|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:197-203
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Childrens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
* Address reprint requests to Dr Mayer, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Childrens Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Presented at the Thirty-sixth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jan 31Feb 2, 2000.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Three groups of anesthetized lambs underwent cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (120 minutes at 18°C), and rewarming (40 minutes). During reperfusion, L-arginine (5 mg/kg per minute), nitroglycerine (2 µg/kg per minute), or saline (control group) was infused for 100 minutes. All animals were separated from cardiopulmonary bypass and observed for 3 additional hours. Preload recruitable stroke work, cardiac index, pulmonary vascular resistance, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, and lung compliance plasma nitrate/nitrite levels (NO metabolites) were measured before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Malondialdehyde in heart tissue and lung tissue was measured 3 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass.
RESULTS: Recovery of preload recruitable stroke work and cardiac index were significantly higher in the L-arginine and nitroglycerine groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). Pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly lower in the L-arginine and nitroglycerine groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). Levels of NO metabolites and issue malondialdehyde did not differ among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: L-arginine and nitroglycerine improved recovery of left ventricular function and reduced pulmonary vascular resistance after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The mechanism of beneficial action could involve increased NO levels, but we did not find higher levels of NO metabolites compared with controls. Tissue malondialdehyde levels were not affected by L-arginine or nitroglycerine. These results show that, at these dosage levels, provision of substrate for NO production or provision of an NO donor were beneficial to the recovery of myocardial and pulmonary vascular function.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of L-arginine and an NO donor (nitroglycerin), which were administered during reperfusion, on the recovery of cardiac and lung functions after DHCA.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An electromagnetic flow probe (FR-100T, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) was placed on the main pulmonary artery for the measurement of cardiac output. The ductus arteriosus was ligated. After systemic heparinization, a 5-F polyurethane sheath was inserted into left atrium for pressure measurement and blood sampling. A 19-G catheter (SPC-330; Millar Instruments Inc, Houston, TX) was placed into the left ventricular [LV]) cavity through the apex to measure LV pressure. Two pairs of ultrasonic transducers were implanted in the LV midmyocardium to measure the length of the long and short axis. Animals received care in compliance with the "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (National Institutes of Health publication 85-23, revised 1985).
Measurements
Cardiac function
Indices were measured using a digital ultrasonic measurement system (Sonometrics Corporation, Ontario, Canada). Left ventricular volume was calculated using the following ellipsoidal model: LV volume =
(DL) (DS)2, where DL is long axis length and DS is short axis length obtained by ultrasonic tranducers.
Stroke work (SW) was calculated as the integral of LV pressure and LV volume over each cardiac cycle by the following formula:
![]() |
Lung function
Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated using the formula:
![]() |
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was calculated with the lung mechanics calculator (Servo 940, Siemens-Elema, Sweden) according to the formula Cdyn (mL/cm H2O) = expiratory tidal volume (mL)/[pause pressure (cm H2O) - end expiratory lung pressure (cm H2O). Alveolar - arterial oxygen tension difference (AaDO2) was calculated using the following equation: AaDO2 (mm Hg) = 1 x (760 - 47) - PACO2 / R - measured PaO2, where PACO2 is alveolar carbon dioxide tension, R is the respiratory exchange ratio, and PaO2 is arterial oxygen tension. It is assumed that R = 0.85 and PACO2 is the same as arterial carbon dioxide tension.
Experimental protocol
After surgical instrumentation, animals were stabilized for 10 minutes. Then baseline cardiac and lung function were measured.
Cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative management
The circuit for CPB consisted of a roller pump and a membrane oxygenator (VPCML; COBE Laboratories, Arvada, CO). The pump prime consisted of 50 mL/kg of Normosol R (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) and 100 mL/kg of homologous heparanized donor blood to achieve a hematocrit of 20%. An 8-F arterial cannula and a 24-F venous cannula were placed into the left femoral artery and right atrium, respectively. The animals were cooled to 18°C for 30 minutes using a pH stat strategy. Cardiopulmonary bypass flow was maintained at 150 mL · kg-1 · min-1. The esophageal temperature was kept between 16 and 18°C using a temperature-controlled blanket during the 120 minutes of DHCA. The patent foramen ovale was closed using autologous pericardium through a right atriotomy during DHCA. The animal was rewarmed to achieve an esophageal temperature of 38°C. The heart was defibrillated if necessary at a temperature of 30°C. L-arginine was infused intravenously just before the onset of reperfusion as a continuous infusion of 5 mg · kg-1 · min-1 for 100 minutes. In controls, normal saline solution was infused at a rate of 1 mL/minute. Nitroglycerin infusion at 2 µg/kg per minute was started just before reperfusion and continued for 100 minutes. The animals were weaned from bypass and observed for 3 hours after reperfusion in both groups. The esophageal temperature was kept between 37 and 38°C.
Measurements
Preload recruitable stroke work and CI were measured before CPB and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after CPB. Lung function, including AaDO2, lung compliance, PVR, systemic pulmonary pressure/systemic arterial pressure ratio (PAP/SAP) were measured before CPB and 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after CPB. Blood samples were collected from the systemic coronary sinus artery, left atrium, and pulmonary artery before CPB and 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after CPB. Myocardial oxygen extraction was determined as 2 [arterial - O2 content (coronary sinus)]/O2 content (arterial). Nitrate and nitrite were measured to assess NO production by modified Griess reaction [nitrate/nitrite colorimetric assay kit; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI]. Heart and lung tissue samples were collected at the end of the experiment. Tissue malondialdehyde was measured using a spectrophotometric method [14]. Mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes were measured as follows: Cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) was measured as described by Glerum and associates [15]. Succinate cytochromic c reductase (complexes II + III) by following the reduction of cytochrome e was measured as described by Fischer and colleagues [16]. Rotenone sensitive nicotine amide dinucleotide (reduced)-cytochrome c reductase activity (complex I + III) was measured by the method of Moreadith and associates [17].
Total body water was estimated by bioelectrical impedance [18]. If it is assumed that the animals have a relatively constant conduction configuration, the relationship between total body water and impedance is given by the following formula: Total body water
height2/impedance, where impedance is calculated as (reactance2 + resistance2)0.5. The animals were placed in the supine position. The right forearm, upper arm, and lower leg were shaved and cleaned with ethyl alcohol to position the electrodes. The impedance readings were obtained using the Weight Manager Analyzer (BIA-I0IQ; RJL System, Clinton Township, MI), in which the current-transmitting clips were connected to the electrodes.
Statistics
All values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Cardiac index, PRSW, PVR, Cdyn, and bioimpedance were normalized by comparison to baseline values and expressed as a percentage of the baseline values. The paired Students t test and one-way analysis of variance were used for comparison of variables among experimental groups. If the analysis of variance revealed a significant interaction, pairwise tests of individual group means were compared by means of multiple comparisons (Tukey test) using a level of significance of p less than 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiac function
The percentage recovery of PRSW of 60 minutes after CPB was significantly higher in the L-arginine and nitroglycerine groups than in the control group. The percentage recovery of PRSW of 30 and 180 minutes after CPB remained significantly higher in the L-arginine group than in the control group (Fig 1A).
The percentage of recoveries of cardiac index at 30 and 60 minutes after CPB was significantly higher in the L-arginine and nitroglycerine groups than in the control group (Fig 1B).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitric oxide and cardiac function
We found that when the NO precursor L-arginine or the NO donor nitroglycerine is administered during reperfusion after DHCA, both the percentage recovery of PRSW and percentage recovery of cardiac index were improved without increasing the heart tissue malondialdehyde and without decreasing the activities of mitochrondrial respiratory chain complexes. These results suggest that the administration of L-arginine or nitroglycerine during reperfusion might be a useful therapeutic maneuver and that provision of either increased amounts of NO substrate or a NO donor did not result in increased malondialdehyde (free radical) production. Contrary to the results of this study, administration of a NO synthase inhibitor has been shown to decrease postischemic injury in some studies in rabbits. Radi and associates [19] reported that peroxynitrite, formed as a result of the interaction between superoxide anions and NO, exerts cytotoxic effects. Beckman and colleagues [20] suggested that generation of hydroxyl radical (OH·) by the Haber-Weiss pathway might be limited in vivo and proposed that during the decompensation of ONOO, the highly reactive oxygen species, OH· can be formed by the following mechanism:
![]() |
Nitric oxide and lung function
Cardiopulmonary bypass and DHCA often cause lung dysfunction, with increased pulmonary resistance, pulmonary edema, and impaired gas exchange. That dysfunction remains a significant cause of morbidity in patients with impaired right ventricular function. Pulmonary vasomotor tone is modulated by the vascular endothelium, which maintains a balance between vasodilators and vasoconstrictors. Cardiopulmonary bypass with DHCA may alter the balance by impairing endothelium-dependent vasodilation and increasing production of vasoconstrictors. Our results show that L-arginine or nitroglycerine decreased PVR and PAP/SAP after DHCA. The inflammatory response resulted in an increase in vascular fluid and protein leakage as well as leukocyte activation and adhesion in postcapillary venules. Our bioimpedance results show the possibility that NO is an important mediator of fluid accumulation during cardiopulmonary bypass with DHCA. This finding also suggests that NO might modulate microvascular permeability and minimize pulmonary edema. The results are in agreement with recent studies showing that inhaled NO reduces microvascular injury produced by an oxygen radical generation system [24]. However, the protective mechanism of NO donors against ischemia-reperfusioninduced microvascular injury is still not known. It is possible that NO donors prevent microvascular damage by increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels in leukocytes and by reducing leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions and neutrophil reaction in the lung [25]. Nitric oxide is also known to decrease platelet aggregation [7]. This decrease in platelet aggregation may improve the microcirculation in the pulmonary vascular bed. However, the impairments in gas exchange function were only partially reversed by L-arginine.
In contrast with our results, some studies have shown that oxidative lung injury could be induced by L-arginine infusion. They indicate that NO has the ability to form the toxic reactive oxygen species peroxynitrite in the presence of superoxide [13]. As in the case of cardiac function, these discrepancies may result from model differences.
In conclusion, the addition of a NO precursor or a NO donor during reperfusion had beneficial effects on cardiac and lung function. The toxic reaction mediated by peroxynitrite production in ischemia-reperfusion injury did not appear to be present in our model. Although the exact mechanism of the protective or toxic effects still remains unclear, NO appears to be a potentially important component in the recovery of myocardial and lung function from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dose and timing of L-arginine or NO donor administration.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One comment on nitric oxide versus peroxynitrite, because many people do look at nitric oxide as having two sides. Really, you only see damaging effects if you have very, very high doses or concentrations of nitric oxide, or if you are using nitric oxide in crystalloid solutions where there is no detoxifying agent such as glutathione or other thiol agents. So, it is not very surprising, and it is actually gratifying to see, that you found beneficial effects with nitric oxide in your in vivo model.
And one question: Did you use a different donor than nitroglycerine, maybe a more spontaneous donor than nitroglycerine? And what is your mechanism of action?
DR HATSUOKA: I thank you very much for your question.
Certainly nitric oxide has been found to have both good and bad effects in various studies. In the blood-perfused model, the action of L-arginine or nitroglycerine on platelets and neutrophils may have a confounding effect and make it difficult to determine the actual effect of L-arginine or nitroglycerine on the myocardium or lung. Our results did show that there was no significant difference in malondialdehyde between groups. We think that the possible explanation for the discrepancy of many nitric oxide studies may be due to difference in the perfusate, and therefore further studies would be required to solve the problem of the optimal dose or optimal time at the infusion.
DR JOHN W. BROWN (Indianapolis, IN): I guess I like to take the privilege of the podium to ask the senior author, John Mayer, to make a comment as to whether or not the use of L-arginine or nitroglycerine has crept into their clinical practice and whether it has affected their use of nitric oxide in the pre- and postoperative management of children with congenital heart disease.
DR MAYER: Well, I would say that I routinely administer nitroglycerine beginning 5 or 10 minutes before we take the aortic cross-clamp off as part of a routine clinical practice. So to that extent I guess you can say this has more than crept into our clinical practice.
When we initially got involved in the studies around nitric oxide, one of the thoughts that I had was to infuse L-arginine; maybe that would be an interesting study to do. But since nitroglycerine is so available and does not have demonstrably different effects, at least in these kinds of studies, and is much less expensive than trying to make up drips containing L-arginine, we chose to go with the nitroglycerine.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Yang, Z. Su, J. Cai, S. Wang, J. Liu, Z. Xu, and W. Ding Continuous Pulmonary Infusion of L-Arginine During Deep Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest Improves Pulmonary Surfactant Integrity in Piglets Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 429 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |