|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1160-1164
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Askepios Fachkiniken Müchen-Gauting, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
b Department of Pathology, Asklepios Fachkliniken München-Gauting, Munich, Germany
c Department of Surgery, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Address reprint requests to Dr Passlick, Department of Surgery, University of Munich, Klinikum Innenstadt, Nussbaumstr 20, 80336 Munich, Germany
e-mail: passlick{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Presented at the Poster Session of the Thirty-seventh Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 2931, 2001.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. A total of 1,162 patients with resected nonsmall cell lung cancer were analyzed in this retrospective study. Fifty-four patients (4.6%) had R1-resections at the bronchial margin. Type of residual disease (mucosal, extramucosal, or involvement of the entire bronchial wall) and occurrence of tumor cells in the lymphatic vessels (lymphangiosis carcinomatosa) were recorded as distinct parameters and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses (Log rank test; Cox regression model).
Results. Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the bronchial margin was detected in 22 patients (40.7%) and was associated with a significantly shortened survival (median survival with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, 13.3 months; without lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, 20.1 months; p = 0.026). Early stage patients (stage III) without lymphangiosis carcinomatosa showed a median survival of 49 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the resection margin is an independent prognostic parameter (p = 0.038). Even after postoperative radiotherapy the prognosis was still poor if a lymphangiosis carcinomatosa was detected (median survival, 17.1 months). All other parameters (T-stage, N-stage, tumor histology, type of bronchial wall involvement) were not of prognostic significance in R1-resected patients.
Conclusions. Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the bronchial resection margin predicts a poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. It is more than questionable whether these patients would benefit from local treatment options like radiotherapy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A generally accepted view is that residual tumor affects the prognosis adversely. However, a recent study that analyzed the postoperative outcome following "incomplete resections" of NSCLC showed that the R-status (R0 versus R1 resection) was not of prognostic impact [4]. Other authors reported that R1-resected NSCLC subgroups with different prognoses can be observed: tumor histology (adenocarcinomas versus squamous cell carcinomas) and type of R1 disease (mucosal versus extramucosal) were reported to be of predictive value in R1-resected NSCLC [2, 5, 6, 8]. However, these prognosticators statistically were not significant or the number of patients appeared to be too small to draw definitive conclusions.
Our assumption is that the current definition of R1-resection covers too many different conditions to allow a clear prognostic assessment of the individual patient. Therefore, the present study analyzed the influence of different parameters on survival of NSCLC patients with an R1-resection at the bronchial resection margin. The parameters included standard clinicopathological factors (T-stage, N-stage), type of R1-disease (mucosal, extramucosal, whole bronchial wall), and based on the work of Soorae and Stevenson [9], detection of tumor cells in the lymphatic vessels of the bronchial margin (lymphangiosis carcinomatosa).
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The only postoperative death was a patient who died of an adult respiratory distress syndrome of the contralateral lung at the 28th postoperative day following pneumonectomy. Two patients developed a bronchial stump insufficiency. One patient was reoperated successfully, and the other patient suffering from a late empyema was treated by open thoracostomy.
Methods
For this study the pathological specimens from all 54 patients were reassessed by our pathologist (AM-H) and the type of residual disease was divided into three groups: (1) mucosal disease, (2) extramucosal disease, and (3) involvement of the entire bronchial wall. In addition, the occurrence of tumor cells in the lymphatic vessels of the bronchial resection margin (lymphangiosis carcinomatosa) was recorded as a distinct parameter.
Generally, postoperative radiotherapy was recommended for patients with a bronchial R1-resection. However, postoperative radiotherapy was completely performed in only 39 (72%) of 54 patients. In 6 patients (including one early postoperative death) the overall condition of the patient was considered to be too poor to perform postoperative radiotherapy, and in the remaining 9 patients radiotherapy was either incomplete or the patients had denied further treatment.
Follow-up information was obtained from all patients. The median observation time was 43 months (range, 2477).
Statistical analysis
Differences in the relative frequency of events were compared by using the
2 test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and the observed differences in survival were compared by log rank test. For multivariate statistical analysis all variables were dichotomized and Cox proportional hazard models were applied. The analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software package (SPSS Software, Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Incidence of lymphangiosis carcinomatosa
The histopathological analysis showed lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the bronchial resection margin in 22 of 54 NSCLC patients with R1 resections (40.7%) (Table 1). The type of bronchial stump involvement was classified as mucosal residual disease in 8 patients (14.8%), extramucosal disease in 34 patients (63%), and the entire bronchial wall in 12 patients (22.2%). The occurrence of lymphangiosis carcinomatosa did not correlate with the type of R1 disease or the type of resection performed. However, involvement of the lymphatic vessels was significantly more frequent in patients with adenocarcinomas (68.8%) compared with patients who had squamous cell carcinomas (28.6%; p = 0.01). Interestingly, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa was even detected in 29.2% of the patients without lymph node involvement (pN0) and in 44% of the patients with pT1-2 tumors (Table 1).
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of the present study was to analyze a cohort of NSCLC patients with bronchial R1-status in greater detail to identify prognostic subgroups of patients as precisely as possible by using simple pathological methods. In addition to standard clinicopathological parameters, such as T-stage and N-stage, the type of residual disease (mucosal, extramucosal, entire bronchial wall) and the occurrence of tumor cells in the lymphatic vessels of the bronchial stump were analyzed. Similar to previous studies [2, 5, 6], the present analysis showed no prognostic significance for routinely assessed parameters like T-stage and N-stage, tumor histology (adenocarcinomas/squamous cell carcinomas), and type of R1-disease. The only significant prognosticator was lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the bronchial resection margin (Table 2; Fig 1). In a multivariate analysis, the risk for cancer-related death in patients with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa was doubled compared with patients without lymphangiosis carcinomatosa (Table 3).
Soorae and Stevenson [9] suggested previously, that the occurrence of tumor cells in the lymphatic vessels at the resection margin might be of predictive value. In a study with 64 patients they reported that 11 of 14 patients (78.6%) with a "lymphatic permeation" of the bronchial margin died within 1 year after surgery.
In the present study, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa was detected in about 40% of all patients. Interestingly, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa was observed not only in patients with advanced tumors, but also in 29% of the patients with pN0 disease and 44% of the patients with small primary tumors (pT1-2) (Table 1). Particularly in the early tumor stages, the examination for lymphangiosis carcinomatosa allowed discrimination between patients with favorable and unfavorable prognoses (Table 4). For example, 39% of the patients with pN0, R1-disease survived more than 3 years after operation if the resection margin was free of lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, whereas none of the pN0 patients with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the resection margin lived longer than 29 months postoperatively. Furthermore, patients with stage III disease but without lymphangiosis carcinomatosa had an excellent prognosis with a median survival of 49 months (Table 4). These data support the view that patients with R1-disease at the bronchial margin should be considered as a heterogeneous group depending on the involvement of the lymphatic vessels. Furthermore, the data might be helpful to explain why some recent publications failed to observe survival differences between R0- and R1-resections [4], because they did not consider these subgroups separately.
Currently there are no standard recommendations for further treatment of patients with a bronchial R1-resection. Classic options include simple observation, reoperation, and radiotherapy [12]. According to recently published studies (including the present series) most centers recommend postoperative chest irradiation for patients with residual disease at the bronchial margin [2, 5, 6]. This view is based mainly on the logic assumption that residual disease needs to be eradicated to provide a chance for long-term survival. However, there are no randomized trials concerning this strategy and some studies even doubt that immediate postoperative radiotherapy influences survival or the incidence of local recurrences [7, 10].
Recently, Massard and colleagues [12] suggested a more differentiated approach for patients with bronchial R1-disease. Based on the observation that patients with carcinoma in situ at the bronchial resection margin had an excellent prognosis per se, which might not be improved by radiotherapy, they suggested that only patients with a peribronchial infiltration should undergo adjuvant radiotherapy to gain better local disease control.
In our study, the majority of the patients received postoperative radiotherapy, and patients with early tumor stages III or squamous cell carcinomas had an acceptable outcome as long as no lymphangiosis carcinomatosa was detected (Table 4). Therefore, we would still recommend local therapy like reoperation or adjuvant radiotherapy in this subgroup of patients. Patients with a sufficient functional reserve in which frozen section analysis has not been performed, or in which false negative results have been found, might be candidates for reoperations. However, as in our study, the majority of patients are candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy for functional reasons.
In contrast, patients with a lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the resection margin have an extremely poor outcome even with radiotherapy (Fig 2). Therefore, this group of patients should be considered as advanced disease irrespective of their actual TNM system stage and all therapeutic options including systemic chemotherapy should be discussed.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Fernandez, P. L. de Castro, J. Astudillo, J. Fernandez-Llamazares, and and GCCB-S (Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Gro Bronchial stump infiltration after lung cancer surgery. Retrospective study of a series of 2994 patients Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 182 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wind, E. J. Smit, S. Senan, and J.-P. Eerenberg Residual disease at the bronchial stump after curative resection for lung cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 32(1): 29 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Guo, M. G. House, C. Hooker, Y. Han, E. Heath, E. Gabrielson, S. C. Yang, S. B. Baylin, J. G. Herman, and M. V. Brock Promoter Hypermethylation of Resected Bronchial Margins: A Field Defect of Changes? Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 5131 - 5136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |