ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert C. Ashton, Jr
Karen M. McGinnis
Cliff P. Connery
Daniel G. Swistel
Joseph J. DeRose, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by DeRose, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, R. C., Jr
Right arrow Articles by DeRose, J. J., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:569-571
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Case report

Totally endoscopic robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis

Robert C. Ashton, Jr, MD*a, Karen M. McGinnis, MDa, Cliff P. Connery, MDa, Daniel G. Swistel, MDa, Douglas R. Ewing, MDa, Joseph J. DeRose, Jr, MDa

a St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

Accepted for publication August 14, 2002.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Ashton, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center, 1000 Tenth Ave, Suite 2B07, New York, NY 10019, USA
e-mail: rashton{at}chpnet.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The current recommendations for treating myasthenia gravis include surgical thymectomy for patients between puberty and 60 years of age. This is a report of a new method for surgical thymectomy using the robotic da Vinci surgical system for a totally endoscopic approach. This new procedure combines the potential advantages of minimally invasive methods with the efficacy of open procedures.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The current recommendations for the treatment of myasthenia gravis include surgical thymectomy for patients between puberty and 60 years of age [1]. Since the first reported thymectomy for myasthenia gravis in 1912 by Sauerbach several techniques and surgical approaches for removal of the thymus gland have been reported [2]. We report the first thymectomy for myasthenia gravis by a totally robotic endoscopic approach using the da Vinci Surgical System. This new technique has the potential advantages of other minimally invasive techniques with regard to improved postoperative recovery, pain control, healing, and pulmonary function. Additionally this robotic system allows the surgeon to perform an extended thymectomy similar to that using a transsternal approach.

The patient is a 28-year-old woman with a 2-year history of generalized weakness. Her medical management included mestinon and corticosteroids for controlling her symptoms. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest demonstrated thymic hyperplasia without evidence of thymoma.

The procedure was performed under general anesthesia with a double-lumen endotracheal tube for single-lung ventilation during the procedure. The patient was positioned right side up at a 30-degree angle with a shoulder roll and bean bag. The right arm was positioned at her side. The right side was approached first owing to increased space in the right pleural space and better visualization of the superior vena cava and inominate vein. A 12-mm incision was made lateral to the breast in the fifth intercostals space for the camera port. A superior 7-mm incision was made in the third intercostal space in the midclavicular line and a 7-mm submammary incision was made in the seventh intercostal space in the anterior axillary line. A separate working 12-mm accessory port was made lateral to the camera port.

With the right lung deflated and insufflation to a pressure of 10 mm Hg the dissection was performed using Caudier forceps, ultrasonic coagulating shears, cautery blade, and a 0-degree scope. Starting inferiorly at the pericardiophrenic angle dissection along the phrenic nerve was performed, inferiorly to superiorly and laterally to medially, to the level of the superior vena cava. Ultrasonic coagulating shears were used along the phrenic nerve to prevent injury to it. A cautery blade was used for the all other parts of the dissection. Dissection along the superior vena cava with identification of the inominate vein proceeded. Next the mediastinum was dissected free from the restrosternal area to the left internal thoracic artery. The dissection continued into the neck teasing out the upper poles of the cervical thymus. A fan retractor was utilized to provide traction of the thymus inferiorly. After mobilization of the cervical poles the inominate vein and its thymic vein branches were visualized. The thymic veins were doubly clipped and transected with the ultrasonic coagulating scalpel. The dissection along the anterior pericardium was performed from right to left. A 30-degree scope was used at this point to evaluate the left phrenic nerve. The left phrenic nerve was not safely visualized despite retraction of the thymus to the right pleural space. The ports were then removed and the incisions closed.

The da Vinci cart was then positioned on the left side and the patient repositioned for a left-sided approach. Mirror incisions of the right side were made with the exception of the accessory port. The dissection along the phrenic nerve was completed inferiorly to superiorly. Only minimal dissection was needed on this side as the majority had been performed from the right side. Once the thymus was completely mobilized it was placed in an endoscopy bag and removed through the inferior submammary incision (Fig 1). Chest tubes were placed bilaterally through the inferior incisions. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without complications. Pathology revealed thymic hyperplasia and no thymoma.



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Specimen: thymus with pericardial fat.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Currently several surgical approaches—transcervical, videoscopic, transsternal, and combined approaches—are used for thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis [24]. Each approach can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. More importantly the long-term outcomes and remission rates demonstrate improvement of clinical symptoms by all methods. Complete thymectomy is necessary for maximum clinical benefit and response and the standard should be at least an extended thymectomy by any of the previously mentioned approaches.

This newest approach for complete thymectomy uses the da Vinci Surgical System. This robotic system has enhanced optics that include three-dimensional visualization and x12 magnification. The surgical arms have distal "endowrists" that simulate normal wrist movement, have scaled motion, and remove hand tremors. With the maneuverability of the endowrists and enhanced visualization, precise dissection of tissue and control of small vessels are obtainable.

The disadvantages with this approach include the initial fixed cost of the system, early increased operative time, and learning curves associated with robotic technology. The variable costs of reusable instruments are comparable with those of disposable thoracoscopic instruments. No studies have documented the number of procedures necessary to develop proficiency using this system. As with the advent of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, learning curves are part of any new technology and need to be studied.

This initial case demonstrated limitations compared with other published approaches. Transcervical thymectomy includes only one neck incision and minimal pain and patients are able to be discharged the same day. Thoracoscopic thymectomy has been performed from one side only whereas our approach is bilateral. A bilateral approach depends on body habitus and a learning curve. Refinements in this procedure, including the surgeons’ learning curve, should make this comparable with the thoracoscopic approach.

Minimally invasive approaches in general have demonstrated shorter recovery times and less pain compared with sternotomies. Lack of sternal and neck incisions are cosmetically appealing to patients. With improved cosmetic results young patients may opt for thymectomy earlier in the course of their disease. That is significant, as some results suggest improved beneficial effects of thymectomy for patients who are younger and who are treated earlier in the course of their disease [5].

It is our intention to continue to refine this robotic approach to provide maximal surgical benefit to patients with myasthenia gravis undergoing thymectomy. We intend to prospectively observe these patients using the guidelines set forth by Jaretski and colleagues [6]. Long-term analysis by standard guidelines is necessary to properly assess all methods of surgical thymectomy. Ultimately thymectomy for myasthenia gravis will be judged on clinical improvement and remissions rates, which increase over time after surgery. Presently surgeons should perform thymectomies using the methods that they find most comfortable and that provide the best clinical outcomes.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Our thanks to Pat Bailey and Rory Diaz for their patience and assistance.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Drachman D.B. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med 1999;330:1797-1810.[Free Full Text]
  2. Cooper J.D., Al-Jihaihawa A.N., Pearson F.G., Humphrey J.G., Humphrey H.E. An improved technique to facilitate transcervical thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;45:242-247.[Abstract]
  3. Jaretski AD, Wolff M. "Maximal" thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: surgical anatomy and operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118;96;711–16
  4. Mack M.J., Landreneau R.J., Yim A.P., Hazelrigg S.R., Scruggs G.R. Results of video-assisted thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1352-1360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Nieto I.P., Robledo J.P.P., Pajuelo M.C. Prognostic factors for myasthenia gravis treated by thymectomy: review of 61 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1568-1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Jareztski A., Barohn R.J., Ernstoff R.M., et al. Myasthenia gravis: Recommendations for clinical research standards. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:327-334.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J. F. Martins Rua, F. B. Jatene, J. R. M. de Campos, R. Monteiro, M. L. Tedde, M. N. Samano, W. M. Bernardo, and J. C. Das-Neves-Pereira
Robotic versus human camera holding in video-assisted thoracic sympathectomy: a single blind randomized trial of efficacy and safety
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2009; 8(2): 195 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Augustin, T. Schmid, M. Sieb, P. Lucciarini, and J. Bodner
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Thymectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): S768 - S771.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
F. Rea, G. Marulli, and L. Bortolotti
Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy
MMCTS, March 24, 2005; 2005(0324): 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Savitt, G. Gao, A. P. Furnary, J. Swanson, H. L. Gately, and J. R. Handy
Application of Robotic-Assisted Techniques to the Surgical Evaluation and Treatment of the Anterior Mediastinum
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 450 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Bodner, H. Wykypiel, A. Greiner, W. Kirchmayr, M. C. Freund, R. Margreiter, and T. Schmid
Early experience with robot-assisted surgery for mediastinal masses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 259 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert C. Ashton, Jr
Karen M. McGinnis
Cliff P. Connery
Daniel G. Swistel
Joseph J. DeRose, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by DeRose, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, R. C., Jr
Right arrow Articles by DeRose, J. J., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS