|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1795-1796
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Surgery (HB7800), Dartmouth Medical School, One Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
e-mail: nancy.j.hirkmeyer{at}dartmouth.edu
To the Editor
Given the complex nature of their underlying models and assumptions, independent validation greatly enhances the value of clinical decision analyses. In this regard, we appreciate the efforts of Takkenberg and colleagues in validating our findings.
Takkenberg and associates also use sensitivity analysis to underscore the importance of assumptions about excess mortality (relative to the general population) in patients undergoing valve replacement. Whether to use additive (as we did in our analysis) or multiplicative models is a matter of some debate [1]. Takkenberg and coworkers have shown that applying a multiplicative model substantially reduces life expectancy estimates in patients under 70. The net effect is to increase the apparent benefit of tissue valves and reduce the age at which tissue valves are preferred over mechanical valves. In our analysis, the decision was similarly sensitive to varying estimates for a number of input variables for patients between the ages of 60 and 70.
Even with different assumptions, however, both of our analyses reach a similar conclusion: A large proportion of the patients who are currently receiving mechanical valves would do better with tissue valves.
References
Related Article
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |