ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzman, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1311-1315
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Neurologic complications of the Novacor left ventricular assist device

Carole E. Thomas, MDa, Draga Jichici, MDa, Ralph Petrucci, PhDa, Victor C. Urrutia, MDa, Robert J. Schwartzman, MDa

a MCP/Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Accepted for publication June 18, 2001.

Address reprint requests to Dr Thomas, Acute Stroke and Neurointensive Care Program, MCP/Hahnemann University, 15th and Vine Sts, M.S. 423, Philadelphia, PA 19102
e-mail: carole.e.thomas{at}drexel.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a bridging mechanism for patients with severe heart failure to remain viable until heart transplantation. The rate of cerebral embolism has been reported as high as 47% in some studies but the rate of other neurologic complications in patients with LVADs is not known.

Methods. Retrospective chart review of all patients who had LVADs implanted at our hospital from September 1993 until September 1997. Complications from the time of implantation until heart transplantation or death and functional outcome were assessed.

Results. Twenty-three patients had LVADs placed in the four-year period. Of 23 patients, 9 had neurologic complications after placement of the LVAD. These included four strokes, three seizures, and two cases of delirium. The 3 patients with seizures all died from multiorgan failure. All of the patients with strokes received a transplant. One patient with delirium died from multiorgan failure and another received a transplant. The most devastating medical complication was renal failure, which occurred in 7 patients and was associated with 100% mortality. All surviving patients with neurologic complications went on to transplant and good functional outcome.

Conclusions. Neurologic complications are common in patients with LVADs, occurring in 9 out of 23 patients in our series. Seizures are a poor prognostic indicator and were associated with 100% mortality. Strokes did not have a negative impact on outcome. Patients with delirium had a mixed outcome, which reflects the multifactorial nature of delirium. Further study needs to be done to limit the neurologic complications associated with LVADs and further improve outcomes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a form of mechanical circulatory assistance that has proven indispensable for the treatment of patients with chronic congestive heart failure who are awaiting orthotropic heart transplant [1]. These devices have also been used for short or intermediate term circulatory support in patients with profound circulatory failure after cardiopulmonary bypass [2]. LVADs have been successful in the resuscitation of critically ill patients by preventing their further deterioration and by improving end-organ function while they waited for an appropriate heart donor [3].

Although LVADs are an accepted "bridge to transplant" in many patients, there is ongoing concern about the morbidity associated with these devices [1]. Patients who have devastating neurologic complications while awaiting heart transplantation may no longer be eligible for transplant. This article addresses the neurologic complications that occur with LVADs, the risk factors for these complications, and what impact these complications have on the clinical outcome in a series of 23 patients.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
This study is a retrospective chart review of the 23 patients admitted to Hahnemann University Hospital in congestive heart failure who had LVADs implanted from September of 1993 until September of 1997. By protocol, LVADs were only used in patients who were eligible for cardiac transplantation and who had failed ionotropic therapy of three or more agents. All patients had a transesophageal echocardiogram before LVAD placement to rule out left ventricular and atrial thrombi. Patients with biventricular failure were excluded from this review.

Charts were reviewed for demographic information, general medical complications and neurologic complications from the use of LVADs. The demographic information obtained was: age, sex, race ethnicity; past medical history; past cardiac history; history of neurologic or psychiatric diseases; base line pre-LVAD history including etiology of heart failure, echocardiogram results, right heart catherization results, and medications; operating room records of events during LVAD placement; and post-LVAD laboratory tests, medications, and complications at 2-week intervals until cardiac transplant or death.

General medical complications of LVADs included: bleeding (requiring transfusion or causing hemodynamic instability), renal failure (creatinine doubling in a 24-hour period, with oliguria), respiratory failure (requiring intubation), infection (positive cultures), and adult respiratory distress syndrome (diffuse pulmonary infiltrates and hypoxemia resistant to supplemental oxygen).

Neurologic complications recorded included: stroke (computed tomograph of the brain consistent with ischemic or hemorrhagic lesion), transient ischemic attack (clinical findings of stroke that cleared within 24 hours and no brain lesion on computed tomography), seizures (electroencephalograph consistent with epileptiform activity or clinical findings), and delirium (depressed mental status and disorientation).

The left ventricular assist device used in our patients was the Novacor left ventricular assist device (LVAD). This is an electrically powered cardiac assist system that functions as a parallel chamber to the left ventricle. It provides circulatory assistance in the presence of left ventricular failure. It has a typical output of 5 to 7 L/min and a maximal stroke volume of 70 ml [5]. Implantation of the Novacor LVAD is accomplished under general anesthesia through a median sternotomy incision with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass. The apex of the left ventricle is cored out, which permits the placement of a large cannula into the cavity. The other end of the cannula is inserted into the aorta. Deairing maneuvers are performed, which are critical to prevent air embolization. These maneuvers involve careful inspection for macroscopic air bubbles in the circuit itself, placement of the patient in Trendelenberg position when initiating LVAD pumping to decrease microscopic air bubbles to the brain, and venting the aortic root during LVAD ejections to capture any remaining emboli.

All patients with LVADs are anticoagulated by protocol. Within 12 hours of LVAD placement the patient is given low–molecular weight dextran intravenously (IV). When the bleeding from chest drains is less than 30 mL/h for three consecutive hours (usually within 12 to 72 hours), a continuous IV heparin drip is started with a target partial thromboplastin time (PTT) of 1.5 to 2.0 times the control. Once the target PTT is achieved the dextran is discontinued. When the chest tubes are removed, administration of 81 mg of aspirin is begun. When the patient can take oral administration of medications, Coumadin (Du Pont Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) is started to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 3.5. Once the target INR is reached, heparin is discontinued and the patient remains on long-term Coumadin and aspirin.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
A total of 23 patients had LVADs inserted at Hahnemann University Hospital from September 1993 until September 1997. There were 19 men and 4 women. The average age was 49.6 years (range 17 to 66 years). Of the patients, 14 were white and 9 were black. Four patients had a prior history of atrial fibrillation. One patient had a prior stroke and another had a prior transient ischemic attack. No patient had a prior history of seizures.

Of the 23 patients, 9 had neurologic complications. These included four strokes, three seizures, and two episodes of delirium. All of the patients with stroke went on to transplant and had good outcomes (either home independent or acute rehabilitation). All of the patients with seizures died. One patient with delirium died and another went on to transplant and short-term rehabilitation

Neurologic complications
Strokes
All 4 patients with strokes underwent computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, echocardiography, and carotid Doppler examinations. Two patients were found to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia by serotonin assay. Both of these patients had infarctions of a branch of the right middle cerebral artery, leaving them with mild weakness of the left face and arm. The third patient had an infarction in the midbrain, producing a Weber’s syndrome (third nerve palsy and contralateral hemiparesis). The fourth patient had atrial fibrillation when his stroke occurred; he had hemiparesis of the left face, arm, and leg from an infarction of the right internal capsule. Both the third and the fourth patients had subtherapeutic anticoagulation on Coumadin with INRs of 1.5 and 1.7 respectively. Strokes occurred from 4 to 32 days after LVAD placement.

Seizures
All seizures occurred within 24 hours of LVAD placement. One patient had a bleeding diathesis immediately after surgery, requiring 14 U of blood. He had a prolonged period of hypotension, began having seizures, and did not regain consciousness before he died. The second patient had a seizure before LVAD insertion that was thought to be secondary to hypoxic encephalopathy from cardiogenic shock. He went into status epilepticus in the postoperative period and did not recover. The third patient had a seizure in the postoperative period and went on to renal failure, septic shock, multisystem organ failure, and death. All 3 patients had generalized tonic–clonic seizures without obvious focality. Although all 3 patients had electroencephalograms to document their seizures, none of the patients were able to have imaging studies after their seizures because of medical instability. Post mortem examinations were not performed on these patients.

Delirium
One patient was found to have a change in mental status and was encephalopathic 24 hours after LVAD placement. He progressed to multisystem organ failure and death. The other patient had pneumonia and pancreatitis at 2 weeks and was encephalopathic, a condition that improved when the underlying illnesses were treated. He went on to transplant.

Risk factors for neurologic complications
Two patients with stroke had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) detected by serotonin assay. While the majority of patients (18 of 23) had thrombocytopenia at some point in their postoperative period, only those with thromboembolic complications were tested for HIT. Neither of the patients with HIT had systemic thromboembolic events. The other two patients with stroke had subtherapeutic anticoagulation, with INRs of 1.5 and 1.7. One of these patients also had atrial fibrillation. None of the stroke patients had significant carotid stenosis or prior evidence of left atrial or ventricular clot. Patients with seizures had evidence of multisystem organ failure including renal insufficiency, elevated liver enzymes, and pulmonary edema. There were no other clear-cut risk factors for seizures. Delirium was associated with a variety of toxic and metabolic derangements including pneumonia and renal insufficiency.

General medical complications
The most common medical complication was bleeding, occurring in 16 out of 23 patients (70%). Infections were the next most frequent (9 of 23, 40%), followed by renal failure (7 of 23, 30%). The medical complications were evenly distributed among patients who survived and went on to transplant and patients who died, with the exception of renal failure. Patients with this complication had a 100% mortality rate.

Timing of neurologic and medical complications
We divided the neurologic and medical complications into early (< 14 days after LVAD placement), and late (>= 14 days after LVAD placement). All but 1 patient had some complication while using the LVAD. Fifteen patients had early complications, with the majority (11 of 15, 73%) occurring exclusively within 24 to 48 hours of LVAD placement. This group of patients had a mortality rate of 67%. Among the 8 patients with late complications, only 1 died (12% mortality). The remainder went on to heart transplant. Patient data is summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Early (< 14 Days) Versus Late Complications and Outcomes in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

 
Overall mortality in patients with and without neurologic complications
Of the 23 patients, 11 (48%) with LVADs died before transplantation. Four of these patients had neurologic complications. The majority (8 of 11, 72%) of patients who died did not have neurologic complications. The average length of time from implantation of LVAD until death was 10 days (range 1 to 41 days). Of the 11 patients who died, 8 did so within the first week of LVAD implantation.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The left ventricular assist device enables patients in heart failure to maintain an adequate cardiac output until a heart becomes available for transplantation [2, 4]. Donor shortages have resulted in continually increasing waiting times once patients are listed for cardiac transplantation. Each year, nearly 15% of patients awaiting cardiac transplant die before a suitable donor organ becomes available [1]. It is important to identify potential problems with these devices to limit the morbidity associated with them and to help patients remain viable until transplant.

Cerebral thromboembolism is the most common neurologic complication reported, ranging from 3% to 47% in different series [19]. Inadequate anticoagulation has been sited as the cause of this complication in most cases [7, 10, 11], although there are no reports to date describing the role of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in these patients. More recent studies have reported a significantly reduced rate of stroke using advanced-design LVADs, which do not require anticoagulation for stroke prevention [9].

Our series found stroke to be the most common neurologic complication among patients with LVADs. Two of the 4 patients with stroke had clear-cut, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosed by serotonin assay. We believe that this entity needs to be considered in any patient with thrombocytopenia and thromboembolic events after LVAD placement. Our other 2 patients were found to have inadequate anticoagulation profiles when their strokes occurred. LVADs are known to activate the coagulation cascade, resulting in device-related thrombus formation. Unstable thrombus exposed to the shearing force of blood flow predisposes to thromboembolic events including stroke and end-organ or extremity ischemia [9]. LVADs that have less thrombogenic potential have decreased this complication, and are being used with increased frequency in heart failure patients awaiting transplant.

This study looked at other neurologic complications associated with LVADs. We found seizures were by far the most devastating neurologic complication, with a 100% mortality rate in our patients. We suggest that seizures are an indication of the overall viability of the patient. They occurred in patients with multisystem organ failure in all three instances. There were no cases of isolated seizures in an otherwise hemodynamically stable patient. It is likely that death was caused by hypoperfusion of all organs from either pump failure or hypovolemia. The seizures reflect this extreme hypoperfusion in all vascular beds, including the brain. In 2 of the patients there were signs of multiorgan failure before LVAD placement. It is possible that earlier placement of the LVAD may have resulted in preservation of organ perfusion and better outcomes.

Another neurologic complication in 2 of our patients was delirium. This was an indication that toxic or metabolic derangements were occurring, causing changes in mental status. These alterations in homeostasis included hypoperfusion in 1 patient who died 1 day after LVAD implantation. Delirium can also reflect more subtle problems that are potentially reversible, as in the case of the second patient.

Medical complications associated with LVADs were fairly common, occurring in all but 1 of our patients. Bleeding was our most common medical complication, a finding that was consistent with other studies [12]. Clearly the most devastating medical complication was renal failure. All patients who experienced acute renal failure after LVAD placement also had multisystem organ failure and died. This is another indication of a lack of perfusion of the end organs; either from pump failure or hypovolemia from massive hemorrhage. Several of these patients survived long enough to have dialysis but later died.

Other studies have found that the rate of complications increase with the length of time the LVAD is in place [3]. Our series of 23 patients had the most devastating complications in the first 14 days after LVAD placement, with most occurring in the first 24 to 48 hours. Seven of the 8 patients who had complications after 14 days went on to heart transplantation. This is encouraging news for the longer-term or permanent use of LVADs.

It is clear that LVADs can have an enormous impact on the survival and viability of heart failure patients. As the technology improves the complications of these devices will hopefully diminish. LVADs are now being used as permanent implants in experimental protocols. More data will be gathered about neurologic complications as experience is gained with these devices.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Mehta S.M., Boehmer J.P., Pae W.E., Aufiero T.X., Davis D., Pierce W.S. Bridging to transplant: equal extended survival for patients undergoing LVAD support when compared with long term medical management. ASAIO J 1996;42:M406-M410.[Medline]
  2. Holman W.L., Bourge R.C., Spruell R.D., Murrah C.P., McGiffin D.C., Kirklin J.K. Ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Ann Surg 1997;225:695-706.[Medline]
  3. Ashton R.C., Goldstein D.J., Rose E.A., Weinberg A.D., Levin H.R., Oz M.C. Duration of left ventricular assist device support affects transplant survival. J Heart Lung Transplant 1996;15:1151-1157.[Medline]
  4. Arabia F.A., Smith R.G., Rose D.S., Arzouman D.A., Sethi G.K., Copeland J.G. Success rates of long-term circulatory assist devices used currently for bridge to heart transplantation. ASAIO J 1996;42:M542-M546.[Medline]
  5. Deng M.C., Wilhelm M., Weyand M., et al. Long-term left ventricular assist device support: a novel pump rate challenge exercise protocol to monitor native left ventricular function. J Heart Lung Transplant 1997;16:629-635.[Medline]
  6. Moazami N., Roberts K., Argenziano M., et al. Asymptomatic microembolism in patients with long-term ventricular assist support. ASAIO J 1997;43:177-180.[Medline]
  7. Despotis G.J., Levine V., Joist H., Santoro S.A., Mendeloff E. Multiple episodes of thrombosis with biventricular support devices with inadequate anticoagulation and evidence of accelerated intravascular coagulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:419-422.[Free Full Text]
  8. Goldstein D.J., Oz M.C., Rose E.A. Implantable left ventricular assist devices. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1522-1532.[Free Full Text]
  9. Slater J.P., Rose E.A., Levin H.R., et al. Low thromboembolic risk without anticoagulation using advanced-design left ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1321-1328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nabavi D.G., Georgiadis D., Mumme T., et al. Clinical relevance of microembolic signals in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Stroke 1996;27:891-896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Schmid C., Weyand M., Nabavi D.G., et al. Cerebral and systemic embolization during left ventricular support with the Novacor N100 device. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1703-1710.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Koul B., Solem J.O., Steen S., Casimir-Ahn H., Granfeldt H., Lonn U.J. HeartMate left ventricular assist device as bridge to heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1625-1630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Tsukui, A. Abla, J. J. Teuteberg, D. M. McNamara, M. A. Mathier, L. M. Cadaret, and R. L. Kormos
Cerebrovascular accidents in patients with a ventricular assist device
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 114 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Knez and B. Rigler
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1690 - 1690.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. M. Lazar, P. A. Shapiro, B. E. Jaski, M. K. Parides, R. C. Bourge, J. T. Watson, L. Damme, W. Dembitsky, J. D. Hosenpud, L. Gupta, et al.
Neurological Events During Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support for Heart Failure: The Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Experience
Circulation, May 25, 2004; 109(20): 2423 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzman, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS