ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ricardo Zalaquett
Manuel J. Irarrazaval
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moran, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Deck, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moran, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Deck, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1552-1556
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Predictors of radial artery patency for coronary bypass operations

Sergio V. Moran, MD*a, Ricardo Baeza, MDa, Eduardo Guarda, MDa, Ricardo Zalaquett, MDa, Manuel J. Irarrazaval, MDa, Eugenio Marchant, MDa, Carlos Deck, MDb

a Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Catholic University School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile
b Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile

Accepted for publication June 28, 2001.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Moran, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Catholic University School of Medicine, Marcoleta 367, Santiago, Chile
e-mail: smoran{at}med.puc.cl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. Few data exist regarding angiographic predictors of radial artery patency for coronary bypass grafting, and the benefit of calcium antagonists is not clear.

Methods. One hundred fifteen patients were studied who had myocardial revascularization with the radial artery plus internal mammary and vein grafts with 3.5 ± 1.1 grafts per patient. Sixty-three patients received diltiazem and 52 patients did not. Base line and follow-up angiographies were analyzed 1 year postoperatively in 50 of these patients with a quantitative computerized method.

Results. One hundred fourteen patients survived and were followed for 30.1 ± 12.6 months. Patency for mammary grafts was 100%, for radial grafts it was 80%, and for saphenous vein grafts it was 68%. Patent radial artery grafts had significantly greater degree of stenosis in the native vessels than occluded grafts (73% ± 14% vs 40% ± 24%), (p = 0.0007; confidence interval = 95%). Radial artery patency increased to 92% when arteries with 70% or more stenosis were considered. No differences were observed for clinical and angiographic end points in the patients that received diltiazem compared with the rest who had not.

Conclusions. The degree of stenosis in the native coronary artery significantly influences the patency rate of radial artery grafts, independent of diltiazem.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Since the revival of the radial artery (RA) for coronary bypass grafting by Acar and colleagues [1] in 1992, many groups have reported encouraging results with this conduit [25]. However, early patency has varied depending on patient selection, and the benefit of calcium channel antagonists, although routinely recommended, is not clear [69].

Our experience with RA started in 1993 in patients without saphenous veins as indication for its use. Excellent clinical and angiographic results in these cases prompted us to start a prospective study in order to evaluate the need for calcium-channel blockers and discern the most appropriate patient characteristics to obtain better angiographic results. Data on angiographic predictors of arterial graft patency, particularly RA grafts, are scarce.

We report the clinical results of 115 consecutive patients in whom the RA was utilized for myocardial revascularization in conjunction with one or two internal mammary arteries (IMAs) and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), and the angiographic results of 50 patients who consented to one-year postoperative follow-up angiographies.


    Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Between January 1996 and December 1998, 115 patients received at least one RA graft during isolated coronary bypass operations. The main preoperative characteristics and operative data of the patients are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Most of the patients were men in their sixth decade of life who had triple-vessel coronary artery disease. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was normal in 71% of these patients. An EF of less than 25% was considered a contraindication for the study because these patients tolerate diltiazem poorly. The left IMA was used almost exclusively for the left anterior descending artery; the RA was mainly used on the circumflex or the right coronary arteries. Bilateral RA harvesting was not performed. Sequential RA grafts were used in 5 patients, and in 3 patients the RA was divided into two separate grafts. The right IMA and saphenous vein were used as needed to complete the myocardial revascularization. The RA graft was used for the second best artery after the left anterior descending coronary, except when the surgeon used the right mammary artery for the right coronary or the circumflex artery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Patient Characteristics

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Operative Data

 
An Allen test was performed in all candidates, and a hyperemic response in the hand extending to the thenar eminence and thumb within 10 seconds indicated satisfactory ulnar collaterals, allowing the RA harvest. In doubtful cases a Doppler test was performed to verify the patency and flow of the ulnar artery. The nondominant RA was always chosen.

The surgical technique used for obtaining the RA graft was similar to that described by Acar and colleagues [1], with emphasis on minimal trauma and avoidance of intraluminal probes and catheters. The RA was externally irrigated with papaverine solution to release spasm while obtained concomitantly with other conduits, such as the IMAs or saphenous vein. Immediate closure of the forearm wound (before heparinization) together with a firm crepe bandage was used to lessen the chance of infection and hematoma. All patients were operated on with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass under moderate hypothermia (28°C) and antegrade or retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia. The site of the proximal anastomosis was the ascending aorta in 74 patients, the head of a saphenous vein graft in the ascending aorta in 39 patients, or the left internal mammary artery as end-to-side anastomosis in 5 patients.

To evaluate the use of calcium-channel blockers, patients were randomly divided in two groups: 63 received diltiazem (group 1) and 52 did not (group 2). There were no statistical differences in patient characteristics between them. Diltiazem was given 1 µg x kg-1 x min-1 intravenously in the operating room as soon as harvesting started and was continued in the intensive care unit until the patient was able to take it orally (180 mg/d). These patients then continued the diltiazem in addition to aspirin (100 mg/d) for 1 year. Clinical end points were: the presence of visible RA spasm during the operation, episodes characterized by acute heart failure progressing to cardiac arrest associated with ischemic electrocardiogram changes postoperatively, perioperative myocardial infarction (new Q waves in the electrocardiogram), and recurrence of angina of any type.

The Institutional Review Board approved the postoperative study. All patients were offered an angiographic reevaluation of the coronary grafts 1 year after the operation. Indication for study was the patient’s acceptance only. Angiographies were performed on an ambulatory basis with 6-French catheters inserted through the other radial artery. A complete study of the coronary arteries and of all the implanted grafts and a left ventriculography was attempted in all patients. Attention was given to exact correspondence of different projections between preoperative and postoperative angiograms so that careful analysis of the degree of stenosis and the size of the recipient coronary artery could be performed.

All measurements on angiographic images were performed with a quantitative computerized angiography method utilizing a digital scanner (Microtek II; Microtek, San Francisco, CA) and an ad hoc National Institutes of Health program [10]. To calculate the degree of coronary stenosis, the normal segment of the artery proximal to the lesion was used as a reference and the difference with the minimum luminal diameter of the stenotic lesion was considered the percent of stenosis. The mean value of five measurements was considered the degree of stenosis for this study. Graft evaluation was classified as: (1) perfect patency, (2) patency with localized stenosis, (3) string sign or severe and extensive narrowing of the whole body of the graft, and (4) occlusion.

Clinical follow-ups were performed at regular intervals at the outpatient clinic or by referring doctors for out-of-town patients. No patients were lost to follow-up.

Statistical analysis
All results are expressed as means ± standard deviation and differences were considered significant when the p value was less than 0.05. Risk factors, patency rates and other parametric data were examined with contingency tables, Fisher’s exact test, or {chi}2 test as appropriate. Independent predictors of graft patency were estimated by multiple logistic regressions. For the comparison between the two groups, the analyses were made by the unpaired Student’s t test and {chi}2 test. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the degree of native coronary stenosis, proximal and distal anastomosis site, and demographic and EF data on RA patency.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
A total of 411 coronary grafts were performed in 115 patients with a mean of 3.5 per patient. The type of graft and distribution of distal anastomosis are depicted in Table 3. One patient died, which accounted for an operative 30-day mortality of 0.8%. She was a 67-year-old woman operated on for unstable angina. The cause of death was bowel necrosis secondary to low cardiac output during a period of atrial fibrillation. The autopsy revealed no embolic phenomena, and the left IMA graft to the left anterior descending artery, the RA graft to the circumflex, and the saphenous graft to the posterior descending coronary arteries were widely patent and in good condition.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Type of Graft and Distribution of Distal Anastomoses

 
Two patients had reoperations for postoperative bleeding. Uncomplicated myocardial infarction was detected in 2 patients during hospital stay (1.7%). There were no patients with cerebrovascular accidents or deep sternal infections.

In the 115 patients in whom the ulnar blood flow was found adequate for RA harvesting, no unsuitable grafts were observed during operation. With respect to forearm status, there were no ischemic complications seen in any patients. No functional disturbances related to the RA harvesting were reported during follow-up. One patient had a wound infection of the forearm incision that healed rapidly with treatment.

Clinical follow-up was complete on all surviving patients. Mean follow-up was 30.1 ± 12.6 months (range, 12 to 51 months). Patients had follow-ups at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively and every 6 months thereafter. Hypertension, diabetes, or other medical conditions determined more frequent visits.

Most patients (96.5%) were free of angina during follow-up and there was no need for reoperation. Angina developed in 4 patients postoperatively. In 2 patients repeat coronary cine angiography showed graft occlusion and a patent but stenosed native coronary artery. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed electively in these 2 patients.

No difference in clinical status was found between patients who received diltiazem (group 1) and those who did not (group 2). Specifically, there was no difference in the incidence of ischemic or other cardiac events suggesting graft occlusion or spasm of the RA graft in particular.

Fifty patients gave informed consent to undergo angiography 12.3 ± 4 months after the operation (range, 6 to 24 months; median, 13 months); 29 of these patients were in group1, and 21 of these patients were in group 2. One hundred seventy two grafts were studied, 56 IMAs, 51 RAs and 65 SVGs. In two patients the left IMA was not accessible through the right RA, and the patients refused a femoral puncture, and one SVG was not catheterized. All IMA grafts were patent although four had the string sign. Thirty-five RA grafts were widely patent, six had the string sign, and 10 were occluded. Forty-four SVGs were patent and 21 were occluded; there were no string signs in the vein grafts. Grafts with diffuse severe narrowing (string sign) were not responsive to in situ vasodilator injection. No statistical significant differences in angiographic patency were observed between patients receiving diltiazem and those who did not. Details of angiographic results are summarized in Table 4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Postoperative Angiographic Results in 50 Patients After a Mean of 12.3 ± 4 Months

 
There were no cases of localized stenosis or irregularities suggesting graft disease. Only 1 patient (who had not received diltiazem) had localized spasm in a 4-mm RA graft that was seen 15 months after the operation; the rest of the patient’s grafts were widely patent, and the patient was asymptomatic. An exercise thallium scan was positive for ischemia, therefore, diltiazem (60 mg tid) was prescribed.

Patent RA grafts had a significantly greater degree of native coronary artery stenosis than occluded grafts (73% ± 14% vs 40% ± 24%), (p = 0.0007; confidence interval = 95%). In 9 out of 10 occlusions there was a less than 70% lesion in the native recipient coronary artery. The string sign was present in four IMA grafts (7%) out of the 56 IMA grafts studied, and in two of them, the grafts were anastomosed to coronaries with less than 70% stenosis. The rest of the grafts were perfectly patent and had excellent flow. Radial artery grafts presenting the string sign had significantly less severe native coronary lesions than perfectly patent RA grafts (51% ± 19% vs 73% ± 14%), (p < 0.02). Neither the sites of the proximal or distal anastomosis nor the EF had a significant influence on RA graft patency. The EF in patients with patent RA grafts was normal in 70% (25 of 35), mildly impaired in 19% (6 of 35), and moderately impaired in 12% (4 of 35). Whereas, the EF in patients with occluded grafts was normal in 70% (7 of 10), mildly impaired in 10% (1 of 10), and moderately impaired in 20% (2 of 10). No differences in patency were found in patients with diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that the degree of coronary artery stenosis was a strong predictor of RA patency (p = 0.00001; odds ratio = 1.08).

The occlusion rate of the saphenous vein graft anastomosis showed no correlation with the degree of stenosis of the bypassed lesion. Nevertheless, it must be taken into consideration that our policy was to utilize the SVG for secondary coronary arteries. In 15 patients with 21 occluded grafts, five were diagonals and 10 were small circumflex arteries (< 2 mm in diameter).

Overall patencies were 100% for left IMAs, 100% for right IMAs, 80% for RAs, and 68% for saphenous vein grafts at 1 year postoperatively. However, if only RA grafts to coronary arteries with stenosis >= 70% are considered, their patency increased to 92%.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Our results confirm the good quality of the RA for coronary bypass grafting. It is easy to harvest with low morbidity and can be used for all major coronary arteries. The Allen test and Doppler study of the ulnar flow are sufficient to assure an excellent RA graft [7]. No sign of hand ischemia was detected in our patients during follow-up. Local skin infection was infrequent and wounds healed rapidly. With delicate surgical technique for harvesting and anastomosing, there seems to be no need for intraoperative and postoperative use of calcium antagonists to avoid spasm.

Arterial graft spasm early after the operation can be a devastating event [2, 11], but in no instances was this complication seen in our experience. Other important clinical events such as myocardial infarction, recurrence of angina, or the need for repeat revascularization were very infrequent, and these did not differ between groups 1 and 2. This agrees with observations from other series in which patients that did not receive diltiazem or who discontinued diltiazem had no adverse effects [3, 4, 6].

Calafiore and colleagues [2] and Possati and colleagues [6] have advocated that RA grafts should be used when bypassing lesions with 70% or more based on their clinical experience. Angiographic evidence from our study, using a reproducible and objective method, gives a quantitative support to this advice. In our series, the degree of native coronary stenosis was a strong predictor of RA patency. When the degree of stenosis in the native coronary artery is 70% or more, the RA graft patency approaches that of the IMA at 1 year postoperatively. On the other hand, we also confirmed that the string sign is almost an exclusive finding in arterial grafts, phenomena that is significantly associated with bypassed stenosis of 70% or less, whereas SVGs are either completely patent or occluded [9, 12].

We also found that there were no differences between patients who received diltiazem and those who did not. Given the thickness of the RA muscular layer, spasm has been observed in response to mechanical stimuli that is twice as frequent as that observed for the IMAs [1, 13]. However, in the present series only 1 patient with asymptomatic vasospasm was seen in an RA graft studied 15 months postoperatively. Therefore the use of diltiazem seems unnecessary, and given the fact that it is poorly tolerated by some patients, particularly those with poor left ventricular function, this evidence may be relevant.

Our results show that patency in arterial grafts correlates with the degree of coronary stenosis and may be explained by the fact that these grafts adapt themselves to the amount of flow through them. They tend to diminish in size if low flow is present and they grow when demand increases [14, 15]. This effect could be related to the phenomenon of shear stress on nitric oxide production with its correspondent protective effect on endothelium and vascular smooth muscle [16].

Saphenous vein graft patency in our study was similar to that of other series in which it was used for secondary small coronary branches with less prognostic impact [17]. Although it has been shown to have excellent patency when anastomosed to major coronary arteries, its known tendency to occlusion after 10 years has led us to modify its indications [18]. On the other hand, it can be used when bypassing arteries with less than 70% stenosis, because there seems to be no correlation between the degree of stenosis of the recipient artery and the saphenous vein graft patency in our data as well as from other groups [19]. Another approach to this problem could be to avoid operations in nonsignificant coronary lesions, and if they increase to provoke ischemia during late follow-up, a less invasive therapy such as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty could then be used.

Careful handling and good patient selection make the RA a very good conduit for coronary revascularization. With these recommendations and known potentiality for long-term patency [20], excellent clinical results and freedom from coronary events can be anticipated.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Drs Gloria Valdés and Jorge Urzúa for their help in preparing this article, Paola Viviani for statistical assistance, and Drs Alejandro Fajuri and Alejandro Martinez for their help in studying these patients.

This study was supported by a research grant from Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Acar C., Debar V.A., Portoghese M., et al. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:652-660.[Abstract]
  2. Calafiore A.M., Di Giammarco G., Teodori G., et al. Radial artery and inferior epigastric artery in composite grafts: improved midterm angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:517-524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Brodman R.F., Frame R., Camacho M., Hu E., Chen A., Hollinger I. Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:959-963.[Abstract]
  4. Acar C., Ramsheyi A., Pagny J.I., et al. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: clinical and angiographic results at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:981-989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Weinschelbaum E., Gabe E., Macchia A., Smmimo R., Suarez L.D. Total myocardial revascularization with arterial conduits. Radial artery combined with internal thoracic arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:911-916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Possati G., Gaudino M., Alessandrini F., et al. Midterm clinical and angiographic results of radial artery grafts used for myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:1015-1021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tatoulis J., Buxton B.F., Fuller J.A. Bilateral radial artery grafts in coronary reconstruction: technique and early results in 261 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:714-720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. He G.-W., Yang C.-Q. Comparative study on calcium channel antagonists in the human radial artery: clinical implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:94-100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Manasse E., Sperti G., Suma H., et al. Use of the radial artery for myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1076-1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Guarda E., Fajuri A., Marchant E., et al. El genotipo D/D de la enzima conversiva de la angiotensina como factor de riesgo de re-estenosis post-stent coronario. Rev Esp Cardiol 1999;52:475-480.[Medline]
  11. Cable D.G., Caccitolo J.A., Pearson P.J., et al. New approaches to prevention and treatment of radial artery graft vasospasm. Circulation 1998;98(Suppl II):15-22.
  12. Manninen H., Jaakkola P., Suhonen M., Rehnberg S., Vuorenniemi R., Matsi P. Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1289-1294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Spence P.A., Montgomery W.D., Santamore W.P. High flow demand on small arterial coronary bypass conduits promotes graft spasm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:952-962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Singh R., Magovern G. Internal mammary graft: improved flow resulting from correction of steal phenomenon. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;84:146-149.[Medline]
  15. Dincer B., Barner H. The "occluded" internal mammary artery graft. Restoration of patency after apparent occlusion associated with progression of coronary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;85:318-320.[Medline]
  16. Mombouli J.V., Vanhouette P. Endothelial dysfunction: from physiology to therapy. J Moll Cell Cardiol 1999;31:61-74.[Medline]
  17. Paz M.A., Lupon J., Bosch X., et al. Predictors of early saphenous vein aorto coronary bypass graft occlusion. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1101-1106.[Abstract]
  18. Lytle B.W., Loop F.D., Taylor P.C., et al. Vein graft disease: the clinical impact of stenosis in saphenous vein bypass grafts to coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:831-840.[Abstract]
  19. Cosgrove D., Loop F., Saunders C., Lytle B., Kramer J. Should coronary arteries with less than fifty percent stenosis be bypassed?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;82:520-530.[Medline]
  20. De Oliveira S. Radial artery for coronary bypass grafting: 23-year graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:2390.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. Ding, W. Feng, H. Li, L. Wang, D. Li, Z. Cheng, J. Guo, and D. Hu
A comparative study on in vitro and in vivo effects of topical vasodilators in human internal mammary, radial artery and great saphenous vein
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 536 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Collins, C. M. Webb, C. F. Chong, N. E. Moat, and for the Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patenc
Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency Randomized Trial: Five-Year Angiographic Follow-Up
Circulation, June 3, 2008; 117(22): 2859 - 2864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III
Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. D. Desai, C. D. Naylor, A. Kiss, E. A. Cohen, R. Feder-Elituv, S. Miwa, S. Radhakrishnan, J. Dubbin, L. Schwartz, S. E. Fremes, et al.
Impact of Patient and Target-Vessel Characteristics on Arterial and Venous Bypass Graft Patency: Insight From a Randomized Trial
Circulation, February 13, 2007; 115(6): 684 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. Patel, S. Asopa, and J. Dunning
Should patients receiving a radial artery conduit have post-operative calcium channel blockers?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 251 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G T Lau, L J Ridley, P G Bannon, S B Freedman, D B Brieger, D Sullivan, L A Wong, and L Kritharides
Hypertriglyceridaemia is associated with early non-patency of coronary bypass grafts.
Heart, April 1, 2006; 92(4): 536 - 538.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, and S. Kitamura
Functional Angiographic Evaluation of Individual, Sequential, and Composite Arterial Grafts
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 807 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. V. Moran
Radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1227 - 1227.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Mussa, B. P. Choudhary, and D. P. Taggart
Reply to the Editor
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1227 - 1228.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. R. Sajja, G. Mannam, N. R. Pantula, and S. Sompalli
Role of Radial Artery Graft in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2180 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. D. Desai, E. A. Cohen, C. D. Naylor, S. E. Fremes, and the Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators
A Randomized Comparison of Radial-Artery and Saphenous-Vein Coronary Bypass Grafts
N. Engl. J. Med., November 25, 2004; 351(22): 2302 - 2309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Berger, P. A. MacCarthy, U. Siebert, S. Carlier, W. Wijns, G. Heyndrickx, J. Bartunek, H. Vanermen, and B. De Bruyne
Long-Term Patency of Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafts: Relationship With Preoperative Severity of the Native Coronary Artery Stenosis
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-36 - II-40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, and S. Kitamura
Competitive flow in arterial composite grafts and effect of graft arrangement in Off-Pump coronary revascularization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 481 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L.P. Perrault, H. Jeanmart, L. Bilodeau, J. Lesperance, J.-F. Tanguay, D. Bouchard, P. Page, and M. Carrier
Early quantitative coronary angiography of saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting harvested by means of open versus endoscopic saphenectomy: A prospective randomized trial
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1402 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Tatoulis, B. F. Buxton, and J. A. Fuller
Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 93 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Bolotin, A. P. Kypson, L. W. Nifong, and W. R. Chitwood Jr
A technique for evaluating competitive flow for intraoperative decision making in coronary artery surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2118 - 2120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. S. Maniar, H. B. Barner, M. S. Bailey, S. M. Prasad, M. R. Moon, M. K. Pasque, M. L. Lester, W. A. Gay, and R. J. Damiano
Radial artery patency: are aortocoronary conduits superior to composite grafting?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1498 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Lev-Ran, R. Mohr, G. Uretzky, D. Pevni, C. Locker, Y. Paz, and I. Shapira
Graft of choice to right coronary system in left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
Y. J. Woo and T. J. Gardner
Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 581 - 607.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. L. Zellner and F. G. Spinale
Preventing radial artery spasm: reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1696 - 1696.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ricardo Zalaquett
Manuel J. Irarrazaval
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moran, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Deck, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moran, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Deck, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS