comparing the QRS morphology of each ventricular site separately with the morphology during MSVP. During the pacing period, no changes were made in inotropic medications, sedation, or ventilation/oxygenation. At the conclusion of the pacing period, the baseline data were repeated.
Cardiac index was calculated using the Fick equation; and VO2 was assumed for each patient based on age, sex, and heart rate.
Echocardiograms were recorded in select patients in the baseline state and during pacing. Echocardiograms could not be obtained in all patients owing to limited echo windows. Mitral (or systemic atrioventricular in single ventricles) and tricuspid valve inflow patterns were recorded to assess E and A wave ratios. Aortic Doppler and area was obtained to calculate cardiac output.
Baseline data were compared with that during pacing using paired t test. Linear regression analysis was used to relate outcomes of cardiac output, change in QRS duration, and systemic blood pressure to each variable. Significance was set at a p value of 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Cardiac index
Data were available to calculate CI in 22 of 29 patients. The mean baseline CI was 3.5 ± 1.3 L · min-1 · m-2 and increased with pacing to 4.1 ± 1.6 L · min-1 · m-2 in 20 of 22 patients (15.1% increase, p = 0.0001; Fig 5).
|
Pr interval
There was no significant change in the PR interval with pacing. Baseline PR intervals were 130 ± 55 msec and with pacing they were 111 ± 25 msec (p = 0.06).
Echocardiography
Echocardiographic data were available for 12 patients. There was no significant change in the mitral, tricuspid, or systemic AV valve inflow pattern, E and A wave ratio, or valve regurgitation with pacing.
Linear regression analysis
The percent change of QRS duration, CI, and systolic blood pressure was not related to age or to grouping of patients younger or older than 3 years of age.
The degree of increase in CI was not related to cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, baseline QRS duration, change in QRS duration, or baseline CI.
There were no complications from the pacing study; no patient demonstrated agitation or muscle twitching during pacing, and no patient had complications from epicardial lead removal.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is estimated that as many as 15% of adults with heart failure have interventricular conduction delay or bundle branch block [3]. This electrical disturbance is thought to impair the synchronous contraction of the right and left ventricles resulting in paradoxical septal wall motion, decreased LV pressures, reduced diastolic filling times, and increased mitral regurgitation [10]. Furthermore, a prolonged QRS duration has been suggested as an independent predictor of mortality in adults with heart failure as well as in patients after surgery for tetralogy of Fallot [11, 12].
Multisite ventricular pacing attempts to improve coordination of contraction by simultaneous pacing of the right and left ventricles. Acute studies of MSVP have shown improvement of interventricular synchrony, regional LV wall motion and LV dp/dt in adults [68]. The benefit of MSVP has been correlated with the degree of QRS prolongation, with some studies suggesting the greatest benefit in patients with QRS more than 150 msec [13]. Our study did not show a correlation between the degree of improvement of CI with QRS duration or with the change in the QRS duration with pacing.
As opposed to the adult population with heart failure and LBBB, patients with congenital heart disease often demonstrate right ventricular conduction delay or RBBB, especially after ventricular surgery. This electrical disturbance is often associated with acute postoperative RV dysfunction or chronic RV dysfunction due to residual defects such as pulmonary regurgitation as a result or previous surgeries or multiple previous surgeries. Our study addressed this issue by locating ventricular pacing sites in an attempt to correct RV conduction disturbances in this population. The acute intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic benefit of multisite RV pacing in this study was similar to what has been reported in adults with low ejection fraction [8]. Previous studies of multisite or single site RV pacing in patients with congenital heart disease and RBBB have yielded promising results. Janousek and colleagues [9] assessed single or multisite pacing in patients with RBBB or complete AV block and found that interventricular resynchronization resulted in an increase in blood pressure of 5.9% to 9.4% in the acute postoperative setting. In another study, single-site pacing in patients with RBBB and RV dysfunction significantly augmented RV performance and cardiac output in the acute setting; however, the optimal pacing site varied among patients [14].
Our study has demonstrated a potential benefit for MSVP in patients with univentricular hearts. Although the groups were small, we did not detect any difference in the response to pacing between univentricular and biventricular anatomy. As the mechanics of univentricular contraction are not well described, the mechanism responsible for this response to pacing is unclear, but could be related to synchronization of the different wall segments of the single ventricle.
The use of multisite pacing in the immediate postoperative period is appealing because its use may avoid some of the unwanted side effects of increasing doses of inotropic agents used to support cardiac function. A recent study showed that while MSVP and dobutamine infusion both increase LV dp/dt, dobutamine did so at the cost of increasing myocardial O2 consumption while MSVP actually lowered myocardial O2 consumption [15]. In the present study, 2 patients had dramatic increases in blood pressure with pacing that allowed weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. This therapy was continued during the immediate postoperative period in addition to inotropic support. The use of multisite pacing for adjunctive therapy during weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass has been reported in adults and children [16, 17].
The limitations of this study include the lack of comparison of multisite pacing with single-site RV pacing, although MSVP has been shown to be superior to single-site pacing in adults with heart failure. In the 2 patients who were paced in the operating room, multisite pacing was significantly better than single-site pacing. Furthermore, we were not able to identify factors to predict which patients may best benefit from this therapy. A standard placement of pacing leads was used based on the anatomic diagnosis for this study but it is possible that an individualized, optimal arrangement for placement of the pacing leads could be tested in the operating room, albeit time consuming, especially in the critically ill patient. Because our specialty deals with single-ventricle anatomy, we prefer the term "multisite ventricular pacing" over the term "biventricular pacing." Again, as opposed to the finding of LBBB and congestive heart failure in adults, patients with chronic heart disease often develop RBBB, and pacing therapy is used to achieve RV resynchronization. Finally, optimization of the AV interval during pacing was not assessed in this study. Because this population had intact AV conduction, there was a limited range of AV intervals that could be programed. The baseline PR intervals were not significantly different from those with pacing and there was no change in the E and A wave morphology or ratio, suggesting that any change in the AV interval was minimal and did not influence the results of this study.
In conclusion, MSVP has beneficial hemodynamic effects on patients with QRS prolongation or bundle branch block after surgery for congenital heart disease. It can be used as effective adjunct therapy in both weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative cardiac dysfunction.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. W.K. Peng, S. Lilley, B. Knight, J. Sinclair, F. Lyall, K. MacArthur, J. C.S. Pollock, and M. H.D. Danton Synergistic interaction between right ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and pulmonary regurgitation determines early outcome following tetralogy of Fallot repair Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 36(4): 694 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 959 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-J. Blanc, J.-C. Daubert, H. Drexler, H. Ector, M. Gasparini, C. Linde, F. B. Morgado, et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2256 - 2295. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Truin, A. Backx, H. van Wetten, and C. Neeleman Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Mitral Systolic Anterior Motion in a Child Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1873 - 1874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bautista-Hernandez, G. R. Marx, K. Gauvreau, J. E. Mayer Jr, F. Cecchin, and P. J. del Nido Determinants of Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Anatomic Repair of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2059 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-P. Diller, D. Okonko, A. Uebing, S. Y. Ho, and M. A. Gatzoulis Cardiac resynchronization therapy for adult congenital heart disease patients with a systemic right ventricle: analysis of feasibility and review of early experience. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 267 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Dubin, J. Janousek, E. Rhee, M. J. Strieper, F. Cecchin, I. H. Law, K. M. Shannon, J. Temple, E. Rosenthal, F. J. Zimmerman, et al. Resynchronization Therapy in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Patients: An International MultiCenter Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 20, 2005; 46(12): 2277 - 2283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Pham, S. Balaji, I. Shen, R. Ungerleider, X. Li, and D. J. Sahn Impact of Conventional Versus Biventricular Pacing on Hemodynamics and Tissue Doppler Imaging Indexes of Resynchronization Postoperatively in Children With Congenital Heart Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 20, 2005; 46(12): 2284 - 2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Dubin Resynchronization in Pediatrics: Who Needs It? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 20, 2005; 46(12): 2290 - 2291. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Y. Vanagt, X. A. Verbeek, T. Delhaas, M. Gewillig, L. Mertens, P. Wouters, B. Meyns, W. J. Daenen, and F. W. Prinzen Acute Hemodynamic Benefit of Left Ventricular Apex Pacing in Children Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 932 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Spotnitz Optimizing temporary perioperative cardiac pacing J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 5 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Berberian, J. P. Kanter, T. A. Quinn, and H. M. Spotnitz Optimized perioperative biventricular pacing in setting of right heart failure Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(4): 385 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Janousek, V. Tomek, V. Chaloupecky, O. Reich, R. A. Gebauer, J. Kautzner, and B. Hucin Cardiac resynchronization therapy: A novel adjunct to the treatment and prevention of systemic right ventricular failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1927 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Bacha, F. J. Zimmerman, V. Mor-Avi, L. Weinert, J. P. Starr, L. Sugeng, and R. M. Lang Ventricular Resynchronization by Multisite Pacing Improves Myocardial Performance in the Postoperative Single-Ventricle Patient Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1678 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Rabkin, L. J. Curtis, S. E. Cabreriza, A. D. Weinberg, and H. M. Spotnitz Load dependence of cardiac output in biventricular pacing: Right ventricular volume overload in pigs J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 98 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Graham Jr The year in congenital heart disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 2132 - 2141. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |