ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Human, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zilla, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Human, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zilla, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S385-S388
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Basic research

Characterization of the immune response to valve bioprostheses and its role in primary tissue failure

Paul Human, MSca, Peter Zilla, MD, PhDa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cape Heart Centre, University of Cape Town Medical School, Cape Town, South Africa

Address reprint requests to Mr Human, Cardiovascular Research Unit, Cape Heart Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Rd, 7925 Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
e-mail: ctshuman{at}samiot.uct.ac.za

Presented at the VIII International Symposium on Cardiac Bioprostheses, Cancun, Mexico, Nov 3–5, 2000.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. The role of an immune response in the failure of bioprosthetic heart valves is poorly understood and disregarded by many. To elucidate the nature of the immune response to glutaraldehyde-treated tissue and the possible role of graft-specific antibody in graft mineralization, we performed immune-calcification studies in the rabbit and correlated those results with the analysis of specific antibodies.

Methods. Aortic wall buttons (6 mm) were punched from porcine aortic wall tissue fixed with 0.2% glutaraldehyde and detoxified with urazole and then subsequently perforated under sterile conditions. The perforated buttons were then incubated with either immune serum prepared by immunization of New Zealand White rabbits (n = 5) with Freund’s incomplete adjuvant emulsions of tissue homogenates of similarly treated aortic wall tissue, or incubated with the corresponding control preimmune sera obtained before immunization of the same animals. The tissue was then implanted subdermally on the back of unrelated New Zealand White rabbits (n = 8) for a period of 3 weeks. After the buttons were explanted, tissue calcium levels were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy.

Results. Tissue calcium was increased in all five immune serum-treated replicates (range, 61.8% to 431.2%; mean, 225.9% ± 73.2%) when compared with control samples treated with preimmune sera. Overall, the mean calcium level was significantly increased (p < 0.0001) when tissue was treated with immune sera (66.0 ± 10.0 µg/mg versus 22.6 ± 4.8 µg/mg in control tissue). Graft specificity of immune sera was confirmed by Western blot analysis.

Conclusions. These results strongly suggest a role of circulating graft-specific antibody in the disease of bioprosthetic graft calcification.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Contemporary bioprosthetic heart valves are predominantly made of porcine or bovine tissue. To suppress antigenicity and thus prevent rejection and failure, these heterografts are cross-linked. Early tissue valves were cross-linked with formaldehyde, but the fixation was insufficient and the prostheses soon failed because of inflammatory degeneration. As a consequence, glutaraldehyde (GA) was adopted as a fixative because of its perceived ability to irreversibly cross-link proteins. For fear of adverse effects of GA, such as cytotoxicity, as well as its intrinsic potential to induce calcification [1], particularly low GA concentrations have been used since its introduction.

As early as 1987, Nimni and associates [2] showed that these low concentrations of GA resulted in a distinctly higher level of circulating antibodies than enhanced fixation using diamine bridges. Nevertheless, without providing a direct link between these circulating antibodies and augmented degeneration of bioprosthetic tissue valves, the presence of specific antibodies could be easily disregarded as inconsequential. In the past few years, such a link between circulating, graft-specific antibodies and valve degeneration was eventually found by a number of investigators. Apart from allograft studies, which increasingly supported the notion of immune degeneration [3], a growing number of researchers also provided evidence for immune-mediated xenograft degeneration. Dahm and colleagues [4] showed in 1995 that specific antibodies were present in 100% of patients with failed tissue valves but in only 25% of patients with intact valves. In 1996, Eishi and coworkers [5] demonstrated in Takayasu patients requiring aortic valve replacement that the administration of steroids significantly suppressed bioprosthetic calcification. Equally supportive data came from Chauvaud and colleagues [6], who recently reported a lack of calcification in a relatively large clinical series of pericardial implants that were fixed with GA but autologous rather than xenogeneic. The most convincing study, however, came from Vincentelli and associates in 1998 [7]. This group demonstrated in the same animal model that after fixation in 0.65% GA, xenogeneic tissue calcified 35 times more than autologous tissue.

As much as these data lend an increasing weight to the suspicion that immune mechanisms are strong facilitators of bioprosthetic degeneration, a direct connection between a specific antibody response and tissue calcification was still outstanding. In the present study we prove this direct connection by demonstrating significantly increased bioprosthetic mineralization after preincubation in autologous serum that contained high levels of specific antibodies against the xenogeneic heart valve tissue.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Study design
Commercially fixed porcine bioprosthetic tissue was incubated in serum from animals immunized against the bioprosthetic tissue, after the presence of specific antibodies was confirmed. Corresponding control tissue was incubated in serum obtained from the same animals before immunization. Both experimental and control samples were implanted subdermally into unrelated animals of the same species to compare tissue calcification in the presence and absence of specific antibodies.

Tissue preparation
After an initial fixation period of 2 days in 0.2% GA (4°C, phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]), 6-mm circular disks were punched out from porcine aortas and transferred back into new 0.2% GA solution. At the end of 7 days of fixation, samples were rinsed in high volumes (30 mL/g) of PBS and thoroughly detoxified in urazole as described in detail elsewhere [8], washed in high volumes of PBS, and finally stored in low volumes of PBS for less than 1 month.

Rabbit immunization
Before immunization, 20 mL of blood was collected from 5 New Zealand White rabbits, and the serum was frozen at -20°C. For the purpose of immunization, fixed and detoxified tissue was taken from the PBS and homogenized by pulverization under liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle until a fine-powder consistency was achieved. Sterile technique was used throughout. Tissue was resuspended in sterile PBS and emulsified with Freund’s incomplete adjuvant. Subsequently, the animals were immunized subcutaneously on the back with a total dose of 10 mg of tissue wet weight per animal distributed between two 0.5-mL injections. Animals were boosted on day 14 with an identical antigen dose, also emulsified in Freund’s incomplete adjuvant. Blood samples were taken before boosting and again after a further 3 weeks.

Detection of specific antibodies
The graft specificity of the immune sera was confirmed by Western blot analysis. Fresh homogenized aortic wall tissue was extracted overnight at 4°C in a sodium dodecyl sulfate extraction buffer (Tris, 50 mmol/L, pH7.4; SDS, 0.1%; NaN3, 0.02%). The protein concentration of the extract was determined spectrophotometrically. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed on 10% Tris-HCl minigels. Separated protein was blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, which were then blocked in Tween Tris-buffered saline. Sera were applied as 1:100 dilutions in Tween Tris-buffered saline, and specific immunoglobulin G antibody was detected through the use of a goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G horseradish peroxidase conjugate (BioRad, Hercules, CA).

Bioprosthetic tissue exposure to specific antibodies
All aortic wall buttons were thoroughly detoxified to prevent antibody cross-linking through leaching GA. After perforation of the buttons under sterile conditions to increase the tissue surface for antibody exposure, eight replicate buttons were incubated in each of the five immune sera. Another eight replicate buttons were incubated in each of the five corresponding preimmune sera. Eight buttons were incubated in normal saline as controls. A total of 88 buttons were therefore prepared.

Rabbit implants
All anesthetic and surgical procedures were approved by the animal research and ethics committee of the University of Cape Town and complied with the "Principles of Laboratory Care" and the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication 86-23). Samples were implanted subdermally on the back of 8 New Zealand White rabbits (1.59 ± 0.04 kg) that were unrelated to those used for immunization. Each animal was the recipient of 11 aortic wall buttons, 5 having been incubated with the different preimmunization sera, 5 with the corresponding postimmunization sera, and 1 with normal saline. After 3 weeks of implantation the animals were euthanized, and the implants were retrieved for tissue calcium analysis.

Tissue calcification measurement
After storage at -20°C, the tissue was dried at 104°C for 24 hours, weighed, ashed in a muffle furnace at 560°C for 12 hours, and dissolved in a 20% hydrochloric acid solution (10 mg dried tissue in 1 mL HCl). Final dilution was achieved in a 0.5% lanthanum chloride solution, and absorption was measured at 422.7 nm on an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Varian AA1275, Springvale, Australia). Calcium levels were expressed as micrograms per milligram of dry mass of tissue.

Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as means ± standard error. Comparison of calcium levels between preimmune sera–incubated and immune sera–incubated tissue was performed using one-way analysis of variance. Comparison of preimmune sera–incubated tissue with saline-incubated tissue was performed using the Dunnett test. A significance level of 0.05 or less was accepted as being statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Detection of specific antibody
Preimmune sera failed to show significant titers of immunoglobulin G specific for porcine aortic wall antigen in Western blots (Fig 1). Before boosting and 2 weeks after initial immunization, a distinct and repeatable immunoglobulin G response had developed, which involved at least six distinct molecular weight antigens. Four antigens, namely 180 kd, 65 kd, 48 kd, and 44 kd, were found to be highly immunogenic and consistent with two other antigens, namely 40 kd and 16 kd, appearing more variable and less intense. Because the antigen loading of the various proteins on the gel is dependent on their ease of extraction in the sodium dodecyl sulfate extraction buffer, direct comparisons are provisional only. Three weeks after booster immunization, the response showed a dramatic increase in intensity to these antigens. No involvement of graft-specific immunoglobulin M was detected (data not shown) in either preimmune or immune sera.



View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Western blots of rabbit sera against an extract of unfixed porcine aortic wall tissue demonstrating the presence of graft-specific immunoglobulin G before immunization (lanes 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13), immediately before boosting (lanes 2, 5, 8, 11, and 14), and 3 weeks after boosting (lanes 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15) with tissue fixed with 0.2% glutaraldehyde.

 
Tissue calcification measurement
Tissue calcium was increased in all five immune serum–treated replicates (range, 61.8% to 431.2%; mean, 225.9% ± 73.2%) when compared with control samples treated with preimmune sera (Fig 2A). Overall, the mean calcium level was significantly increased by a factor of 3 (p[dlt]0.0001) when tissue was treated with immune sera (66.0 ± 10.0 µg/mg versus 22.6 ± 4.8 µg/mg in controls; Fig 2B). There was no significant difference between calcium levels of saline-incubated and preimmune sera–incubated aortic wall coupons (Dunnett test).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Tissue calcium in aortic wall discs after incubation in preimmune and immune sera. (A) Individual values. (B) Mean values.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
After years of controversy about the role of immune responses in the degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valves, we conclusively proved a direct relationship between specific antibodies directed against bioprosthetic tissue and calcification.

Aortic wall tissue—which was chosen because of its detrimental calcification in both homografts and modern stentless xenografts—calcified three times more after incubation with serum containing specific antibodies against the porcine tissue. As control samples were incubated in preimmune sera of the same animals, the calcific-promoting effect of immune sera can conclusively be linked to the immunization process itself. To exclude nonspecific inflammatory effects as a reason behind this phenomenon, the presence of specific antibodies against porcine tissue was demonstrated in the immune sera.

The underlying theory of all attempts to link bioprosthetic degeneration with immune mechanisms is one of suboptimally masked antigenicity. This phenomenon was demonstrated by various groups [4, 9] and is the result of a compromise on which commercial fixation is still based today. This compromise, which was to choose very low concentrations of GA and thus insufficient cross-linking over the perceived adverse effects of the dialdehyde [1], stands in stark contrast to common knowledge in immunology. Even basic laboratory experience, such as immunohistochemistry, teaches that masking of antigens through better cross-linking prevents antigen recognition. It should therefore not come as a surprise that evidence has accumulated over the past 20 years confirming that the low-grade fixation of bioprosthetic heart valves does indeed elicit an immune response. As early as 1987, Nimni and coworkers [2] alerted the scientific community that standard commercial GA fixation only achieves a 59% reduction in antigenicity as opposed to a 92% reduction obtained through enhanced fixation. Other groups have demonstrated the generation of specific antibodies against pericardium fixed in 0.2% GA [9, 10]. The main criticism against all these studies was the fact that their subcutaneous administration of immunogens hardly reflects the low-grade exposure to the immune system of intracardially placed bioprosthetic tissue. However, circulating antibodies were regularly detected in human recipients of bioprosthetic heart valves. In patients with porcine valves, specific antibodies were detected in as many as 58% [11]. In homograft patients, 82% of recipients presented with a specific antibody response, 92% of which produced immunoglobulin G against class I human leukocyte antigens [3].

The most crucial step in proving the involvement of an immune response in tissue valve failure is the demonstration of a link between an immune response and calcific degeneration. In the past few years, both Vincentelli and colleagues [7] and our group [1214] have provided indirect evidence for such a link. Vincentelli and associates [7] demonstrated that xenogeneic tissue fixed in 0.65% GA calcified 35 times more in the same animal model compared with fixed autologous tissue. Our group found a direct correlation between cross-link density, inflammation, and calcification in both the rat [12, 13] and the sheep model [14]. By increasing the cross-link density in GA-treated porcine root prostheses, bioprosthetic calcification of 0.2% GA-fixed aortic wall tissue could be reduced by 90.0% (p = 0.004) and 53.7% (p < 0.0001) after 6 and 24 weeks of sheep implantation, respectively. However, as much as these data strongly supported the notion that calcification correspondingly decreases with increasing masking of antigenicity, the multifactorial nature of tissue mineralization made it likely that higher cross-linking itself rather than the mitigation of an immune reaction alone may have contributed to the lower calcification. Therefore, a more direct connection between an immune response and tissue calcification was required. By demonstrating threefold higher calcification in aortic wall tissue that was preincubated in serum containing high levels of graft-specific antibodies, we were able to provide this direct immune-calcification link. Such a link certainly does not disregard the complexity of bioprosthetic heart valve degeneration. Undoubtedly, a variety of other mechanisms, such as tissue fixation itself and accessibility of nucleation sites, plays a crucial role. Furthermore, the level of insight into the actual molecular mechanisms behind an immune link to calcification is unsatisfying and can only be seen as a beginning. At the same time, it was the categorical exclusion of antigenicity as a contributing factor to bioprosthetic tissue degeneration in the 1980s and early 1990s that was the reason that observations in this direction started late and the mechanisms involved are still unidentified. The main challenge ahead will be to both identify tissue antigens eliciting a specific immune response and elucidate molecular mechanisms through which antibody binding facilitates calcification.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Golomb G., Schoen F., Smith M., et al. The role of glutaraldehyde-induced cross-links in calcification of bovine pericardium used in cardiac valve bioprostheses. Am J Pathol 1987;127:122-130.[Abstract]
  2. Nimni M., Cheung D., Strates B., et al. Chemically modified collagen: a natural biomaterial for tissue replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:741-771.[Medline]
  3. Smith J., Hornick P., Rasmi N., et al. Effect of HLA mismatching, and antibody status on "homovital" aortic valve homograft performance. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S212-S215.
  4. Dahm M., Husmann M., Eckhard M., et al. Relevance of immunologic reactions for tissue failure of bioprosthetic heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S348-S352.
  5. Eishi K., Ishibashi U.H., Nakano K., et al. Calcific degeneration of bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients receiving steroid therapy. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:668-672.[Medline]
  6. Chauvaud S., Jebara V., Chachques J., et al. Valve extension with glutaraldehyde-preserved autologous pericardium. Results in mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:171-178.[Abstract]
  7. Vincentelli A., Latremouille C., Zegdi R., et al. Does glutaraldehyde induce calcification of bioprosthetic tissues?. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S255-S258.
  8. Zilla P., Fullard L., Trescony P., et al. Glutaraldehyde detoxification of aortic wall tissue: a promising perspective for emerging bioprosthetic valve concepts. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:510-520.[Medline]
  9. Dahm M., Lyman W., Schwell A., et al. Immunogenicity of glutaraldehyde-tanned bovine pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:1082-1090.[Abstract]
  10. Nimni M. The cross-linking and structure modification of the collagen matrix in the design of cardiovascular prosthesis. J Card Surg 1988;3:523-533.[Medline]
  11. Sheikh K., Tascon M., Nimni M. Autoimmunity in patients with Hancock valve implant and bypass heart surgery. Fed Proc 1980;39:472.
  12. Zilla P., Weissenstein C., Bracher M., et al. High glutaraldehyde concentrations reduce rather than increase the calcification of aortic wall tissue. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:502-509.[Medline]
  13. Weissenstein C., Human P., Bezuidenhout D., Zilla P. Glutaraldehyde detoxification in addition to enhanced amine cross-linking dramatically reduces bioprosthetic tissue calcification in the rat model. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:230-240.[Medline]
  14. Zilla P., Weissenstein C., Human P., Dower T., von Oppell U.O. High glutaraldehyde concentrations mitigate bioprosthetic root calcification in the sheep model. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:2091-2095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
G. Van Nooten, P. Somers, M. Cornelissen, S. Bouchez, F. Gasthuys, E. Cox, L. Sparks, and K. Narine
Acellular porcine and kangaroo aortic valve scaffolds show more intense immune-mediated calcification than cross-linked Toronto SPV(R) valves in the sheep model
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2006; 5(5): 544 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. E. David and J. Ivanov
Is degenerative calcification of the native aortic valve similar to calcification of bioprosthetic heart valves?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2003; 126(4): 939 - 941.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Trantina-Yates, C. Weissenstein, P. Human, and P. Zilla
Stentless bioprosthetic heart valve research: sheep versus primate model
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S422 - S427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Human, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zilla, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Human, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zilla, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology
Right arrow Valve disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS