ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joe B. Putnam, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, J. B., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1058-1059
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Invited commentary

Joe B. Putnam, Jr, MDa

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 109, Houston, TX 77030-4095, USA email: putnam@mdanderson.org

Resection for local control in patients with clinical T1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provides both a survival advantage and the potential to diagnose regional nodal metastases. Based upon a prospective randomized study, lobectomy is considered the standard operation for T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer [1].

In this article, the authors examine the role of wide segmental resection in a consecutive series of patients with peripheral (T1, <=2 cm) NSCLC with five-year or longer follow-up on all patients. Five-year survival was excellent (91.8%) and decrease in FEV1 was minimal (13.4 ± 10.4 %). Limited resection did not appear to worsen survival, local control, or functional results compared to known results of lobectomy. When performed in this manner, extended segmentectomy with segmental, hilar, and mediastinal lymph node dissection may have results equivalent to lobectomy.

Can optimal local control be obtained with an extended segmentectomy? Even in this highly selected T1 population, 18 patients (18 of 73 patients, 25%) were excluded based on intraoperative findings of local invasion or positive lymph nodes on frozen section. Surgeons who apply this technique may struggle with a tumor larger than 2 cm or one that straddles two segments or two lobes.

The technique of segmental and hilar lymph node dissection may be tedious and demands a close interaction between the surgeon and the pathologist. Nodal metastases do not necessarily follow a linear progression from primary tumor to the segmental nodes, hilar nodes, and then to the mediastinum. "Skip" metastasis may occur. Hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection are required in this procedure to adequately stage these patients and to optimize intraoperative and postoperative treatment decisions. The surgeon must have sufficient patience to await the results of the intraoperative lymph node histology and then to proceed with lobectomy if necessary.

In a physiologically fit individual, lobectomy remains the standard resection for clinical stage I NSCLC. Although extended segmentectomy appears to be an appropriate alternative to lobectomy as defined within this report, further evidence to support equivalency or improvement over lobectomy is necessary. Application of this technique in the absence of a randomized trial may be appropriate in selected patients with limited pulmonary function, or with multiple synchronous primary lung cancers. A prospective randomized trial to further investigate the role of this technique in lieu of lobectomy for NSCLC is needed.

References

  1. Ginsberg R.J., Rubinstein L.V. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:615-623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Prospective study of extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors: the final report
Koichi Yoshikawa, Noriaki Tsubota, Ken Kodama, Hiroyoshi Ayabe, Toshihiko Taki, and Takashi Mori
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002 73: 1055-1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joe B. Putnam, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, J. B., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS