|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:874-881
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Internal Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Accepted for publication October 3, 2002.
* Address reprint requests to A. Wackenfors, Division of Experimental Vascular Research, BMC A13, Lund University Hospital, SE-22184 Lund, Sweden.
e-mail: angelica.wackenfors{at}med.lu.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Endothelin-induced vasoconstriction was evaluated in isolated, endothelium-denuded vessel segments of the human saphenous vein (SV), left internal mammary artery (LIMA), and coronary arteries. The ETA and ETB receptor mRNA levels were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.
RESULTS: The ETA and ETB receptor mRNA levels were significantly higher in the SV than in the LIMA and the coronary arteries. ET-1 induced a more efficacious contraction in the SV and LIMA as compared with in the coronary arteries. The ETB receptor agonist, Sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) stimulated constriction of the LIMA and SV, while inactive in the coronary arteries. The concentration-response curve for S6c was biphasic, suggesting activation of ETA receptors at high concentrations as this response could be inhibited by FR139317 (10 µmol/L), and ETB at low concentrations as this response could be inhibited by BQ788 (0.1 µmol/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Endothelin-induced vasoconstriction is mediated by ETA receptors alone in coronary arteries, while a combination of ETA and ETB receptors are of importance in SV and LIMA. Expression of contractile ETB receptors may be a pharmacologic disadvantage that contributes to the vasospasm during CABG surgery. The lower levels of ETA and ETB receptor mRNA in the LIMA and coronary arteries as compared with in the SV may provide one explanation for the better long- and short-term patency of LIMA as compared with SV grafts.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelin-1 binds to two different receptor subtypes: endothelinA (ETA) at low concentrations and endothelinB (ETB) at higher concentrations [4, 5]. The ETA receptors are located on vascular smooth muscle cells and mediate vasoconstriction. The ETB receptor mediates different responses depending on location. On endothelial cells, this G-protein coupled receptor induces an increase of cGMP and a subsequent release of dilatory mediators, while on smooth muscle cells the intracellular Ca2+ concentrations are increased leading to contraction. The ETB receptors mainly induce endothelium-dependent dilatation by release of nitric oxide and prostaglandins [6]. During physiologic conditions the ETB receptor mediated contractions are negliable [7]. Conversely during pathologic conditions such as arteriosclerosis [8], congestive heart failure [9], and subarachnoid hemorrhage [10] ETB receptors are upregulated on smooth muscle cells and mediate vasoconstriction. ETB receptor activity on smooth muscle cells may contribute to the pathologic vasomotor function and vasospasm during these conditions.
There are differences in the conducting characteristics of the two main coronary bypass vessels, the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and the saphenous vein (SV). In the SV the occlusion rate amounts to 50% 10 years after CABG surgery mainly due to arteriosclerosis in the vein called "venous graft disease" [11]. In contrast the LIMA has good long-term patency [11]. Currently at the Lund University Hospital the LIMA is used as a graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery in 95% of the cases whereas the SV is used as a graft for the other occluded coronary arteries. The molecular mechanism responsible for the difference in pathologic development of the two grafts remains unknown. It is probable that the vasocontractile properties are of importance. In the present study the relative contribution of ETA and ETB receptors in mediating ET-induced vasoconstriction was evaluated in endothelium-denuded human coronary artery bypass grafts (the LIMA and the SV). The results were compared with that for endothelium-denuded, human coronary arteries, which has rarely been done before. In addition the ETA and ETB receptor mRNA levels in the LIMA, the SV and the coronary arteries were here quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) study.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vitro pharmacology
In the laboratory the vessels were dissected free from adhering tissue and the luminal side was gently rubbed with a metal wire to disrupt the endothelium. The vessels were then cut into cylindrical segments (3 to 4 mm long) and mounted on two L-shaped metal prongs, one of which was connected to a force displacement transducer for continuous recording of the isometric tension [12]. The mounted artery segments were immersed in temperature controlled (37°C), tissue baths containing a bicarbonate based buffer solution, which was continuously gassed with 5% CO2 in O2 resulting in a pH of 7.4. Eight to 16 ring segments were studied at the same time in separate tissue baths. The segments were allowed to stabilize at a resting tension of 4 mN (see results and [13]) for 1 hour before the experiments were started. The contractile capacity of each vessel segment was examined by exposure to a K+ rich (63.5 mmol/L) buffer solution. Endothelium removal was assessed by exposure to acetylcholine (ACh), alternatively adenosine 5'-O-thiodiphosphate (ADPßS), which dilates blood vessels through an endothelium-dependent mechanism. Abolished dilatation indicated properly removed endothelium. For method details, see Malmsjö and associates [14].
Cumulative concentration-response curves were constructed for ET-1 and sarafotoxin 6c (S6c). Thereafter, the LIMA and the SV experiments were terminated by the addition of 10 µmol/L ACh and the coronary arteries, by the addition of 10 µmol/L ADPßS to check that the endothelium was removed. The ET-1 and S6c experiments were run in the absence (control) and presence of the selective ETA antagonist, FR139317 (0.1 µmol/L to 10 µmol/L) or the selective ETB antagonist BQ788 (0.1 µmol/L to 10 µmol/L) added 15 minutes before each agonist.
Length-tension measurements
The SV and the LIMA from 2 patients were removed and each vessel was divided into eight segments. The segments were immediately suspended in a bicarbonate based buffer solution and mounted for continuous recording of isometric tension (see above). The vessels were allowed to stabilize for 1 hour after which they were activated by a potassium-rich (63.5 mmol/L) buffer solution. After a short accommodation period (10 minutes) the distance between the metal prongs was increased, each time by 0.25 mm, and the tension recorded at different internal diameter. The tension was always allowed to reach a steady level between the extensions. The magnitude of the steady state tension was used in the calculations.
The optimal resting (wall tension) force in coronary arteries has been calculated using the same method before [13]. A resting force between 2 to 8 mN can be used in coronary arteries to obtain an optimal vascular response. In the present study the resting force of the coronary arteries was set to 4 mN.
Real-time PCR
After removal of the endothelium, the vessels were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and put in a -70°C freezer. Total cellular RNA was extracted using the FastRNA kit-green (Bio 101, Carlsbad, CA) following the suppliers instructions. Reverse transcription of total RNA to cDNA was carried out using the GeneAmp RNA PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in a Perkin-Elmer DNA thermal cycler. First strand cDNA was synthesized from 5 µg total RNA in a 100 µL reaction volume using random hexamers as primers.
Real-time PCR was performed in a GeneAmp 5700 sequence detection system (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems) using the GeneAmp SYBR Green kit (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems) with the cDNA synthesized above as template in a 50 µL reaction volume. The GeneAmp 5700 sequence detection system monitors the growth of DNA in real-time using an optic imaging system through the binding of a fluorescent dye to double-stranded DNA. Specific primers for the human ETA and ETB receptors were designed as follows: ETA receptor forward: 5'-ATTGCCCTCAGCGAACAC-3' reverse: 5'-CAACCAAGCAGAAAGACGGTC-3'. ETB receptor forward: 5'-GATACGACAACTTCCGCTCCA-3' reverse: 5'-GTCCACGATGAGGACAATGAG-3' ß-actin mRNA was used as a reference because it is the product of a housekeeping gene continuously expressed to a constant amount in cells. For method details, see Stenman and associates [15].
Drugs
The ET-1, S6c, FR139317, and BQ788, were purchased from Sigma (Stockholm, Sweden). All drugs were dissolved in 0.9% saline with 10% albumin. Oligonucleotides and reagents for the PCR assay were purchased from Perkin-Elmer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Calculations and statistics
For in vitro pharmacology, all calculations and statistics were performed using GraphPad 3.02 software. Emax refers to the maximum contraction calculated as percent of the contractile capacity of 63.5 mmol/L K+. The negative logarithm of the drug concentration that elicited 50% contraction (pEC50) was determined by linear regression analysis using the values immediately above and below half-maximum response. When antagonists were used to inhibit the ET-1 and S6c contraction, the maximum contractile response was sometimes not reached within the agonist concentration interval and the real Emax value will therefore be similar to or higher than the obtained value. The pEC50 value was then calculated as the negative logarithm of the drug concentration at the contraction reaching 100% or 140% of K+ (marked pEC(100% K+) and pEC(140% K+) in the text). The pharmacologic experiments were performed in arteries from 6 to 8 patients for each substance and statistical significance was accepted when p was less than 0.05, using Students t test. All differences referred to in the text have been statistically verified. Values are presented as means ± SEM.
The contractile effect of S6c added in cumulative concentrations was analyzed according to a two-site model by fitting the following equation to the data by a nonlinear regression analysis:
![]() |
For real-time PCR, 17 experiments were performed on the LIMA from 6 patients, 13 experiments on the SV from 6 patients, and 7 experiments in coronary arteries from 3 patients. The amount of ETA and ETB receptor mRNA was calculated as relative to the amount of ß-actin mRNA in the same sample by the formula: X0/R0 = 2CtR-CtX, where X0 = original amount of ET receptor mRNA, R0 = original amount of ß-actin mRNA, CtR = CT-value for ß-actin and CtX = CT-value for the ET receptor. Statistical analyses were performed using Students t test, where p less than 0.05 was considered significant. All differences referred to in the text have been statistically verified.
Ethics
The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Lund University in Sweden and conforms with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Endothelium removal
After endothelium denudation vascular relaxations to 10 µmol/L ACh in the LIMA and SV and 10 µmol/L ADPßS in the coronary arteries were abolished, indicating that the endothelium was properly removed.
Contractile ETA receptors
Endothelin-1 induced a significantly more efficacious contraction in the LIMA and SV as compared with in the coronary arteries (p < 0.05; Fig 2A,
Table 1), while the potency was similar (p = not significant; Fig 2A, Table 1). These results indicate higher amounts of functional ETA receptors in the bypass vessels as compared with the coronary arteries. In accordance with this the level of ETA receptor mRNA was higher in the SV as
compared with in the LIMA and coronary arteries (p < 0.05; Fig 2B, Table 1).
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Before the experiments were started the endothelium was removed mechanically to minimize the influence that a varying endothelium function would imply in these arteries from patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. Previous results from our group have shown that the endothelium function is poor in human coronary arteries that are obtained during the procedure of heart transplantation. The arteries did not dilate when exposed to 1 µmol/L ACh, probably owing to coronary artery disease [17].
ETA receptor mediated vasoconstriction
The ETA receptor agonist, ET-1, induced a significantly more efficacious contraction in the coronary bypass grafts as compared with in the coronary arteries (Fig 2A). Endothelin-1 plasma levels are 1 to 5 pmol/L in healthy humans. In vascular disease the plasma concentration of ET-1 is increased from picomolar to nanomolar concentrations [18]. During CABG surgery the ET-1 plasma levels are further elevated [3]. High ET-1 plasma levels in combination with the greater effect of ET-1 in the coronary bypass grafts increase the risk of efficacious vasocontractile effects. Consequently ET-1 may be a cause of the deleterious vasospasm that is commonly observed in the coronary bypass grafts during surgery [1].
When the two different bypass grafts were compared ET-1 could be shown to induce a significantly more potent vasoconstriction in the SV as compared with in the LIMA (Fig 2A). Furthermore ETA receptor mRNA levels were higher in the SV (Fig 2B). The ETA receptors mediate strong vasoconstriction, which may provide one explanation of why vein grafts are more susceptible to the development of spasm than artery grafts [11]. On the other hand the lumen of the SV is larger than of the LIMA and vasospasm in the SV may therefore have less deleterious consequences for the patient. Further well-documented, potentially harmful effects of ET-1 include proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells and the subsequent development of arteriosclerosis [16]. The high ETA receptor mRNA levels in the SV in contrast to in the LIMA, in combination with the elevated levels of ET-1 in heart failure patients, may contribute to the rapid development of arteriosclerosis and long-term failure of vein grafts called "venous graft disease" [11, 19].
In the presence of the selective ETA receptor antagonist FR139317 the concentration-response curve for ET-1 was shifted to the right in the LIMA, SV, and coronary arteries, which is in accordance with the belief that ET-1 induces vasoconstriction by activating ETA receptors [2022].
ETB receptor mediated vasoconstriction
Sarafotoxin 6c is believed to be a selective ETB receptor agonist [23]. Sarafotoxin 6c induced vasoconstrictions in the endothelium denuded SV and LIMA. When the Hill-slope was calculated for the entire S6c concentration-response curve it was found to be 1.9 for the SV and 3.2 for the LIMA. Simple binding is supposed to be hyperbolic and thus have a Hill-slope of one. When an agonist activates a multitude of receptors or second messengers, the slope of the curve will alter [24]. A closer look at the concentration-response curve revealed a biphasic tendency suggesting involvement of two different types of receptors: ETB at low concentrations and ETA at high concentrations. This conclusion was further supported in that the pEC50 value and the Hill-slope for the second part of the S6c concentration-response curve were similar to that for the ETA receptor agonist, ET-1. Furthermore the selective ETA receptor antagonist FR139317 (0.1 µmol/L) could antagonize this response. A closer look at published S6c concentration-response curves revealed biphasic properties that were not discussed [25]. It has recently been suggested that ETA receptors play a role in mediating the systemic vasoconstrictor response to high doses of S6c, further supporting our results [26]. Previous reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR has proven that both ETA and ETB receptors are located on the smooth muscle cells of the SV and LIMA and also ligand-binding studies have demonstrated the presence of these receptors in vascular smooth muscle [20]. By real-time PCR experiments in this study, the presence of ETA and ETB receptor mRNA in smooth muscle cells from the SV and the LIMA could be verified. Coronary arteries did not contract when exposed to S6c. Thus there are no functional ETB receptors. The levels of ETA receptor mRNA were low in the coronary arteries and were probably not stimulated by the concentrations of S6c used in the present experiments.
The SV and LIMA from 42% of the patients did not respond to S6c. Others have observed the same irregularity in the responses [23]. The expression of contractile ETB receptors thus varies greatly. The cause of this variation is not known although the blood vessels derive from patients with different diseases. The coronary arteries were obtained from hearts that were explanted in the procedure of heart transplantation. These patients suffered from congestive heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy. The LIMA and SV were obtained from patients who suffered from coronary artery disease due to arteriosclerosis. In arteriosclerosis [8] and coronary artery disease [27] contractile ETB receptors are upregulated and appear on vascular smooth muscle. Different degrees of arteriosclerosis or different types of atherosclerotic disease may be responsible for the variations seen in the vasocontractile responses to S6c in the present experiments [20].
In physiologic conditions ETB receptors mediate endothelium-dependent dilatation through the release of nitric oxide and prostaglandins [6]. Conversely, in arteriosclerosis, congestive heart failure, and subarachnoid hemorrhage ETB receptors are upregulated on smooth muscle cells and elicit vasoconstriction [810]. ETB receptor activity on smooth muscle cells may contribute to the pathologic vasomotor function and vasospasm during these conditions. S6c-elicited vasoconstriction and ETB receptor mRNA expression could be shown in the bypass grafts, LIMA and the SV. Conversely, no pharmacologic activity of S6c could be noted in the coronary arteries. Contractile ETB receptors on the smooth muscle cells of the bypass grafts may be a pharmacologic disadvantage that contributes to the vasospasm during CABG surgery. Despite the absence of S6c effect in the coronary arteries, a small amount of ETB receptor mRNA could be found by real-time PCR. The reason for this discrepancy is not known although mRNA expression for a receptor does not necessarily mean that there is active receptor protein on the cell surface.
Conclusion
Bypass surgery is hampered by the deleterious vasospasm in the conduit vessels. Many measures have been undertaken to control the vessel tone during surgery including dilating the vessels with potent vasodilators such as papaverine, sodium nitroprusside, and nifedipine and distending the vessel with NaCl [28, 29]. Circulating plasma levels of ET are elevated in heart failure patients and during CABG surgery [3, 19]. One difference between the bypass grafts and the coronary arteries is that both ETA and ETB receptors mediate the vasoconstrictor effects of ET in bypass grafts, while only ETA is of importance in coronary arteries. Contractile ETB receptors may be a pharmacological disadvantage that contributes to vasospasm during CABG surgery. Furthermore the ETA and ETB receptor mRNA levels are significantly higher in the SV as compared with the LIMA and coronary arteries, which may explain the higher frequency of vasospasm in the vessel wall at the time of surgery in SV and restenosis due to "venous graft disease." An ET receptor antagonist could be of use in preventing perioperative graft vasospasm and postoperative restenosis. Because not only ETA but also ETB receptors mediate strong vasoconstriction in the bypass grafts, an ETA/ETB balanced antagonist might have beneficial effects. Further knowledge about the molecular basis of the vasospasm will hopefully provide us with pharmacologic tools in the future to revoke the spasm during surgery.
Limitation of the study
It should be noted that this study was performed on coronary arteries from patients suffering from congestive heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy and on LIMA and SV from patients with coronary artery disease. The coronary arteries were used as a control and for obvious reasons it is impossible to obtain coronary arteries from a patient undergoing CABG surgery.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. H. Korzick, J. M. Muller-Delp, P. Dougherty, C. L. Heaps, D. K. Bowles, and K. K. Krick Exaggerated coronary vasoreactivity to endothelin-1 in aged rats: Role of protein kinase C Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2005; 66(2): 384 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhou, W. P. Dirksen, J. L. Zweier, and M. Periasamy Endothelin-1-induced responses in isolated mouse vessels: the expression and function of receptor types Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): H573 - H578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |