ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ochi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honma, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ochi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honma, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1210-1214
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Limited flow capacity of the right gastroepiploic artery graft: postoperative echocardiographic and angiographic evaluation

Masami Ochi, MDa, Nobuo Hatori, MD, PhDa, Masahiro Fujii, MDa, Yoshiaki Saji, MDa, Shigeo Tanaka, MDa, Hiroshi Honma, MDb

a Department of Surgery II, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
b Department of Internal Medicine I, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan

Accepted for publication November 28, 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr Ochi, 1-1-5 Sendagi Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
e-mail: ochi/surg2{at}nms.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. The flow capacity of the right gastroepiploic artery graft has not been clarified.

Methods. Angiographic and echocardiographic studies were conducted in 30 patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting using both the internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries. The luminal diameter of the arterial grafts was measured from the postoperative angiograms. The adequacy of the myocardial blood supply from the arterial grafts was evaluated by dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Results. With echocardiography, 14 patients exhibited an ischemic response in the gastroepiploic artery grafted region, whereas no patients exhibited an ischemic response in the internal thoracic artery grafted area. The luminal diameter of the gastroepiploic artery and a younger age were correlated with the ischemic response observed in the dobutamine stress echocardiography. A luminal diameter of the gastroepiploic artery of greater than 2.6 mm had the highest sensitivity and specificity for a nonischemic change.

Conclusions. To generate the maximal flow reserve, the luminal diameter of the gastroepiploic artery when used as a graft should be sufficiently large enough, nearly 3 mm at the anastomosis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
It has been more than 10 years since the first clinical application of the right gastroepiploic artery (GEA) as an in situ graft to the coronary artery was performed [14]. The GEA has been used enthusiastically with much expectation from the cardiac surgeons as the next alternative to the internal thoracic artery (ITA) [58].

The GEA has a wide individual variation in its length and caliber. However, there has been little data presented providing criteria for the usage of this artery with regard to the characteristics of the flow capacity of the GEA. We assessed the flow capacity of the GEA by analyzing the results of the postoperative angiographic and dobutamine stress echocardiographic evaluations in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using both the GEA and the ITA.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Thirty patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting using both the ITAs and GEA with or without venous grafts were studied. There were 24 men and all had multivessel coronary lesions. Their age ranged from 48 to 72 years with a mean age of 61.2 years. None of the patients experienced angina during daily life, or received antianginal drugs postoperatively. The number of bypassed vessels was two to six (mean, 3.8). The left anterior descending artery was revascularized by the left ITA in all patients. The GEA was grafted to the right coronary artery, which had critical occlusive lesions at its proximal segment with or without distal lesions, or to the distal branch of the dominant left circumflex artery, which had a significant area of perfusion. The GEAs that were grafted to an isolated small branch were not included in this study.

Sequential anastomoses were performed with the left ITA in 17 patients and with the GEA in 11 patients (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Graft Placement

 
Because preoperative angiograms of the GEA can be obtained during diagnostic catheterization by the cardiologists, it has been our standard procedure to use a GEA with a luminal diameter of greater than 2 mm at the presumptive point of anastomosis on the angiogram.

The GEA was brought into the pericardial cavity anterior to the stomach and liver. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (MO).

An angiographic examination was performed from 3 to 21 months (mean, 6.8 months) postoperatively as a routine practice to confirm the status of the grafts, as well as that of the coronary arteries. All patients were informed of this preoperatively and all accepted to comply with the procedure. During the same period, all patients were offered the option of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) to document the adequacy of the myocardial blood flow, and informed consent was obtained.

Protocol of the postoperative dobutamine stress echocardiography study
The protocol for the DSE [9] included infusion of nitroglycerin at 0.1 to 0.2 µg · kg-1 · min-1, followed by infusion of dobutamine at 4 µg · kg-1 · min-1 with stepwise increases to 8, 12, 16, 20, 25, and 30 µg · kg-1 · min-1 (infusion at each dose for 3 minutes). The electrocardiogram was monitored continuously, and the blood pressure, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram were recorded at baseline and at the end of each stage.

The following end points were applied to the DSE: (1) appearance of a new regional wall motion abnormality involving two or more wall segments; (2) attaining 85% of the target heart rate; (3) an ST-segment depression or elevation greater than 2 mm; (4) occurrence of significant chest pain; (5) an increase in the systolic blood pressure more than 200 mm Hg; (6) a decrease in the systolic blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or to less than 90 mm Hg; (7) appearance of complex ventricular arrhythmias; and (8) administration of the maximum dose of dobutamine.

Echocardiographic images were video-recorded and reviewed by at least two experienced cardiologists. The presence of an ischemic response to the DSE was diagnosed when one of the following involving two or more wall segments was identified: (1) development of asynergy in the patients without a wall motion abnormality at rest and (2) worsening of the wall motion abnormality in the patients with a wall motion abnormality at rest (ie, deterioration from hypokinesis to akinesis or dyskinesis).

Angiographic examination
Diagnostic angiographic catheters (5F) of various shapes were used through a transfemoral approach in all patients. All grafts were investigated for patency. The ITAs and GEAs were visualized selectively or semiselectively. Care was taken to obtain a cineangiogram in which both the distal segments of the arterial grafts around the anastomosis and the catheter could be seen in the same frame. Coronary angiograms were also obtained. Before angiography, a 2.5-mg bolus of isosorbide dinitrate was injected into the coronary arteries and arterial grafts to eliminate spasms.

The luminal diameter of the arterial grafts near the anastomosis was measured from the angiogram by comparing it with the lumen of a 5F angiographic catheter (1.67 mm) by means of computer-analyzed Quantitative Coronary Angiography (Cardio 500, KONTRON Elektronik GmbH, Munich, Germany).

The angiographic status of the arterial grafts was evaluated by classifying the pattern of the blood flow of the grafted coronary artery by the arterial graft as follows:

  1. A "dominant graft" was defined when the coronary artery was visualized only or mainly by the graft injection.
  2. A "balanced condition" was defined when the coronary artery was equally visualized either by the graft or by the intracoronary injection.
  3. A "dominant coronary artery" was defined when the coronary artery was entirely visualized by the intracoronary injection and not by the graft.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS10.0J (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The distributions were analyzed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the variances of the data by the Levene test. Then, comparisons between the two groups were performed using the unpaired Student’s t test. The {chi}2 test using the Fisher’s direct method was used for comparison of categoric data. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using the patient characteristics and the difference between the ischemic and nonischemic changes in the GEA anastomosed region as independent covariates, by selecting a forward-stepping selection method with maximum likelihood estimates and default criteria. A receiver operator characteristic curve was used to optimize the sensitivity and specificity of using the diameter of the GEA to predict nonischemic change. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. All p values were two-tailed, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Angiography
The ITAs, as well as the GEAs, were patent and appeared normal in all patients. The luminal diameter of the ITAs ranged from 1.4 to 3.1 mm (2.3 ± 0.4 mm) and that of the GEA from 1.5 to 4.5 mm (2.9 ± 0.7 mm), and the latter was significantly larger than the former (p < 0.005).

The status of the ITAs was: A dominant ITA in 19 patients, balanced condition in 7, and dominant coronary in 4 patients. The status of the GEAs was: A dominant GEA in 23 patients, balanced condition in 6, and dominant coronary in 1 patient. Residual nongrafted vessels in the right coronary system were identified in 5 patients.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography
In the DSE, no patients exhibited new wall motion abnormalities in the anteroseptal to lateral region where the ITAs were grafted. On the contrary, a new wall motion abnormality during the DSE was identified in 14 patients in the inferoposterior region where the GEA was anastomosed. Among these patients, 3 complained of chest pain with an ST-segment depression on the electrocardiogram during the DSE.

Patients were divided into three groups according to the results of the DSE and the presence of residual nongrafted vessels in the inferoposterior region on the angiogram (Table 2). Group I patients did not exhibit an ischemic change in the DSE and did not have residual nongrafted vessels in the inferoposterior region (N = 16). Group II patients exhibited an ischemic change in the DSE, but did not have residual nongrafted vessels in the inferoposterior region (N = 9). Group III patients exhibited an ischemic change in the DSE and had residual nongrafted vessels in the inferoposterior region (N = 5). The luminal diameter and angiographic status of the arterial grafts of the GEA in each group are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Groups of Patients According to the Presence of Ischemic Change in the DSE and Residual Nongrafted Vessels in the GEA-Grafted Region

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean Luminal Diameter of the ITAs and GEAs

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Angiographic Status of the GEAs and Grafted Coronary Arteries

 
All patients in group III exhibited satisfactory angiographic results and had GEAs with a luminal diameter greater than 3 mm. The presence of residual nongrafted vessels in the right coronary system, however, made it difficult to determine the adequacy of flow reserve of the GEA. Accordingly, patients in groups I and II were analyzed for predictors of the ischemic change in the DSE.

On univariate analyses, the age, body surface area, presence of hypertension, diabetes or hyperlipidemia, and history of smoking, or old myocardial infarction were not associated with an ischemic change. The variables observed during the DSE also were not associated with an ischemic change in the DSE. The only significant variable associated with an ischemic change was the luminal diameter of the GEA (Fig 1).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Luminal diameter of the gastroepiploic arteries of the patients in group I and group II. Patients 1 through 16 are included in group I, and patients 17 through 25 are in group II.

 
A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors for the ischemic change in the GEA region. The results demonstrated that the luminal diameter of the GEA and a younger age of the patients were significant independent predictors for the ischemic change. When the presence of hyperlipidemia was combined with these predictors, a much greater likelihood of the occurrence of an ischemic change in the GEA grafted region was obtained (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Multivariate Analysis for Ischemic Change in GEA-Grafted Region

 
The receiver operator characteristic curve showed that a luminal diameter of the GEA of greater than 2.6 mm had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 78.0% for nonischemic change in the GEA anastomosed region (Fig 2).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Receiver operator characteristic curve showing a luminal diameter of the GEA of greater than 2.6 mm (*) had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 78.0% for nonischemic change in the dobutamine stress echocardiography in the gastroepiploic artery-grafted region.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
From the beginning of the development of the GEA as a graft to the coronary artery, its angiographic and anatomic relevancy has been confirmed by various investigations [1013]. In addition, many aspects of the differences between the ITA and the GEA have been pointed out [1419].

In the current study, ischemic wall motion abnormalities occurred in the DSE only in the region perfused by the GEA, even in the patients who exhibited acceptable angiographic findings for the GEA. Among the 9 patients in group II, 6 exhibited a definite angiographic dominancy of the GEA over the coronary artery. Furthermore, no wall motion abnormalities were induced in the DSE in the region perfused by the ITA. These results led us to assume that the flow capacity is apparently different between the GEA and ITA, especially under certain stress conditions.

There have been several reports on the free flow rate and the diameter of the GEA for the anastomosis measured intraoperatively [6, 18, 20, 21]. A large luminal diameter correlated with better flow rates. None of the previous reports, however, have demonstrated the adequacy of the flow capacity of the GEA under maximum stress conditions. The results in this study clearly indicate that the luminal diameter of the GEA should be large enough (2.6 mm or more) to meet the myocardial oxygen demand during exercise.

Many reports have warned that a GEA with a small diameter should not be anastomosed to a noncritically stenosed coronary artery because of the frequent occurrence of competitive flow between the coronary artery [8, 2224]. As mentioned previously, 6 patients in group II showed angiographic dominancy (Fig 3). In 4 of these patients, the GEA grafted coronary artery was totally occluded. Dominant GEAs were supposed to perfuse the entire vascular bed of the grafted coronary artery.



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. A 62-year-old male patient in group II showing a dominant gastroepiploic artery with a luminal diameter of 2.5 mm. The entire right coronary artery is opacified by the gastroepiploic artery.

 
The response of grafts to increased blood flow under conditions of stress is correlated to the coronary vascular bed. The larger the grafted vascular bed, the more blood flow is required. The GEAs of small diameter may not be capable of supplying the entire coronary vascular bed with sufficient blood flow. The dominancy on the angiogram is one thing and the flow reserve of the GEA is another.

The length of the GEA graft may influence its flow reserve. The distal segment of the GEA contains more smooth muscle cells and is smaller in diameter. Therefore, the distal segment of the GEA graft should be trimmed, because the distal segment of the arterial grafts is reactive and functions as a flow regulator [25]. Use of a shorter GEA graft has been advocated to obtain better blood flow [20].

However, the GEA has a wide individual variation in its length and caliber. In our series, 7 patients with a sequential graft of the GEA were included in the nonischemic group. Despite the need for a longer length of the GEA than that for nonsequential grafts, all these patients had GEAs with a luminal diameter of more than 3 mm. This indicates that the major determinant of the flow capacity of the GEA is its luminal diameter. As long as the luminal diameter of the GEA is large enough, the length of the GEA graft may not influence its flow reserve. Conversely, even if the length of the GEA is sufficient, a small luminal diameter is a contraindication to its use.

There was at least one residual nongrafted vessel of the right coronary artery in the group III patients. All the patients in group III had GEAs with a luminal diameter of more than 3 mm (range, 3.1 to 3.8 mm; mean, 3.6 mm). In 4 of these patients, the GEA graft was anastomosed to the totally occluded right coronary artery. Whether the ischemic change was the result of the inadequate flow reserve of the GEA or the nongrafted vessels remained ambiguous. However, even in group II patients, there was 1 patient whose GEA was 3.3 mm in diameter (Fig 1). The right coronary artery of this patient was totally occluded at the proximal segment and the remainder of it was perfused by the GEA. A possibility still exists that the ischemic response in the group III patients was attributable to the inadequate flow capacity of the GEA. There may be other factors that influence the flow capacity of the GEA as a graft [19]. Further study, for example, a measurement of the change in the flow velocity of the GEA under stress conditions using transcutaneous Doppler echocardiography [26], may give us a solution to this problem.

A possible explanation for why a younger age is an independent predictor for ischemic change in the DSE is an age-related reduction in the basal metabolic rate that reduces oxygen consumption of the heart [27, 28]. Aging is associated with a progressive loss of myocytes and an increase in the rate of degenerative change [29]. The structural and functional changes can affect the oxygen utilization of the heart.

In conclusion, considering the high occurrence of ischemic change in the GEA grafted region, which is not observed at all in the ITA grafted region, the flow capacity of the GEA differs from that of the ITA especially under maximal stress conditions. In that sense, the GEA should not be used routinely in the same way as the ITA. The luminal diameter of the GEA as a graft to the coronary artery should be more than 2.6 mm at the anastomosis, and adding the thickness of the arterial wall, the outer diameter should be 3 mm or more.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We are grateful to John Martin for his assistance in preparing the manuscript.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Suma H., Fukumoto H., Takeuchi A. Coronary artery bypass grafting by utilizing in situ right gastroepiploic artery: basic study and clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:394-397.[Abstract]
  2. Pym J., Brown P.M., Charrette E.J.P., Parker J.O., West R.O. Gastroepiploic-coronary anastomosis. A viable alternative bypass graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:256-259.[Abstract]
  3. Suma H., Wanibuchi Y., Terada Y., Fukuda S., Takayama T., Furuta S. The right gastroepiploic artery graft. Clinical and angiographic midterm results in 200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:615-623.[Abstract]
  4. Pym J., Brown P.M., Pearson M., Parker J. Right gastroepiploic-to-coronary bypass. The first decade of use. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl 2):45-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lytle B.W., Cosgrove D.M., Ratliff N.B., Loop F.D. Coronary artery bypass grafting with the right gastroepiploic artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:826-831.[Abstract]
  6. Mills N.L., Hockmuth D.R., Everson C.T., Robart C.C. Right gastroepiploic artery used for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:579-586.[Abstract]
  7. Grandjean J.G., Boonstra P.W., den Heyer P., Ebels T.E. Arterial revascularization with the right gastroepiploic artery and internal mammary arteries in 300 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:1309-1316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Jegarden O., Eker A., Montagna P., et al. Technical aspects and late functional results of gastroepiploic bypass grafting (400 cases). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:575-581.[Abstract]
  9. Kishida H., Kusama Y., Homma H. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease and viable myocardium. Jpn Heart J 1997;38:151-161.[Medline]
  10. Suma H., Wanibuchi Y., Furuta S., Isshiki T., Yamaguchi T., Takanashi R. Comparative study between the gastroepiploic and the internal thoracic artery as a coronary bypass graft. Size, flow, patency, histology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991;5:244-247.[Abstract]
  11. Van Son J.A.M., Smedts F.M., Yang C.-Q., et al. Morphometric study of the right gastroepiploic and inferior epigastric arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:709-715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Van Son J.A.M., Falk V., Walther T., Smedts F.M., Mohr F.W. Low-grade intimal hyperplasia in internal mammary and right gastroepiploic arteries as bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:706-708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. O’Neil G.S., Chester A.H., Allen S.P., et al. Endothelial function of human gastroepiploic artery. Implication for its use as a bypass graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:561-565.[Abstract]
  14. Tavilla G., van Son J.A.M., Verhagen A.F., Smedts F. Retrogastric versus antegastric routing and histology of the right gastroepiploic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:1057-1061.[Abstract]
  15. Dignan R.J., Yeh T., Dyke C.M., et al. Reactivity of gastroepiploic and internal mammary arteries. Relevance to coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:116-123.[Abstract]
  16. Hanet C., Semaan C., Khoury G., Dion R., Robert A. Differences in vasoreactivity between gastroepiploic artery grafts late after bypass surgery and grafted coronary arteries. Circulation 1994;90(Part 2):155-159.
  17. He G.-W., Yang C.-Q. Comparison among arterial grafts and coronary artery. An attempt at functional classification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:707-715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Malhotra R., Bedi H.S., Bazaz S., Jain S., Trehan N. Morphometric analysis of the right gastroepiploic artery and the internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:124-127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tedoriya T., Kawasuji M., Sakakibara N., Ueyama K., Watanabe Y. Pressure characteristics in arterial grafts for coronary bypass surgery. Cardiovasc Surg 1995;3:381-385.[Medline]
  20. Dietl C.A. Vascular reactivity of the gastroepiploic artery graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1568-1569.[Free Full Text]
  21. Tavilla G., Jackimovicz J., Berreklouw E. Intraoperative blood flow measurement of the right gastroepiploic artery using pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:426-431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Albertini A., Lochegnies A., El Khoury G., et al. Use of the right gastroepiploic artery as a coronary artery bypass graft in 307 patients. Cardiovasc Surg 1998;6:419-423.[Medline]
  23. Uchida N., Kawaue Y. Flow competition of the right gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1342-1346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Voutilainen S., Verkkala K., Järvinen A., Keto P. Angiographic 5-year follow-up study of right gastroepiploic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:501-505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. He G.W. Clinical physiology and related characteristics. In: He G.W., ed. Arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass surgery. Singapore: Springer, 1999:39-41.
  26. Nishida H., Endo M., Koyanagi H., Koyanagi T., Nakamura K. Coronary artery bypass grafting with the right gastroepiploic artery and evaluation of flow with transcutaneous Doppler echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:532-539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Piers L.S., Soares M.J., McCormack L.M., O’Dea K. Is there evidence for an age-related reduction in metabolic rate?. J Appl Physiol 1998;85:2196-2204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Olivetti G., Melissari M., Capasso J.M., Anversa P. Cardiomyopathy of the aging human heart: myocyte loss and reactive cellular hypertrophy. Circ Res 1991;68:1560-1568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lie J.T., Hammond P.I. Pathology of the senescent heart: autonomic observation on 237 autopsy studies of patients 90 to 105 years old. Mayo Clin Proc 1988;63:552-564.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Di Mauro, M. Contini, A. L. Iaco, A. Bivona, M. Gagliardi, E. Varone, P. Bosco, and A. M. Calafiore
Bilateral internal thoracic artery on the left side: A propensity score-matched study of impact of the third conduit on the right side
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 869 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Glineur, W. D'hoore, G. El Khoury, S. Sondji, G. Kalscheuer, J.-C. Funken, J. Rubay, A. Poncelet, P. Astarci, R. Verhelst, et al.
Angiographic Predictors of 6-Month Patency of Bypass Grafts Implanted to the Right Coronary Artery: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Gastroepiploic Artery and Saphenous Vein Grafts
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 120 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Minakawa, I. Fukuda, M. Wada, J. Kaiqiang, K. Daitoku, K. Itoh, and K. Fukui
Preoperative evaluation of the right gastroepiploic artery using abdominal ultrasonography.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 1131 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Mizukami, T. Sueda, H. Wada, K. Imai, M. Hamamoto, and D. Futagami
Right Gastroepiploic Artery Grafting for Saphenous Vein Graft Pseudoaneurysm
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 742 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K.-B. Kim, K. R. Cho, J.-S. Choi, and H.-J. Lee
Right Gastroepiploic Artery for Revascularization of the Right Coronary Territory in Off-Pump Total Arterial Revascularization: Strategies to Improve Patency
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2135 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S.-W. Ryu, B.-H. Ahn, S.-J. Choo, K.-J. Na, Y.-K. Ahn, M.-H. Jeong, and S.-H. Kim
Skeletonized Gastroepiploic Artery as a Composite Graft for Total Arterial Revascularization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 118 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Shimizu, H. Suesada, M. Cho, S. Ito, K. Ikeda, and S. Ishimaru
Flow Capacity of Gastroepiploic Artery Versus Vein Grafts for Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Pevni, G. Uretzky, P. Yosef, B. Gal Yanay, I. Shapira, N. Nesher, R. Braunshtein, and R. Mohr
Revascularization of the Right Coronary Artery in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 564 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. Formica, O. Ferro, P. Greco, A. Martino, D. Gastaldi, and G. Paolini
Long-term follow-up of total arterial myocardial revascularization using exclusively pedicle bilateral internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 26(6): 1141 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Kamiya, G. Watanabe, H. Takemura, S. Tomita, H. Nagamine, and T. Kanamori
Skeletonization of gastroepiploic artery graft in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: early clinical and angiographic assessment
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2046 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Kamiya, G. Watanabe, H. Takemura, S. Tomita, H. Nagamine, and T. Kanamori
Total arterial revascularization with composite skeletonized gastroepiploic artery graft in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1151 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Tatoulis, B. F. Buxton, and J. A. Fuller
Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 93 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Lev-Ran, R. Mohr, G. Uretzky, D. Pevni, C. Locker, Y. Paz, and I. Shapira
Graft of choice to right coronary system in left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ochi, N. Hatori, R. Bessho, M. Fujii, Y. Saji, S. Tanaka, and H. Honma
Adequacy of flow capacity of bilateral internal thoracic artery T graft
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2008 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ochi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honma, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ochi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honma, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS