ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Alessandro Brunelli
Majed Al Refai
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brunelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fianchini, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brunelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fianchini, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1958-1962
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original article: general thoracic

Pleural tent after upper lobectomy: a randomized study of efficacy and duration of effect

Alessandro Brunelli, MDa*, Majed Al Refai, MDa, Marco Monteverde, MDa, Alessandro Borri, MDa, Michele Salati, MDa, Armando Sabbatini, MDa, Aroldo Fianchini, MDa

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy

Accepted for publication June 27, 2002.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Brunelli, Via S Margherita 23, Ancona 60129, Italy
e-mail: alexit_2000{at}yahoo.com


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: The object of this study was to assess the efficay and maximum duration of effect of the pleural tent in reducing the incidence of air leak after upper lobectomy.

METHODS: Two hundred patients who underwent upper lobectomy were prospectively randomized into two groups: 100 patients who underwent an upper lobectomy and a pleural tent procedure (group 1; tented patients) and 100 patients who underwent only an upper lobectomy and not a pleural tent procedure (group 2; untented patients). The preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics of both groups were compared. Then multivariate analyses were used to identify factors predictive of prolonged air leaks and their duration. The reduction of incidences of air leak in the two groups was subsequently compared during successive postoperative periods.

RESULTS: No differences were detected between the two groups in terms of preoperative and operative characteristics. A significant reduction occurred in group 1 patients for the mean duration of air leak in days (2.5 vs 7.2 days; p < 0001), the number of days a chest tube was required (7.0 vs 11.2 days; p < 0.0001), the length of postoperative hospital stay in days (8.2 vs 11.6 days; p < 0.0001), and the hospital stay cost per patient ($4,110 vs $5,805; p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analyses showed that not having undergone a pleural tent procedure was the most significant predictive factor of the occurrence and duration of prolonged air leaks. A greater reduction in the duration of air leaks was observed before postoperative day 4 in group 1, and logistic regression analysis showed that having undergone a pleural tent procedure was the most significant predictive factor of air leaks that persisted for less than 4 days.

CONCLUSIONS: Pleural tenting after upper lobectomy was a safe procedure that reduced the duration of air leaks and the hospital stay costs. The benefit from that procedure was achieved before postoperative day 4.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Parenchymal air leak is a frequent complication after upper lobectomy. One of the most plausible explanations for these leaks is that after upper lobectomy the raw surface of the remaining lung does not remain in opposition to the parietal pleura of the apex. The creation of a pleural tent eliminates a persistent apical pleural space and facilitates the sealing of air leaks. The favorable results of the pleural tent procedure, which are described in a previously published retrospective study [1], prompted us to investigate the effect of the pleural tent prospectively. Preliminary favorable results [2] prompted us to conduct an analysis of the effects of pleural tenting after upper lobectomy in a larger randomized series.

The objectives of this study were to assess the cost–benefit ratio of this procedure in a larger prospective randomized trial and to evaluate the duration of the maximum effect of pleural tenting in reducing air leaks after upper lobectomy.


   Patients and methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent upper lobectomy (194 patients) and right upper bilobectomies (6 patients) for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma at our institution from June 1998 through January 2002 formed the database of this study. The first 50 patients of that population constituted the series reported in our previous analysis [2] of the effect of pleural tenting after upper lobectomy. Because of the conclusion of that study, we have been performing pleural tent procedures routinely after upper lobectomy. For this analysis, we decided to randomize an additional 75 patients to the group who did not undergo a pleural tent procedure.

Thus before an operation the patients were randomized into two groups: 100 patients who underwent an upper lobectomy and a pleural tent procedure (group 1; tented patients) and 100 patients who underwent only an upper lobectomy and not a pleural tent procedure (group 2 untented patients). Patients who underwent chest wall resection or required postoperative mechanical ventilatory support were excluded from the study.

The same surgical team performed the lobectomies by muscle-sparing thoracotomy at the fourth or fifth intercostal space. Mechanical staplers were used to develop incomplete fissures in 80 patients in group 1, in 77 patients in group 2, and to close the bronchus in all patients. Pleural tenting was performed according to the technique previously reported elsewhere [1–4] after completion of the lobectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy. From the upper border of the thoracotomy incision, the parietal pleura was dissected down from the endothoracic fascia of the thoracic wall and apex. After the dissection had been completed, the free pleural margin was sutured in its midportion to the intercostal muscle at the chest wound to create a tent configuration.

Two chest tubes were positioned, one anteriorly and one posteriorly, in all patients. In the patients with a pleural tent, the tubes were directed under the tent. During the postoperative period, the chest tubes were placed on suction (-10/-20 cm H2O) and removed when the quantity of effusion was less than 200 mL in 24 hours and when no evidence of air leak was present (after a 24-hour clamping trial).

For the purpose of this study, air leaks that persisted for more than 7 days were termed prolonged. Furthermore, the following complications occurred within 30 days after the operation (or over a longer period if the patient remained hospitalized): atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, adult respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac failure, arrhythmia requiring medical treatment, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, metabolic complications, reoperation.

Statistical analysis
Numerical variables of the two groups were compared by means of the unpaired Student’s t test, and the {chi}2 test was used to compare categorical variables.

The following preoperative variables were considered: the patient’s age and gender, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the forced vital capacity (FEF25%–75%), predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppoFEV1), index of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), smoking (pack-years), side of tumor, arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), and partial pressure (tension) of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2). FEV1, FVC, FEF25%–75%, and ppoFEV1 were expressed as a percentage of predicted value for age, gender, and height according to the European Community for Steel and Coal prediction equations [5]. PpoFEV1 was calculated on the basis of the functioning segments removed and was estimated by computed tomographic scan and bronchoscopy [6]. If the calculated ppoFEV1 was less than 50% of the predicted value, a quantitative lung perfusion scan was performed according to Markos and colleagues [7].

The COPD index was calculated by adding the FEV1 value in decimal form to the FEV1/FVC ratio, according to Korst and colleagues [8].

Operative variables included the tumor size, the location of the tumor (central and peripheral), the presence of pleural adhesions, the length of the stapled parenchyma, and total operative time.

Postoperative variables included the duration of air leaks in days, the presence of a prolonged air leak, the duration of chest tube use in days, the quantity of pleural effusion during the first 48 hours after the operation, the number of units of postoperative blood transfused, the presence of other complications, the length of postoperative hospital stay in days, and the cost of hospital stay (estimated cost, $500 per day).

Stepwise logistic regression analysis was then performed to assess two models. In model 1 the dependent variable was the presence or absence of a prolonged air leak (categorical variable); in model 2 the dependent variable was the duration of the air leak (continuous variable). The predictors of a prolonged air leak in both models were the patient’s age, size of tumor, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, FEF25%–75%, ppoFEV1, COPD index, smoking (pack-years), presence of pleural tent or pleural adhesions, length of the staple line, PaO2, and PaCO2.

To identify the maximum duration of the efficacy of the pleural tent, we compared the reduction in the number of patients with air leak occurrance in successive postoperative periods (<2 days, <4 days, <6 days, <8 days, and <10 days, respectively for groups 1 and 2). These differences were assessed by means of Fisher’s exact test.

When groups 1 and 2 were compared, patients in group 1 (those with a pleural tent) had significantly fewer incidences of air leak than those in group 2 did before postoperative day 4 (see Results). A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed on the entire database to identify factors predictive of an air leak that would persist less than 4 days after the operation (the dependent variable). The following independent variables were used: patient age, size of tumor, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, FEF25%–75%, ppoFEV1, COPD index, smoking (pack-years), presence of a pleural tent or pleural adhesions, length of the staple line, PaO2, and PaCO2.

Statview 5.0 software (SAS Inc, Cary, NC) was used to perform all statistical tests, which were two-tailed with a significant level of 0.05.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Tables 1, 2, and 3 show the results of comparing groups 1 and 2. No differences in preoperative and operative variables were detected. However, in group 1 (when compared with group 2), there was a 65.7% reduction in the duration of air leaks (p < 0.0001), a 56.2% reduction in the incidence of prolonged air leaks (p = 0.002), a 37.5% reduction in the duration for which a chest tube was required (p < 0.0001), a 29.2% reduction in the length of postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.0001), and a mean reduction per patient of $1,695 in the cost of hospital stay (p < 0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Preoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Upper Lobectomies With Pleural Tent (100 Cases) and Without Pleural Tent (100 Cases)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Comparison of Operative Characteristics Between Patients With Pleural Tent (100 Cases) and Without Pleural Tent (100 Cases)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Comparison of Postoperative Characteristics Between Patients With Pleural Tent (100 Cases) and Without Pleural Tent (100 Cases)

 
In Table 4, the results of the logistic regression analyses are shown. In model 1, older patient age and the absence of a pleural tent were significant independent predictors of a prolonged air leak. In model 2 the only significant independent variable associated with the duration of air leak was the absence of a pleural tent.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4. Results of the Logistic Regression Analysis for Prediction of Air Leak

 
Table 5 shows the results of comparing the reduction in the incidence of air leak in successive postoperative periods with the two groups. A significantly greater decrease in the incidence of air leak was observed in group 1 in the earlier postoperative period when compared with the incidence in group 2 (<2 days and <4 days, respectively). In those patients with an air leak of 4 days of duration or longer, there was no significant difference in air leak duration between tented and untented patients (10.4 ± 4.2 versus 12.6 ± 8.6, respectively; Student’s t test = 1; p = 0.3). In Table 6, the results of the logistic regression analysis performed to identify predictors of air leak of less than 4 days of duration are shown; significant independent variables were the patient’s age and presence of a pleural tent.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5. Number of Patients Without Air Leak at Successive Postoperative Intervals

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 6. Results of the Logistic Regression Analysis to Identify Predictors of Air Leak Lasting Less Than 4 Days

 

   Comment
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
Acknowledgments
 References
 
Pleural tenting was originally designed to prevent overexpansion of the lung after resection for tuberculosis [3] and was then applied to prevent air leaks after upper lobectomy [9, 10]. Stimulated by the recent use of pleural tenting after lung volume reduction operation [11], some authors retrospectively [1] and prospectively [2, 12] investigated the efficacy of the procedure.

The objectives of this study were to assess the costs and benefits of the pleural tent in a prospective randomized trial and identify the time of maximum duration of efficacy of the procedure.

The results of our analysis confirmed the favorable findings reported previously by our group and others [1, 2, 12].

We found that after upper lobectomy, patients in group 1 exhibited an average of 4.7 fewer days of air leak than patients without the pleural tent. Furthermore, with the tented patients, the mean duration of chest tube use was 4.2 days less, and the mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 3.4 days less. Three patients with a pleural tent and 12 patients without tents were discharged with a Heimlich valve ({chi}2 = 5.8; p = 0.015). We also demonstrated that the time taken to perform a pleural tent procedure did not significantly increase the total operative time. In addition, we did not observe a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications or a significant increase in the need for postoperative blood transfusion in patients who underwent pleural tenting.

The results of logistic regression analyses indicated that the absence of a pleural tent was the most significant independent variable associated with a prolonged air leak and with the duration of air leak.

Subsequently, we found that patients with a pleural tent experienced the maximum reduction in duration of air leak before postoperative day 4. Moreover, the presence of a pleural tent was identified as the most significant independent predictor of an air leak lasting less than 4 days (after controlling for the effect of other variables in a multiple regression analysis). Thus we can confidently assume that the greatest reduction rate in the duration of air leak observed in group 1 during the first 4 postoperative days was predominantly an effect of the presence of the pleural tent. However, pleural tenting appeared to exert a diminished beneficial effect after postoperative day 4 in patients who had undergone upper lobectomy.

In conclusion, we have confirmed that pleural tenting is a safe procedure that can be accomplished quickly, and that, when performed, reduces the duration of air leaks and the cost of hospital stay. Even though additional large prospective studies are needed to further confirm this finding, we recommend the routine use of pleural tenting after upper lobectomy.


   Acknowledgments
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
References
 
We thank Dr William F. Sasser for language editing the manuscript.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Robinson L.A., Preksto D. Pleural tenting after upper lobectomy decreases chest tube time and total hospitalization days. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:319-327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Brunelli A., Al Refai M., Muti M., Sabbatini A., Fianchini A. Pleural tent after upper lobectomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1722-1724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Miscall L., Duffy R.W., Nolan R.B., Klopstock R. The pleural tent as a simultaneous tailoring procedure in combination with pulmonary resection. Am Rev Tuberc 1956;73:831-852.[Medline]
  4. Miller J. Acute and delayed space problems following pulmonary resection. Chest Surg Clin North Am 1996;6:615-621.[Medline]
  5. Quanjer PhH, Tammeling G.J., Cotes J.E., Pedersen O.F., Peslin R., Yernault J.C. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party. Standardization of lung function tests. European Community for Steel and Coal. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993;6(Suppl 16):5-40.[Medline]
  6. Brunelli A., Fianchini A. Predicted postoperative FEV1 and complications in lung resection candidates. Chest 1997;111:1145-1146.[Free Full Text]
  7. Markos J., Mullan B.P., Hillman D.R., et al. Pre-operative assessment as a predictor of morbidity and mortality after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:902-910.[Medline]
  8. Korst R.J., Ginsberg R.J., Ailawadi M., et al. Lobectomy improves ventilatory function in selected patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:898-902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hansen J.L. Parietal pleurolysis (the pleural tent) as a simul-taneous space-reducing procedure in combination with pulmonary resection. Acta Chir Scand 1957;112:485-488.[Medline]
  10. Bell J.W. Management of the postresection space in tuberculosis. III. Role of pre- and post-resection thoracoplasty. J Thorac Surg 1956;31:580-592.
  11. Cooper J.D., Patterson G.A., Sundaresan R.S., et al. Results of 150 consecutive bilateral lung volume reduction procedures in patients with severe emphysema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1319-1330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Okur E., Kir A., Halezeroglu S., Levent Alpay A., Atasalihi A. Pleural tent following upper lobectomies or bilobectomies of the lung to prevent residual air space and prolonged air leak. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:1012-1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Cerfolio and A. S. Bryant
The Benefits of Continuous and Digital Air Leak Assessment After Elective Pulmonary Resection: A Prospective Study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 396 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Cerfolio, A. S. Bryant, and L. M. Maniscalco
Management of Subcutaneous Emphysema After Pulmonary Resection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1759 - 1765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Gomez-Caro, M. J. R. Calvo, J. T. Lanzas, R. Chau, P. Cascales, and P. Parrilla
The approach of fused fissures with fissureless technique decreases the incidence of persistent air leak after lobectomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 31(2): 203 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
A. Brunelli, F. Xiume, M. Al Refai, M. Salati, R. Marasco, and A. Sabbatini
Air leaks after lobectomy increase the risk of empyema but not of cardiopulmonary complications: a case-matched analysis.
Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1150 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Thomas, G. Massard, H. Porte, C. Doddoli, X. Ducrocq, and M. Conti
A new bioabsorbable sleeve for lung staple-line reinforcement (FOREsealtrade mark): report of a three-center phase II clinical trial.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 29(6): 880 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Ueda, Y. Kaneda, M. Sudo, J. Mitsutaka, T.-S. Li, K. Suga, N. Tanaka, and K. Hamano
Quantitative Computed Tomography Versus Spirometry in Predicting Air Leak Duration After Major Lung Resection for Cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1853 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Okereke, S. C. Murthy, J. M. Alster, E. H. Blackstone, and T. W. Rice
Characterization and Importance of Air Leak After Lobectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1167 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Varela, M. F. Jimenez, N. Novoa, and J. L. Aranda
Estimating hospital costs attributable to prolonged air leak in pulmonary lobectomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 329 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Brunelli, M. Monteverde, A. Borri, M. Salati, R. D. Marasco, M. Al Refai, and A. Fianchini
Comparison of water seal and suction after pulmonary lobectomy: a prospective, randomized trial
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 1932 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Cerfolio
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 1937 - 1937.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Brunelli, M. Monteverde, A. Borri, M. Salati, R. D. Marasco, and A. Fianchini
Predictors of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1205 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
C. A. Keller
Lasers, Staples, Bovine Pericardium, Talc, Glue and... Suction Cylinders?: Tools of the Trade To Avoid Air Leaks in Lung Volume Reduction Surgery
Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 361 - 363.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Alessandro Brunelli
Majed Al Refai
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brunelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fianchini, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brunelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fianchini, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS