ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas Salamon
Robert E. Michler
David A. Brown
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salamon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salamon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:505-507
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting does not decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation

Thomas Salamon, MDa, Robert E. Michler, MDa, Kelly M. Knott, MSa, David A. Brown, MDa*

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Accepted for publication August 14, 2002.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Brown, Midwestern Cardiac Surgery, Inc, 680 Park Ave West, Suite 203, Mansfield, OH 44906, USA
e-mail: dabrown{at}mwcsinc.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation remains a significant source of morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting. We reviewed the data on 2,569 patients to determine if the absence of cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS: All patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1, 1997 through June 30, 2001 were evaluated for postoperative atrial fibrillation. The data of 252 patients with no cardiopulmonary bypass (group 1) were reviewed and compared with three other patient groups. Group 2 consisted of 1,470 patients using cardiopulmonary bypass during the same study period. Group 3 consisted of 841 patients with a similar number of grafts as the study group but using cardiopulmonary bypass. Group 4 consisted of historical data for 847 patients operated on using cardiopulmonary bypass collected from January 1995 through December 1996. Prophylactic ß-blockade was instituted in January 1997. Groups 1 to 3 received this treatment, but group 4 did not.

RESULTS: Group 1 had an incidence of atrial fibrillation of 8.8%. Groups 2, 3, and 4 had incidences of atrial fibrillation of 11.6%, 9.4%, and 28.0%, respectively. When compared with group 1, the incidence of atrial fibrillation in group 4 was statistically different (p <. 0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass did not aid the reduction of atrial fibrillation at our institution.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) consistently has been reported as between 20% to 40% in large groups of patients [13]. This clinical problem continues to remain a significant source of morbidity. Increased risk of stroke, length of stay in the intensive care unit, total hospital stay, need for antiarrhythmics and permanent pacemakers, as well as total cost of patient care have all been attributed to postoperative atrial fibrillation [1, 46]. Numerous preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors have been identified and targeted as possible culprits for triggering postoperative atrial fibrillation. The use of cardiopulmonary bypass has routinely been implicated as a primary cause of postoperative atrial fibrillation. In this study we compared the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients who underwent coronary revascularization using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with a large group of patients who were revascularized without using CPB. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) techniques were used to determine whether the absence of CPB resulted in a lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patient selection
Data were gathered for patients undergoing CABG at our institution from January 1995 through June 2001. All patients with concomitant procedures were excluded from the data. Patients undergoing revascularization with the use of CPB from January 1995 through December 1996 (n = 847) compromised a historical comparison group (group 4). The remaining patients were divided into other groups depending on the surgical approach and whether CPB was used. Three principal surgeons operated on the patients, with each surgeon performing both on-pump and off-pump operations. Surgeon preference and patient suitability determined the type of surgical approach. One surgeon stopped using the MIDCAB approach because of personal experience with increased patient discomfort. Off-pump operations were attempted on any patient in which it was believed to be hemodynamically stable and with virtually all single-vessel operations.

Group 1 consisted of 252 patients who underwent CABG without the use of CPB. Group 2 consisted of 1,470 patients who underwent CABG using CPB. Group 3 was a subgroup of group 2, consisting of 841 patients undergoing revascularization using CPB, but with a similar number of grafts (1 to 2 distal grafts) compared with group 1.

Operative technique
Off-pump operations
These operations were performed either by using the MIDCAB or OPCAB approach, again depending on surgeon preference. The MIDCAB procedures were performed through a left anterior thoracotomy incision with harvesting of the left internal mammary artery by either direct or thorascopic techniques. The OPCAB procedures were performed through a median sternotomy approach with standard left internal mammary artery dissection. Other conduits for revascularization included the right internal mammary artery, the radial artery, or saphenous vein grafts, or a combination thereof, dependent on patient need. The type of stabilization device used was determined by the discretion of the individual surgeon. Proximal anastamoses were performed either directly to the left internal mammary artery as T-grafts or directly to the aorta with partial occlusion clamping. Patients undergoing MIDCAB and OPCAB operations did not receive epidurals or magnesium.

Bypass operations
The more standard CABG procedure used a median sternotomy incision. Single two-stage venous and aortic cannulations were used. Revascularization was performed during a period of moderate systemic hypothermia (30°C to 34°C) and cardiac arrest. After aortic cross clamping, cardioplegic arrest was achieved and maintained with individual surgeon preferences including antegrade and retrograde cardioplegic techniques, as well as either crystalloid or blood cardioplegia. Proximal anastamoses were performed under single cross clamp or side-biting clamp depending on surgeon preference. Two grams of magnesium were routinely given after release of the cross clamp. The sternotomy was closed in a standard fashion.

All patients were continuously monitored postoperatively for the duration of their hospital stay by telemetry. Postoperatively all patients were kept within the normal range for magnesium and potassium, which were replaced as needed. In 1997 the routine use of prophylactic postoperative ß-blockade (metoprolol 25 mg twice daily, titrating to 50 mg twice daily for a heart rate > 60) was instituted in all patients undergoing CABG. Therefore the patients in group 4 preceded this institutional change.

For the purpose of this study, atrial fibrillation was defined as sustained atrial fibrillation requiring pharmacological intervention or electrical cardioversion, or both. Other possible measures included percentage of reoperation, preoperative use of ß-blockers, and ejection fraction.

Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 10.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Age data are presented as mean (± standard deviation) and compared between groups using the Student’s t test. Differences in incidences between the groups were analyzed using analysis of variance. All p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Preoperative demographic comparison of all four groups are outlined in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the patient groups with respect to mean age or to age more than 70 years. Groups 2 and 4 had significantly less percentage of reoperative procedures compared with groups 1 and 3. Group 1 had significantly less males compared with group 3. The ejection fraction was significantly different between all groups. Group 4 was statistically different from the other groups when considering the use of preoperative ß-blockers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Demographics

 
The incidence of atrial fibrillation in the OPCAB (group 1) was 8.8%. There was no statistically significant difference between the OPCAB (group 1) and the CPB groups (groups 2 and 3) with 11.6% and 9.4% incidence of atrial fibrillation, respectively. All three groups had significantly lower rates of atrial fibrillation when compared with the historical CPB group (group 4), which had an incidence of atrial fibrillation of 28.0%. The risk for mortality between all four groups was not statistically different: group 1 = 2.4%; group 2 = 2.9%; group 3 = 2.3%; and group 4 = 2.6%.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Postoperative atrial fibrillation remains the most common cause of morbidity after CABG [3] and carries a risk of hemodynamic instability and increased risk for thromboembolic events [13], as well as a significant economic impact. Need for further intervention both pharmacologically as well as surgically, longer intensive care unit stays, and longer hospital stays have all translated into increased hospital and patient charges [1, 46].

Although the cause of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary revascularization remains unknown, multiple risk factors and triggering events have been suggested. Several reports have targeted the use of CPB as a significant factor. Atrial manipulation and cannulation, cardioplegic arrest, prolonged aortic cross-clamp times, poor preservation of atrial tissue, and release of systemic mediators have also been implicated [1, 4, 6, 7]. This study was designed to determine if eliminating CPB would lower the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Data regarding the use of CPB and the incidence of atrial fibrillation is conflicting. Previous reports with small numbers of patients have demonstrated no decrease in atrial fibrillation in comparing these two patient populations [810]. Other studies have shown decreased rates of atrial fibrillation in patients who have undergone CABG without the use of CPB [1112]. Kilger and colleagues [11] actually suggest that the use of CPB was responsible for an increased rate of atrial fibrillation. In this study, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of atrial fibrillation between groups 1, 2, and 3. Preoperatively, these three groups were quite similar except that the CPB group 2 had less reoperative patients and group 3 had slightly more males compared with group 1.

Avoiding CPB in CABG patients has not led to the reduction of atrial fibrillation at our institution in the last 3 years. There may have been a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation in the operations performed using cardiopulmonary bypass because of the use of magnesium, however the effects of intravenous magnesium should be considered transient at best.

A statistically significant difference was identified in all groups from 1997 to 2001 when compared with the historical CPB group (group 4). Increased circulating catecholamines have repeatedly been postulated as an important pathogenesis for triggering postoperative atrial fibrillation [13]. In reviewing changes instituted at our program that could have led to such an improvement, the addition of routine ß-blockade prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation for all postoperative CABG patients was identified as a significant change. This would support what has already been described about the efficacy of ß-blockade in reducing postoperative atrial arrhythmias [1415]. The increased use of preoperative ß-blockers and its subsequent withdrawal probably also contributed to the difference in incidence in group 4 when compared with the other groups.

Atrial fibrillation remains a difficult postoperative concern and the exact cause is uncertain. In our institution we have not lowered the incidence of atrial fibrillation by simply removing cardiopulmonary bypass.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Cresswell L.L., Schuessler R.B., Rosenbloom M., Cox J.L. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:539-549.[Abstract]
  2. Ommen S.R., Odell J.A., Stanton M.S. Atrial arrhythmias after cardiothoracic surgery. NEJM 1997;336:1429-1434.[Free Full Text]
  3. Creswell L.L. Postoperative atrial arrhythmias: risk factors and associated adverse outcomes. Semin Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:303-307.
  4. Mathew J.P., Parks R., Savino J.S., Friedman A.S. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors, outcomes and resource utilization. JAMA 1996;276:300-306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Aranki S.F., Shaw D.P., Adams D.H., et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impacts on hospital resources. Circulation 1996;94:390-397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Almassi G.H., Schowalter T., Nicolosi A.C., Aggarwal A. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event?. Ann Surg 1997;226:501-513.[Medline]
  7. Ad N., Snir E., Vidne B.A., Golomb E. Potential preoperative markers for the risk of developing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Semin Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:308-313.
  8. Cohn W.E., Sirois C.A., Johnson R.G. Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective, matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:298-301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Puskas J.D., Wright C.E., Ronson R.S., Brown W.M., Gott J.P., Guyton R.A. Off-pump multivessel coronary bypass via sternotomy is safe and effective. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1068-1072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Saatvedt K., Fiane A.E., Sellevold O., Nordstrand K. Is atrial fibrillation caused by extracorporeal circulation?. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:931-933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kilger E., Weis F.C., Goetz A.E., Frey L., et al. Intensive care after minimally invasive and conventional coronary surgery: a prospective comparison. Inten Care Med 2001;27:534-539.
  12. Stamou S.C., Dangas G., Hill P.C., et al. Atrial fibrillation after beating heart surgery. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:64-67.[Medline]
  13. Kalman J.M., Munawar M., Howes L.G., et al. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with sympathetic activation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1709-1715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Andrews T.C., Reimold S.C., Berlin J.A., Antman E.M. Prevention of supraventricular arrhytmias after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Circulation 1991;84:III-236-III-244.
  15. Kowey P.R., Taylor J.E., Rials S.J., Marinchak R.A. Met-analysis of the effectiveness of prophylactic drug therapy in preventing supraventicular arrhythmia early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:963-965.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Castellheim, T. N. Hoel, V. Videm, E. Fosse, A. Pharo, J. L. Svennevig, A. E. Fiane, and T. E. Mollnes
Biomarker Profile in Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in Low-Risk Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 1994 - 2002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. E. Cohn, I. D. Gregoric, B. Radovancevic, R. K. Wolf, and O.H. Frazier
Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Transplantation: Experience in 498 Consecutive Cases
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 56 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. R. Edgerton, M. A. Herbert, S. L. Prince, J. L. Horswell, L. Michelson, M. J. Magee, T. M. Dewey, Z. J. Edgerton, and M. J. Mack
Reduced Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Immediately Extubated After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2121 - 2127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Ishii, R. B. Schuessler, S. L. Gaynor, K. Yamada, A. S. Fu, J. P. Boineau, and R. J. Damiano Jr
Inflammation of Atrium After Cardiac Surgery Is Associated With Inhomogeneity of Atrial Conduction and Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, June 7, 2005; 111(22): 2881 - 2888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Bisleri, T. Bottio, J. A. Morgan, and C. Muneretto
Preservation of the anterior fat pad and incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation following coronary surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1308 - 1308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. G. Raja, A. A. Behranwala, and J. Dunning
Does off-pump coronary artery surgery reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 647 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Enc, B. Ketenci, D. Ozsoy, G. Camur, I. Kayacioglu, S. Terzi, and S. Cicek
Atrial fibrillation after surgical revascularization: is there any difference between on-pump and off-pump?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 26(6): 1129 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. A. Palin, R. Kailasam, and C. W. Hogue Jr
Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: Pathophysiology and Treatment
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 175 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Athanasiou, O. Aziz, O. Mangoush, A. Weerasinghe, S. Al-Ruzzeh, S. Purkayastha, J. Pepper, M. Amrani, B. Glenville, and R. Casula
Do off-pump techniques reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 77(5): 1567 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Hakala, O. Pitkanen, and J. Hartikainen
Cardioplegic arrest does not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 415 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
A. H Olivencia-Yurvati, N. Wallace, S. Ford, and R. T Mallet
Leukocyte filtration and aprotinin: synergistic anti-inflammatory protection
Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S13 - S19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. L. Ngaage
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the myth, the logic and the science
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 24(4): 557 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas Salamon
Robert E. Michler
David A. Brown
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salamon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salamon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS