ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Zoltán Szabó
Rolf Svedjeholm
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szabó, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Svedjeholm, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szabó, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Svedjeholm, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:712-719
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Early postoperative outcome and medium-term survival in 540 diabetic and 2239 nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Zoltán Szabó, MD, PhDa, Erik Håkanson, MD, PhDa, Rolf Svedjeholm, MD, PhD*b

a Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Linköping Heart Center, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Linköping Heart Center, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden

Accepted for publication April 25, 2002.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Svedjeholm, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Linköping Heart Center, University Hospital, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
e-mail: rolf.svedjeholm{at}lio.se


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. An increasing proportion of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are diabetics. Patient characteristics, early postoperative outcome, and midterm survival in diabetic patients after CABG were investigated.

Methods. A total of 2779 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG during 1995 to 1999 were studied, 19.4% of whom had diabetes mellitus. Demographic and peri-procedural data were registered prospectively in a computerized institutional database.

Results. The diabetic group was younger and included a higher proportion of women, and patients with hypertension, triple-vessel disease, and unstable angina. They required a higher number of bypasses, and longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. Intensive care unit and hospital stays were prolonged and the need for inotropic agents, hemotransfusions, and dialysis was higher in the diabetic group. Renal failure, stroke (4.3% versus 1.7%), mediastinitis, and wound infections were more frequently encountered. Thirty-day mortality was 2.6% versus 1.6% (p = 0.15). Cumulative 5-year survival was 84.4% versus 91.3% (p < 0.001).

Conclusions. Short-term mortality was acceptable in diabetic patients after CABG but they had increased postoperative morbidity in comparison with nondiabetic patients, particularly with regard to renal function, cerebral complications, and infections. Midterm survival was impaired in diabetic patients mainly because of a less favorable outcome in patients treated with insulin.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Diabetes mellitus is a recognized risk factor for the development of the coronary artery disease and an independent risk factor for mortality from myocardial infarction [1]. Diabetes is also a risk factor in association with myocardial revascularization procedures but, according to recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be the treatment of choice in this group of patients [2]. A consequence of the evolution of coronary angioplasty is that a higher proportion of patients undergoing CABG today either have extensive coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus. A previous large scale Scandinavian study demonstrated a more than twofold increase in early postoperative mortality among diabetic patients [3]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate short-term outcome in terms of postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality and medium-term survival in all diabetic patients undergoing CABG in the southeast health region of Sweden.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Patients
The University Hospital in Linköping is the referral center for the southeast region of Sweden serving a population of approximately 1 million. From January 1995 to December 31, 1999, all 2779 patients undergoing isolated CABG were studied. Five hundred forty (19.4%) of these patients had a history of diabetes mellitus on admission that had necessitated active therapy with diet or medication (45% were on insulin treatment and 38.0% on oral antidiabetic agents). Demographic and perioperative data are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Data

 
Methods
Demographic and peri-procedural data including complications were registered prospectively in a computerized institutional database (Summit Vista for Windows; Summit Medical Systems Inc, Version 1.98.1). All fields were defined in a data dictionary. Data on late mortality were retrieved from the Swedish Civil Registry and included follow-up to March 2000.

Clinical management
After an overnight’s fast, and administration of their beta-blockers and calcium-antagonists, the patients were premedicated with 4 to 10 mg oxicone and 0.2 to 0.5 mg scopolamine intramuscularly. Anesthesia was induced with thiopentone 1 to 2 mg/kg body weight (BW) and fentanyl 10 µg/kg BW. Pancuronium bromide was used for neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesia was maintained with intermittent doses of fentanyl and isoflurane.

Most patients underwent CABG using standard techniques with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamping. Ringer’s acetate and mannitol were used for priming the extracorporeal circuit. Moderate hemodilution (hematocrit 20% to 25%) and light hypothermia (33° to 36°C) were usually used. Antegrade or combined ante- and retrograde delivery of a modified St. Thomas’ cold crystalloid cardioplegic solution (Plegisol, Abbot, IL) was used for myocardial protection. Weaning from CPB was started at a rectal temperature of 35° to 36°C. Heparin was neutralized with protamine chloride. A total of 4.3% of the procedures were done without the aid of CPB. Ringer’s acetate was used for volume substitution postoperatively. Shed mediastinal blood was routinely retransfused in the intensive care unit (ICU). Postoperative rewarming was facilitated by radiant heat provided by a thermal ceiling.

Prevention and treatment of postoperative heart failure differed from traditional treatment by frequent use of metabolic interventions with intravenous glutamate or high-dose glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK). Details about these treatments have been given previously [4, 5]. Postoperatively the patients received heparin or dalteparin 5000 IU twice daily until fully mobilized. Salicylic acid 160 mg daily was given during the first week and thereafter changed to 75 mg daily.

Definitions
Patients were classified as diabetic only if they had an established diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to medical records that could be confirmed by the patient. Registration in the database also required active treatment on admission ranging from diet to insulin. Thus, history of diabetes was not based on actual laboratory values after admission. Complications presented refer to in-hospital events occurring at our institution. Perioperative myocardial infarction was defined by combined electrocardiogram and enzyme criteria. Electrocardiographic criteria included appearance of new Q-waves in at least two or more contiguous leads or the appearance of pathologic R-wave progression together with inversion of T-waves in at least two leads on a 12-lead electrocardiogram. Enzyme criteria included ASAT exceeding 3.0 µkat/L with alanine aminotransferase less than half of the aspartate aminotransferase value, usually supported by a creatine kinase MB fraction of more than 70 µg/L on the first postoperative morning or by a sustained elevation of troponin-T of more than 2.0 µg/L on the third to fourth postoperative day. Stroke was defined as a permanent or transient central neurologic deficit. Most patients with suspected neurologic injury were examined by computed tomography scan. Cognitive dysfunction was not assessed. Postoperative renal failure was defined as a serum creatinine level exceeding 170 µ mol/L regardless of preoperative value. Use of inotropic agents was defined as the use of either catecholamines or phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Sepsis was defined as a septic clinical condition with positive blood cultures. Hospital stay refers to hospital stay at the University Hospital (most patients were discharged to the referring hospitals). The cause of death was defined as the event initiating multiorgan failure if several potential causes were described. The other variables in the database were defined according to definitions of the Society of Thoracic Surgery Cardiac and Thoracic Databases.

Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Nonparametric tests, the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables were used for comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. The {chi}2 test for unordered categories was used to compare the incidence of different complications within the diabetic cohort depending on the type of antidiabetic therapy on admission. Cumulative long-term survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p less than 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with computerized statistical packages (Statistica 5.5, StatSoft, Inc, Tulsa, OK; Statview for Windows 5.0.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Preoperative data
The diabetic group was characterized by lower mean age, higher body mass index, a higher proportion of female patients, and more patients with hypertension, triple-vessel disease, and unstable angina. Left-main stenosis was less frequently encountered in the diabetic group. Details are given in Table 1.

Intraoperative data
Most (95.7%) of the procedures were performed with CPB in both groups; arterial grafts were used in 95.4% of the diabetic patients and 94.0% of the nondiabetic patients. The diabetic group was characterized by a higher number of distal anastomoses, and longer aortic cross-clamp and CPB times. No significant difference was found in the use of inotropic agents, but high-dose GIK was more frequently used in diabetic patients. Details are given in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Intraoperative Data

 
Hemodynamic results
Use of Swan-Ganz catheter postoperatively was registered in 7.9% of the cases (10.9% of diabetic and 7.2% of nondiabetic patients). Detailed hemodynamic measurements were not recorded in the database. Mixed venous oxygen saturation was registered as it was monitored routinely by sampling from an epidural catheter, which was inserted intraoperatively through the right ventricular outflow tract into the pulmonary artery. Mixed venous oxygen saturation on arrival to ICU was lower in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients (65.1% ± 6.9% versus 66.6% ± 7.0%; p < 0.001).

Overall metabolic interventions with high-dose GIK including use intraoperatively and postoperatively were recorded in 20.4% of the diabetic patients compared with 10.5% of the nondiabetic patients (p < 0.001). No difference in the overall use of intravenous glutamate was found (4.8% versus 4.6%; p = 0.82).

The use of inotropic agents did not differ intraoperatively (6.5% versus 4.6%) but was higher in the diabetic group during their ICU stay (13.9% versus 8.9%; p = 0.006).

Postoperative data
The diabetic group had longer ICU and hospital stays. Hemotransfusions were more frequently used in the diabetic group. Stroke, renal failure, use of dialysis, wound infections, and reoperations for mediastinitis were more often observed in the diabetic patients.

Overall results are given in Table 3 and the major complications are described below. Univariate analysis of diabetes as a risk factor for major complications is given in Table 4. Intergroup differences regarding mortality and major complications depending on diabetic treatment on admission is given in Figure 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Postoperative Outcome

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Univariate Analysis of Diabetes as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Events

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Thirty-day mortality and the incidence of stroke, renal failure, and sternal wound infections after coronary artery bypass grafting in nondiabetic (control, n = 2239) and diabetic patients depending on diabetic therapy (diet, n = 97; tablet, n = 205; insulin, n = 238). *Statistically significant difference between the diet and insulin-treated groups ({chi}2 test for unordered categories) within the diabetic cohort of patients.

 
Infectious complications
The diabetic patients had a higher incidence of reoperations for mediastinitis (1.3% versus 0.2%; p < 0.001). The incidence of deep and superficial sternal wound infections was also higher in the diabetic group (4.3% versus 1.5%; p < 0.001). The registered incidence of septicemia and pneumonia was 0.6% and 3.0%, respectively, in diabetics, which did not differ from the respective 0.8% and 2.1% registered in nondiabetic patients.

Renal complications
Preoperative dialysis was observed in 0.6% of the diabetic group and 0.4% of the nondiabetic gourp. The need for postoperative dialysis in the remaining patients was higher in the diabetic group (0.9% versus 0.2%; p = 0.03). A postoperative s-creatinine level exceeding 170 µmol/L was observed in 3.9% of the diabetic patients compared with 2.2% of the nondiabetic patients (p = 0.03).

Neurologic outcome
The total incidence of stroke was 4.3% in the diabetic group and 1.7% in the nondiabetic group (p < 0.001). The neurologic deficit had resolved during the hospital stay in 17% of the diabetic patients and 22% of the nondiabetic patients.

Mortality
Thirty-day mortality was 2.6% in the diabetic group and 1.6% in nondiabetic group (p = 0.15). The primary cause of early mortality was cardiac in 41.7% in the diabetic patients and 67.6% of the nondiabetic patients. Neurologic injury was the cause of the early death in 33.3% of the diabetic patients compared with 14.7% in the nondiabetic patients. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 3 to 63 months). The crude mortality during this period was 10.2% in the diabetic group compared with 5.6% in the nondiabetic group (p < 0.001). Cumulative 5-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 84.4% in the diabetic patients and 91.3% in the nondiabetic patients (p < 0.001; Fig 2).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Cumulative 5-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.

 
The cumulative 5-year-survival depending on type of antidiabetic treatment is given in Figure 3. Patients with insulin-treated diabetes had a poorer midterm survival than patients whose diabetes was controlled by oral antidiabetic agents or diet.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Cumulative 5-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) after coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients depending on method of antidiabetic therapy on admission.

 
In the diabetic population the use of left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was associated with a 2.3% 30-day mortality compared with 8.0% mortality if the LITA was not used (p = 0.13). At 6 months the mortality associated with LITA use in diabetic patients was 3.9% versus 12.0% if the LITA was not used (p = 0.07).


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
An increasing proportion of patients undergoing CABG are diabetic [6]. However, the proportions of CABG patients that are diabetic vary markedly even within the European community. A recent survey of risk factor variation demonstrated that the proportions of diabetic patients ranged from 11.8% to 27.7% [7]. In the present study, 19.4% of the patients were diabetic when all patients with an established diagnosis and active treatment ranging from diet to insulin were included.

Before the results are discussed some aspects of study design deserve comment. The major strengths of the study were the completeness of survival data, prospective data collection, and that the material represented all diabetic patients undergoing CABG in the southeast region of Sweden during the given time interval.

The limitations of the study included aspects inherent to large data registries with various degrees of incomplete data, hazards associated with definitions of data entries, and possible misclassification of some individual data. To attenuate these limitations, only reasonably complete data were assessed. Mortality data were checked against the Swedish Civil Registry.

The mean age was younger in diabetic patients, which is consistent with studies demonstrating a more rapidly evolving atherosclerotic progress in diabetic individuals [8]. Accordingly, triple-vessel disease was overrepresented in diabetic patients. As in previous studies, female sex and hypertension also were overrepresented in the diabetic group [3, 9, 10].

Data in the literature conflict regarding the influence of diabetes on outcome after cardiac operations [3, 914]. It is generally accepted that diabetic individuals have a higher mortality and morbidity in association with CABG, but the influence of diabetes per se on outcome has been under debate. Some studies have found associated risk factors to explain the differences in postoperative mortality [11], whereas other studies have claimed diabetes to be an independent risk factor for mortality even after adjustment for confounding factors [3, 9, 10]. In the present study a sufficiently broad set of validated and complete data were not considered to be available to permit reliable multivariable analysis of diabetes per se as an independent risk factor. With the exception of studies that have either included a limited number of patients [12] or matched surgical populations [13, 14], most studies have found diabetes to be associated with an increased early postoperative mortality [3, 911]. In our study the difference in postoperative 30-day mortality between diabetic and nondiabetic patients did not reach statistical significance. However, in agreement with previous studies we found an untoward effect of diabetes on late outcome, with a 1.9-fold increased risk of late mortality during the follow-up compared with nondiabetic patients. Also, in agreement with previous studies an increased risk of postoperative morbidity particularly with regard to renal failure, neurologic injury, and wound infections was observed [3, 10, 13, 15, 16].

Previous studies that investigated subgroups of diabetic patients have found the method of therapy on admission, preoperative blood glucose level, and presence of proteinuria to predict an adverse outcome [10, 1719]. Our database did not provide information about blood glucose control on admission or the presence of proteinuria, but in agreement with previous studies diabetic patients dependent on insulin treatment had worse long-term survival and seemed to account for the difference in midterm outcome between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups (Figures 2 and 3). The diabetic treatment required on admission was also related to early postoperative morbidity particularly with regard to renal failure and wound infections (Fig 1). As the complications presented only refer to in-hospital events, the incidence of some complications such as neurologic injury, and in particular wound infections, may have been underestimated.

In general the incidence of complications was comparable to that reported in the literature and the short-term mortality compared favorably with most previous studies (Table 5). With the exception of a low rate of redo procedures, our case-mix does not seem to be less severe compared with most other studies on this issue. The mean age and the proportion of patients with unstable angina was higher than in most studies [3, 9, 10, 17, 20, 21]. However, the results regarding unstable angina have to be interpreted with regard to a shift toward a larger proportion of Braunwald Class II C patients being operated during recent years, particularly after the FRISC II trial [22]. Furthermore, due to differences in case-mix between countries even within the European community and even within countries using similar principles for case selection and therapy, comparisons have to be made cautiously. In a similar large scale Swedish study, the 30-day mortality rate was more than twofold higher [3]. Our results do not provide any clear explanations for this discrepancy, but the previous study included a higher proportion of redo procedures and patients with previous history of cerebrovascular disease. Also, differences between institutions in perioperative management deserve consideration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Comparative Studies on Diabetic and Nondiabetic Populations Undergoing Coronary Operation

 
Compared with other studies the use of arterial grafts in diabetic patients was comparatively high in our study [3, 10]. The use of LITA has been shown to be associated with reduced long-term mortality and possibly a reduced operative mortality [23, 24]. In our study the number of diabetic patients not receiving LITA (n = 25) was too small to achieve statistical significance, but nonuse of LITA was associated with a trend suggesting that these premises also apply to diabetic patients. Thus, the high proportion of LITA grafts used could be speculated to have contributed to the favorable results regarding mortality. However, the low early postoperative mortality reported by Clement and colleagues [14] (Table 5) in diabetic patients despite a 44% use of LITA seems to argue against the impact of LITA for short-term outcome in diabetic patients. One further aspect that deserves consideration when the impact of LITA for short-term outcome is discussed is the change in strategy that has occurred over time toward routine use of LITA. Thus, nonuse of LITA today may have different implications than in older studies, such as a higher probability of hemodynamic instability or emergency procedure as the reason for not harvesting LITA. However, available data in the literature suggest that the impact of LITA for long-term survival is similar in diabetic and nondiabetic patients, but the use of LITA does not negate the adverse effect of diabetes on long-term survival [25].

The perioperative care in our study differed from traditional management by the use of metabolic treatment with high-dose GIK and glutamate for prevention and treatment of perioperative heart failure [4, 5]. This difference could explain the comparatively low use of inotropic agents intraoperatively in both groups of patients. Whether these characteristics of perioperative care contributed to the overall results remains to be established.

An interesting observation is that other investigators who have used insulin or GIK for metabolic control in diabetic patients undergoing CABG have presented favorable results [13, 26]. The role of insulin and strict blood glucose control for outcome in association with cardiac -elated critical conditions has received increasing attention over the last few years. In critically ill surgical patients, intensive insulin treatment to achieve strict blood glucose control was found to reduce both morbidity and mortality [27]. Approximately two thirds of these patients had undergone cardiac operative procedures and in this subgroup the unadjusted reduction in ICU mortality was 59%. The benefit from insulin treatment in diabetic patients was not as evident as in nondiabetic patients. However, strict metabolic control with insulin infusion after cardiac operation has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of wound infections in diabetic patients [28]. Furthermore, in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, insulin infusions have been shown to reduce late mortality [29]. The latter study is particularly interesting as it suggests that optimization of metabolic control in the acute phase and during follow-up can enhance long-term survival in diabetic patients. Thus, a sustained strict metabolic control with insulin may prove more important for outcome than intensive insulin treatment during the acute phase in diabetic patients. Considering the impaired long-term survival in diabetic patients after CABG, similar approaches deserve evaluation after cardiac operations.

To conclude, diabetic patients can undergo CABG with an acceptable mortality risk only marginally different from that found in nondiabetic patients. Cardiac causes for early death were predominant in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, but neurologic injury accounted for a comparatively higher proportion of early deaths in the diabetic group. The risk for postoperative morbidity with regard to neurologic, infectious, and renal complications was increased and partly related to type of diabetic therapy on admission and, hence, severity of diabetic disease. Moreover, midterm survival was markedly impaired, particularly in insulin-treated diabetic patients. Further efforts are warranted to address early postoperative morbidity and late outcome as diabetic patients are accounting for an increasing proportion of the patients undergoing CABG.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The authors are grateful to Dr Lars Löfström and RN Inger Huljebrant for assistance with retrieval of data from the institutional database. The study was supported by Stina och Birger Johansson Stiftelse Sweden and the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Herlitz J., Malmberg K. How to improve the cardiac prognosis for diabetes. Diab Care 1999;22(Suppl 2):B89-B96.[Medline]
  2. Detre K.M., Lombardero M.S., Brooks M.M., et al. The effect of previous coronary-artery bypass surgery on the prognosis of patients with diabetes who have acute myocardial infarction. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342:989-997.[Medline]
  3. Herlitz J., Wognsen G.B., Emanuelsson H., et al. Mortality and morbidity in diabetic and nondiabetic patients during a 2-year period after coronary artery bypass grafting. Diabetes Care 1996;19:698-703.[Medline]
  4. Svedjeholm R., Huljebrant I., Hkanson E., Vanhanen I. Glutamate and high-dose glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) in the treatment of severe cardiac failure after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:S23-S30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Svedjeholm R., Hkanson E., Szabó Z. Metabolic intervention for the ischemic and post-ischemic heart. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1999;111:501-511.[Medline]
  6. Abramov D., Tamariz M.G., Fremes S.E., et al. Trends in coronary artery bypass surgery results: a recent, 9-year study. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:84-90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Nashef S.A., Roques F., Michel P., et al. Coronary surgery in Europe: comparison of the national subsets of the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:396-399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Nathan D.M. Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1676-1685.[Medline]
  9. Cohen Y., Raz I., Merin G., Mozes B. Comparison of factors associated with 30-day mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus. Israeli Coronary Artery Bypass (ISCAB) Study Consortium. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:7-11.[Medline]
  10. Thourani V.H., Weintraub W.S., Stein B., et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1045-1052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Higgins T.L., Estafanous F.G., Loop F.D., Beck G.J., Blum J.M., Paranandi L. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score. JAMA 1992;267:2344-2348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Risum O., Abdelnoor M., Svennevig J.L., et al. Diabetes mellitus and morbidity and mortality risks after coronary artery bypass surgery. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;30:71-75.[Medline]
  13. Morricone L., Ranucci M., Denti S., et al. Diabetes and complications after cardiac surgery: comparison with a non-diabetic population. Acta Diabetol 1999;36:77-84.[Medline]
  14. Clement R., Rousou J.A., Engelman R.M., Breyer R.H. Perioperative morbidity in diabetics requiring coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:321-323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Antunes P.E., Bernardo J.E., Eugenio L., de Oliveira J.F., Antunes M.J. Mediastinitis after aorto-coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:443-449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. John R., Choudhri A.F., Weinberg A.D., et al. Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:30-35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Salomon N.W., Page U.S., Okies J.E., Stephens J., Krause A.H., Bigelow J.C. Diabetes mellitus and coronary artery bypass. Short-term risk and long-term prognosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;85:264-271.[Abstract]
  18. Lawrie G.M., Morris G.C., Jr, Glaeser D.H. Influence of diabetes mellitus on the results of coronary bypass surgery. Follow-up of 212 diabetic patients ten to 15 years after surgery. JAMA 1986;256:2967-2971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Marso S.P., Ellis S.G., Gurm H.S., Lytle B.W., Topol E.J. Proteinuria is a key determinant of death in patients with diabetes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2000;139:939-944.[Medline]
  20. Corbineau H., Lebreton H., Langanay T., Logeais Y., Leguerrier A. Prospective evaluation of coronary arteries: influence on operative risk in coronary artery surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:429-434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Weintraub W.S., Kosinski A., Culler S. Comparison of outcome after coronary angioplasty and coronary surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease in persons with diabetes. Am Heart J 1999;138:S394-S399.[Medline]
  22. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease. FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet 1999;354:708-715.[Medline]
  23. Loop F.D., Lytle B.W., Cosgrove D.M., et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6.[Medline]
  24. Björk V.O., Ivert T. Five-year survival after coronary bypass surgery. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;15:31-37.[Medline]
  25. Morris J.J., Smith L.R., Jones R.H., et al. Influence of diabetes and mammary artery grafting on survival after coronary bypass. Circulation 1991;84:III275-III84.[Medline]
  26. Lazar H.L., Chipkin S., Philippides G., Bao Y., Apstein C. Glucose-insulin-potassium solutions improve outcomes in diabetics who have coronary artery operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:145-150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Van den Berghe G., Wouters P., Weekers F., et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-1367.[Medline]
  28. Zerr K.J., Furnary A.P., Grunkemeier G.L., Bookin S., Kanhere V., Starr A. Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:356-361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Malmberg K. Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. DIGAMI (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Study Group. BMJ 1997;314:1512-1515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Verska J.J., Walker W.J. Aortocoronary bypass in the diabetic patient. Am J Cardiol 1975;35:774-777.[Medline]
  31. Johnson W.D., Pedraza P.M., Kayser K.L. Coronary artery surgery in diabetics: 261 consecutive patients followed four to seven years. Am Heart J 1982;104:823-827.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
T. Kinoshita, T. Asai, T. Suzuki, A. Kambara, and K. Matsubayashi
Preoperative hemoglobin A1c predicts atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary bypass surgery
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2012; 41(1): 102 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Sato, G. Carvalho, T. Sato, R. Lattermann, T. Matsukawa, and T. Schricker
The Association of Preoperative Glycemic Control, Intraoperative Insulin Sensitivity, and Outcomes after Cardiac Surgery
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2010; 95(9): 4338 - 4344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
A. H. M. van Straten, M. A. Soliman Hamad, A. A. J. van Zundert, E. J. Martens, J. P. A. M. Schonberger, J. F. J. ter Woorst, and A. M. de Wolf
Diabetes and survival after coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison with an age- and sex-matched population
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2010; 37(5): 1068 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Alserius, N. Hammar, T. Nordqvist, and T. Ivert
Improved survival after coronary artery bypass grafting has not influenced the mortality disadvantage in patients with diabetes mellitus.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2009; 138(5): 1115 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. L. Lazar, M. McDonnell, S. R. Chipkin, A. P. Furnary, R. M. Engelman, A. R. Sadhu, C. R. Bridges, C. K. Haan, R. Svedjeholm, H. Taegtmeyer, et al.
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Blood Glucose Management During Adult Cardiac Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 663 - 669.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Marcheix, F. Vanden Eynden, P. Demers, D. Bouchard, and R. Cartier
Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Survival in Systematic Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1181 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. E. Halkos, J. D. Puskas, O. M. Lattouf, P. Kilgo, F. Kerendi, H. K. Song, R. A. Guyton, and V. H. Thourani
Elevated preoperative hemoglobin A1c level is predictive of adverse events after coronary artery bypass surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 631 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
P. E. Antunes, J. F. de Oliveira, and M. J. Antunes
Coronary surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus: a risk-adjusted study on early outcome
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2008; 34(2): 370 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Ascione, C.A. Rogers, C. Rajakaruna, and G.D. Angelini
Inadequate Blood Glucose Control Is Associated With In-Hospital Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Circulation, July 8, 2008; 118(2): 113 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Interact CardioVasc Thorac SurgHome page
F. Filsoufi, P. B. Rahmanian, J. G. Castillo, J. I. Mechanick, S. K. Sharma, and D. H. Adams
Diabetes is not a risk factor for hospital mortality following contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, December 1, 2007; 6(6): 753 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. P. Choudhary, C. Antoniades, A. F. Brading, A. Galione, K. Channon, and D. P. Taggart
Diabetes Mellitus as a Predictor for Radial Artery Vasoreactivity in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 11, 2007; 50(11): 1047 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Rajakaruna, C. A. Rogers, C. Suranimala, G. D. Angelini, and R. Ascione
The effect of diabetes mellitus on patients undergoing coronary surgery: A risk-adjusted analysis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2006; 132(4): 802 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
D. E Birnbaum and K. Lehle
CPB in High-Risk Groups: CPB in Diabetics
Perfusion, July 1, 2006; 21(4): 235 - 238.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. K. Toumpoulis, C. E. Anagnostopoulos, S. Balaram, D. G. Swistel, R. C. Ashton Jr, and J. J. DeRose Jr
Does Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Increase Long-Term Survival of Diabetic Patients?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 599 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-S. Choi, K. R. Cho, and K.-B. Kim
Does Diabetes Affect the Postoperative Outcomes After Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1353 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. H. Edwards, V. A. Ferraris, D. M. Shahian, E. Peterson, A. P. Furnary, C. K. Haan, and C. R. Bridges
Gender-Specific Practice Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Perioperative Management
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2189 - 2194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Kubal, A. K. Srinivasan, A. D. Grayson, B. M. Fabri, and J. A.C. Chalmers
Effect of Risk-Adjusted Diabetes on Mortality and Morbidity After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1570 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Friberg, R. Svedjeholm, B. Soderquist, H. Granfeldt, T. Vikerfors, and J. Kallman
Local Gentamicin Reduces Sternal Wound Infections After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 153 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
C. L. Thompson, K. C. Dunn, M. C. Menon, L. E. Kearns, and S. S. Braithwaite
Hyperglycemia in the Hospital
Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2005; 18(1): 20 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. E. Woods, J. M. Smith, S. Sohail, A. Sarah, and A. Engle
The Influence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: An 8-Year Prospective Cohort Study
Chest, December 1, 2004; 126(6): 1789 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. K. Srinivasan, A. D. Grayson, and B. M. Fabri
On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1604 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Mack, P. Brown, F. Houser, M. Katz, A. Kugelmass, A. Simon, S. Battaglia, L. Tarkington, S. Culler, and E. Becker
On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Matched Sample of Women: A Comparison of Outcomes
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-1 - II-6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. J. Leavitt, L. Sheppard, C. Maloney, R. A. Clough, J. H. Braxton, D. C. Charlesworth, R. M. Weintraub, F. Hernandez, E. M. Olmstead, W. C. Nugent, et al.
Effect of Diabetes and Associated Conditions on Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-41 - II-44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Lev-Ran, R. Braunstein, N. Nesher, Y. Ben-Gal, G. Bolotin, and G. Uretzky
Bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery grafting in oral-treated diabetic subsets: comparative seven-year outcome analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2039 - 2045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clinical Infectious DiseasesHome page
S. E. Baum and D. P. Dooley
Preventing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Cardiovascular Surgery Patients: Can We Do Any Better?
Clinical Infectious Diseases, June 1, 2004; 38(11): 1561 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. A. Morgan, R. John, A. D. Weinberg, N. J. Colletti, D. M. Mancini, and N. M. Edwards
Heart transplantation in diabetic recipients: A decade review of 161 patients at Columbia Presbyterian
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1486 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
O. Lev-Ran, R. Mohr, D. Pevni, N. Nesher, Y. Weissman, D. Loberman, and G. Uretzky
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in diabetic patients: Short-term and long-term results of a 515-patient series
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1145 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
N. Winer and J. R. Sowers
Epidemiology of Diabetes
J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2004; 44(4): 397 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. L. Lazar, S. R. Chipkin, C. A. Fitzgerald, Y. Bao, H. Cabral, and C. S. Apstein
Tight Glycemic Control in Diabetic Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients Improves Perioperative Outcomes and Decreases Recurrent Ischemic Events
Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12): 1497 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Clement, S. S. Braithwaite, M. F. Magee, A. Ahmann, E. P. Smith, R. G. Schafer, and I. B. Hirsch
Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in Hospitals
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 553 - 591.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. K. Wenger
Is what's good for the gander good for the goose?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2003; 126(4): 929 - 931.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D Smith
The CARDia trial protocol
Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1125 - 1126.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Z. Szabo
A simple method to pass a pulmonary artery flotation catheter rapidly into the pulmonary artery in anaesthetized patients
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2003; 90(6): 794 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. S. Hochman and J. E. Tamis-Holland
Acute Coronary Syndromes: Does Sex Matter?
JAMA, December 25, 2002; 288(24): 3161 - 3164.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Zoltán Szabó
Rolf Svedjeholm
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szabó, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Svedjeholm, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szabó, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Svedjeholm, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS